Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Joint modeling and within-cluster resampling are two approaches that are used for analyzing correlated data with informative cluster sizes. Motivated by a developmental toxicity study, we examined the performances and validity of these two approaches in testing covariate effects in generalized linear mixed-effects models. We show that the joint modeling approach is robust to the misspecification of cluster size models in terms of Type I and Type II errors when the corresponding covariates are not included in the random effects structure; otherwise, statistical tests may be affected. We also evaluate the performance of the within-cluster resampling procedure and thoroughly investigate the validity of it in modeling correlated data with informative cluster sizes. We show that within-cluster resampling is a valid alternative to joint modeling for cluster-specific covariates, but it is invalid for time-dependent covariates. The two methods are applied to a developmental toxicity study that investigated the effect of exposure to diethylene glycol dimethyl ether.

Keywords

Joint random effects model nonignorable cluster size hypothesis testing power within-cluster resampling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dunson

Chen

Harry

. A Bayesian approach for joint modeling of cluster size and subunit-specific outcomes. Biometrics 2003; 59: 521–530.

Gueorguieva

. Comments about joint modeling of cluster size and binary and continuous subunit-specific outcomes. Biometrics 2005; 61: 862–866.

Chen

Zhang

Albert

. A joint modeling approach to data with informative cluster size: robustness to the cluster size model. Stat Med 2011; 30: 1825–1836.

Collins

Gray

Bucher

. Transforming environmental health protection. Science 2008; 319: 906–907.

Litière

Alonso

Molenberghs

. Type I and Type II error under random effects misspecification in generalized linear mixed models. Biometrics 2007; 63: 1038–1044.

Neuhaus

McCulloch

Boylan

. A note on Type II error under random effects misspecification in generalized linear mixed models. Biometrics 2010; 67: 654–660.

Neuhaus

McCulloch

. Estimation of covariate effects in generalized linear mixed models with informative cluster sizes. Biometrika 2011; 98: 147–162.

Hoffman

Sen

Weinberg

. Within-cluster resampling. Biometrika 2001; 88: 1121–1134.

Follmann

Proschan

Leifer

. Multiple outputation: inference for complex clustered data by averaging analyses from independent data. Biometrics 2003; 59: 420–429.

10.

Williamson

Datta

Satten

. Marginal analyses of clustered data when cluster size is informative. Biometrics 2003; 59: 36–42.

11.

Benhin

Rao

Scott

. Mean estimating equation approach to analysing cluster-correlated data with nonignorable cluster sizes. Biometrika 2005; 92: 435–450.

12.

Ten Have

Chinchilli

. Two-stage negative binomial and overdispersed Poisson models for clustered developmental toxicity data with random cluster size. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 1998; 3: 75–98.

13.

White

. Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica 1982; 50: 1–25.

14.

Væth

. On the use of Wald’s test in exponential families. Int Stat Rev 1985; 53: 199–214.

15.

Hauck

Donner

. Wald’s test as applied to hypotheses in logit analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 1977; 72: 851–853.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.23 MB