Recent increases in institutional childcare utilization among Korean mothers, particularly stay-at-home mothers, have transformed daily scheduling patterns. Analysis of Korean Time Use Survey data from 2009, 2014, and 2019 (N = 2517) examined how mothers with children aged 5 and younger organize their childcare and non-childcare activities during weekdays, tracked changes in these patterns, and investigated their relationship with subjective well-being. Through sequence and cluster analysis with dynamic Hamming distance, multinomial logistic regression, and path analysis, distinct scheduling clusters and their prevalence over time were identified. Results show that recent waves of stay-at-home mothers increasingly adopted scheduling patterns characterized by more uninterrupted time for housework, leisure, and personal care activities, which positively influenced their well-being through reduced time pressure. However, employed mothers showed no significant changes in their scheduling patterns during this period, despite the evolving societal context of childcare arrangements. While this trend represents meaningful progress for stay-at-home mothers who are often vulnerable to the stress of full-time caregiving, the unchanged situation of employed mothers warrants continued attention to ensure equitable improvements in daily scheduling patterns across different maternal employment statuses.
AisenbreySFasangAE (2010) New life for old ideas: The “second wave” of sequence analysis bringing the “course” back into the life course. Sociological Methods & Research38(3): 420–462.
2.
BianchiSM (2000) Maternal employment and time with children: Dramatic change or surprising continuity?Demography37(4): 401–414.
3.
CarriganMDuberleyJ (2013) Time triage: Exploring the temporal strategies that support entrepreneurship and motherhood. Time & Society22(1): 92–118.
4.
ChaSEPapastefanouG (2020) Understanding the time pressure of working parents: How parents’ childcare time impacts the diurnal organization of activities and the sense of feeling rushed. Journal of Comparative Family Studies51(1): 110–130.
5.
ChesleyNFloodS (2017) Signs of change? At-home and breadwinner parents’ housework and child-care time. Journal of Marriage and Family79(2): 511–534.
6.
CraigLBrownJEJunJ (2020) Fatherhood, motherhood and time pressure in Australia, Korea, and Finland. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society27(2): 312–336.
DunatchikASpeightS (2020) Re-examining how partner co-presence and multitasking affect parents’ enjoyment of childcare and housework. Sociological Science7: 268–290.
9.
FisherGGBulgerCASmithCS (2009) Beyond work and family: A measure of work/nonwork interference and enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology14(4): 441–456.
10.
FloodSMeierAMusickK (2020) Reassessing parents’ leisure quality with direct measures of well-being: Do children detract from parents’ down time?Journal of Marriage and Family82(4): 1326–1339.
11.
FloreanDEngelhardt-WölflerH (2020) His and her working hours and well-being in Germany: A longitudinal crossover-spillover analysis. Journal of Family Research32(2): 249–273.
12.
GreenhausJHPowellGN (2006) When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review31(1): 72–92.
13.
HägerstrandT (1970) What about people in regional science?Papers of the Regional Science Association24(1): 6–21.
14.
HellgrenM (2014) Extracting more knowledge from time diaries?Social Indicators Research119: 1517–1534.
KagaYBarnettSBennettJ (2012) Integration and coordination of early childhood care and education in the Republic of Korea. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy6: 1–20.
17.
KimEJParishSL (2020) Family-supportive workplace policies and South Korean mothers’ perceived work-family conflict: Accessibility matters. Asian Population Studies16(2): 167–182.
18.
KimmelJConnellyR (2007) Mothers’ time choices: Caregiving, leisure, home production, and paid work. Journal of Human Resources42(3): 643–681.
19.
Korea Institute of Child Care and Education (2009) 2009 national childcare survey: A household Census. Available at: https://repo.kicce.re.kr/handle/2019.oak/1365 (accessed 14 December 2024).
20.
Korea Institute of Child Care and Education (2018) 2018 national childcare survey: A household Census. Available at: https://repo.kicce.re.kr/handle/2019.oak/1591 (accessed 14 December 2024).
21.
KramerKZKramerA (2016) At-home father families in the United States: Gender ideology, human capital, and unemployment. Journal of Marriage and Family78(5): 1315–1331.
22.
LeeSH (2022) Why the initiative of free childcare failed to be an effective policy implementation of universal childcare in South Korea. Journal of Asian Public Policy15(3): 558–574.
23.
LeeY (2023) Undoing gender or selection effects?: Fathers’ uptake of leave and involvement in housework and childcare in South Korea. Journal of Family Studies29(5): 2430–2458.
