In the absence of real-life role models, images of women scientists and engineers on the World Wide Web can be important sources of information about women in science, engineering, and technology. This study analyzed the content of 27 science and engineering Web sites for girls and examined recurring themes in 168 of the biographies of women scientists and engineers found on these sites. Most of the Web sites included information about scientific, engineering, and technological disciplines and presented occupational information—information shown to be important for increasing girls’ interest in these areas. The biographies of women scientists and engineers found on these Web sites addressed issues concerning parental attitudes, acceptance by male colleagues, and family-friendly policies in workplaces— issues shown to be related to girls’ future interest in careers in science, engineering, and technology. By providing detailed information about the experiences and personal lives of women scientists and engineers, the biographies on these Web sites may be useful in countering existing cultural stereotypes of women scientists and engineers and initiating changes in perceptions needed to narrow the gender gap in science, engineering, and technology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 American Association of University Women, How Schools Shortchange Girls: The AAUW Report ( Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation and the National Education Association , 1992); American Association of University Women, Tech-Savvy: Education Girls in the New Computer Age (Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation, 2000); M. G. Jones and Jack Wheatley, “Gender differences in teacher–student interactions in science classrooms,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27, no. 9 (1990): 861–874; Jane B. Kahle and Marsha D. Lakes, “The myth of equality in science classrooms,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20 (1983): 131–140; Marsha L. Matyas, “Factors affecting female achievement and interest in science and in scientific careers,” in Women in Science: A Report From the Field, ed. Jane Bulter Kahle (Philadelphia, PA: Falmer, 1985), 27–48; Linda W. Morse and Herbert M. Handley, “Listening to adolescents: gender differences in science classroom interaction,” in Gender Influences in Classroom Interaction, eds L. C. Wilkinson and C. B. Marrett (New York: Academic Press, 1985), 37–56.
2.
2 Roger Lock, “Gender and practical skill performance in science,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching29, no. 3 (1992): 227–241 ; Michael Shemesh, “Gender-related differences in reasoning skills and learning interests of junior high school students,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27, no. 1 (1990): 27–34; Joan Skolnick, et al., How to Encourage Girls in Math and Science(Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1982).
3.
3 Daniel P. Shepardson and Edward L. Pizzini, “Gender bias in female elementary teachers’ perceptions of the scientific ability of students,” Science Education76, no. 2 (1992): 147–153 .
4.
4 Judith A. Bazler and Doris A. Simonis, “Are high school chemistry textbooks gender fair?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching28, no. 4 (1991): 353–362 ; Ellen F. Potter and Sue V. Rosser, “Factors in life science textbooks that may deter girls’ interest in science,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29, no. 7 (1992): 669–686.
5.
5 Helen Farmer, Diversity and Women’s Career Development: From Adolescence to Adulthood ( Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE , 1997); James R. Campbell, “The roots of gender inequity in technical areas,”Journal of Research in Science Teaching28, no. 3 (1991): 251–264.
6.
6 Alberto Elena, “Skirts in the lab: Madame Curie and the image of the woman scientist in the feature film,” Public Understanding of Science6 (1997): 269–278 ; Elfriede Fursich and E. P. Lester, “Science journalism under scrutiny: a textual analysis of ‘Science Times’,” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 13 (1996): 24–43; Marcel C. LaFollette, Wizards, Villains, and Other Scientists: The Science Content of Television for Children. Report prepared for Action for Children’s Television (Newton, MA, 1981); Marcel C. LaFollette, “Eyes on the stars: images of women scientists in popular magazines,” Science, Technology, and Human Values13, no. 3/4 (1988): 262–275; Marcel C. LaFollette, Making Science Our Own: Public Images of Science 1910–1955 (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1990); Jocelyn Steinke and Marilee Long, “A lab of her own? Portrayals of female characters on children’s educational science programs,” Science Communication 18, no. 2 (1996): 91–115; Jocelyn Steinke, “A portrait of a woman as a scientist: breaking down barriers created by gender-role stereotypes,” Public Understanding of Science 6 (1997): 409–428; Jocelyn Steinke, “Connecting theory and practice: women scientist role models in television programming,” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 42 (1998): 142–151; Jocelyn Steinke, “Women scientist role models on screen: a case study of Contact,” Science Communication21, no. 2 (1999): 111–136.
7.
7 Sandra L. Bem and E. Lenney, “Sex typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology33, no. 1 (1993): 48–54 ; Sandra L. Bem, “Gender schema theory: a cognitive account of sex typing,” Psychological Review 88, no. 4 (1981): 354–364.
8.
8 Sandra L. Bem and E. Lenney, “Sex typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior” (cit. no. 7); Sandra L. Bem, “Gender schema theory: a cognitive account of sex typing” (cit. no. 7); Sandra L. Bem, “Gender schema theory and its implications for child development: raising gender-aschematic children in a gender-schematic society,”Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 8, no. 4 (1983): 598–616; Sandra L. Calvert and Aletha C. Huston, “Television and children’s gender schemata,” in Children’s Gender Schema, eds L. S. Liben and M. L. Signorella (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1987): 75–88; S. G. Koblinksy, et al., “Sex role stereotypes and children’s memory for story content,” Child Development 49 (1978): 452–458; Lynn S. Liben and Margaret L. Signorella, “Gender-related schemata and constructive memory in children,” Child Development51 (1980): 11–18; Margaret L. Signorella, “Remembering gender-related information,” Sex Roles 27, no. 3/4 (1992): 143–156; Diana F. Ruble and Charles Stangor, “Stalking the elusive schema: insights from developmental and social psychological analyses of gender schemas,” Social Cognition 4 (1986): 227–261.
9.
9 Lynn S. Liben and Margaret L. Signorella, “Gender-schematic processing in children: the role of initial interpretations of stimuli,” Developmental Psychology29, no. 1 (1993): 141–149 .
10.
10 Sandra L. Bem and E. Lenney, “Sex typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior” (cit. no. 7).
11.
11 Lyn M. Brown and Carol Gilligan, Meeting at the Crossroads: Women’s Psychology and Girls’ Development ( New York: Ballantine Books , 1992), 175-175.
12.
12 Girls, Inc., Taking the Lead: Girls’ Rights in the 21st Century ( New York: Girls Inc. , 2000).
13.
13 Shirley L. O’Bryant and Charles R. Corder-Bolz, “The effects of television on children’s stereotyping of women’s work roles,” Journal of Vocational Behavior12 (1978): 233–244 ; Angela B. Ginorio and Jeri Grignon, “The transition to and from high school of ethnic minority students,” in Accessed Denied: Race, Ethnicity and the Scientific Enterprise, eds George Campbell, et al. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000): 151–173.
14.
14 Jacquelynne S. Eccles, “Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions,” Psychology of Women Quarterly11 (1987): 135–172, 141-141 .
15.
15 Elizabeth M. Perse, Media Effects and Society ( New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates , 2001).
16.
16 Ibid., p. 172.
17.
17 LaFollette, Wizards, Villains, and Other Scientists: The Science Content of Television for Children (cit. no. 6); LaFollette, Making Science Our Own: Public Images of Science 1910–1955 (cit. no. 6); Steinke and Long, “A lab of her own? Portrayals of female characters on children’s educational science programs” (cit. no. 6); Fursich and Lester, “Science journalism under scrutiny: a textual analysis of ‘Science Times”’ (cit. no. 6); Dorothy Nelkin, Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1987).
18.
18 Steinke, “A portrait of a woman as a scientist: breaking down barriers created by gender-role stereotypes” (cit. no. 6); Steinke, “Women scientist role models on screen: a case study of Contact” (cit. no. 6).
19.
19 Alison Kelly, “Science achievement as an aspect of sex roles,” in The Missing Half: Girls and Science Education, ed. Alison Kelly ( Manchester: Manchester University Press , 1981); Alison Kelly and B. Smail, “Sex stereotypes and attitudes to science among eleven-year-old children,” British Journal of Educational Psychology 56 (1986): 158–168.
20.
20 Dale Baker and R. Leary, “Letting girls speak out about science,” Journal of Research in Science and Teaching32, no. 1 (1995): 3–27 ; David W. Chambers, “Stereotypic images of the scientists: the draw-a-scientist test,” Science Education67 (1983): 255–265; Micheal O. Maoldomhnaigh and Aine Hunt, “Some factors affecting the image of the scientist drawn by older primary school pupils,” Research in Science and Technological Education 6, no. 2 (1988): 159–166; Margaret Mead and R. Metraux, “Image of the scientist among high-school students,” Science 126 (1957): 384–390.
21.
21 Lorna Erwin and Paula Maurutto, “Beyond access: considering gender deficits in science education,” Gender and Education10, no. 1 (1998): 51–69 ; Jane B. Kahle and Marsha D. Lakes, “The myth of equality in science classrooms,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20 (1983): 131–140; Jane B. Kahle et al., “Gender differences in science education: building a model,” Educational Psychologist 28, no. 4 (1993): 379–404.
22.
22 Carol L. Mason and Jane B. Kahle, “Student attitudes toward science and science-related careers: a program designed to promote a stimulating gender-free learning environment,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching26, no. 1 (1988): 25–39 ; Edward L. Vockell and Susan Lobonc, “Sex-role stereotyping by high school females in science,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 18, no. 3 (1981): 209–219; Carol Wareing, “A survey of antecedents of attitudes toward science,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching27, no. 4 (1990): 371–386.
23.
23 National Science Foundation, Land of Plenty: Diversity as America’s Competitive Edge in Science, Engineering and Technology. ( Washington, DC: National Science Foundation , 2000).
29 Nancy E. Lee, “A mentoring program with hands-on laboratory experiments,” Journal of College Science Teaching, September/October (1999): 29(1), 47–49 .
30.
30 P. R. Mawasha et al. “Girls entering technology, science, math and research training (GET SMART): a model for preparing girls in science and engineering disciplines,” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering7 (2001): 49–57 .
31.
31 Ibid.
32.
32 Julie M. Wood, “The girls have it!” Instructor109, no. 6 (1999): 31–35 .
33.
33 Baker and Leary, “Letting girls speak out about science” (cit. no. 20).
34.
34 Sheila M. Humphreys, “Effectiveness of science career conferences,” in Women and Minorities in Science: Strategies for Increasing Participation, ed. Sheila M. Humphreys ( Boulder, CO: Westview Press , 1982), 165–186; Walter S. Smith and Thomas O. Erb, “Effect of women science career role models on early adolescents’ attitudes toward scientists and women in science,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 23, no. 8 (1986): 667–676; B. M. Schmidt and R. M. Nixon, “Improving girls’ attitudes towards science,” Public Understanding of Science 5 (1996): 255–268.
35.
35 Mary Thom, Balancing the Equation: Where Are Women and Girls in Science, Engineering and Technology? ( New York: The National Council for Research on Women , 2001), 12-12.
36.
36 Alec Bodzin and Mike Gehringer, “Breaking science stereotypes,” Science and Children, January (2001).
37.
37 Smith and Erb, “Effect of women science career role models on early adolescents’ attitudes toward scientists and women in science” (cit. no. 34).
38.
38 Yuki Fujioka, “Television portrayals and African-American stereotypes: examination of television effects when direct contact is lacking,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly6, no. 1 (1999): 52–75 .
39.
39 Robert J. Griffin, S. Shaikat, and Rhonda Plotkin, “Sex, schemata, and social status: TV character identification and occupational aspirations among adolescents,” in Differences That Make a Difference: Examining the Assumptions in Gender Research, eds L. H. Turner and H. M. Sterk ( Westport, CT: Bergin Garvey , 1994): 85–97.
40.
40 Elena, “Skirts in the Lab: Madame Curie and the Image of the Woman Scientist in the Feature Film” (cit. no. 6); Fursich and Lester, “Science journalism under scrutiny: a textual analysis of ‘Science Times”’ (cit. no. 6); LaFollette, Wizards, Villains, and Other Scientists: The Science Content of Television for Children(cit. no. 6); LaFollette, “Eyes on the stars: images of women scientists in popular magazines” (cit. no. 6); LaFollette, Making Science Our Own: Public Images of Science 1910–1955 (cit. no. 6); Steinke and Long, “A lab of her own? Portrayals of female characters on children’s educational science programs” (cit. no. 6); Steinke, “A portrait of a woman as a scientist: breaking down barriers created by gender-role stereotypes” (cit. no. 6); Steinke, “Women scientist role models on screen: a case study of Contact” (cit. no. 6); Nelkin, Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (cit. no. 17).
41.
41 Elena, “Skirts in the lab: Madame Curie and the image of the woman scientist in the feature film” (cit. no. 6); Fursich and Lester, “Science journalism under scrutiny: a textual analysis of ‘Science Times” (cit. no. 6); LaFollette, Wizards, Villains, and Other Scientists: The Science Content of Television for Children(cit. no. 6); LaFollette, “Eyes on the stars: images of women scientists in popular magazines” (cit. no. 6); LaFollette, Making Science Our Own: Public Images of Science 1910–1955(cit. no. 6); Steinke and Long, “A lab of her own? Portrayals of female characters on children’s educational science programs” (cit. no. 6); Steinke, “A portrait of a woman as a scientist: breaking down barriers created by gender-role stereotypes” (cit. no. 6); Steinke, “Women scientist role models on screen: a case study of Contact” (cit. no. 6); Nelkin, Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (cit. no. 17).
