Cinematic climate change,a promising perspective on climate change communication

Abstract

Previous research findings display that after having seen popular climate change films, people became more concerned, more motivated and more aware of climate change, but changes in behaviors were short-term. This article performs a meta-analysis of three popular climate change films, The Day after Tomorrow (2005), An Inconvenient Truth (2006), and The Age of Stupid (2009), drawing on research in social psychology, human agency, and media effect theory in order to formulate a rationale about how mass media communication shapes our everyday life experience. This article highlights the factors with which science blends in the reception of the three climate change films and expands the range of options considered in order to encourage people to engage in climate change mitigation actions.

Keywords

cinema climate change communication popular culture

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen

(1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2): 179–211.

Ajzen

Brown

Rosenthal

(1996) Information bias in contingent valuation: Effects of personal relevance, quality of information, and motivational orientation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30(1): 43–58.

Alaszewski

Brown

(2007) Risk, uncertainty and knowledge. Health Risk & Society 9(1): 1–10.

Allum

Sturgis

Tabourazi

Brunton-Smith

(2008) Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science 17: 35–54.

Andrews

Clawson

Gramig

Raymond

(2013) Why do farmers adopt conservation tillage? An experimental investigation of framing effects. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 68(6): 501–511.

Appel

Richter

(2007) Persuasive effects of fictional narratives increase over time. Media Psychology 10(1): 113–134.

Aumont

Bergala

Marie

Vernet

(1992) Aesthetics of Film (trans. Neupert

). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Backer

Rogers

Sopory

(1992) Designing Health Communication Campaigns: What Works? Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

Bahk

(2011) Environmental education through narrative films: Impact of medicine man on attitudes toward forest preservation. Journal of Environmental Education 42(1): 1–13.

10.

Ball-Rokeach

Rokeach

Grube

(1984) The Great American Values Test: Influencing Behavior and Belief Through Television. New York: Free Press.

11.

Balmford

Manica

Airey

Birkin

Oliver

Schleicher

(2004) Hollywood, climate change and the public. Science 305(5691): 1713.

12.

Bandura

(1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

13.

Barnes

(2000) Understanding Agency: Social Theory and Responsible Action. London: SAGE.

14.

Beattie

Sale

McGuire

(2011) An inconvenient truth? Can a film really affect psychological mood and our explicit attitudes towards climate change? Semiotica 187: 105–125.

15.

Besley

Shanahan

(2005) Media attention and exposure in relation to support for agricultural biotechnology. Science Communication 26(4): 347–367.

16.

Blewitt

(2011) Critical practice and the public pedagogy of environmental and conservation media. Environmental Education Research 17(6): 719–734.

17.

Boykoff

(2004) Balance as bias: Global warming and the U.S. prestige press. Global Environmental Change 14: 125–136.

18.

Brulle

(2010) From environmental campaigns to advancing the public dialog: Environmental communication for civic engagement. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture 4(1): 82–98.

19.

Bryant

(2009a) Peering into the abyss: Environment, research and absurdity in the ‘Age of Stupid’. Environment, Politics and Development Working Paper Series, Paper 19, Department of Geography, King’s College London. Available at: http://www.kcl.ac.uk/schools/sspp/geography/research/epd/working.html

20.

Bryant

(2009b) Reviews. Public Policy Research 16: 64–67.

21.

Chomsky

(2002) Media Control: The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda, 2nd edn. New York: Seven Stories Press.

22.

Cox

(2012) Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere, 3rd edn. USA: SAGE.

23.

Dennett

(1987) The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

24.

Doulton

Brown

(2009) Ten years to prevent catastrophe? Discourses of climate change and international development in the UK press. Global Environmental Change 19: 191–202.

25.

Dudo

Brossard

Shanahan

Scheufele

Morgan

Signorielli

(2011) Science on television in the 21^st century: Recent trends in portrayals and their contributions to public attitudes toward science. Communication Research 38(6): 754–777.

