The Prevalence of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Northern Ireland

Abstract

Using six sources of patient ascertainment, 467 patients were initially identified as having a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Northern Ireland. The diagnosis was subsequently altered in 45 of these, either by the patient, their family, or their physician. The corrected source data were then reanalysed by the 'capture-recapture' technique, which suggested a further 71 patients missed during the initial identification process. Eighty-eight patients underwent physical examination, and 14 were found to have a diagnosis other than SLE. A final estimated figure of 415 patients was obtained, giving a point prevalence on August 1, 1993 of 25.4 per 100000 for the Province (95% confidence interval 22.1-28.7 per 100000).

Keywords

systemic lupus erythematosus epidemiology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Samanta A. , Roy S. , Feehally J. , Symmons Dpm. The prevalence of diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus in Whites and Indian Asian immigrants in Leicester city, UK. Br J Rheumatol 1992; 31: 679-682.

Hopkinson ND , Doherty M. , Powell RJ The prevalence and incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus in Nottingham UK, 1989-1990. Br J Rheumatol 1993; 32: 110-115.

Johnson AE , Gordon C. , Palmer RG , Bacon PA The prevalence and incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus in Birmingham , England. Relationship to ethnicity and country of birth. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 4: 551-558.

Gourley IS et al. A clinical and serological comparison of familial and non-familial systemic lupus erythematosus in Ireland. Lupus 1996; 5: 288-293.

Bishop Ymm , Fienberg SE , Holland PW Estimating the size of a closed population. In: Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1975; 229-256.

LaPorte RE Assessing the human condition: capture-recapture techniques. BMJ 1994; 308: 5-6.

Baker RJ , Nelder JA GLIM System (Generalised Linear Interactive Modelling Manual). Royal Statistical Society 1978.

Tan EM et al. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1882; 25: 1271-1277.

Armitage P. , Berry G. Some other variance formulae. In: Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2nd Ed. Blackwell Scientific , Oxford 1987; Section 3.6 90-92.

10.

Seventy-Second Annual Report of The Registrar General 1993. HMSO: Belfast 1995.

11.

Nived O. , Sturfelt G. , Wollheim F. Systemic lupus erythematosus in an adult population in southern Sweden: incidence, prevalence and validity of ARA revised classification criteria. Br J Rheumatol 1985; 24: 147-154:

12.

Gudmundsson S. , Steinsson K. Systemic lupus erythematosus in Iceland 1975 through 1984. A nationwide epidemiological study in an unselected population . J Rheumatol 1990; 17: 1162-1167.

13.

Helve T. Prevalence and mortality rates of systemic lupus erythematosus and causes of death of SLE patients in Finland. Scand J Rheumatol 1985; 14: 43-46.

14.

Hopkinson N. Epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus . Ann Rheum Dis 1992; 51: 1292-1294.