While ideology can have a strong effect on citizen understanding of science, it is unclear how ideology interacts with other complicating factors, such as college education, which influence citizens’ comprehension of information. We focus on public understanding of climate change science and test the hypotheses: [H 1] as citizens’ ideology shifts from liberal to conservative, concern for global warming decreases; [H2] citizens with college education and higher general science literacy tend to have higher concern for global warming; and [H3] college education does not increase global warming concern for conservative ideologues. We implemented a survey instrument in California’s San Francisco Bay Area, and employed regression models to test the effects of ideology and other socio-demographic variables on citizen concern about global warming, terrorism, the economy, health care and poverty. We are able to confirm H1 and H3, but reject H2. Various strategies are discussed to improve the communication of climate change science across ideological divides.
Adger, W.N. ( 2003) "Social Capital, Collective Action, and Adaptation to Climate Change," Economic Geography79(4): 387-404.
2.
Antonakis, N. ( 1999) "Guns Versus Butter: A Multisectoral Approach to Military Expenditure and Growth with Evidence from Greece, 1960-1993," Journal of Conflict Resolution43(4): 501-20.
3.
Axelrod, R. ( 1976) Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
Bingham, S. ( 2007) "Climate Change: A Moral Issue," in S. Moser and L. Dilling (eds) Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change, pp. 153-66. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Bord, R.J., O’Connor, R.E. and Fischer, A. ( 2000) "In What Sense Does the Public Need to Understand Global Climate Change?,"Public Understanding of Science9(3): 205-18.
6.
Bostrom, A., Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B. and Read, D. ( 1994) "What Do People Know about Global Climate Change? 1. Mental Models,"Risk Analysis14(6): 959-70.
7.
Caputo, D.A. ( 1975) "New Perspectives on the Public Policy Implications of Defense and Welfare Expenditures in Four Modern Democracies, 1950-1970," Policy Sciences6: 423-46.
8.
Carrubba, C.J. and Singh, A. ( 2004) "A Decision Theoretic Model of Public Opinion: Guns, Butter, and European Common Defense,"American Journal of Political Science48(2): 218-31.
9.
Carvalho, A. ( 2007) "Ideological Cultures and Media Discourses on Scientific Knowledge: Re-Reading News on Climate Change," Public Understanding of Science16(2): 223-43.
10.
Christensen, G.L. and Olson, J.C. ( 2002) "Mapping Consumers’ Mental Models with ZMET," Psychology and Marketing19(6): 477-501.
11.
Clark, D.H. ( 2001) "Trading Butter for Guns: Domestic Imperatives for Foreign Policy Substitution," Journal of Conflict Resolution45(5): 636-60.
12.
Clayton, J.L. ( 1976) "The Fiscal Limits of the Warfare-Welfare State: Defense and Welfare Spending in the United States since 1900," Western Political Quarterly29: 364-83.
13.
Durant, J., Evans, G.A. and Thomas, G.P. ( 1989) "The Public Understanding of Science," Nature340: 11-4.
14.
Eagelton, T. ( 1991) Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso.
15.
Evans, G.A. and Durant, J. ( 1995) "The Relationship between Knowledge and Attitudes in the Public Understanding of Science in Britain," Public Understanding of Science4: 57-74.
16.
Frumkin, H., Hess, J., Luber, G., Malilay, J. and McGeehin, M. ( 2008) "Climate Change: The Public Health Response," American Journal of Public Health98(3): 435-45.
17.
Hartman, S.W. ( 1973) "The Impact of Defense Expenditure on the Domestic American Economy, 1964-1972," Public Administration Review33: 379-90.
18.
Kempton, W. ( 1991) "Lay Perspectives on Global Climate Change,"Global Environmental Change June: 183-208.
19.
Kempton, W. ( 1997) "How the Public Views Climate Change," Environment39(9): 12-21.
20.
Kosko, B. ( 1986) "Fuzzy Cognitive Maps," International Journal of Man-Machine Studies24(1): 65-75.
21.
Leiserowitz, A. ( 2006) "Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery and Values," Climatic Change77: 45-72.
22.
