In 2010-2012, the controversy over fracking grew rapidly, first in the United States, and then internationally. An important step was the anti-fracking documentary film Gasland. With help from celebrity sources, the film was produced and won a prize at the Sundance Film Festival by early 2010 and had an Oscar nomination by early 2011, in the meantime popularizing potent images of hazard including tainted aquifers and ignitable water running from kitchen faucets. During this period, major US news organizations paid little attention to the issue. The offshore Deepwater Horizon disaster of April 2010 spurred The New York Times to prolific reporting on potential risks of the new onshore technique for extracting shale gas. With flagship news coverage, the controversy had by 2012 gained wide media attention that evoked public concern and opposition, spreading from the United States to other nations.
AndrewsKCarenaN (2010) Making the news: Movement organizations, media attention, and the public agenda. American Sociological Review75: 841–866.
2.
ApplebomeP (2008) The light is green, and yellow, on drilling. New York Times, 27July, A21.
3.
BarnesB (2013) Documentaries: Where Sundance goes, Oscars follow. New York Times, 27December, p. C-1.
4.
BrulleRCarmichaelJJenkinsJ (2012) Shifting public opinion on climate change. Climate Change114: 169–188.
5.
CathlesLBrownLTaamMHunterA (2012) A commentary on “The greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas in shale formations” by R.W. Howarth, R. Santoro, and Anthony Ingraffea. Climate Change113: 525–535.
6.
ColbornTDumanoskiDMeyersJ (1996) Our Stolen Future. New York, NY: Dutton, Penguin Books.
7.
Corfee-MorlotJMaslinMBurgessJ (2007) Global warming in the public sphere. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences365: 2741–2776.
DawsonCLyonsH (2003) The media and the market: The case of CJD. British Food J105: 380–394.
10.
GoldenbergS (2011) Energy lobby reignites Oscar interest in film on gas drilling. The Guardian, 22February, p. 22.
11.
HarveyF (2011) Energy: Public relations: In leafy Singleton, drilling chief’s safety pledges ring out yards from village church. The Guardian, 21April, p. 9.
12.
HarveyF (2012) Gas fracking gets the green light: Experts say controversial drilling can be extended in the UK even though it causes earthquakes. The Guardian, 17April, p. 1.
13.
HarveyF (2013) Fracking firm starts drilling for oil as villagers swell rural protest in Balcombe. The Guardian, 3August, p. 3.
14.
HarveyFJonesSTaylorM (2013) As new protest looms, Church argues against total opposition to fracking. The Guardian, 17August, p. 6.
15.
HenleyJ (2013) Fracking: Who’s who in the Battle of Balcombe?The Guardian, 31July, p. 2.
16.
HowarthRSantoroRIngraffeaA (2011) Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formation. Climate Change106: 679–690.
17.
JaspalRNerlichB (2013) Fracking in the UK press: Threat dynamics in an unfolding debate. Public Understanding of Science. Epub ahead of print 13August2013. DOI: 10.1177/0963662513498835.
18.
KahnemanD (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
19.
McCombsMShawD (1972) The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly36: 176–187.
20.
MazurA (1981) The Dynamics of Technical Controversy. Washington, DC: Communications Press.
21.
MazurA (1990) Nuclear power, chemical hazards, and the quantity of reporting. Minerva28: 294–323.
22.
MazurA (2004) True Warnings and False Alarms: Evaluating Fears about the Health Risks of Technology, 1948–1971. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.
23.
MazurA (2006) Risk perception and news coverage across nations. Risk Management8: 149–174.
24.
MazurA (2009) American generation of worldwide environmental warnings: Avian influenza and global warming. Human Ecology Review16: 17–26.
25.
MazurA (2013) Energy and Electricity in Industrial Nations: The Sociology and Technology of Energy. London: Routledge.
26.
MazurALeeJ (1993) Sounding the global alarm. Social Studies of Science23: 681–720.
27.
MazurAWelchE (1999) The geography of environmentalism. Environmental Science & Policy2: 389–396.
28.
NijhuisM (2006) How Halliburton’s technology is wrecking the Rockies. OnEarth (summer), pp. 30–37.
29.
O’HaraSHumphreyMJaspalRNerlichBKnightW (2014) Public perception of shale gas extraction in the UK: Is the Balcombe effect taking hold?University of Nottingham.
30.
PalfremanJ (2006) A tale of two fears. Review of Policy Research23: 23–43.
31.
RaoV (2012) Shale Gas: The Promise and the Peril. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International.
32.
RoweGFrewerLSjöbergL (2000) Newspaper reporting of hazards in the UK and Sweden. Public Understanding of Science9: 59–78.
