Self-efficacy toward information literacy is and has been demonstrated as an essential and fundamental key for academic performance and lifelong learning of students at all levels. This research reported the results of a cross-sectional survey carried out to investigate the correlatives of information literacy self-efficacy among business students at the University of Management and Technology, Lahore. The questionnaire contained an Information Literacy Self-Efficacy Scale, which along with sociodemographic and academic variables was utilized for collecting data from 350 students. The survey participants were recruited through a convenient sampling procedure due to accessibility issues and time limitations. The data were analyzed by applying both descriptive and inferential statistics using SPSS. The results revealed that the business students had high self-efficacy for basic information literacy skills and low self-efficacy for advanced-level information literacy skills. Age, study program, study stage, proficiency for computer, and English language appeared to be the correlatives of students’ information literacy self-efficacy. The pragmatic insights generated in this research might be used as a guide by university librarians, especially those who are engaged in information literacy instructions for designing a need-based and student-centered curriculum for information literacy instruction programs.
AdalierASerinO (2012) Teacher candidates’ information literacy self-efficacy. Online Journal of Science and Technology2(2): 71–78.
2.
AnwarMA (1981) Education of the user of information. International Library Review13(4): 365–383.
3.
AnwarMANaveedMA (2019) Development in information literacy in Pakistan: Background and research. Pakistan Library & Information Science Journal50(2): 7–20.
4.
AtaFBaranB (2011) Investigation of undergraduate students’ information literacy self–efficacy according to foreign language level, gender, computer ownership and the internet connection duration. In: Paper presented at the 5th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium. Elazığ: Fırat University, pp. 22–24.
5.
AtasevenNOguzA (2016) Relationship between the lifelong learning tendency and information literacy self-efficacy of students. Anthropologist24(1): 28–34.
6.
BanduraA (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behaviour change. Psychological Review84(2): 191–215.
7.
BanduraA (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
BanduraA (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
9.
BaroEFynemanB (2009) Information literacy among undergraduate students in Niger Delta University. The Electronic Library27(4): 659–675.
10.
BayramHComekA (2009) Examining the relations between science attitudes, logical thinking ability, information literacy and academic achievement through internet assisted chemistry education. In: Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Sciences—New Trends and Issues in Educational Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
11.
BronsteinJ (2014) The role of perceived self-efficacy in the information seeking behavior of library and information science students. Journal of Academic Librarianship40(2): 101–106.
12.
BronsteinJTzivianL (2013) Perceived self-efficacy of library and information science professionals regarding their information retrieval skills. Library & Information Science Research35(2): 151–158.
13.
CarrSEJohnsonPH (2013) Does self-reflection and insight correlate with academic performance in medical students?BMC Medical Education13(1): 113–119.
14.
CassidySEachusP (1998) Developing the Computer Self-efficacy (CSE)Scale: Investigating the relationship between CSE, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research26(2): 133–153.
15.
De MeulemeesterA (2013) The information literacy self-efficacy scale and the medical curriculum at Ghent university. In: Paper presented at the European Conference on Information Literacy. Cham: Springer, pp. 465–470.
16.
De MeulemeesterABuysseHPelemanR (2018) Development and validation of an information literacy self-efficacy scale for medical students. Journal of Information Literacy12(1): 27–47.
17.
DemiralayRKaradenizS (2010) The effect of use of information and communication technologies on elementary student teachers’ perceived information literacy self-efficacy. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice10(2): 841–851.
18.
EkşiG (2012) Foreign language instructors’ computer and information literacy perceived self-efficacy: A School of Foreign Languages case. ELT Research Journal1(2). Available at: www.mulkiyedergi.org/eltrj/article/view/1063000002 (accessed 22 January 2016).
19.
HamidAAhmadZ (2016) User education programs in university libraries: A survey. Pakistan Library & Information Science Journal47(1): 72–78.
20.
HargittaiE (2002) Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday7(4). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/article/view/942/864 (accessed 25 July 2018).
21.
JohnsonDEisenbergM (1996) Computer literacy and information literacy: A natural combination. Emergency Librarian23(5): 12–16.
22.
KeshavarzHGiviMREVafaeianA, et al. (2017) Information literacy self-efficacy dimensions of post graduate students: Validating a Persian version scale. Libri67(1): 75–86.
23.
KhanSAnwarMANaveedMA (2021) Prevalence and levels of information seeking anxiety among business students. Library Philosophy and Practice 4622. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4622 (accessed 21 January 2021).
24.
Kiliç-ÇakmakK (2010) Learning strategies and motivational factors predicting information literacy self-efficacy of e-learners. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology26(2): 192–208.
25.
KimSW (2011) A study on the relationship between the self-efficacy on the information literacy and the level of academic achievement. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management28: 331–346.
26.
KousarMMahmoodK (2015) Perceptions of faculty about information literacy skills of postgraduate engineering students. International Information & Library Review47(1–2): 52–57.
27.
KuhlthauCC (1987) Information Skills for an Information Society: A Review of Research. an ERIC Information Analysis Product. Syracuse, NY: Information Resources Publications, Syracuse University.
28.
KurbanogluSS (2003) Self-efficacy: A concept closely linked to information literacy and lifelong learning. Journal of Documentation59(6): 635–646.
29.
KurbanogluSSAkkoyunluBUmayA (2006) Developing the information literacy self-efficacy scale. Journal of Documentation62(6): 730–743.
30.
KwonNSongH (2011) Personality traits, gender, and information competency among college students. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science16(1): 87–107.
31.
LangendykV (2006) Not knowing that they do not know: Self-assessment accuracy of third year medical students. Medical Education40(2): 173–179.