24.
LeeYHLeeJY (2021) Issues and future directions for Korean childcare policy. Asian Education and Development Studies10(3): 469–480.
25.
LesnardL (2010) Setting cost in optimal matching to uncover contemporaneous socio-temporal patterns. Sociological Methods & Research38(3): 389–419.
26.
LiaoTFBolanoDBrzinsky-FayC, et al. (2022) Sequence analysis: Its past, present, and future. Social Science Research107: 102772.
27.
MacindoeHAbbottA (2004) Sequence analysis and optimal matching techniques for social science data. In: HardyMBrymanA (eds) Handbook of Data Analysis. London: Sage, 387–406. 10.4135/9781848608184.n17
28.
MaherJ (2009) Accumulating care: Mothers beyond the conflicting temporalities of caring and work. Time & Society18(2-3): 231–245.
29.
Martínez-PastorJIJurado-GuerreroTFernández-LozanoI, et al. (2024) Caring fathers in Europe: Toward universal caregiver families?Gender, Work & Organization31(5): 1616–1638.
30.
MeierAMusickKFloodS, et al. (2016) Mothering experiences: How single parenthood and employment structure the emotional valence of parenting. Demography53(3): 649–674.
31.
MilkieMANomaguchiKMDennyKE (2015) Does the amount of time mothers spend with children or adolescents matter?Journal of Marriage and Family77(2): 355–372.
32.
MindrilaD (2010) Maximum likelihood (ML) and diagonally weighted least squares (DWLS) estimation procedures: A comparison of estimation bias with ordinal and multivariate non-normal data. International Journal for Digital Society1(1): 60–66.
33.
MusickKMeierAFloodS (2016) How parents fare: Mothers’ and fathers’ subjective well-being in time with children. American Sociological Review81(5): 1069–1095.
34.
NockoldsD (2016) Acceleration for working sole parents: Squeezed between institutional temporalities and routinised parenting practices. Time & Society25(3): 513–532.
35.
NomaguchiKJohnsonW (2016) Parenting stress among low-income and working-class fathers: The role of employment. Journal of Family Issues37(11): 1535–1557.
36.
NomaguchiKMBrownSL (2011) Parental strains and rewards among mothers: The role of education. Journal of Marriage and Family73(3): 621–636.
37.
OfferS (2014) Time with children and employed parents’ emotional well-being. Social Science Research47: 192–203.
38.
OfferSSchneiderB (2011) Revisiting the gender gap in time-use patterns: Multitasking and well-being among mothers and fathers in dual-earner families. American Sociological Review76(6): 809–833.
39.
PerroneKMCivilettoCL (2004) The impact of life role salience on life satisfaction. Journal of Employment Counseling41(3): 105–116.
40.
RuppannerLMaltbyBHewittB, et al. (2021) Parents’ sleep across weekdays and weekends: The influence of work, housework, and childcare time. Journal of Family Issues: 1–27.
41.
Statistics Korea (2009) 2009 Time use survey report. Available at: https://kostat.go.kr (accessed 20 August 2025).
42.
Statistics Korea (2019) 2019 Time use survey report. Available at: https://kostat.go.kr (accessed 20 August 2025).
43.
Statistics Korea (2024) Population and household. Available at: https://kostat.go.kr (accessed 20 August 2025).
44.
StonePJ (1972) The analysis of time-budget data. In: SzalaiA (eds) The Use of Time: Daily Activities of Urban and Suburban Populations in Twelve Countries. Den Haag: Mouton, 249–264.
45.
StuderM (2013) Weighted Cluster library manual: A practical guide to creating typologies of trajectories in the social sciences with R. LIVES Working Papers 24, pp. 1–32. 10.12682/lives.2296-1658.2013.24
46.
StuderMRitschardG (2016) What matters in differences between life trajectories: A comparative review of sequence dissimilarity measures. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society179(2): 481–511.
47.
VagniG (2020) The social stratification of time use patterns. The British Journal of Sociology71(4): 658–679.
48.
YudaTK (2020) Reappraisal of the political approach on east Asian welfare state development: The case of childcare expansion in South Korea. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy40(7/8): 677–693.
49.
ZhangZHamagamiFGrimmKJ, et al. (2015) Using R package RAMpath for tracing SEM path diagrams and conducting complex longitudinal data analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal22(1): 132–147.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
