Despite the fact that citizen engagement in research is widely practised and regarded as one of the keys to maximizing the impact of research and innovation, empirical evidence on the value, potential and possibilities of engaging a broad diversity of citizens in practice is scant. The purpose of our article is twofold: (1) to provide more insight into the value and opportunities of engaging audiences that typically are not engaged with science and (2) to explore the effect of a targeted recruitment strategy versus a generic recruitment strategy on the profile, motivation and retainment of citizen science volunteers. Our empirical research is based on five citizen science projects in the domain of surface and drinking water research in the Netherlands. This article finds that using a targeted recruitment strategy, it is possible and worth to recruit a diverse sample of citizen science volunteers.
BäckstrandK (2003) Civic science for sustainability: Reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics3: 24–41.
2.
BallardHLDixonCGHarrisEM (2017) Youth-focused citizen science: Examining the role of environmental science learning and agency for conservation. Biological Conservation208: 65–75.
3.
BlueGMedlockJEinsiedelE (2012) Representativeness and the politics of inclusion. In: RaskMWorthingtonRLammiR (eds) Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance. London; Washington, DC: Earthscan, pp. 139–152.
4.
BonneyRBallardHJordanR, et al. (2009) Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Washington, DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).
5.
BonneyRPhillipsTBBallardHLEnckJW (2016) Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science?Public Understanding of Science25: 2–16.
6.
BosCWalhoutBPeineAVan LenteH (2014) Steering with big words: Articulating ideographs in research programs. Journal of Responsible Innovation1: 151–170.
7.
BrossardDLewensteinBBonneyR (2005) Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education27: 1099–1121.
8.
BrouwerSVan der WielenPWJJSchriksMClaassenMFrijnsJ (2018) Public participation in science: The future and value of citizen science in the drinking water research. Water10(3): 284.
9.
BuytaertWZulkafliZGraingerS, et al. (2014) Citizen science in hydrology and water resources: Opportunities for knowledge generation, ecosystem service management, and sustainable development. Frontiers in Earth Science2: 1–21.
ChandlerMBebberDPCastroSLowmanMDMuoriaPOgugeN, et al. (2012) International citizen science: Making the local global. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment10: 328–331.
12.
CohnJP (2008) Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research?Bioscience58: 192–197.
13.
ConradCCHilcheyKG (2011) A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: Issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment176: 273–291.
14.
CrallAWJordanRCHolfelderKGregNGrahamJWallerDM (2013) The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior and science literacy. Public Understanding of Science22: 745–764.
15.
CronjeRRohlingerSCrallANewmanG (2011) Does participation in citizen science improve scientific literacy? A study to compare assessment methods. Applied Environmental Education & Communication10: 135–145.
16.
De JongSPSmitJVan DroogeL (2015) Scientists’ response to societal impact policies: A policy paradox. Science and Public Policy43: 102–114.
17.
Den BroederLLemmensLUysalSKauwKWeekenborgJSchönenbergerM, et al. (2017) Public health citizen science; Perceived impacts on citizen scientists: A case study in a low-income neighbourhood in the Netherlands. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice21(1): 7201–7217.
FuntowiczSRavetzJ (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures25: 735–755.
21.
HaywoodBK (2016) Beyond data points and research contributions: The personal meaning and value associated with public participation in scientific research. International Journal of Science Education, Part B6: 239–262.
22.
HesselsLKVan LenteHSmitsREHM (2009) In search of relevance: The changing contract between science and society. Science and Public Policy36: 387–401.
23.
JollymoreAHainesMJSatterfieldTJohnsonMS (2017) Citizen science for water quality monitoring: Data implications of citizen perspectives. Journal of Environmental Management200: 456–467.
24.
Lamy Committee (2017) LAB – FAB – APP – Investing in the European Future We Want. Brussels: European Commission.
25.
LidskogR (2008) Scientised citizens and democratised science: Re-assessing the expert-lay divide. Journal of Risk Research11: 69–86.
26.
McKinleyDCMiller-RushingAJBallardHLBonneyRBrownHCook-PattonSC, et al. (2017) Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation208: 15–28.
27.
OckendenN (2007) Volunteering in the natural outdoors in the UK and Ireland: A literature review. Institute for Volunteering Research.
28.
OverdevestCOrrCHStepenuckK (2004) Volunteer stream monitoring and local participation in natural resource issues. Human Ecology Review11: 177–185.
29.
RaddickMJBraceyGGayPLLintottCJCardamoneCNMurrayP, et al. (2013) Galaxy zoo: Motivations of citizen scientists. Astronomy Education Review12: 1–27.
30.
ReedMS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation141: 2417–2431.
31.
SmithSWardVHouseA (2011) ‘Impact’ in the proposals for the UK’s research excellence framework: Shifting the boundaries of academic autonomy. Research Policy40: 1369–1379.
32.
StilgoeJLockSJWilsdonJ (2014) Why should we promote public engagement with science?Public Understanding of Science23: 4–15.
33.
StrasserBJHaklayM (2018) Citizen Science: Expertise, Democracy, and Public Participation. Bern: Report to the Swiss Science Council.
34.
UnellJCastleR (2012) Developing Sustainable Volunteering within the Natural Connections Demonstration Project: A Review of Evidence, Natural England Commissioned Reports no. NECR06. Available at: file:///C:/Users/USER%206/Downloads/NECR096_edition_1.pdf
35.
WestSEPatemanRM (2016) Recruiting and retaining participants in citizen science: What can be learned from the volunteering literature?Citizen Science: Theory and Practice1: 1–10.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
