Artificial intelligence competency and ethical considerations: Strategies for sustainable adoption among librarians in the fifth industrial revolution

Abstract

The emergence of the Fifth Industrial Revolution (5IR) emphasises the need for ethical, human-centric technological integration in knowledge institutions. As a result, this study investigates the competencies, usage patterns, ethical concerns, and contextual challenges influencing the sustainable adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools among librarians in Nigeria. Grounded in the Technology-Organisation-Environment (TOE) framework and guided by AI ethics principles of transparency, accountability, and fairness, the study employed a mixed-methods descriptive research design. Using a snowball sampling technique, data were gathered from 1244 librarians across Nigeria via a semi-structured online survey distributed through social media platforms (WhatsApp and Facebook). The survey combined closed-ended items and open-ended prompts to capture both quantitative and qualitative insights. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics (means, frequencies, and percentages), while qualitative responses were subjected to narrative analysis. Findings reveal that librarians predominantly use language tools such as Grammarly and Quillbot, yet demonstrate lower competence and adoption of complex tools like speech-to-text and literature analysis applications. Ethical concerns ranging from data privacy to cultural insensitivity were prevalent, along with structural barriers including poor infrastructure, lack of policies, and limited training opportunities. In conclusion, the need for comprehensive strategies to promote sustainable AI adoption remains a gap. Therefore, the study proposes a holistic strategy for sustainable AI adoption encompassing institutional policy, inclusive training, infrastructural equity, ethical education, and the localisation of AI tools. These measures are vital for aligning librarianship in Nigeria with global 5IR trends while remaining responsive to local realities.

Keywords

artificial intelligence librarianship 5IR AI ethics competency Nigeria TOE framework methodology sustainable adoption

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdulah

Zaman

Mustafa

, et al. (2024) Artificial intelligence integration in academic writing: Insights from the University of Duhok. ARO The Scientific Journal of Koya University 12(2): 194–200.

Agboke

Oladokun

(2024) Emerging technologies in academic libraries: prospects and challenges in Nigeria. Communicate Journal of Library and Information Science 26(2): 10–20.

Ajani

Tella

Salawu

, et al. (2022) Perspectives of librarians on awareness and readiness of academic libraries to integrate artificial intelligence for library operations and services in Nigeria. Internet Reference Services Quarterly 26(4): 213–230.

Al-Zahrani

(2024) From traditionalism to algorithms: Embracing artificial intelligence for effective university teaching and learning. IgMin Research 2(2): 102–112.

Baig

Yadegaridehkordi

(2025) Factors influencing academic staff satisfaction and continuous usage of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 22: 5.

Baker

(2012) The technology–organization–environment framework. In: Dwivedi

Wade

Schneberger

(eds) Information Systems Theory. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol. 28. Springer, pp. 231–245.

Bakiri

Mbembati

Tinabo

(2023) Artificial intelligence services at academic libraries in Tanzania: Awareness, adoption, and prospects. University of Dar es Salaam Library Journal 18(2): 19–35.

Bosworth

(2024) Learning about AI (for free) with the University of Johannesburg. Human Element Communications. Available at: https://www.humanelementcommunications.com/insights/learning-about-ai-for-free-with-the-university-of-johannesburg (accessed 28 March 2025).

Carnegie Mellon University Africa (n.d.) Academics - CMU-Africa. Available at: https://www.africa.engineering.cmu.edu/academics/index.html (accessed 27 March 2025).

10.

Centre for Human-Inspired Artificial Intelligence (2025) About us. University of Cambridge. Available at: https://www.chia.cam.ac.uk/about/ (accessed 27 March 2025).

11.

Coetzee

(2025) Navigating the use of publicly available artificial intelligence in tertiary education. Doctoral dissertation summary. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/126939737/Navigating_the_use_of_Publicly_Available_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Tertiary_Education/ https://www.educationhub.ac.nz (accessed 28 March 2025).

12.

Dwivedi

Hughes

Ismagilova

, et al. (2023) Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management 57: 101994.

13.

Weng

(2024) Navigating the ethical terrain of AI in education: A systematic review on framing responsible human-centered AI practices. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 7: 100–306.

14.

George

Wooden

(2023) Managing the strategic transformation of higher education through artificial intelligence. Administrative Sciences 13(9): 196.

15.

