Are the religious suspicious of science? Investigating religiosity,religious context,and orientations towards science

Abstract

Are the religious suspicious of science? Drawing on data from 52 nations in the World Values Survey (wave 6) (N = 58,474), I utilize multilevel models to examine the relationship between religiosity, religious context, and five different orientations towards science: confidence in science, trust in scientific authority under conditions of conflict with religion, faith in science, views on the moral effects of science, and interest in scientific knowledge. Results show that while religiosity is on average negatively associated with the five outcomes, the relationship between religiosity and orientations towards science varies by country such that religiosity is sometimes positively associated with the different outcomes. Religiosity is only consistently negatively associated with trust in scientific authority in all countries and with all orientations towards science in western countries. Finally, differences in orientations towards science also exist across country religious contexts, with countries dominated by the unaffiliated having more positive orientations towards science.

Keywords

public understanding of science science and religion science attitudes and perceptions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adamczyk

(2013) The effect of personal religiosity on attitudes toward abortion, divorce, and gender equality–does cultural context make a difference? Euramerica 43(1): 213–253.

Adamczyk

Hayes

(2012) Religion and sexual behaviors: Understanding the influence of Islamic cultures and religious affiliation for explaining sex outside of marriage. American Sociological Review 77(5): 723–746.

Adas

(2015 [1989]) Machines as the Measure of Men: Science, Technology, and Ideologies of Western Dominance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Allum

Sturgis

Tabourazi

Smith

. (2008) Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understandings of Science 17(1): 35–54.

Alumkal

(2016) Paranoid Science: The Christian Right’s War on Reality. New York: New York University Press.

Asad

(2003) Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, and Modernity. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

Baker

(2012a) Perceptions of science and American secularism. Sociological Perspectives 55(1): 167–188.

Baker

(2012b) Public perceptions of incapability between ‘science and religion’. Public Understandings of Science 21(3): 340–353.

Baram-Tsabari

Segev

(2011) Exploring new web-based tools to identify public interest in science. Public Understanding of Science 20(1): 130–143.

10.

Bauer

Durant

Evans

(1994) European public perceptions of science. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 6(2): 163–186.

11.

Bauer

Allum

Miller

(2007) What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understandings of Science 16(1): 79–95.

12.

Berger

(1967) The Sacred Canopy. New York: Doubleday.

13.

Berger

Davie

Fokas

(2008) Religious America, Secular Europe? A Theme and Variations. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.

14.

Blancke

Hjermitslev

Braeckman Kjaergaard

(2013) Creationism in Europe: Facts, gaps, and prospects. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 81(4): 996–1028.

15.

Boyd

Chung

(2012) Opinions toward suicide: Cross-national evaluation of cultural and religious effects on individuals. Social Science Research 41(6): 1565–1580.

16.

Brewer

Ley

(2013) Whose science do you believe? Explaining trust in sources of scientific information about the environment. Science Communication 35(1): 115–137.

17.

Brooke

Numbers

(2011) Religion and Science around the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

18.

Bruce

(2002) God Is Dead: Secularization in the West. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

19.

Cacciatore

Browning

Scheufele

Brossard

Xenos

Corley

(2016) Opposing ends of the spectrum: Exploring trust in scientific and religious authorities. Public Understanding of Science 27: 11–28.

20.

Campbell

Curtis

(1996) The public’s views on the future of religion and science: Cross-national survey results. Review of Religious Research 37(3): 260–267.

21.

Casanova

(2011) The secular, secularizations, secularisms. In: Calhoun

Juergensemeyer

Van Antwerpen

(eds) Rethinking Secularism. New York: Oxford University Press.

22.

Chakrabarty

(2007) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

23.

Chan

Ecklund

(2016) Narrating and navigating authorities: Evangelical and Mainline Protestant interpretations of the Bible and science. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 55(1): 54–69.

24.

Collins

(2006) The Language of God. Cambridge: Free Press.

25.

Collins

(2014) Are We All Scientific Experts Now. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

26.

Dawkins

(2006) God Delusion. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

27.

Dennett

(2014) Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meaning of Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

28.

Doolin

Motion

(2010) Christian lay understandings of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Public Understanding of Science 19(6): 669–685.

29.

Ecklund

Johnson

Scheitle

Mathews

Lewis

(2016) Religion among scientists in international context a new study of scientists in eight regions. Socius Epub ahead of print 1 September. DOI: 10.1177/2378023116664353.

30.

Ecklund

Peifer

White

Chan

(2017) Moral schemas in articulation and intuition: How religious people evaluate human reproductive genetic technologies. Sociological Forum 32(2): 277–297.

