Learning the wrong lessons? Science and fisheries management in the Chesapeake Bay blue crab fishery

Abstract

This paper argues that information produced and then taken up for policy decision making is a function of a complex interplay within the scientific community and between scientists and the broader policy network who are all grappling with issues in a complex environment with a high degree of scientific uncertainty. The dynamics of forming and re-forming the scientific community are shaped by political processes, as are the directions and questions scientists attend to in their roles as policy advisors. Three factors: 1) social construction of scientific communities, 2) the indeterminacy of science, and 3) demands by policy makers to have concrete information for decision making; are intertwined in the production and dissemination of information that may serve as the basis for policy learning. Through this process, however, what gets learned may not be what is needed to mitigate the problem, be complete in terms of addressing multiple causations, or be correct.

Keywords

decision making in science discourses of science framing risk interaction experts/publics public understanding of science

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

T. F. H.

Tainter

J. A.

Pires

J. C.

Hoesktra

T. W.

(2001) “Dragnet Ecology: ‘Just the Facts, Ma’am’: The Privilege of Science in a Postmodern World,” BioScience 51(6): 475–85.

Baumgartner

F. R.

Jones

B. D.

(1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Beem

B. E.

(2006) “Planning to Learn: Blue Crab Policymaking in the Chesapeake Bay,” Coastal Management 34(2): 167–82.

Berkes

Mahon

McConney

Pollnac

Pomeroy

(2001) Managing Small-Scale Fisheries: Alternative Directions and Methods. Ottawa: International Development Research Center.

Bi-State Blue Crab Advisory Committee (BBCAC) (1997) First Progress Report of the Bi-State Blue Crab Advisory Committee. June 4. Annapolis: Chesapeake Bay Commission.

Bi-State Blue Crab Advisory Committee (1998) “Minutes, Bi-State Blue Crab Advisory Committee Meeting.” May.

Bi-State Blue Crab Advisory Committee (1999) “Minutes, Bi-State Blue Crab Advisory Committee Meeting.” May.

Bi-State Blue Crab Advisory Committee (2001a) “Taking Action for the Blue Crab: Managing and Protecting the Stock and its Fisheries.” Annapolis: Chesapeake Bay Commission.

Bi-State Blue Crab Advisory Committee (2001b) “The Chesapeake Bay Blue Crab: Harvest Trends and Dockside Values.” Annapolis: Chesapeake Bay Commission.

10.

Capitol

The

(1995) “Blue Crabs Sink 62%, Survey Says,” 2 February, p. A1. Annapolis.

11.

Chesapeake Bay Commission (2000) “Annual Report to the General Assemblies of Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia.” Annapolis: Chesapeake Bay Commission.

12.

Chesapeake Bay Program (1997) “Chesapeake Bay Blue Crab Management Plan.” Annapolis: Environmental Protection Agency.

13.

Chesapeake Bay Stock Assessment Committee (CBSAC) (1999) “Blue Crab Advisory Report.” URL: noaa.chesapeakebay.net/cbsac.htm

14.

Chesapeake Bay Stock Assessment Committee (2001) “Blue Crab Advisory Report.” URL (last accessed 23 June 2010): http://www.mdsg.umd.edu/images/uploads/siteimages/Living_Chesapeake/bluecrabs/cbsac/pdfs/2001BCAR.pdf

15.

Chesapeake Bay Stock Assessment Committee (2008) “2008 Chesapeake Bay Blue Crab Advisory Report.” Annapolis: NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office.

16.

Cohen

M. D.

March

J. G.

Olsen

J. P.

(1972) “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice,” Administrative Science Quarterly 17(1): 1–25.

17.

Cronin

(1968) “Blue Crab Shortages, Commercial Fisheries Research Legislation,” Statement to the House, Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries, Subcommittee on Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.

18.

Cronin

(1998) “Early Days of Crabbing and a Brief History of the Chesapeake Bay,” Journal of Shellfish Research 17(2): 379–81.

19.

Denzau

North

(1994) “Shared Mental Models,” Kyklos 47(1): 3–32.

20.

Fischler

K. J.

(1965) “The Use of Catch-Effort, Catch-Sampling, and Tagging Data to Estimate Populations of Blue Crabs,” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 94(4): 287–310.

21.

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (1995) Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries. Rome: FAO.

22.

Haas

(1989) “Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution Control,” International Organization 43(3): 377–403.

23.

Hargis

24.

Hilgartner

Bosk

(1988) “The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model,” American Journal of Sociology 94(1): 53–79.

25.

Jasanoff

(1990) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

26.

Jones

B. D.

Baumgartner

F. R.

(2005) The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

27.

S. J.

Secor

D. H.

Harvey

H. R.

(1999) “Use of Extractable Lipofuscin for Age Determination of Blue Crab Callinectes sapidus,” Marine Ecology Progress Series 185: 171–9.

28.

Leffler

(1996) “Blue Crabs: The Biology of Abundance,” Maryland Marine Notes Online 14(3) (May–June), URL (last accessed 13 June 2010): http://www.mdsg.umd.edu/MarineNotes/May-June96/

29.

Litfin

(1994) Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.

30.

MacDonald

J. M.

(1995) “Appreciating the Precautionary Principle as an Ethical Evolution in Ocean Management,” Ocean Development and International Law 26(3): 255–86.

31.

Majone

(1989) Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven: Yale University Press.

32.

May

P. J.

(1992) “Policy Learning and Failure,” Journal of Public Policy 12(4): 331–54.

33.

Miller

(2001) “Challenges in the Application of Science to Global Affairs: Contingency, Trust, and Moral Order,” in Miller

Edwards

P. N.

(eds) Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, pp. 246–86. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

34.

Miller

R. J.

(1990) “Properties of a Well-managed Nearshore Fishery,” Fisheries 15(5): 7–12.

35.

Miller

(2001) “The Precautionary Approach to Managing the Blue Crab in Chesapeake Bay: Establishing Limits and Targets,” University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Chesapeake Bay Laboratory.

36.

Miller

Houde

E. D.

(1998) “Blue Crab Target Setting.” Final Report to US EPA.

37.

Ostrom

(1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

38.

Pearson

J. C.

(1948) Fluctuations in the Abundance of the Blue Crab in Chesapeake Bay. Washington DC: United States Department of the Interior.

39.

Peterson

M. J.

(1997) “International Organizations and the Implementation of Environmental Regimes,” in Young

O. R.

(ed.) Global Governance: Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience, pp. 115–51. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

40.

Ravetz

(1990) The Merger of Knowledge with Power: Essays in Critical Science. London: Mansell Publishing.

41.

Rhodes

Lipton

Shabman

(2001) “A Socio-Economic Profile of the Chesapeake Bay Commercial Blue Crab Fishery.” Bi-State Blue Crab Advisory Committee. Annapolis: Chesapeake Bay Commission.

42.

Rugolo

Knotts

Lange

Crecco

Terceiro

. (1997) Stock Assessment of Chesapeake Bay Blue Crab (Callinectes sapidus). Annapolis: NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office.

43.

Sabatier

Jenkins-Smith

(1993) Policy Change and Learning : An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

44.

Sabatier

P. A.

Jenkins-Smith

H. C.

(1999) “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment,” in Sabatier

P. A.

(ed.) Theories of the Policy Process, pp. 117–65. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

45.

Simon

H. A.

(1985) “Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science,” American Political Science Review 79(2): 293–304.

46.

United Nations (1995) United Nations Conference on Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks. New York: United Nations.

47.

Valiante

Muldoon

Botts

(1997) “Ecosystem Governance: Lessons from the Great Lakes,” in Young

O. R.

(ed.) Global Governance: Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience, pp. 197–224. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

48.

VanderZwaag

(2002) “The Precautionary Principle and Marine Environmental Protection: Slippery Shores, Rough Seas, and Rising Normative Tides,” Ocean Development and International Law 33(2): 165–88.

49.

Virginia Natural Resource Leadership Institute (n.d.) “Managing the Blue Crab: Seeking a Solution to an Uncertain Crisis.”

50.

Virginian Pilot

The

(1995) “72 Storm is Suspect in Crab Decline: The Problem Now is Overfishing, Some Say. Other Theories Contradict that Thought,” 22 September, page B1. Hampton Roads.