Engaging with the political imaginaries of science: Near misses and future targets

Abstract

The current economic and financial crisis is also a political crisis that requires a rethinking of public engagement with science. In the past, the dominant focus of science, technology and society (STS) has led to a blind spot: political understanding and engagement of policy-makers and politicians with science, which is an integral part of any public engagement. Arguably, it is bound to and emerges from what Ezrahi calls collective political imaginaries. These are necessary fictions, which are causative and performative. In crude form, they manifest themselves in short-term impact measurements of every unit of scientific activity with citizens as the fictitious ultimate beneficiaries. In the future, STS can gain from coming up with a workable definition of the public interest with a focus on the public value of science. It can investigate collective imaginaries as they emerge from interactions with new media. As necessary fictions they may hold answers we never imagined them to hold.

Keywords

decision-making in science governance of science and technology interaction experts/ publics participation in science policy popularization of science public understanding of science scientific citizenship

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

(2012) Too much information? Political science, the university, and the public sphere. Perspectives on Politics 10(2): 385–396.

Castells

(2009) Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Ezrahi

(2012) Imagined Democracies: Necessary Political Fictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jasanoff

(2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Nowotny

Scott

Gibbons

(2001) Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in the Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Nowotny

Testa

(2011) Naked Genes: Reinventing the Human in the Molecular Age. Cambridge, MA; London England: The MIT Press

Wynne

(2007) Public participation in science and technology: Performing and obscuring a political–conceptual category mistake. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 1(1): 99–110.