Our study examines how individuals decide which scientific claims and experts to believe when faced with competing claims regarding a policy issue. Using an experiment in a public opinion survey, we test the source content and credibility hypotheses to assess how much confidence people have in reports about scientific studies of the safety of offshore oil drilling along the California coast. The results show that message content has a substantial impact. People tend to accept reports of scientific studies that support their values and prior beliefs, but not studies that contradict them. Previous studies have shown that core values influence message acceptance. We find that core values and prior beliefs have independent effects on message acceptance. We also find that the sources of the claims make little difference. Finally, the public leans toward believing reports that oil drilling is riskier than previously believed.
Abramson, P.R. ( 1983) Political Attitudes in America: Formation and Change. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
2.
Albarracín, D. ( 2002) "Cognition in Persuasion: An Analysis of Information Processing in Response to Persuasive Communications," Advances in Experimental Social Psychology34: 61-130.
3.
Albarracín, D. and Wyer, R.S. ( 2001) "The Cognitive Impact on Past Behavior: Influences on Beliefs, Attitudes, and Future Behavioral Decisions," Social Psychology Bulletin27: 691-705.
4.
Alvarez, R.M. and Brehm, J. ( 2002) Hard Choices, Easy Answers. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
5.
Anderson, C.A. ( 1983) "Abstract and Concrete Data in the Perseverance of Social Theories: When Weak Data Lead to Unshakable Beliefs," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology19: 93-108.
6.
Baldassare, M. ( 2000) California in the New Millennium: The Changing Social and Political Landscape. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Begley, S. ( 2007) "The Truth about Denial," Newsweek 13 August: 20-9.
8.
Brambor, T., Clark, W.R. and Golder, M. ( 2006) "Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis," Political Analysis14: 63-82.
9.
Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E. and Stokes, D.R. ( 1960) The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
10.
Carlisle, J.E. and Smith, E.R.A. N. (2001) "Confidence in Expert Claims about Environmental Risks," Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Montreal, Canada, 17-20 May.
11.
Chaiken, S. ( 1980) "Heuristic versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source versus Message Cues in Persuasion," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39: 752-66.
12.
Chaiken, S., Liberman, A. and Eagly, A.H. ( 1989) "Heuristic and Systematic Information Processing within and beyond the Persuasion Context," in J. S. Uleman and J. A. Bargh (eds) Unintended Thought, pp. 212-52. New York: Guilford Press.
13.
Chaiken, S., Ginger-Sorolla, R. and Chen, S. ( 1996) "Beyond Accuracy: Defense and Impression Motives in Heuristic and Systematic Information Processing," in P. M. Gollwitzer and J. A. Bargh (eds) The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior, pp. 553-78. New York: Guilford Press.
14.
Chen, S. and Chaiken, S. ( 1999) "The Heuristic-Systematic Model in its Broader Context ," in S. Chaiken and Y. Trope (eds) Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, pp. 73-96. New York: Guilford Press.
15.
Citrin, J. ( 1974) "The Political Relevance of Trust in Government," American Political Science Review68: 973- 88.
16.
Converse, P. ( 1964) "The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics," in D. Apter (ed.) Ideology and Discontent, pp. 206-61. New York: The Free Press.
17.
Crocker, J., Fiske, S. and Taylor, S.E. ( 1984) "Schematic Bases of Belief Change," in J. R. Eiser (ed.) Attitudinal Judgment , pp. 197-226. New York: Springer-Verlag.
18.
Delli Carpini, M.X. and Keeter, S. ( 1996) What Americans Know about Politics and Why it Matters . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
Douglas, M. ( 1992) Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.
20.
Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A. ( 1982) Risk and Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
Earle, T.C. and Cvetkovich, G.T. ( 1995) Social Trust: Toward a Cosmopolitan Society. Westport, CT: Praeger.
22.
Ellis, R.J. and Thompson, F. ( 1997) "Culture and the Environment in the Pacific Northwest ," American Political Science Review91(4): 885-97.
23.
Feldman, S. ( 1988) "Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: The Role of Core Beliefs and Values," American Journal of Political Science32: 416-40.
24.
Feldman, S. and Zaller, J. ( 1992) "The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State," American Journal of Political Science36: 268-307.
25.
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. ( 1981) "Acceptance, Yielding, and Impact: Cognitive Processes in Persuasion," in R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom and T. C. Brock (eds) Cognitive Responses in Persuasion, pp. 339-59. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
Freudenburg, W.R. and Gramling, R. ( 1994) Oil in Troubled Waters: Perceptions, Politics, and the Battle over Offshore Oil Drilling. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
27.
Greenwald, A.G. ( 1968) "Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Responses to Persuasion and Attitude Change," in A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock and T. M. Ostrom (eds) Psychological Foundations of Attitudes, pp. 147-70. New York: Academic Press.