26.

Dunwoody

Brossard

Dudo

(2009) Socialization of rewards? Predicting U.S. scientist-media interactions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 86(2): 299–314.

27.

Elkamel

(1995) The use of television series in health education. Health Education Research 10: 225–232.

28.

Farnsworth

Lichter

(2012) Scientific assessments of climate change information in news and entertainment media. Science Communication 34(4): 435–459.

29.

Fuchs

(2001) Beyond agency. Sociological Theory 19(1): 24–40.

30.

Gamson

Modigliani

(1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology 95: 1–37.

31.

Gavin

Marshall

(2011) Mediated climate change in Britain: Scepticism on the web and on television around Copenhagen. Global Environmental Change 21(3): 1035–1044.

32.

Gerrig

(1993) Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

33.

Good

(2008) The framing of climate change in Canadian, American, and international newspapers: A media propaganda model analysis. Canadian Journal of Communication 33(2): 233–255.

34.

Gray

Stites

(2011) In search of integrative logics: Reframing the climate change debate. Strategic Organization 9(1): 85–90.

35.

Green

Brock

(2002) In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In: Green

Strange

Brock

(eds) Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., pp. 315–342.

36.

Greitemeyer

(2013) Beware of climate change skeptic films. Journal of Environmental Psychology 35: 105–109.

37.

Hall

(1980) Encoding/decoding. In: Stuart

Hobson

Lowe

Willis

(eds) Culture, Media, Language. London: Hutchinson, pp. 128–138.

38.

Hart

Feldman

(2014) Threat without efficacy? Climate change on U.S. network news. Science Communication 36(2): 1–27.

39.

Hart

Leiserowitz

(2009) Finding the teachable moment: An analysis of information seeking behavior on global warming related websites during the release of The Day After Tomorrow. Environmental Communication 3(3): 355–366.

40.

Henry

(2000) Public perceptions of global warming. Human Ecology Review 7(1): 25–30.

41.

Hines

Hungerford

Tomera

(1987) Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education 18(2): 1–8.

42.

Hodgetts

Bolam

Stephens

(2005) Mediation and the construction of contemporary understandings of health and lifestyle. Journal of Health Psychology 10(1): 123–136.

43.

Hodgetts

Chamberlain

Bassett

(2003) Between television and the audience: Renegotiating representations of aging. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 7: 251–272.

44.

Hoffman

(2011) The culture and discourse of climate skepticism. Strategic Organization 9(1): 77–84.

45.

Holden

(2009) An alarm from 2055: Act now to save the earth. Available at: http://movies.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/movies/17age.html

46.

Howell

(2011) Lights, camera … action? Altered attitudes and behaviour in response to the climate change film The Age of Stupid. Global Environmental Change 21(1): 177–187.

47.

Howell

(2012) Investigating the long-term impacts of climate change communications on individuals’ attitudes and behavior. Environment and Behavior 46(1): 70–101.

48.

Hulme

(2008) The conquering of climate: Discourses of fear and their dissolution. The Geographical Journal 174(1): 5–16.

49.

Hungerford

Volk

(1990) Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education 21: 8–21.

50.

Jacobsen

(2011) The Al Gore effect: An inconvenient truth and voluntary carbon offsets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 61(1): 67–78.

51.

Kahan

Jenkins-Smith

Braman

(2011) Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research 14(2): 147–174.

52.

Kinsella

(2008) Narratives, rhetorical genres, and environmental conflict: Responses to Schwarze’s “Environmental Melodrama” (Special section). Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture 2: 78–109.

53.

Kirby

(2003) Scientists on the set: Science consultants and communication of science in visual fiction. Public Understanding of Science 12(3): 261–278.

54.

Kirby

(2011) Lab Coats in Hollywood: Science, Scientists and Cinema. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

55.