Gwagwa

Kraemer-Mbula

Rizk

, et al. (2020) Artificial intelligence (AI) deployments in Africa: Benefits, challenges and policy dimensions. The African Journal of Information and Communication (26): 1–28.

16.

Ibrahim

(2024) Assessing the knowledge and perception of artificial intelligence for teaching and research among lecturers in the faculties of Arts in Nigeria. Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science 18(2): 25–33.

17.

Kubanek

Szymoniak

(2024) Ethical challenges in AI integration: A comprehensive review of bias, privacy, and accountability issues. In: Pelegrín-Borondo

Arias-Oliva

Murata

, et al. (eds) The Leading Role of Smart Ethics in the Digital World. Springer, pp.75–85.

18.

Librarians’ Registration Council of Nigeria (2019) Standards and guidelines for academic libraries in Nigeria. Librarians’ Registration Council of Nigeria. Available at: https://lrcn.gov.ng/ova_dir/

19.

(2025) Tracing the evolution of artificial intelligence education at Stanford University. TechTrends 69(2): 447–453.

20.

Manoharan

Ashtikar

Nivedha

(2024) Integrating artificial intelligence in library management: An emerging trend. In: Senthilkumar

(ed.) AI-Assisted Library Reconstruction. IGI Global, pp.144–157.

21.

Marchena Sekli

(2024) The research landscape on generative artificial intelligence: A bibliometric analysis of transformer-based models. Kybernetes. Epub ahead of print 19 July 2024. DOI: 10.1108/k-03-2024-0554

22.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2018) The Institute Launches a College. MIT Technology Review. Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/2018/12/19/138376/the-institute-launches-a-college/ (accessed 27 March 2025).

23.

McCormack

(2023) EDUCAUSE QuickPoll results: Adopting and adapting to generative AI in higher ed tech. EDUCAUSE Review. Available at: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2023/4/educause-quickpoll-results-adopting-and-adapting-to-generative-ai-in-higher-ed-tech

24.

Ofem

Chukwujama

(2024) Sustainable artificial intelligence-driven classroom assessment in higher institutions: Lessons from Estonia, China, the USA, and Australia for Nigeria. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education 5(2): e02403.

25.

Okunlaya

Syed Abdullah

Alias

(2022) Artificial intelligence (AI) library services innovative conceptual framework for the digital transformation of university education. Library Hi Tech 40(6): 1869–1892.

26.

Okuonghae

Tunmibi

(2024) Digital competence as predictor for the motivation to use artificial intelligence technologies among librarians in Edo and delta States, Nigeria. Journal of Technology Innovations and Energy 3(1): 1–11.

27.

Pedro

Subosa

Rivas

, et al. (2019) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Development. UNESCO.

28.

Salman

Aliif

Ibrahim

, et al. (2024) Technology readiness for generative AI among academic researchers. In: 2024 International conference on innovation and intelligence for informatics, computing, and technologies (3ICT), pp.329–336.

29.

Sanusi

Olaleye

Oyelere

, et al. (2022) Investigating learners’ competencies for artificial intelligence education in an African K-12 setting. Computers and Education Open 3: 100083.

30.

Tarisayi

(2024) Strategic leadership for responsible artificial intelligence adoption in higher education. CTE Workshop Proceedings 11: 4–14.

31.

Tornatzky

Fleischer

(1990) The Process of Technology Innovation. Lexington Books.

32.

Tsinghua University (2025) Artificial intelligence. School of Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, 1 January. Available at: https://www.sigs.tsinghua.edu.cn/en/2024/1230/c7587a99302/page.htm (accessed 28 March 2025).

33.

University of Pretoria (2024) Responsible use of AI for postgraduate students in the Faculty of Health Sciences, 16 September. Available at: https://www.up.ac.za/faculty-of-health-sciences-research/news/post_3259711-responsible-use-of-ai-for-postgraduate-students-in-the-faculty-of-health-sciences (accessed 28 March 2025).

34.

Uppal

Hajian

(2025) Students’ perceptions of ChatGPT in higher education: A study of academic enhancement, procrastination, and ethical concerns. European Journal of Educational Research 14(1): 199–211.

35.

Zlotnikova

Hlomani

Mokgetse

, et al. (2025) Establishing ethical standards for GenAI in university education: A roadmap for academic integrity and fairness. Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society 23(2): 188–216.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB