The temporal dimensions of Internet use have been primarily examined as daily or weekly totals in the literature, which ignores other important structural dimensions of time and the contextual nature of Internet use. Using event history analysis, this study provides a nuanced analysis of the timing and duration of Internet use with an Internet-activity diary dataset collected in Columbus (Ohio, USA) in 2003–2004. Compared to the analysis of daily totals, the fine-grained analysis reveals that besides social, demographic, and geographic factors, the attributes of Internet episodes, such as activity purpose, also significantly affect both the timing and duration, and these temporal dimensions of Internet use are also connected.
AllisonPD (1984) Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Barzilai-NahonK (2006) Gaps and bits: Conceptualizing measurements for digital divide/s. The Information Society. 22(5): 269–278.
6.
BhatCRKoppelmanFS (1999) A retrospective and prospective survey of time-use research. Transportation. 26: 119–139.
7.
BhatCRMisraR (2002) A representation and analysis framework for analysis of the activity-travel patterns of nonworkers: Organization of activities. Transportation Research Record. 1777: 16–24.
8.
BhatCRSteedJL (2002) A continuous-time model of departure time choice for urban shopping trips. Transportation Research B. 36: 207–224.
9.
BoaseJWellmanB(2006) Personal relationships: On and off the Internet. In: PerlmanDVangelistiAL (eds) Handbook of Personal Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 709–723.
10.
BurnettPHansonS (1982) The analysis of travel as an example of complex human behavior in spatially-constrained situations: Definitions and measurement issues. Transportation Research A. 16: 87–102.
11.
CoxD (1972) Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B. 34: 187–202.
12.
CrangMCrosbyTGrahamS (2006) Variable geometries of connection: Urban digital divides and the use of Information Technology. Urban Studies. 43: 2551–2570.
13.
DavidsonELCottonSR (2003) ‘Connection discrepancies: unmasking further layers of the digital divide’. First Monday. 8(3):
14.
DholakiaRR (2006) Gender and IT in the household: Evolving patterns of Internet use in the United States. The Information Society. 22: 231–240.
15.
DijstMKwanM-PSchwanenT (2009) Decomposing, transforming, and contextualising (e)-shopping. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 36: 195–203.
16.
DiMaggioPHargittaiECelesteCShaferS(2004) From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. In: NeckermanKM (eds) Social Inequality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 355–400.
17.
EttemaDSchwanenTTimmermansH (2007) The effect of location, mobility and socio-demographic factors on task and time allocation of households. Transportation. 34: 89–105.
18.
FaragSSchwanenTDijstMFaberJ (2007) Shopping online and/or in-store? A structural equation model of the relationship between e-shopping and in-store shopping. Transportation Research A. 41: 125–141.
19.
GoldfarbAPrinceJ (2008) Internet adoption and usage patterns are different: Implications for the digital divide. Information Economics and Policy. 20(1): 2–15.
20.
HargittaiEShaferS (2006) Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly. 87(2): 432–448.
21.
HelsperEJ (2010) Gendered Internet use across generations and life stages. Communications Research. 37(3): 352–374.
22.
KitamuraRChenCPendyalaRM (1997) Generation of synthetic daily activity-travel patterns. Transportation Research Record. 1607: 154–162.
23.
KrautRPattersonMLundmarkVKieslerSMukopadhyayTScherlisM (1998) Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?American Psychologist. 53: 1017–1031.
24.
KwanM-P (1999) Gender, the home-work link, and space-time patterns of non-employment activities. Economic Geography. 75(4): 370–394.
25.
KwanM-P (2002) Time, information technologies, and the geographies of everyday life. Urban Geography. 23: 471–482.
26.
KwanM-PDijstMSchwanenT (2007) The interactions between ICT and human activity-travel behavior. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 41: 121–124.
27.
LivingstoneSHelsperS (2007) Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society. 9: 671–696.
28.
LokeYJFooCS (2010) Computer ownership and home usage: The case of Malaysia. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 34: 96–104.
29.
MadgeCO’ConnorH (2006) Parenting gone wired: Empowerment of new mothers on the Internet?Social & Cultural Geography. 7: 199–220.
30.
MayJThriftN (2001) Timespace: Geographies of Temporality. London: Routledge.
NiemeierDAMoritaJA (1996) Duration of trip-making activities: A survival analysis. Transportation. 23: 353–371.
33.
PendyalaRMBhatCR (2004) An exploration of the relationship between timing and duration of maintenance activities. Transportation. 31: 429–456.
34.
PinjariARBhatCR (2010) A multiple discrete–continuous nested extreme value (MDCNEV) model: Formulation and application to non-worker activity time-use and timing behavior on weekdays. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 44: 562–583.
35.
RiceREKatzJE (2003) Comparing Internet and mobile phone usage: Digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts. Telecommunications Policy. 27: 597–623.
36.
ReichmanS(1976) Travel adjustment and lifestyles: A behavioral approach. In: StopherPMeyburgA (eds) Behavioral-Travel Demand Models. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
37.
RenFKwanM-P (2009a) The impact of geographic context on e-shopping behavior. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 36: 262–278.
38.
RenFKwanM-P (2009b) The impact of the Internet on human activity-travel patterns: Analysis of gender differences using multi-group structural equation models. Journal of Transport Geography. 17: 440–450.
39.
SalomonI (1986) Telecommunications and travel relationships. Transportation Research A. 20: 223–238.
40.
SchönfelderS (2006) Urban Rhythms: Modelling the Rhythms of Individual Travel Behaviour. Zurich: ETH.
41.
SchwanenT (2004) The determinants of shopping duration on workdays in the Netherlands. Journal of Transport Geography. 12: 35–48.
42.
SchwanenT (2006) On ‘arriving on time’, but what is ‘on time’?Geoforum. 37(6): 882–894.
43.
SchwanenTKwanM-PRenF (2008) How fixed is fixed? Gendered rigidity of space–time constraints and geographies of everyday activities. Geoforum. 39: 2109–2121.
44.
ShklovskiIKieslerSKrautR(2006) The Internet and social interaction: A meta-analysis and critique of studies, 1995–2003. In: KrautRBryninMKieslerS (eds) Computers, Phones, and the Internet: Domesticating Information Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 251–264.
45.
SinghS (2001) Gender and the use of the Internet at home. New Media & Society. 3(4): 395–416.
46.
SpennemannDHR (2006) The Internet and daily life in Australia: An exploration. The Information Society. 22: 101–110.
47.
ValentineGHollowaySL (2002) Cyberkids? Exploring children’s identities and social networks in on-line and off-line worlds. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 92: 302–319.
48.
Van DijkJAGM (2006) Digital divide research, achievements and shortcoming. Poetics. 34: 221–235.
49.
Van DijkJHackerK (2003) The digital divide as a complex dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society. 19: 315–326.
50.
WangHWellmanB (2010) Social connectivity in America: Changes in adult friendship network size from 2002 to 2007. American Behavioral Scientist. 53: 1148–1169.
51.
WarschauerM (2003) Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52.
WeberJ (2003) Individual accessibility and distance from major employment centers: An examination using space-time measures. Journal of Geographical Systems. 5: 51–70.
53.
ZillienNHargittaiE (2009) Digital distinction: Status-specific types of Internet usage. Social Science Quarterly. 90: 274–291.