Kitzinger

(2004) Audience and readership research. In: Downing

McQuail

Schlesinger

Wartella

(eds) The SAGE Handbook of Media Studies. London: SAGE, pp. 167–181.

56.

Kitzinger

(2010) Questioning the sci-fi alibi: A critique of how “science fiction fears” are used to explain away public concerns about risk. Journal of Risk Research 13(1): 73–86.

57.

Leiserowitz

(2004) Before and after the day after tomorrow: A U.S. study of climate change risk perception. Environment 46(9): 22–37.

58.

Leiserowitz

Maibach

Roser-Renouf

(2012) Global warming’s six Americas, March 2012. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change. Available at: http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/Six-Americas-March-2012.pdf

59.

Lofstedt

(2003) Risk communication: Pitfalls and promises. European Review 11(3): 417–443.

60.

Lowe

(2006) Vicarious experience vs. scientific information in climate change risk perception and behaviour: A case study of undergraduate students in Norwich, UK. Technical report 43, May. Norwich: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.

61.

Lowe

Brown

Dessai

de Franca Doria

Haynes

Vincent

(2006) Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Public Understanding of Science 15(4): 435–457.

62.

Loyal

Barnes

(2001) Agency’ as a red herring in social theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31(4): 507–524.

63.

McChesney

(2008) The Political Economy of Media: Enduring Issues, Emerging Dilemmas. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

64.

McCright

(2010) The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Population and Environment 32(1): 66–87.

65.

Madianou

(2005) Mediating the Nation. London: UCL Press.

66.

Marsh

Meade

Roediger

(2003) Learning facts from fiction. Journal of Memory and Language 49: 519–536.

67.

Mazur

(2009) American generation of environmental warnings: Avian influenza and global warming. Human Ecology Review 16(1): 17–26.

68.

Mellor

(2009) The politics of accuracy in judging global warming films. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture 3(2): 134–150.

69.

Meyer

Jepperson

(2000) The ‘actors’ of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory 18(1): 100–120.

70.

Mieszkowski

(2006) Did Al get the science right? Available at: http://www.salon.com/2006/06/10/truths/

71.

Morisson

Hatfield-Dodds

(2011) The success and failure of an inconvenient truth and the stern report in influencing Australian public support for greenhouse policy. The Economic Record 87(277): 269–281.

72.

Moser

(2007) More bad news: The risk of neglecting emotional response to climate change information. In: Moser

Dilling

(eds) Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–80.

73.

Murray

Heumann

(2009) Ecology and Popular Film: Cinema on the Edge. New York, NY: SUNY Press.

74.

Nariman

(1993) Soap Operas for Social Change. Westport, CT: Praeger.

75.

Nichols

(1992) Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary Film. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

76.

Nisbet

Scheufele

(2009) What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany 96(10): 1767–1778.

77.

Nolan

(2010) “An inconvenient truth” increases knowledge, concern, and willingness to reduce greenhouse gases. Environment and Behavior 42(5): 643–658.

78.

Obermiller

(1995) The baby is sick/the baby is well: A test of environmental communication appeals. Journal of Advertising 24(2): 55–70.

79.

O’Neill

Nicholson-Cole

(2009) ‘‘Fear Won’t Do It’’: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication 30(3): 355–379.

80.

Pellizoni

(2005) Trust, responsibility and environmental policy. European Societies 7(4): 567–594.

81.

Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (2012) More say there is solid evidence of global warming. Available at: http://www.people-press.org/2012/10/15/more-say-there-is-solid-evidence-of-global-warming/

82.

Podeschi

(2002) The nature of future myths: Environmental discourse in science fiction film, 1950–1999. Sociological Spectrum 22: 251–297.

83.

Renov

(1993) Introduction: The truth about non-fiction. In: Renov

(ed.) Theorizing Documentary. London and New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 1–11.

84.

Reusswig

Leiserowitz

(2005) The international impact of The Day After Tomorrow. Environment 47(3): 41–44.

