This study examined to what extent Nobel Prize announcements and awards trigger global and local searches or “teachable moments” related to the laureates and their discoveries. We examined the longitudinal trends in Google searches for the names and discoveries of Nobel laureates from 2012 to 2017. The findings show that Nobel Prize events clearly trigger more searches for laureates, but also for their respective discoveries. We suggest that fascination with the Nobel prize creates a teachable moment not only for the underlying science, but also about the nature of science. Locality also emerged as playing a significant role in intensifying interest.
AndersonAABrossardDScheufeleDA (2010) The changing information environment for nanotechnology: Online audiences and content. Journal of Nanoparticle Research12: 1083–1094.
2.
AndersonB (2006) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Brooklyn, NY: Verso Books.
3.
Baram-TsabariASegevE (2011) Exploring new web-based tools to identify public interest in science. Public Understanding of Science20: 130–143.
4.
Baram-TsabariASegevE (2015) The half-life of a ‘teachable moment’: The case of Nobel laureates. Public Understanding of Science24: 326–337.
5.
Baram-TsabariASegevESharonA (2017) What’s new? The applications of data mining and big data in the social sciences. In: FieldingNLeeRBlankG (eds) Handbook of Online Research Methods, 2nd edn.New York, NY: SAGE, p. 92.
6.
BragazziNLWatadABrigoFAdawiMAmitalHShoenfeldY (2017) Public health awareness of autoimmune diseases after the death of a celebrity. Clinical Rheumatology36: 1911–1917.
7.
BucchiM (2012) Visible scientists, media coverage and national identity: Nobel laureates in the Italian daily press. In: SchieleBShiS (eds) Science Communication in the World. Berlin: Springer, pp. 259–268.
8.
BuchemI (2011) Serendipitous learning: Recognizing and fostering the potential of microblogging. Form@ Re-open Journal Per La Formazione in Rete11: 7–16.
9.
ButlerD (2013) When Google got flu wrong. Nature494: 155–156.
10.
CaoC (2014) The universal values of science and China’s Nobel Prize pursuit. Minerva52: 141–160.
CohenJ (2008) What I watch and who I am: National pride and the viewing of local and foreign television in Israel. Journal of Communication58: 149–167.
13.
CrawfordE (1998) Nobel: Always the winners, never the losers. Science282: 1256–1257.
14.
CrawfordET (1987) The Beginnings of the Nobel Institution: The Science Prizes, 1901–1915. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
De CheveignéSVéronE (1994) Nobel on the front page: The Nobel Physics prizes in French newspapers. Public Understanding of Science3: 135–154.
16.
Demark-WahnefriedWAzizNMRowlandJHPintoBM (2005) Riding the crest of the teachable moment: promoting long-term health after the diagnosis of cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology23: 5814–5830.
17.
DesaiSJenaAB (2016) Do celebrity endorsements matter? Observational study of BRCA gene testing and mastectomy rates after Angelina Jolie’s New York Times editorial. BMJ. 355:i6357. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i6357.
HartPSLeiserowitzAA (2009) Finding the teachable moment: An analysis of information-seeking behavior on global warming related websites during the release of The Day After Tomorrow. Environmental Communication3: 355–366.
22.
HidiSRenningerA (2006) The four-phase model of interest and achievement of interest development. Educational Psychologist41: 111–127.
23.
HorriganJB (2017a) How people approach facts and information. Pew Research Center, p. 35.
24.
HorriganJB (2017b) Lifelong learning and technology. Pew Research Center, p. 69.
25.
Ivo vanHAgnesERuudS (2010) How to influence national pride? The Olympic medal index as a unifying narrative. International Review for the Sociology of Sport45: 87–102.
26.
JankWGoldenBZantekP (2005) Old world vs. new world: Evolution of Nobel Prize shares. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research43: 41–49.
27.
LazerDKennedyRKingGVespignaniA (2014) The parable of Google Flu: Traps in big data analysis. Science343: 1203–1205.
28.
LedermanNG (2007) Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In: AbellSKLedermanNG (eds) Handbook of Research in Science Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 831–879.
29.
LeistJCKristofcoRE (1990) The changing paradigm for continuing medical education: Impact of information on the teachable moment. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association78: 173–179.
30.
LisbethC (2004) Localizing the global: “Domestication” processes in international news production. Media, Culture & Society26: 25–44.
31.
McBrideCMBlocklinMLipkusIMKleinWMPBrandonTH (2017) Patient’s lung cancer diagnosis as a cue for relatives’ smoking cessation: Evaluating the constructs of the teachable moment. Psycho-Oncology26: 88–95.
32.
McBrideCMEmmonsKMLipkusIM (2003) Understanding the potential of teachable moments: The case of smoking cessation. Health Education Research18: 156–170.
33.
MarsickVJWatkinsK (2015) Informal and Incidental Learning in the Workplace (Routledge Revivals). London: Routledge.
RenningerKAHidiS (2016) The Power of Interest for Motivation and Learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
SegevE (2016) International News Flow Online: Global Views with Local Perspectives. Bern: Peter Lang Verlag.
40.
SegevEBaram-TsabariA (2012) Seeking science information online: Data mining Google to better understand the roles of the media and the education system. Public Understanding of Science21: 813–829.
41.
SegevESharonAJ (2017) Temporal patterns of scientific information-seeking on Google and Wikipedia. Public Understanding of Science26: 969–985.
WilliamsSBrownAPattonRCrawfordMJTouquetR. (2005) The half-life of the “teachable moment” for alcohol misusing patients in the emergency department. Drug and Alcohol Dependence77: 205–208.
