This study examines the link between dyadic conflicts in goal-relevant activities and well-being using simultaneous daily life assessments from 59 employed parents who participated in a one-week time-sampling study. Findings indicate that partnerships characterized by conflicts regarding the simultaneous pursuit of goal-relevant activities are associated with low spousal affective well-being and psychological functioning as compared to partnerships allowing for a simultaneous pursuit of goals. The results of this study speak to the importance of investigating the interdependence among the daily activities of multiple actors when examining well-being and psychological functioning in employed parents.
AustinJTVancouverJB (1996) Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin120(3): 338–375.
2.
BirdittKSFingermanKLAlmeidaDM (2005) Age differences in exposure and reactions to interpersonal tension: A daily diary study. Psychology & Aging20(2): 330–340.
3.
BolgerNDavisARafaeliE (2003) Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology54(1): 579–616.
4.
BrykASand RaudenbushSW (1992) Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods, Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
5.
CampbellLKashyDA (2002) Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide. Personal Relationship9(3): 327–342.
6.
CantorNAcker Mand Cook-FlannaganC (1992) Conflict and preoccupation in the intimacy life task. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology63(4): 644–655.
7.
CantorNKemmelmeierMBastenJPrenticeDA (2002) Life-task pursuit in social groups: Balancing self-exploration and social integration. Self & Identity1(2): 177–184.
8.
CohenSWillsTA (1985) Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin98(2): 310–357.
9.
DienerESuhEMLucasRESmithHL (1999) Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin125(2): 276–302.
10.
DriskellJESalasEJohnstonJ (1999) Does stress lead to a loss of team perspective?Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice3(4): 291–302.
11.
DurhamCCKnightDLockeEA (1997) Effects of leader role, team-set goal difficulty, efficacy, and tactics on team effectiveness. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes72(2): 203–231.
12.
FeeneyBC (2004) A secure base: Responsive support of goal strivings and exploration in adult intimate relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology87(5): 631–648.
13.
GowenCR (1986) Managing work group performance by individual goals and group goals for an interdependent group task. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management735–27.
14.
HamermeshDS (1996) The timing of work time: Evidence from the U.S. and Germany. Konjunkturpolitik42(1): 1–22.
15.
HeathCLarrickRPWuG (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology38(1): 79–109.
HookerKFieseBHJenkinsLMorfeiMZSchwaglerJ (1996) Possible selves among parents of infants and preeschoolers. Developmental Psychology32(3): 542–550.
18.
KlumbPLHoppmannCAStaatsM (2006) Division of labor in german dual-earner families: Testing equity theoretical hypotheses. Journal of Marriage and Family68(4): 870–882.
19.
KossekEEOzekiC (1998) Work-family conflict, policies, and the job-life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior-human resources research. Journal of Applied Psychology83(2): 139–149.
20.
MooreWE (1963) Man, time and society, New York, NY: Wiley.
21.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2001) Employment Outlook, Paris: France; OECD.
22.
OechsleMGeisslerB (2003) Between Paid Work and Private Commitments: Women's perceptions of time and life planning in young adulthood. Time & Society12(1): 79–98.
23.
RiedigerMFreundAM (2004) Interference and facilitation among personal goals: Differencial associations with subjective well-being and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin30(12): 1511–1523.
24.
RookKS (1998) Investigating the positive and negative sides of personal relationships: Through a lens darkly? In: SpitzbergBHCupachWR (eds) The dark side of close relationships, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 369–393.
25.
RyffCDKeyesCLM (1995) The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology69(4): 719–727.
26.
Salmela-AroKNurmiJ-ESaistoTHalmesmäkiE (2000) Women´s and men´s personal goals during the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology14(2): 1–16.
27.
SouthertonD (2003) ‘Squeezing Time’: Allocating practices, coordinating networks and scheduling society. Time & Society12(1): 5–25.