32.
McTavishM (2009) I get my facts from the Internet: A case study of the teaching and learning of information literacy in in-school and out-of-school contexts. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy9(1): 3–28.
33.
MahmoodK (2013) Relationship between students’ perceived information literacy skills with personal and academic variables. Libri63(3): 232–239.
34.
MahmoodK (2016) Do people overestimate their information literacy skills? A systematic review of empirical evidence on the Dunning-Kruger Effect. Communications in Information Literacy10(2): 199–213.
35.
MahmoodK (2017) Reliability and validity of self-efficacy scales assessing students’ information literacy skills: A systematic review. The Electronic Library35(5): 1035–1051.
36.
NaveedMA (2017) Information seeking anxiety: Background, research, and implications. International Information & Library Review49(4): 266–273.
NaveedMAAmeenK (2016a) Information seeking anxiety among postgraduate students of university. Journal of Behavioural Science26(1): 142–154.
39.
NaveedMAAmeenK (2016b) Measuring levels of students’ anxiety in information seeking tasks. Pakistan Journal of Information Management & Libraries17(1): 56–68.
40.
NaveedMAAmeenK (2016c) A mixed-method invesitgaion of information seeking anxiety in Pakistani reseach students. Pakistan Library & Information Sceince Journal47(2): 24–33.
41.
NaveedMAAmeenK (2017) Determining the prevalence and correlates of information seeking anxiety among postgraduates in Pakistan. Libri67(3): 205–214.
NaveedMAAnwarMA (2021) Evidence on psychometric properties of scales assessing information related anxieties: A systematic review. Library Philosophy and Practice 4470. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4470 (accessed 21 January 2021).
45.
NaveedMAMahmoodM (2019) Information literacy self-efficacy of business students in Pakistan. Libri69(4): 303–314.
46.
NaveedMARafiqueF (2018) Information literacy in the workplace: A case of scientists from Pakistan. Libri68(3): 247–257.
47.
NaveedMAJanSUAnwarMA (2020) Reliability and validity of scales assessing anxiety associated with information related tasks: A systematic review. Library Philosophy and Practice 4344. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4344 (accessed 21 January 2021).
48.
NaveedQSharifA (2015) Assessing the needs and measuring the impact of the information literacy sessions at the Aga Khan University’s Institute for Educational Development, Pakistan. Asian Review of Social Sciences4(1): 20–29.
49.
PintoMSalesD (2010) Insights into translation students’ information literacy using the ILHUMASS survey. Journal of Information Science36(5): 618–630.
50.
PunterRAMeelissenMRGlasCA (2017) Gender differences in computer and information literacy: An exploration of the performances of girls and boys in ICILS 2013. European Educational Research Journal16(6): 762–780.
51.
RafiqueAMahmoodK (2015) Information literacy skills of engineering students: A survey. Pakistan Library & Information Science Journal46(4): 34–41.
52.
RehmanSUMohammadG (2001) Relationship of library skills with selected personal and academic variables: A study of the undergraduate students of Kuwait University. International Information & Library Review34(1): 1–20.
53.
RossMPerkinsHBodeyK (2013) Information literacy self-efficacy: The effect of juggling work and study. Library & Information Science Research35(4): 279–287.
54.
RossMPerkinsHBodeyK (2016) Academic motivation and information literacy self- efficacy: The importance of a simple desire to know. Library & Information Science Research38(1): 2–9.
55.
ShafiqueHMBhattiR (2017) Assessing Information Literacy Skills of Students in The Islamia University of Bahawalpur. Pakistan Library & Information Science Journal48(1): 59–70.
56.
ShimWSAhnHYKimHS, et al. (2009) Exploring the dimensions of self efficacy scale for information literacy. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science43(4): 307–326.
57.
SoroyaSHIqbalMMYSoroyaMS, et al. (2020) Predictors of information literacy self-efficacy among medical students: PLS-SEM analysis. Library Hi Tech. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-07-2020-0172 (accessed 21 January 2021).
58.
TangYTsengHW (2013) Distance learners’ self-efficacy and information literacy skills. The Journal of Academic Librarianship39(6): 517–521.
59.
TaylorADalalHA (2017) Gender and information literacy: Evaluation of gender differences in a student survey of information sources. College & Research Libraries78(1): 90–113.
60.
TellaAMutulaSM (2008) Gender differences in computer literacy among undergraduate students at the University of Botswana: Implications for library use. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science13(1): 59–76.
61.
Ting-tingLIUSunHB (2012) Gender differences on information literacy of science and engineering undergraduates. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science4(2): 23–30.
62.
TuncerM (2013) An Analysis on the effect of computer self-efficacy over scientific research self-efficacy and information literacy self-efficacy. Educational Research and Reviews8(1): 33–40.
63.
TuncerMBalciK (2013) The research of the effect of computer and information literacy self-efficacy on the achievement of information literacy. Journal of Studies in Education3(4). Available at: www.macrothink.org.journal.index.php.jse.article.view.4212.3620 (accessed 22 January 2016).
64.
UllahMAmeenK (2014) Current status of information literacy instruction practices in medical libraries of Pakistan. Journal of the Medical Library Association102(4): 281–287.
65.
WhitmireE (2001) Factors influencing undergraduates’ self-reported satisfaction with their information literacy skills. Portal: Libraries and the Academy1(4): 409–420.
66.
ZinnSE (2013) The information literacy self-efficacy of disadvantaged teachers in South Africa. In: European Conference on Information Literacy. Cham: Springer, pp. 212–218.