85.

Reusswig

Schwarzkopf

Pohlenz

(2004) PIK Report No. 92. Double Impact, The Climate BlockBuster ‘The Day after Tomorrow’ and Its Impact on the German Cinema Public. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. Available at: http://www.pik-potsdam.de/research/publications/pikreports/.files/pr92.pdf

86.

Rogers

(1983) Cognitive and psychological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In: Cacioppo

Petty

(eds) Social Psychophysiology: A Sourcebook. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 153–177.

87.

Rosteck

Frentz

(2009) Myth and multiple readings in environmental rhetoric: The case of an inconvenient truth. Quarterly Journal of Speech 95(1): 1–19.

88.

Russill

(2011) Truth and opinion in climate change discourse: The Gore–Hansen disagreement. Public Understanding of Science 20(6): 796–809.

89.

Saldana

(2009) Popular film as an instructional strategy in qualitative research methods courses. Qualitative Inquiry 15(1): 247–261.

90.

Salvador

Norton

(2011) The flood myth in the age of global climate change. Environmental Communication 5(1): 45–61.

91.

Sarewitz

(2010) Entertaining science. Nature 466(7302): 27.

92.

Schwartz

(1977) Normative influences on altruism. In: Berkowitz

(ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 10). New York: Academic Press, pp. 221–279.

93.

Schwarze

(2006) Environmental melodrama. Quarterly Journal of Speech 92(3): 239–261.

94.

Silverstone

(1999) Why Study the Media? London: SAGE.

95.

Silverstone

(2002) Complicity and collusion in the mediation of everyday life. New Literary History 33(5): 745–764.

96.

Silverstone

(2005) Mediation and communication. In: Calhoun

Rojek

Turner

(eds) The International Handbook of Sociology. London: SAGE, pp. 188–207.

97.

Singhal

Rogers

(2002) A theoretical agenda for entertainment-education. Communication Theory 12(2): 117–135.

98.

Singhal

Cody

Rogers

Sabido

(2004) Entertainment-Education Worldwide: History, Research, and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

99.

Sjoberg

Engelberg

(2010) Risk perception and movies: A study of availability as a factor in risk perception. Risk Analysis 30(1): 95–106.

100.

Slovic

(1999) Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis 19(4): 689–701.

101.

Stebbing

(2009) Avoiding the trust deficit: Public engagement, values, the precautionary principle and the future of nanotechnology. Bioethical Inquiry 6: 37–48.

102.

Steckler

Allegrante

Altman

Brown

Burdine

Goodman

(1995) Health education intervention strategies: Recommendations for future research. Health Education Quarterly 22: 307–328.

103.

Sturgis

Allum

(2004) Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science 13(1): 55–74.

104.

Svoboda

(2011) Communicating climate change five years after an inconvenient truth. Available at: http://www.yaleclimatemediaforum.org/2011/05/an-inconvenient-anniversary/

105.

Vaughan

Rogers

Singhal

Swalehe

(2000) Entertainment education and HIV/AIDS prevention: A field experiment in Tanzania. Journal of Health Communication 5: 81–100.

106.

Von Burg

(2012) Decades away or the day after tomorrow? Rhetoric, film, and the global warming debate. Critical Studies in Media Communication 29(1): 7–26.

107.

Wallack

Dorfman

Jernigan

Themba

(1993) Media Advocacy and Public Health. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

108.

Weik von Mossner

(2013) Troubling spaces: Ecological risk, narrative framing, and emotional engagement in The Age of Stupid. Emotion Space and Society 6: 108–116.

109.

Winsten

(1994) Promoting designated drivers: The Harvard alcohol project. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 10(Suppl. 3): 11–14.

110.

YouGov (2012) YouGov/The Sunday Times Survey Results, 21–22 June. Available at: http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/0w8gg3rki9/YG-Archives-Pol-ST-results-22-240612v2.pdf