Given the known relationship between eveningness and sociosexuality among females, the aims of this study were: (a) to analyze this relationship in four countries using midsleep time on free days and morning affect measures of morningness–eveningness and (b) to test the role of dark personality and other relevant control variables in this relationship. Data from 1483 females were collected from Poland, Spain, Germany, and Slovakia. Adjusting for age, relationship status, country, age at first intercourse, and Dark Triad traits, the most universal findings were that females with later sleep timing were less sociosexually restricted (3% shared variance with sociosexuality). Sleep timing played a greater role in sociosexuality compared to morning affect. This finding showed that Dark Triad personality is not involved in association between morningness–eveningness and sociosexuality and it added a value to the importance of sleep–wake habits in mating preferences.
CohenJ (1992)A power primer.Psychological Bulletin112: 155–159.
4.
CzarnaAZJonasonPKDufnerM, et al. (2016)
The dirty dozen scale: Validation of a Polish version and extension of the nomological net. Frontiers in Psychology7: 1–12
5.
Di MiliaLRandlerC (2013)
The stability of the morning affect scale across age and gender. Personality and Individual Differences54: 298–301.
6.
Díaz-MoralesJFEscribanoCJankowskiKS (2015)
Chronotype and time-of-day effects on mood during school day. Chronobiology International32: 37–42.
7.
Díaz MoralesJFSánchez-LópezMP (2004)
Composite and preferences scales of morningness: Reliability and factor invariance in adult and university samples.The Spanish Journal of Psychology7: 93–100.
8.
EllisonPT (2003) On fertile ground: A natural history of human reproduction. Harvard University Press.
9.
FosterJDShriraICampbellWK (2006)
Theoretical models of narcissism, sexuality, and relationship commitment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships23: 367–386.
10.
FurnhamARichardsSCPaulhusDL (2013)
The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass7: 199–216.
11.
GangestadSWSimpsonJA (2000)
The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism.Behavioral and Brain Sciences23: 573–587.
12.
GunawardaneKGCCustanceDMPifferD (2011)
Evidence of sexual selection for evening orientation in human males: A cross cultural study in Italy and Sri Lanka.IBC3: 13.
13.
HoltzmanNSStrubeMJ (2013)
Above and beyond short-term mating, long-term mating is uniquely tied to human personality. Evolutionary Psychology11: 1101–1129.
14.
JankowskiKS (2015)
Composite scale of morningness: Psychometric properties, validity with Munich ChronoType Questionnaire and age/sex differences in Poland.European Psychiatry30: 166–171.
15.
JankowskiKSDiaz-MoralesJFRandlerC (2014a)
Chronotype, gender, and time for sex.Chronobiology International31: 911–916.
16.
JankowskiKSDíaz-MoralesJFVollmerC, et al. (2014b)
Morningness–eveningness and sociosexuality: Evening females are less restricted than morning ones. Personality and Individual Differences68: 13–17.
17.
JankowskiKSVollmerCLinkeM, et al. (2014c)
Differences in sun time within the same time zone affect sleep–wake and social rhythms, but not morningness preference: Findings from a Polish–German comparison study.Time & Society23: 258–276.
18.
Jankowski KS (2016) Charakterystyka psychometryczna polskiej wersji zrewidowanego Inwentarza Orientacji Socjoseksualnej (SOI-R). In: Rynkiewicz A, Jankowski KS and Oniszczenko W (eds) Wybrane metody i paradygmaty badawcze w psychologii. Warsaw: Scholar, pp.77–92.
19.
JonasonPKJonesALyonsM (2013)
Creatures of the night: Chronotypes and the Dark Triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences55: 538–541.
20.
JonasonPKKavanaghP (2010)
The dark side of love: Love styles and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences49: 606–610.
21.
JonasonPKLiNPWebsterGD, et al. (2009)
The dark triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality23: 5–18.
22.
