Understanding information literacy self-efficacy is essential for creating an intervention that helps students to be more successful in their academics and research work. The primary aim of the study is to measure university students’ information literacy self-efficacy by comparing their perceived competence with their actual competence and to find any differences between these two. Using a quantitative research approach, this study utilized a validated 23-item IL self-efficacy scale to assess students’ perceived competence and a set of 20 task-based questions to measure their actual competence. A total of 432 data were collected from the students of a public university in Bangladesh utilizing print-based surveys and a convenience sampling technique. Collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. The study found moderate levels of perceived IL self-efficacy and comparatively lower levels of actual self-efficacy among the students. Additionally, there existed a significant positive relationship as well as a significant positive difference between students’ perceived and actual IL self-efficacy. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first initiative to measure and compare perceived and actual IL self-efficacy among university students in Bangladesh.
AbdullahS (2010) Measuring the outcomes of information literacy: Perception vs evidence-based data. International Information & Library Review42(2): 98–104.
AdalıerASerinO (2012) Teacher candidates’ information literacy self-efficacy. TOJSAT2(2): 71–78.
4.
AdetoroNSimisayeAOyefugaAB (2010) Relationship between perceived self-efficacy and information literacy among library and information science undergraduates in a Nigerian university of education. IFE PsychologIA18(2): 172–191.
5.
AharonyNGazitT (2019) Factors affecting students’ information literacy self-efficacy. Library Hi Tech37(2): 183–196.
6.
AharonyNGazitT (2020) Students’ information literacy self-efficacy: An exploratory study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science52(1): 224–236.
7.
AkterTAhmedSZ (2024) University students’ information literacy skills and impact of training in Bangladesh. IFLA Journal50: 620–632.
8.
ALA/ACRL (2000) Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Chicago, IL: American Library Association and Association of College and Research Libraries.
9.
ArthiMPGandhimathiSNS (2024) Self-efficacy based instruction: Exploring the correlation between writing self-efficacy and critical thinking. World Journal of English Language14(6): 495.
10.
AtikuzzamanMAhmedSMZ (2023a) Information literacy self-efficacy scale: Validating the translated version of the scale for use among Bangla-speaking population. Journal of Academic Librarianship49(1): 102623.
11.
AtikuzzamanMAhmedSMZ (2023b) Investigating the impact of demographic and academic variables on assessing students’ perceived information literacy self-efficacy. Journal of Academic Librarianship49(4): 102733.
12.
BanduraA (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
13.
BernsA (2020) Scored out of 10: Experiences with binary grading across the curriculum. In: Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp.1152–1157.
14.
BronsteinJ (2014) The role of perceived self-efficacy in the information seeking behavior of library and information science students. Journal of Academic Librarianship40(2): 101–106.
15.
BronsteinJTzivianL (2013) Perceived self-efficacy of library and information science professionals regarding their information retrieval skills. Library & Information Science Research35(2): 151–158.
16.
CassidySEachusP (2002) Developing the computer user self-efficacy (CUSE) scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research26(2): 133–153.
17.
ChenMZhouCWangY, et al. (2022) The role of school ICT construction and teacher information literacy in reducing teacher burnout: Based on SEM and fsQCA. Education and Information Technologies27(6): 8751–8770.
18.
CompeauDRHigginsCA (1995) Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly19: 189–211.
19.
De MeulemeesterA (2013) The ‘information literacy self-efficacy scale’ and the medical curriculum at Ghent University. In: Worldwide commonalities and challenges in information literacy research and practice: european conference on information literacy, ECIL 2013, Istanbul, Turkey, 22–25 October 2013, Revised Selected Papers 1, pp.465–470. Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-03919-0_62.
20.
De MeulemeesterABuysseHPelemanR (2018) Development and validation of an information literacy self-efficacy scale for medical students. Journal of Information Literacy12(1): 27–47.
21.
DemiralayRKaradenizS (2010) The effect of use of information and communication technologies on elementary student teachers’ perceived information literacy self-efficacy. Educational Sciences Theory & Practice10(2): 841–851.
22.
DemirelMAkkoyunluB (2017) Prospective teachers’ lifelong learning tendencies and information literacy self-efficacy. Educational Research and Reviews12(6): 329–337.
23.
EkşiG (2012) Foreign language instructors’ computer and information literacy perceived self-efficacy: A school of foreign languages case. ELT Research Journal1(2): 91–108.
24.
FainM (2011) Assessing information literacy skills development in first year students: A multi-year study. Journal of Academic Librarianship37(2): 109–119.
25.
FerdowsJAhmedSMZ (2015) An empirical investigation of information skills among undergraduate students at Dhaka University. Library Review64(4/5): 274–284.
26.
GrossMLathamD (2007) Attaining information literacy: An investigation of the relationship between skill level, self-estimates of skill, and library anxiety. Library & Information Science Research29(3): 332–353.
27.
GrossMLathamD (2012) What’s skill got to do with it?: Information literacy skills and self-views of ability among first-year college students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology63(3): 574–583.
28.
HengLKMansorY (2010) Impact of information literacy training on academic self-efficacy and learning performance of university students in a problem-based learning environment. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities18(1): 121–134.
29.
IslamMATsujiK (2010) Assessing information literacy competency of information science and library management graduate students of Dhaka University. IFLA Journal36(4): 300–316.
30.
JulienHBarkerS (2009) How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development. Library & Information Science Research31(1): 12–17.
31.
KavšekTPeklajCŽugeljU (2016) Information literacy training evaluation: The case of first year psychology students. Journal of Academic Librarianship42(4): 293–299.
32.
KearM (2000) Concept analysis of self-efficacy. Graduate Research in Nursing2(2): 1–7.
33.
KeshavarzHEsmailie GiviMRVafaeianA, et al. (2017) Information literacy self-efficacy dimensions of post graduate students: Validating a Persian version scale. Libri67(1): 75–86.
34.
Kiliç-çakmakE (2010) Learning strategies and motivational factors predicting information literacy self-efficacy of e-learners. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology26(2): 192–208.
35.
KimSW (2011) A study on the relationship between the self-efficacy on the information literacy and the level of academic achievement. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management28(3): 31–46.
36.
Ko-WaiTW (2018) Assessing information literacy skills of undergraduate freshmen: A case study from Hong Kong. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy3(1): 11–17.
37.
KrugerJDunningD (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology77(6): 1121–1134.
38.
KuhlthauCC (ed.) (2004) Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services, 2nd edn. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
39.
KurbanogluS (2003) Self-efficacy: A concept closely linked to information literacy and lifelong learning. Journal of Documentation59(6): 635–646.
40.
KurbanogluSAkkoyunluBUmayA (2006) Developing the information literacy self-efficacy scale. Journal of Documentation62(6): 730–743.
41.
LiuQ (2023) Information literacy and recent graduates: Motivation, self-efficacy, and perception of credit-based information literacy courses. Journal of Academic Librarianship49(3): 102682.
42.
MahmoodK (2013) Relationship of students’ perceived information literacy skills with personal and academic variables. Libri63(3): 232–239.
43.
MahmoodK (2017) Reliability and validity of self-efficacy scales assessing students’ information literacy skills: A systematic review. Electronic Library35(5): 1035–1051.
44.
MaughanPD (2001) Assessing information literacy among undergraduates: A discussion of the literature and the University of California-Berkeley assessment experience. College & Research Libraries62(1): 71–85.
45.
MichalakRRysavyMDTWesselA (2017) Students’ perceptions of their information literacy skills: The confidence gap between male and female international graduate students. Journal of Academic Librarianship43(2): 100–104.
46.
NaveedMAMahmoodM (2019) Information literacy self-efficacy of business students in Pakistan. Libri69(4): 303–314.
47.
NaveedMAMahmoodM (2022) Correlatives of business students’ perceived information literacy self-efficacy in the digital information environment. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science54(2): 294–305.
48.
OdedeIR (2018) A comparative analysis of information literacy self-efficacy skills of postgraduate students in library schools in South-South, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice1: 15.
49.
PajaresF (1996) Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research66(4): 543–578.
50.
PeciuliauskienePTamoliuneGTrepuleE (2022) Exploring the roles of information search and information evaluation literacy and pre-service teachers’ ICT self-efficacy in teaching. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education19(1): 33.
51.
PintoM (2010) Designing the information literacy assessment approach in higher education: A case study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science42(4): 212–221.
52.
PintoMSalesD (2010) Insights into translation students’ information literacy using the IL-HUMASS survey. Journal of Information Science36(5): 618–630.
53.
PrabowoTTSitthiworachartJHongJC, et al. (2024) Problem-based learning with library e-resources to enhance student information literacy self-efficacy. Library Management45: 564–580.
54.
RichardsonB (2019) Scale evaluating the information literacy self-efficacy of medical students created and tested in a six-year Belgian medical program. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice14(2): 128–130.
55.
RossMPerkinsHBodeyK (2016) Academic motivation and information literacy self-efficacy: The importance of a simple desire to know. Library & Information Science Research38(1): 2–9.
56.
SengCJonson CarlonMKCrossJ (2021) Undergraduate information literacy self-efficacy: A cross-sectional study of Cambodian provincial universities. Information Research26(3): 903.
57.
SergentTDanielMBouchetF, et al. (2024) How can self-evaluation and self-efficacy skills of young learners be scaffolded in a web application?IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies17: 1184–1197.
58.
ShimWSAhnHYKimHS, et al. (2009) Exploring the dimensions of self efficacy scale for information literacy. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science43(4): 307–326.
59.
ShoebMZH (2021) Evidence of improved students’ perceptions towards online research: Pre and post assessment study of information literacy and research support. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication70(8/9): 842–857.
60.
SommerMKohnenARitzhauptA, et al. (2021) Investigation of the validity evidence of the information literacy self-efficacy scale (ILSES) among undergraduate students. Communications in Information Literacy15(1): 1–23.
61.
SpisakJR (2018) Secondary Student Information Literacy Self-Efficacy vs. Performance. Virginia Commonwealth University. DOI: 10.25772/4AP6-F755.
62.
TangYTsengHW (2013) Distance learners’ self-efficacy and information literacy skills. Journal of Academic Librarianship39(6): 517–521.
63.
TasmimSAtikuzzamanM (2025) Impact of attitudes, demographics and proficiencies on students’ perceived information literacy self-efficacy. Information Development. Epub ahead of print 8 May 2025. DOI: 10.1177/02666669251338833
64.
TuncerMBalciK (2013) The research of the effect of computer and information literacy self-efficacy on the achievement of information literacy. Journal of Studies in Education3(4): 81–90.
65.
UsluelYK (2007) Can ICT usage make a difference on student teachers’ information literacy self-efficacy. Library & Information Science Research29(1): 92–102.
66.
ZimmermanBJ (2000) Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology25(1): 82–91.
67.
ZinnSE (2013) The information literacy self-efficacy of disadvantaged teachers in South Africa. In: Worldwide commonalities and challenges in information literacy research and practice: European conference on information literacy, ECIL 2013, Istanbul, Turkey, 22–25 October 2013, pp.212–218, Revised Selected Papers 1. Springer International Publishing.
