Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-5
Positions on science and religious beliefs across societies: Development of a research instrument and testing of its validity among high school students
Science education inclusive of learners’ cultures requires understanding how students position scientific knowledge with regard to identity-laden beliefs, such as religions. To address this need, we developed a research tool administered across linguistic and societal contexts. In this article, we present the conceptual frameworks the instrument articulates and draws upon. We then test the construct validity and internal consistency of its dimensions based on data collected from a main sample of 238 English-speaking American, Dutch and Norwegian students, all in their final year of compulsory school education, as well as from a secondary sample of 372 French-speaking Belgian students that we use to further discuss the results from the main sample. The results obtained through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and by Cronbach’s alpha analysis are consistent with our theoretical model. We discuss implications for the use of this instrument by researchers, as well as formal or informal science educators.
AikenheadGSJegedeOJ (1999) Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching36(3): 269–287.
2.
AlexanderDR (2007) Models for relating science and religion. Faraday Papers3: 1–4.
3.
AlexanderR (2020) A Dialogic Teaching Companion. New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
ArouaSCoquidéMAbbesS (2012) Controverses dans l’enseignement de l’évolution. Questions de recherches sur les strategies d’intervention en classe et dans la formation [Controversies in teaching the theory of evolution. Research questions about intervention strategies in classrooms and during training]. Revue de Didactique des Sciences et Technologies5: 47–62.
5.
BarbourI (1965) Issues in Science and Religion. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6.
BaribeauCRoyerC (2012) L’entretien individuel en recherche qualitative: usages et modes de présentation dans la Revue des sciences de l’éducation [Individual interview in qualitative research: Uses and methods of presentation in the Journal of Educational Sciences]. Revue des sciences de l’éducation38(1): 23–45.
7.
BeckfortJA (2003) Social Theory and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BillingsleyBBrockRTaberKRigaF (2016) How students view the boundaries between their science and religious education concerning the origins of life and the universe. Science Education100: 459–482.
9.
BillingsleyBTaberKRigaFNewdickH (2012) Secondary school students’ epistemic insight into the relationships between science and religion – a preliminary enquiry. Research in Science Education43(4): 1715–1732.
10.
ByrneBM (2012) Structured Equations Modeling with M Plus: Basic Concepts, Application, and Programming. London: Routledge.
11.
FrancisLJGreerJE (2001) Shaping adolescents’ attitudes towards science and religion in Northern Ireland: The role of scientism, creationism and denominational schools. Research in Science and Technological Education19(1): 39–53.
12.
FrancisLJAstleyJMcKennaU (2018) ‘Science disproves the biblical account of creation’: Exploring the predictors of perceived conflict between science and religion among 13- to 15-year-old students in the UK. British Journal of Religious Education41(2): 188–201.
13.
GouldSJ (2000) Et Dieu dit ‘que Darwin soit !’ [And God said ‘may Darwin be!’]. Paris: Seuil.
14.
HanleyPBennettJRatcliffeM (2014) The inter-relationship of Science and Religion: A typology of engagement. International Journal of Science Education36(7): 1210–1229.
15.
HaughtJF (1995) Science and Religion: From Conflict to Conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.
16.
HokayemHBoujaoudeS (2008) College students’ perceptions of the theory of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching45(4): 395–419.
17.
HrairiSCoquidéM (2002) Attitudes d’élèves Tunisiens par rapport à l’évolution biologique [Tunisian students’ attitude towards biological evolution]. Aster35: 149–163.
18.
KindPOsborneJ (2017) Styles of scientific reasoning: A cultural rationale for science education?Science Education101: 8–31.
19.
KlineRB (2015) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
20.
LambertD (1999) Sciences et théologie – Les figures d’un dialogue [Science and Theology – The Figures of a Dialogue]. Namur: Presses universitaires de Namur.
21.
Le RuV (2010) La science et Dieu. Entre croire et savoir [Science and God. Between Believing and Knowing]. Paris: Vuibert and Adapt-SNES.
22.
LemkeJL (2001) Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching38(3): 296–316.
23.
MinoisG (1990) L’Eglise et la science. Histoire d’un malentendu [Church and Science. History of a Misunderstanding]. Paris: Fayard (Tome 1).
24.
MinoisG (1991) L’Eglise et la science. Histoire d’un malentendu [Church and Science. History of a Misunderstanding]. Paris: Fayard (Tome 2).
25.
MinoisG (1998) Histoire de l’athéisme [History of Atheism]. Paris: Fayard.
26.
O’BrienTLNoyS (2015) Traditional modern and post-secular perspectives on science and religion in the United States. American Sociological Review80(1): 92–115.
27.
OsborneJ (2010) Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative critical discourse. Science328(5977): 463–466.
28.
PopperK (1991) La connaissance objective [Objective Knowledge]. Paris: Aubier.
29.
RasiH (2003) La foi, la raison et le chrétien cultivé [Faith, religion and the cultivated Christian]. Dialogue15(3): 5–9.
30.
StenmarkM (2004) How to Relate Science and Religion. Grand Rapids, MI: Eedermans.
31.
UrvoyD (2006) Histoire de la pensée arabe et islamique [History of Arabic and Islamic Thought]. Paris: Seuil.
32.
WallisRBruceS (1992) Secularization: The Orthodox model. In: SBruce (ed) Religion and Modernization. Sociologists and Historians Debate the Secularization Thesis. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 8–30.
33.
WeberM (1919) Le savant et le politique traduit de l’allemand par J. Freund [The Scholar and the Politician translated from German by J. Freund]. Paris: Plon Bibliothèque 10/18.
34.
WolfsJ-L (2013) Sciences, religions et identités culturelles. Quels enjeux pour l’éducation ? [Sciences, Religions and Cultural Identities. What Are the Challenges for Education?]. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
35.
Wolfs J-L (2018) La concurrence entre savoirs scientifiques et croyances religieuses à l’école: Enquête auprès d’élèves de terminale en Belgique francophone et pistes didactiques [Competition between scientific knowledge and religious beliefs at school: Survey of final year students in French-speaking Belgium and educational avenues]. Revue internationale d’éducation77: 103–112.
36.
WolfsJ-LLeysCLegrandSKarnasDDelhayeCBoukoC, et al. (2014) Les représentations des élèves à propos de différentes postures intellectuelles possibles entre science et croyance religieuse. Mise à l’épreuve de la validité de construit d’un questionnaire y afférant [The students’ representations about different possible intellectual postures between science and religious belief. Testing the construct validity of a related questionnaire]. Mesure et évaluation en éducation37(2): 101–126.
37.
YasriPMancyR (2014) Understanding student approaches to learning evolution in the context of their perceptions of the relationship between science and religion. International Journal of Science Education36(1): 24–45.
38.
YasriPArthurSSmithMMancyR (2013) Relating science and religion: An Ontology of taxonomies and development of a research tool for identifying individual views. Science and Education22: 2679–2707.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