31.

Eisendstadt

(2000) Multiple modernities. Daedalus 129(1): 1–29.

32.

Ellison

Musick

(1995) Conservative Protestantism and public opinion toward science. Review of Religious Research 36: 245–262.

33.

Evans

Durant

(1995) The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understandings of Science 4(1): 57–74.

34.

Evans

(2010) Contested Reproduction: Genetic Technologies, Religion, and Public Debate. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

35.

Evans

(2011) Epistemological and moral conflict between religion and science. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 50(4): 707–727.

36.

Evans

(2014) Faith in science in global perspective: Implications for transhumanism. Public Understanding of Science 23(7): 814–832.

37.

Evans

(2008) Religion and science: Beyond the epistemological conflict narrative. Annual Review of Sociology (34): 87–105.

38.

Evans

(2012) Supporting science reasons, restrictions, and the role of religion. Science Communication 34(3): 334–362.

39.

Evans

(2010) Arguing against Darwinism. In: Turner

(ed.) The New Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Religion. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing, pp286–308.

40.

Gauchat

(2008) A test of three theories of anti-science attitudes. Sociological Focus 41(3): 337–357.

41.

Gauchat

(2011) The cultural authority of science: Public trust and acceptance of organized science. Public Understandings of Science 20(6): 751–770.

42.

Gauchat

(2012) Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974–2010. American Sociological Review 77(2): 167–187.

43.

Gorski

Altinordu

(2008) After secularization? Annual Review of Sociology 34: 55–85.

44.

Hackett

(2014) Seven things to consider when measuring religious identity. Religion 44(3): 313–396.

45.

Hameed

(2015) Making sense of Islamic creationism in Europe. Public Understanding of Science 24(4): 388–399.

46.

Harding

(2011) The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

47.

Harrison

(2007) The Fall of Man and the Foundations of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

48.

Harrison

(2015) The Territories of Science and Religion. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

49.

Brossard

Scheufele

(2008) Effects of value predispositions, mass media use, and knowledge on public attitudes toward embryonic stem cell research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20(2): 171–192.

50.

Hsu

Reynolds

Hackett

Gibbon

(2008) Estimating the religious composition of all nations: an empirical assessment of the world Christian database. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 47(4): 678–693.

51.

Jaeshik

(2016) Mapping one world: Religion and science from an East Asian perspective. Zygon 51(1): 204–224.

52.

Johnson

Scheitle

Ecklund

(2015) Individual religiosity and orientation towards cience: Reformulating relationships. Sociological Science 2(1): 106–124.

53.

Johnson

Grim

(2008) World Religion Database. Leiden; Boston, MA: Brill Publishers.

54.

Leuba

(1916) The Belief in God and Immortality, a Psychological, Anthropological and Statistical Study. Boston, MA: Sherman, French & Company.

55.

Leuba

(1934) Religious beliefs of American scientists. Harper’s 169: 291–300.

56.

McGrath

(2007) Dawkins’ God: Genes, Memes, and the Meaning of Life. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

57.

Merton

(1970 [1938]) Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth-Century England. New York: Howard Fertig.

58.

Norris

Inglehart

(2011 [2004]) Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

59.

Numbers

(2006) The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

60.

Oberlin

(2016) Science. In: Yamane

(ed.) Handbook of Religion and Society. Berlin: Springer, pp. 47–65.

61.

Pardo

Calvo

(2008) Attitudes toward embryo research, worldviews and the moral status of the embryo frame. Science Communication 30(1): 8–47.

62.

Raudenbush

Bryk

(2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, 2nd edn. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

63.

Scheitle

Ecklund

(2015) The influence of science popularizers on the public’s view of religion and science: An experimental assessment. Public Understandings of Science 26(1): 25–39.

64.

Scheitle

Johnson

Ecklund

(2017) Scientists and religious leaders compete for cultural authority of science. Public Understanding of Science 27: 59–75.

65.

Schmidt

(2006) Multiple modernities or varieties of modernity? Current Sociology 54(1): 77–97.

66.

Schofer

(2004) Cross-national differences in the expansion of science, 1970–1990. Social Forces 83: 215–248.

67.

Sherkat

(2011) Religion and scientific literacy in the United States. Social Science Quarterly 92(5): 1134–1150.

68.

Sturgis

Allum

(2004) Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understandings of Science 13(1): 55–74.

69.

The World Factbook (2013-2014) The World Factbook. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html (accessed 17 December 2015).

70.

Wohlrab-Sahr

Burchardt

(2012) Multiple secularities: Toward a cultural sociology of secular modernities. Comparative Sociology 11(6): 875–909.