42.
42 Steinke, “A portrait of a woman as a scientist: breaking down barriers created by gender-role stereotypes” (cit. no. 6); Steinke, “Women scientist role models on screen: a case study of Contact” (cit. no. 6).
44 K .C. Montgomery, “Digital kids,” in Handbook of Children and the Media, eds Dorothy G. Singer and Jerome L. Singer ( Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE , 2001), 635–650; Todd Tarpley, “Children, the internet, and other new technologies,” in Handbook of Children and the Media, eds Dorothy G. Singer and Jerome L. Singer (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2001), 547–556.
45.
45 Joseph M. Kayany and Paul Yelsma, “Displacement effects of online media in socio-technical contexts of households,” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media44, no. 2 (2000): 215–229 .
46.
46 Fujioka, “Television portrayals and African-American stereotypes: examination of television effects when direct contact is lacking” (cit. no. 38).
47.
47 Matthew B. Miles, and A. M. Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis ( Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE , 1994).
48.
48 Steinke, “A portrait of a woman as a scientist: breaking down barriers created by gender-role stereotypes” (cit. no. 6).
72 Mawasha et al.,“Girls entering technology, science, math and research training (GET SMART): a model for preparing girls in science and engineering disciplines” (cit. no. 30).
75 Sumru Erkut and Janice R. Mokros, “Professors and models and mentors for college students,” American Educational Research Journal21, no. 2 (1984): 399–417 ; Gail Hackett, et al., “The relationship of role model influences to the career salience and educational and career plans of college women,” Journal of Vocational Behavior 35 (1989): 164–180; Lucia A. Gilbert, et al., “Sex of faculty role model and students’ self-perceptions of competency,” Sex Roles9, no. 5 (1983): 597–607.
76.
76 Humphreys, “Effectiveness of science Career Conferences” (cit. no. 34); Sue V. Rosser, Re-EngineeringFemale Friendly Science (New York: Teachers College Press, 1997).
77.
77 Jocelyn Steinke, “Connecting theory and practice: women scientist role models in television programming” (cit. no. 6).
78.
78 Jacquelynne S. Eccles, “Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decision,” Psychology of Women Quarterly11 (1987): 135-172, p. 142-142 .
79.
79 Steinke and Long, “A lab of her own? Portrayals of female characters on children’s educational science programs” (cit. no. 6); Steinke, “A Portrait of a woman as a scientist: breaking down barriers created by gender-role rtereotypes” (cit. no. 6).
80.
80 S. Giurleo, “Persisters and career changers in technical careers,” in Diversity and Women’s Career Development: From Adolescence to Adulthood, ed. H. S. Farmer ( Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE , 1997), 81–94.
81.
81 M. E. Vermeulen and C. W. Minor, “Context of career decisions: women reared in a rural community,” Career Development Quarterly46, no. 3 (1998): 230–245 .
82.
82 Helen Farmer et al., “Gender differences in science, math, and technology careers: prestige level and Holland interest type,” Journal of Vocational Behavior53 (1998): 73–96 .
83.
83 Eccles, “Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions” (cit. no. 78), p. 141-141.
84.
84 Ibid.
85.
85 Angela B. Ginorio, et al., “The feminist and the scientist: one and the same,” Women’s Studies Quarterly1/2 (2000): 271–295 ; Rosser, Re-Engineering Female Friendly Science (cit. no. 76); Thom, Balancing the Equation: Where are Women and Girls in Science, Engineering and Technology?(cit. no. 35).
86.
86 National Science Foundation, Land of Plenty: Diversity as America’s Competitive Edge in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2000 (cit. no. 23).
87.
87 Sue V. Rosser and Mireille Zieseniss, “Career issues and laboratory climates: different challenges and opportunities for women engineers and scientists (survey of fiscal year 1997 POWRE awardees),” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering6 (2000): 95–114 .
88.
88 National Science Foundation, Land of Plenty: Diversity as America’s Competitive Edge in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2000, p. 58-58 (cit. no. 23).
