Applications in artificial intelligence such as self-driving cars may profoundly transform our society, yet emerging technologies are frequently faced with suspicion or even hostility. Meanwhile, public opinions about scientific issues are increasingly polarized along the ideological line. By analyzing a nationally representative panel in the United States, we reveal an emerging ideological divide in public reactions to self-driving cars. Compared with liberals and Democrats, conservatives and Republicans express more concern about autonomous vehicles and more support for restrictively regulating autonomous vehicles. This ideological gap is largely driven by social conservatism. Moreover, both familiarity with driverless vehicles and scientific literacy reduce respondents’ concerns over driverless vehicles and support for regulation policies. Still, the effects of familiarity and scientific literacy are weaker among social conservatives, indicating that people may assimilate new information in a biased manner that promotes their worldviews.
AgarwalRPrasadJ (1998) A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research9(2): 204–215.
2.
AllumNSturgisPTabouraziDBrunton-SmithI (2008) Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science17(1): 35–54.
BeckerFAxhausenKW (2017) Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation44(6): 1293–1306.
5.
BrellTPhilipsenRZiefleM (2019) sCARy! Risk perceptions in autonomous driving: The influence of experience on perceived benefits and barriers. Risk Analysis39(2): 342–357.
6.
ButlerJC (2013) Authoritarianism and fear responses to pictures: The role of social differences. International Journal of Psychology48(1): 18–24.
7.
ChomaBLHodsonG (2017) Right-wing ideology: Positive (and negative) relations to threat. Social Cognition35(4): 415–432.
8.
ChomaBLHanochYGummerumMHodsonG (2013) Relations between risk perceptions and socio-political ideology are domain-and ideology-dependent. Personality and Individual Differences54(1): 29–34.
9.
CrowsonHM (2009) Are all conservatives alike? A study of the psychological correlates of cultural and economic conservatism. The Journal of Psychology143(5): 449–463.
10.
DixonGHartPSClarkeCO’DonnellNHHmielowskiJ (2020) What drives support for self-driving car technology in the United States?Journal of Risk Research23(3): 275–287.
11.
DrummondCFischhoffB (2017) Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America114(36): 9587–9592.
12.
DuckittJ (2006) Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin32(5): 684–696.
13.
DuckittJFisherK (2003) The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology24(1): 199–222.
14.
FeldmanSJohnstonC (2014) Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology35(3): 337–358.
15.
FernbachPMLightNScottSEInbarYRozinP (2019) Extreme opponents of genetically modified foods know the least but think they know the most. Nature Human Behaviour3(3): 251–256.
16.
GauchatG (2012) Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review77(2): 167–187.
17.
GkartzonikasCGkritzaK (2019) What have we learned? A review of stated preference and choice studies on autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies98: 323–337.
18.
GuberDL (2013) A cooling climate for change? Party polarization and the politics of global warming. American Behavioral Scientist57(1): 93–115.
19.
HabouchaCJIshaqRShiftanY (2017) User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies78: 37–49.
20.
HamiltonLCHartterJSaitoK (2015) Trust in scientists on climate change and vaccines. SAGE Open. Epub ahead of print 25August. DOI: 10.1177/2158244015602752.
21.
HartPSNisbetECMyersTA (2015) Public attention to science and political news and support for climate change mitigation. Nature Climate Change5(6): 541–545.
22.
HibbingJRSmithKBAlfordJR (2014) Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences37(3): 297–307.
23.
HowardDDaiD (2014) Public perceptions of self-driving cars: The case of Berkeley, California. In: Transportation research board 93rd annual meeting, Washington, DC, 12–16 January.
24.
JostJTGlaserJKruglanskiAWSullowayFJ (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin129(3): 339–375.
25.
KahanDM (2012) Cultural cognition as a conception of the cultural theory of risk. In: RoeserSHillerbrandRSandinPPetersonM (eds) Handbook of Risk Theory. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 725–759.
26.
KahanDMBramanDGastilJSlovicPMertzCK (2007) Culture and identity-protective cognition: Explaining the white-male effect in risk perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies4(3): 465–505.
27.
KahanDMBramanDSlovicPGastilJCohenG (2009) Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nature Nanotechnology4(2): 87–90.
28.
KahanDMPetersEWittlinMSlovicPOuelletteLLBramanD, et al. (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change2(10): 732–735.
29.
KaurKRampersadG (2018) Trust in driverless cars: Investigating key factors influencing the adoption of driverless cars. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management48: 87–96.
30.
KohlCKniggeMBaaderGBöhmMKrcmarH (2018) Anticipating acceptance of emerging technologies using twitter: The case of self-driving cars. Journal of Business Economics88(5): 617–642.
31.
KrosnickJAHolbrookALVisserPS (2000) The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American public opinion. Public Understanding of Science9(3): 239–260.
32.
KyriakidisMHappeeRde WinterJC (2015) Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour32: 127–140.
33.
MalkaALelkesYSotoCJ (2019) Are cultural and economic conservatism positively correlated? A large-scale cross-national test. British Journal of Political Science49(3): 1045–1069.
34.
MichaudKECarlisleJESmithER (2009) The relationship between cultural values and political ideology, and the role of political knowledge. Political Psychology30(1): 27–42.
35.
NanXMaddenK (2014) The role of cultural worldviews and message framing in shaping public opinions toward the human papillomavirus vaccination mandate. Human Communication Research40(1): 30–53.
36.
NovOYeC (2008) Personality and technology acceptance: Personal innovativeness in IT, openness and resistance to change. In: Proceedings of the 41st annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Waikoloa, HI, 7–10 January, pp. 448–448. New York, NY: IEEE.
37.
PayreWCestacJDelhommeP (2014) Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour27: 252–263.
38.
PetersESlovicP (1996) The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology26(16): 1427–1453.
39.
SchoettleBSivakM (2014) A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US, the UK, and Australia. Available at: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/108384 (accessed 1 January 2019).
40.
ShiJVisschersVHSiegristMArvaiJ (2016) Knowledge as a driver of public perceptions about climate change reassessed. Nature Climate Change6(8): 759–762.
41.
SwedlowB (2008) Beyond liberal and conservative: Two-dimensional conceptions of ideology and the structure of political attitudes and values. Journal of Political Ideologies13(2): 157–180.
42.
Van HielAMervieldeI (2004) Openness to experience and boundaries in the mind: Relationships with cultural and economic conservative beliefs. Journal of Personality72(4): 659–686.
43.
WardCRaueMLeeCD’AmbrosioLCoughlinJF (2017) Acceptance of automated driving across generations: The role of risk and benefit perception, knowledge, and trust. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on human-computer interaction, part 1, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 9–14 July, pp. 254–266. Cham: Springer.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
