BentleyPKyvikS (2011) Academic staff and public communication: A survey of popular science publishing across 13 countries. Public Understanding of Science20(1): 48–63.
2.
CassidyA (2006) Evolutionary psychology as public science and boundary work. Public Understanding of Science15(2): 175–205.
3.
CeccarelliL (2001) Shaping Science with Rhetoric: The Cases of Dobzhansky, Schrödinger, and Wilson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
ConditCMLynchJWindermanE (2012) Recent rhetorical studies in public understanding of science: Multiple purposes and strengths. Public Understanding of Science21(4): 386–400.
5.
GierynTF (1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
GleickJ (1997) Chaos: Making a New Science. London: Vintage.
7.
GrossAG (1994) The roles of rhetoric in the public understanding of science. Public Understanding of Science3(1): 3–23.
8.
HilgartnerS (1990) The dominant view of popularization: Conceptual problems, political uses. Social Studies of Science20(3): 519–539.
9.
LeaneE (2007) Reading Popular Physics: Disciplinary Skirmishes and Textual Strategies. Farnham: Ashgate.
10.
MellorF (2003) Between fact and fiction: Demarcating science from non-science in popular physics books. Social Studies of Science33(4): 509–538.
11.
PaulD (2004) Spreading chaos: The role of popularizations in the diffusion of scientific ideas. Written Communication21(1): 32–68.
12.
TurneyJ (2001) More than story-telling: Reflecting on popular science. Science communication in theory and practice. In: StocklmayerSMGoreMMBryantC (eds) Science Communication in Theory and Practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 47–62.
13.
TurneyJ (2008) Popular science books. In: BucchiMTrenchB (eds) Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. London: Routledge, pp. 5–14.