Leiserowitz, A. ( 2007) "Communicating the Risks of Global Warming: American Risk Perceptions, Affective Images, and Interpretive Communities," in S. Moser and L. Dilling (eds) Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change, pp. 44-63. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Lorenzoni, I. and Pidgeon, N.F. ( 2006) "Public Views on Climate Change: European and USA Perspectives ," Climatic Change77: 73-95.
24.
McCarthy, J.J., Canziani, O.F., Leary, N.A., Dokken, D.J. and White, K.S. ( 2001) Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability . New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Mintz, A. and Huang, C. ( 1991) "Guns Versus Butter: The Indirect Link," American Journal of Political Science35(3): 738-57.
26.
Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A. and Atman, C.J. ( 2002) Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Moser, S. and Dilling, L. ( 2004) "Making Climate Hot: Communicating the Urgency and Challenge of Global Climate Change," Environment46(10): 32-46.
28.
Moser, S. and Dilling, L. (eds) (2007) Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
National Science Foundation (NSF) (1999) Geosciences Beyond 2000: Report of a Long-Range Planning Effort for Geosciences in the 21st Century. NSF00-28.
30.
Pardo, R. and Calvo, F. ( 2002) "Attitudes toward Science among the European Public: A Methodological Analysis," Public Understanding of Science11: 155-95.
31.
Pardo, R. and Calvo, F. ( 2004) "The Cognitive Dimension of Public Perceptions of Science: Methodological Issues," Public Understanding of Science13: 203-27.
32.
Peroff, K. and Podolak-Warren, M. ( 1979) "Does Spending on Defence Cut Spending on Health? A Time-Series Analysis of the U.S. Economy, 1929-1974," British Journal of Political Science9: 21-39.
33.
Priest, S.H., Bonfadelli, H. and Rusanen, M. ( 2003) "The ‘Trust Gap’ Hypothesis: Predicting Support for Biotechnology across National Cultures as a Function of Trust in Actors ," Risk Analysis23(4): 751-66.
34.
Russett, B.M. ( 1969) "Who Pays for Defense?," American Political Science Review63: 412-26.
35.
Russett, B.M. ( 1970) What Price Vigilance? The Burdens of National Defense . New Haven: Yale University Press .
36.
Slovic, P. ( 2000) The Perception of Risk. London: Earthscan.
37.
Sterman, J.D. and Sweeney, L.B. ( 2007) "Understanding Public Complacency about Climate Change: Adults’ Mental Models of Climate Change Violate Conservation of Matter ," Climatic Change80: 213-38.
38.
Stern, N. ( 2008) "The Economics of Climate Change (Richard T. Ely Lecture) ," American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings98(2): 1-37.
39.
Stoll-Kleemann, S., O’Riordan, T. and Jaeger, C.C. ( 2001) "The Psychology of Denial Concerning Climate Mitigation Measures: Evidence from Swiss Focus Groups," Global Environmental Change11: 107-17.
40.
Taylor, S.E. and Fiske, S.T. ( 1981) "Getting inside the Head: Methodologies for Process Analysis in Attribution and Social Recognition," in J. A. Harvey and W. J. Kidd (eds) New Directions in Attribution Research, Vol. 3, pp. 459-524. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41.
Trumbo, C. ( 1996) "Constructing Climate Change: Claims and Frames in US News Coverage of an Environmental Issue," Public Understanding of Science5: 269-83.
42.
Ungar, S. ( 2007) "Public Scares: Changing the Issue Culture," in S. Moser and L. Dilling (eds) Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change, pp. 81-8. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
US Department of State (2002) US Climate Action Report. URL (consulted February 2009): www.gcrio.org/CAR2002/
44.
Weingart, P., Engels, A. and Pansegrau, P. ( 2000) "Risks of Communication: Discourses on Climate Change in Science, Politics, and the Mass Media," Public Understanding of Science9: 261-83.
45.
Wilensky, H. ( 1975) The Welfare State and Equality. Berkeley : University of California Press.
46.
Wood, B.D. and Vedlitz, A. ( 2007) "Issue Definition, Information Processing, and the Politics of Global Warming," American Journal of Political Science51(3): 552-68.
47.
Zaltman, G. ( 1997) "Rethinking Market Research: Putting People Back In," Journal of Marketing Research34(4): 424-37.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
