Whatever happened to the ‘mad,bad’ scientist? Overturning the stereotype

Abstract

The cluster of myths relating to the pursuit of knowledge has perpetuated the archetype of the alchemist/scientist as sinister, dangerous, possibly mad and threatening to society’s values. Shelley’s Frankenstein provided imagery and a vocabulary universally invoked in relation to scientific discoveries and technological innovation. The reasons for the longevity of this seemingly antiquated, semiotic imagery are discussed. In the twenty-first century, this stereotype has been radically revised, even overturned. Scientists are now rarely objects of fear or mockery. Mathematicians, both real-life and fictional, are discussed here as being representative of scientists now depicted empathically. This article examines possible sociological reasons for this reversal; what the revisionist image suggests about society’s changed attitudes to science; and what might be the substitute fears and sources of horror.

Keywords

alchemist communication environment evil scientists Frankenstein ‘mad scientist’mathematicians in fiction myth semiotic characters

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Auburn

(2000) Proof: A Play. New York: Faber & Faber.

Balchin

(1943) The Small Back Room. London: Collins.

Balzac

H de

(1839) [1834] La Recherche de l’Absolu. Paris: Charpentier.

Barber

(1952) Science and the Social Order. New York: Free Press.

Boyd

(1990) Brazzaville Beach. New York: William Morrow & Company.

Campbell (1938 [1948]) Who Goes There? & Other Stories. Chicago, IL: Shasta Publishers.

Casti

(1998) The Cambridge Quintet. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.

Chaucer

(1996) [c. 1475] ‘The Canon Yeoman’s Tale’, Canterbury Tales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chevalier

(2009) Remarkable Creatures. London: HarperCollins.

10.

Clerens

(1967) An Illustrated History of the Horror Film. New York: Capricorn.

11.

Doxiadis

(2000) Uncle Petros and Goldbach’s Conjecture. London: Faber & Faber.

12.

Dudman

(2003) Wegener’s Jigsaw. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

13.

Frisch

(1969 [1953]) Four Plays: The Great Wall of China, Don Juan, or the Love of Geometry, Philipp Hotz’s Fury, Biography, a Game (trans. Bulloch

). London: Methuen & Company Ltd.

14.

Gaines

(2001) Carbon Dreams. Berkeley, CA: Creative Arts Book Company.

15.

Ghosh

(2004) The Hungry Tide. London: HarperCollins.

16.

Goldschmidt

(2013) The Falling Sky. Glasgow: Freight Books.

17.

Goldstein

(2005) Incompleteness: The Proof and the Paradox. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

18.

Goodman

(2006) Intuition. New York: The Dial Press.

19.

Gruen

(2010) Ape House. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

20.

Hardy

(2004 [1940]) A Mathematician’s Apology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

21.

Hauptman

(2003) Partition. New York: Playscripts.

22.

Haynes

(1994) From Faust to Strangelove: Representations of the Scientist in Western Literature. Baltimore, MD and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

23.

Haynes

(2003) From alchemy to artificial intelligence: Stereotypes of the scientist in Western literature. Public Understanding of Science 12(3): 243–253.

24.

Haynes

(2006) The alchemist in fiction: The master narrative. HYLE International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 12(1): 5–29.

25.

Hodges

(1983) Alan Turing: The Enigma. London: Burnett Books.

26.

Kalb

(2007) The Gift. Alpine, Texas: Special Delivery Books.

27.

Kehlmann

(2005) Measuring the World. Oxford: Isis.

28.

King

(1983) Danse Macabre, 3rd edn. New York: Berkeley Books.

29.

Kuhn

(1963) The function of dogma in scientific research. In: Crombie

(ed.) Scientific Change. London: Heinemann, pp. 347–369.

30.

Lab Lit List (2013) Available at: http://www.lablit.com/the_list (updated 7 April 2013; accessed 1 March 2014).

31.

Leavitt

(2006) The Man Who Knew Too Much: Alan Turing and the Invention of the Computer. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

32.

Leavitt

(2007) The Indian Clerk. New York: Bloomsbury.

33.

Levin

(1976) The Boys from Brazil. New York: Random House.

34.

Levin

(2006) A Madman Dreams of Turing Machines. New York: Knopf.

35.

Lewis

(2008) Stem Cell Symphony. Bloomington, IN: Trafford Publishing.

36.

Lewis

(1925) Arrowsmith. New York: Harcourt Brace & Co.

37.

McBurney

(Théâtre de Complicité) (2007) A Disappearing Number. London: Oberon Books.

38.

McEwan

(2005) Saturday. London: Jonathan Cape.

39.

McEwan

(2010) Solar. London: Jonathan Cape.

40.

Mahoney

(1976) Scientist as Subject: The Psychological Imperative. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.

41.

Nasar

(1998) A Beautiful Mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.

42.

Papadimitriou

(2003) Turing: A Novel about Computation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

43.

Petsinis

(1997) The French Mathematician. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

44.

Polyani

(1957) Passion and controversy in science. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 13: 114–119.

45.

Rankine

WJM

(1874) ‘The mathematician in love’. In: Songs and Fables. London: Griffin. Available at: http://rpo.library.utoronto.ca/poems/mathematician-love

46.

Rohn

(2009) Experimental Heart. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

47.

Rohn

(2010a) The Honest Look. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

48.

Rohn

(2010b) More lab in the library. Nature 465(7298): 552.

49.

Schogt

(2000) The Wild Numbers. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.

50.

Shadwell

(1966 [1676]) The Virtuoso (ed. Nicolson

Marjorie Hope

Rodes

David Stuart

). Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.

51.

Shelley

(1996 [1818]) Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus (ed. Hunter

). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

52.

Sprat

(1667) The History of the Royal Society of London for the Advancement of Natural Knowledge. London: J Martyn and J Allerby.

53.

Stiles

(2009) Literature in Mind: H. G. Wells and the evolution of the mad scientist. Journal of the History of Ideas 70(2): 317–345.

54.

Swift

(1995 [1726]) Gulliver’s Travels, Book II. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

55.

The Editors of The New Atlantis (2005) Hiroshima and Nagasaki at sixty. The New Atlantis 9(Summer): 139.

56.

Tudor

(1989a) Monsters and Mad Scientists: A Cultural History of the Horror Movie. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–47.

57.

Tudor

(1989b) Seeing the worst side of science. Nature 340: 589–592.

58.

Turney

(1998) Frankenstein’s Footsteps. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.

59.

United States Atomic Energy Commission (1954) In the Matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer: Transcript of Hearing before the Personnel Security Board. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

60.

Wagstaff

(2007) The Turing Test. Edinburgh Studio Opera, August 2007. Available at: www.julianwagstaff.com/ttt/turingtestprogramme.pdf

61.

Weingart

Muhl

Pansegrau

(2003) Of power maniacs and unethical geniuses: Science and scientists in fiction film. Public Understanding of Science 12(3): 279–287.

62.

Wells

(1896) The Island of Doctor Moreau. London: Heinemann.

63.

Wells

(1909) Ann Veronica. London: T Fisher Unwin.

64.

Wells

(1909) Tono-Bungay. London: Macmillan.

65.

Whitemore

Hodges

(1986) Breaking the Code. New York: Samuel French, Inc.