JonasonPKWebsterGD (2010)
The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad.Psychological Assessment22: 420–432.
23.
JöreskogKGSörbomD (1993) LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Scientific Software International. The publisher is Scientific Software International which is located in Lincolnwood, USA.
24.
KüfnerACPDufnerMBackMD (2015)
Das Dreckige Dutzend und die Niederträchtigen Neun. Diagnostica61: 76–91.
25.
MaestripieriD (2014)
YY night owl women are similar to men in their relationship orientation, risk-taking propensities, and cortisol levels: Implications for the adaptive significance and evolution of eveningness. Evolutionary Psychology12: 130–147.
26.
MarcinkowskaUMHelleSLyonsMT (2015)
Dark traits: Sometimes hot, and sometimes not? Female preferences for Dark Triad faces depend on sociosexuality and contraceptive use. Personality and Individual Differences86: 369–373.
27.
MillerJDFewLRSeibertLA, et al. (2012)
An examination of the dirty dozen measure of psychopathy: A cautionary tale about the costs of brief measures. Psychological Assessment24: 1048–1053.
28.
Penke L (2011) Revised sociosexual orientation inventory. Handbook of sexuality-related measures: 622–625.
29.
PenkeLAsendorpfJB (2008)
Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95: 1113–1135.
30.
PifferD (2010)
Sleep patterns and sexual selection: An evolutionary approach. Mankind Quarterly50: 361.
31.
PonziDHenryAKubickiK, et al. (2015)
The slow and fast life histories of early birds and night owls: Their future- or present-orientation accounts for their sexually monogamous or promiscuous tendencies.Evolution and Human Behavior36: 117–122.
32.
RahafarARandlerCCastellanaI, et al. (2017)
How does chronotype mediate gender effect on Dark Triad?Personality and Individual Differences108: 35–39.
33.
RandlerCDíaz-MoralesJFRahafarA, et al. (2016a)
Morningness–eveningness and amplitude – Development and validation of an improved composite scale to measure circadian preference and stability (MESSi).Chronobiology International33: 832–848.
34.
RandlerCEbenhöhNFischerA, et al. (2012)
Eveningness is related to men’s mating success. Personality and Individual Differences53: 263–267.
35.
RandlerCJankowskiKSRahafarA, et al. (2016b) Sociosexuality, morningness–eveningness, and sleep duration. SAGE Open 6: 1–8.
36.
RandlerCProkopPSahuS, et al. (2015)
Cross-cultural comparison of seven morningness and sleep–wake measures from Germany, India and Slovakia. International Journal of Psychology50: 279–287.
37.
RoennebergTKuehnleTPramstallerPP, et al. (2004)
A marker for the end of adolescence. Current Biology14: R1038–R1039.
38.
RoennebergTWirz-JusticeAMerrowM (2003)
Life between clocks: Daily temporal patterns of human chronotypes. Journal of Biological Rhythms18: 80–90.
39.
SchallerMMurrayDR (2008)
Pathogens, personality, and culture: Disease prevalence predicts worldwide variability in sociosexuality, extraversion, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95: 212–221.
40.
SchmittDP (2005)
Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating.Behavioral and Brain Sciences28: 247–275.
41.
SchmittDPFullerRC (2015)
On the varieties of sexual experience: Cross-cultural links between religiosity and human mating strategies. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality7: 314–326.
42.
SchmittDPShackelfordTK (2008)
Big five traits related to short-term mating: From personality to promiscuity across 46 nations. Evolutionary Psychology6: 246–282.
43.
SmithCSReillyCMidkiffK (1989)
Evaluation of three circadian rhythm questionnaires with suggestions for an improved measure of morningness. Journal of Applied Psychology74: 728–738.
44.
TonettiLFabbriMNataleV (2008)
Sex difference in sleep-time preference and sleep need: A cross-sectional survey among Italian pre-adolescents, adolescents, and adults.Chronobiology International25: 745–759.
