Why did Local Exchange and Trading Schemes (LETS) fail to realise their promise in 1990s Britain? This article argues that a core reason was the inability to make community labour, a concept at the heart of LETS logic, function as a self-perpetuating dynamic, in which community bonding would encourage trade and trade in turn would build community. In exploring reasons for this failure, the article focuses on the centrifugal pull of two contrasting temporalities: community time and labour-market time. And in understanding why these two, normative, temporal orders were unable to combine, cohere or simply to coexist, the article addresses three factors: failure in design; individual member responsibility; and wider temporal pressures.
AdamB (2003) When time is money: Contested rationalities of time in the theory and practice of work. Theoria, 102: 94–125.
2.
AldridgeTJPattersonA (2002) LETS get real: Constraints on the development of Local Exchange Trading Schemes. Area, 34(4): 370–381.
3.
AldridgeTTookeJLeeRLeyshonAThriftNWilliamsC (2001) Recasting work: The example of local exchange trading schemes. Work, Employment & Society, 15(3): 565–579.
Bird-DavidNDarrA (2009) Commodity, gift and mass-gift: On gift–commodity hybrids in advanced mass consumption cultures. Economy and Society, 38(2): 304–325.
6.
BourdieuP (2000) Pascalian Meditations, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
BoyleD (2002) The Money Changers: Currency Reform from Aristotle to E-Cash, London: Earthscan Publications.
8.
BrannenJ (2005) Time and the negotiation of work–family boundaries: Autonomy or illusion?Time and Society, 14(1): 113–131.
9.
CooperD (2004) Challenging Diversity: Rethinking Equality and the Value of Difference, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
CooperD (2007) Opening up ownership: Community belonging, belongings, and the productive life of property. Law & Social Inquiry, 32(3): 625–1095.
11.
CooperD (2009) Caring for sex and the power of attentive action: Governance, drama, and conflict in building a queer feminist bathhouse. Signs, 35(1): 105–130.
12.
CrowGPAllanG (1995) Community types, community typologies and community time. Time & Society, 4(2): 147–166.
13.
DaunceyG (1996) After the Crash: The Emergence of the Rainbow Economy, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Green Print.
14.
de Sousa SantosB (1987) Law: A map of misreading. Toward a postmodern conception of law. Journal of Law and Society, 14(3): 279–302.
15.
DobsonR (1993) Bringing the Economy Home from the Market, Montreal: Black Rose Books.
16.
EvansMS (2009) Zelizer’s theory of money and the case of local currencies. Environment and Planning A, 41(5): 1026–1041.
17.
GrabhamE (2010) Governing permanence: Trans subjects, time, and the Gender Recognition Act. Social & Legal Studies, 19(1): 107–126.
18.
GranovetterM (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360–1380.
19.
GrossD (1985) Temporality and the modern state. Theory and Society, 14(1): 53–82.
20.
HopeW (2009) Conflicting temporalities: State, nation, economy and democracy under global capitalism. Time & Society, 18(1): 62–85.
21.
JurczykK (1998) Time in women’s everyday lives. Time & Society, 7(2–3): 283–308.
22.
KenyonE (2000) Time, temporality and the dynamics of community. Time & Society, 9(1): 21–41.
23.
LeccardiC (1996) Rethinking social time: Feminist perspectives. Time & Society, 5(2): 169–186.
24.
LeeRLeyshonAAldridgeTTookeJWilliamsCThriftN (2004) Making geographies and histories? Constructing local circuits of value. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22(4): 595–617.
MacaulayS(2003) The real and the paper deal: Empirical pictures of relationships, complexity and the urge for transparent simple rules. In: CampbellDCollinsHWightmanJ (eds) Implicit Dimensions of Contract: Discrete, Relational, and Network Contracts, Oxford: Hart, pp. 51–102.
29.
MacdonaldRSandomierskiD (2006) Against nomopolies. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 57(4): 610–633.
30.
MaherJM (2009) Accumulating care: Mothers beyond the conflicting temporalities of caring and work. Time & Society, 18(2–3): 231–245.
31.