28.
Guber, D.L. ( 2003) The Grassroots of a Green Revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
Hovland, C.I., Janis, I.L. and Kelly, H.H. ( 1953) Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.
30.
Johnson, B.T., Maio, G.R. and Smith-McLallen, A. ( 2005) "Communication and Attitude Change: Causes, Processes, and Effects," in D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson and M. P. Zanna (eds) The Handbook of Attitudes, pp. 617-69. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
Jones, R.E. and Dunlap, R.E. ( 1992) "The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: Have They Changed Over Time?," Rural Sociology57(1): 28-47.
32.
Kinder, D.R. ( 1983) "Diversity and Complexity in American Public Opinion," in A. Finifter (ed.) Political Science: The State of the Discipline, pp. 389-425. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
33.
Kraus, N., Malmfors, T. and Slovic, P. ( 1992) "Intuitive Toxicology: Expert and Lay Judgments of Chemical Risks," Risk Analysis12(2): 215-32.
34.
Lodge, M. and Taber, C. ( 2000) "Three Steps toward a Theory of Motivated Political Reasoning ," in A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins and S. L. Popkin (eds) Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, pp. 183-213. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Lord, C.G., Ross, L. and Lepper, M.R. ( 1979) "Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37: 2098-109.
36.
McClosky, H. and Zaller, J. ( 1984) The American Ethos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
MacCoun, R.J. and Paletz, S. ( 2009) "Citizens’ Perceptions of Ideological Bias in Research on Public Policy Controversies,"Political Psychology30: 43-65.
38.
Marsden, P.V. ( 1981) "Conditional Effects in Regression Models," in P. V. Marsden (ed.) Linear Models in Social Research, pp. 97-116. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
39.
Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T. ( 1983) "Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion: Applications to Advertising," in L. Percy and A. G. Woodside (eds) Advertising and Consumer Psychology, pp. 3-23. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
40.
Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T. ( 1986a) Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
41.
Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T. ( 1986b) "The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion," in L. Berkowitz (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 19, pp. 123-205. New York: Academic Press.
42.
Petty, R.E. and Wegener, D.T. ( 1999) "The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current Status and Controversies," in S. Chaiken and Y. Trope (eds) Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, pp. 41-72. New York: Guilford Press.
43.
Pomerantz, E.M., Chaiken, S. and Tordesillas, R.S. ( 1995) "Attitude Strength and Resistance Processes," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology69: 408-19.
44.
Pyszczynski, T. and Greenberg, J. ( 1987) "Toward an Integration of Cognitive and Motivational Perspectives on Social Inference: A Biased Hypothesis-testing Model," in L. Berkowitz (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 20, pp. 297-340. New York: Academic Press.
45.
Rubin, D.B. ( 1987) Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley.
46.
Rubin, D.B. ( 1996) "Multiple Imputation after 18+ Years," Journal of the American Statistical Association91: 473-89.
47.
Sherif, C.W., Sherif, M. and Nebergall, R.E. ( 1965) Attitude and Attitude Change: The Social Judgment-Involvement Approach. Philadelphia: Saunders .
48.
Sherif, M. and Hovland, C.I. ( 1961) Social Judgement: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
49.
Sherif, M. and Sherif, C.W. ( 1967) "Attitude as the Individual’s Own Categories: The Social Judgment-Involvement Approach to Attitude and Attitude Change," in C. W. Sherif and M. Sherif (eds) Attitude, Ego-Involvement and Change, pp. 105-39. New York: Wiley.
50.
Sherif, M., Taub, D. and Hovland, C.I. ( 1958) "Assimilation and Contrast Effects of Anchoring Stimuli on Judgments," Journal of Experimental Psychology55: 150-5.
51.
Slovic, P. ( 1999) "Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy," in G. Cvetkovich and R. E. Löfstedt (eds) Social Trust and the Management of Risk, pp. 42-52. London: Earthscan Publications.
52.
Smith, E.R.A.N. ( 1989) The Unchanging American Voter. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
53.
Smith, E.R.A.N. ( 2002) Energy, the Environment, and Public Opinion. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.
54.
Smith, E.R.A.N. and Garcia, S.R. ( 1995) "Evolving California Opinion on Offshore Oil Development ," Ocean & Coastal Management26: 41-56.
55.
Wildavsky, A. ( 1991) The Rise of Radical Egalitarianism. Washington, DC: American University Press.
56.
Wildavsky, A. and Dake, K. ( 1990) "Theories of Risk Perception: Who Fears What and Why," Daedalus41: 41-60.
57.
Wilder, R.J. ( 1998) Listening to the Sea: The Politics of Improving Environmental Protection. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
58.
Zaller, J.R. ( 1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