MayJThriftNJ (2001) Timespace: Geographies of Temporality, London: Routledge.
32.
MelissarisE (2004) The more the merrier? A new take on legal pluralism. Social & Legal Studies, 13(1): 57–79.
33.
MerrySE (1988) Legal pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22(5): 869–896.
34.
MooreG (2004) The Fair Trade movement: Parameters, issues and future research. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1): 73–86.
35.
NorthP (1999) Explorations in heterotopia: Local Exchange Trading Schemes (LETS) and the micropolitics of money and livelihood. Environment and Planning D, 17(1): 69–86.
36.
NorthP (2006) Alternative Currency Movements as a Challenge to Globalisation? A Case Study of Manchester's Local Currency Networks, Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
37.
NorthP (2007) Money and Liberation: The Micropolitics of Alternative Currency Movements, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
38.
O’DohertyRDurrschmidtJJowersPPurdueD (1999) Local exchange and trading schemes: A useful strand of community economic development policy?Environment and Planning A, 31(9): 1639–1653.
39.
PacioneM (1997) Local exchange trading systems as a response to the globalisation of capitalism. Urban Studies, 34(8): 1179–1197.
40.
PurdueDDürrschmidtJJowersPO’DohertyR (1997) DIY culture and extended milieux: LETS, veggie boxes and festivals. The Sociological Review, 45(4): 645–667.
41.
RaddonM (2003) Community and Money: Men and Women Making Change, Montreal: Black Rose Books.
42.
RobertsonJ (2005) The New Economics of Sustainable Development – A Briefing for Policy Makers. Initially published by Kogan Page, London, for the European Commission (1999 edn).
43.
SeyfangG (2001a) Community currencies: Small change for a green economy. Environment and Planning A, 33(6): 975–996.
44.
SeyfangG (2001b) Working for the Fenland dollar: An evaluation of local exchange trading schemes as an informal employment strategy to tackle social exclusion. Work, Employment & Society, 15(3): 581–593.
45.
SeyfangG (2004) Time banks: Rewarding community self-help in the inner city?Community Development Journal, 39(1): 62–71.
46.
SeyfangGSmithK (2002) The Time of Our Lives: Using Time Banking for Neighbourhood Renewal and Community Capacity Building, London: New Economics Foundation.
47.
ShephardL (1997) LETS Info Pack, 8th edn. London: LETSlink UK.
48.
SmartA (1993) Gifts, bribes, and guanxi: A reconsideration of Bourdieu’s social capital. Cultural Anthropology, 8(3): 388–408.
49.
SmetsPten KateS (2008) Let’s meet! Let’s exchange! LETS as an instrument for linking asylum seekers and the host community in the Netherlands. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21(3): 326–346.
50.
TamanahaB (1993) The folly of the social scientific concept of legal pluralism. Journal of Law and Society, 20(2): 192–217.
51.
ThomeL (1996) Local exchange trading systems in the United Kingdom: A case of re-embedding?Environment and Planning A, 28(8): 1361–1376.
52.
TietzeSMussonG (2002) When ‘work’ meets ‘home’: Temporal flexibility as lived experience. Time and Society, 11(2–3): 315–334.
53.
VincentS (2003) Preserving domesticity: Reading tupperware in women’s changing domestic, social and economic roles. Canadian Review of Sociology & Anthropology, 40(2): 171–196.
54.
WilliamsC (1996) Informal sector responses to unemployment: An evaluation of the potential of Local Exchange Trading Systems (LETS). Work, Employment & Society, 10(2): 341–359.
55.
WilliamsCWindebankJ (2001) Reconceptualising paid informal exchange: Some lessons from English cities. Environment and Planning A, 33(1): 121–140.
56.
WilliamsCAldridgeTLeeRLeyshonAThriftNTookeJ (2001) Bridges into work? An evaluation of Local Exchange and Trading Schemes (LETS). Policy Studies, 22(2): 119–132.
57.
WilliamsCAldridgeTTookeJ(2003) Alternative exchange spaces. In: LeyshonALeeRWilliamsC (eds) Alternative Economic Spaces, London: Sage, pp. 151–167.
