This study examined the level of digital well-being among Indonesian library and information science students, focusing on demographic factors including gender, age, residency (urban vs rural), geographic location, and grade point average (GPA). Digital well-being is critical in effectively supporting learning in Library and Information Science. This study was a sequential explanatory design. Students from more than 15 universities over multiple regions participated in this self-assessment survey (n = 900). Quantitative data collected through an online survey based on Jisc’s digital well-being scale were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, and ANOVA. Qualitative data from follow-up surveys to selected students were thematically analyzed (n = 30). Positive impacts of digital well-being were higher than the negative ones. Gender, age, geographic location, and GPA affected digital well-being; but there was no difference between residency settings. Generally positive overall digital well-being beliefs were found among the students, with variations in some demographic factors. This study underscores the importance of digital well-being in a digital world. Valuable insights into the effective use of a two-stage survey demographics are provided, aiming to facilitate students in realizing the full potential benefits of digital technology use.
Alvarez-JimenezMRiceSD’AlfonsoS, et al. (2020) A novel multimodal digital service (Moderated online social therapy+) for help-seeking young people experiencing mental ill-health: Pilot evaluation within a national youth e-mental health service. Journal of Medical Internet Research22(8): e17155.
2.
AnNVestyGCheongC (2023) Defining digital wellbeing literacy in remote work integrated learning. Australasian Journal of Information Systems27: 1–24.
3.
ArslankaraVBDemiRAÖztaşÖ, et al. (2022) Digital well-being scale validity and reliability study. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning4(2): 263–274.
4.
BabinBMoneyAHSamouelP, et al. (2003) Essentials of Business Research Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
6.
BuckinghamD (2006) Defining digital literacy – What do young people need to know about digital media?Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy1(4): 263–277.
7.
BurrCTaddeoMFloridiL (2020) The ethics of digital well-being: A thematic review. Science and Engineering Ethics26(4): 2313–2343.
8.
CarterSAndersenCTurnerM, et al. (2023) “What about us?” Wellbeing of higher education librarians. Journal of Academic Librarianship49(1): 102619.
9.
ChurchillN (2020) Development of students’ digital literacy skills through digital storytelling with mobile devices. Educational Media International57(3): 271–284.
10.
ComreyALLeeHB (eds) (1992) A First Course in Factor Analysis, 2nd edn.New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, p.xii, 430.
11.
CoxABrewsterL (2022) Aligned but not integrated: UK academic library support to mental health and well-being during COVID-19. Library Management43(1/2): 108–127.
12.
CreswellJWPlano ClarkVL (eds) (2011) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 2nd edn. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
13.
DaviesRMKnollMAKyranidesMN (2024) A moderated mediation analysis on the influence of social support and cognitive flexibility in predicting mental wellbeing in elite sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise70: 102560.
14.
DienlinTJohannesN (2020) The impact of digital technology use on adolescent well-being. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience22(2): 135–142.
15.
EdgeSDavisCDeanJ, et al. (2023) The role of urban and rural greenspaces in shaping immigrant wellbeing and settlement in place. Wellbeing, Space and Society4: 100127.
16.
ElmassahSHassaneinEA (2022) Digitalization and subjective wellbeing in Europe. Digital Policy Regulation and Governance24(1): 52–73.
17.
FergusonSThornleyCGibbF (2016) Beyond codes of ethics: How library and information professionals navigate ethical dilemmas in a complex and dynamic information environment. International Journal of Information Management36(4): 543–556.
18.
FieldAP (ed.) (2009) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: (And Sex, Drugs and Rock “n” Roll), 3rd edn. London: Sage.
19.
FosterSLy ThienTFosterAJ, et al. (2023) Digital wellbeing – A review of the JISC guidance from the UK and Vietnam. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning14(2): 435–442.
20.
FuSChenXZhengH, et al. (2021) Understanding health information literacy of mHealth app users from digital wellbeing perspective: Evidence from regression analysis and fsQCA. Library & Information Science Research43(3): 101108.
21.
GomesRMathewJNairS, et al. (2023) Design and validation of the digital well-being scale. Ricerche Di Pedagogia e Didattica. Journal of Theories and Research in Education18(1): 1.
HarringtonKFultonPBrownM, et al. (2015) Digital wellbeing assessments for people affected by dementia. Human-Computer Interaction: Users and Contexts, LNCS 9171, 409–418.
24.
HatamiZYiSHallM (2022) Well-being and relative deprivation in a digital era. Heliyon8(10): e11233.
25.
IvankovaNVCreswellJWStickSL (2006) Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods18(1): 3–20.
KearnsAWhitleyE (2019) Associations of internet access with social integration, wellbeing and physical activity among adults in deprived communities: Evidence from a household survey. BMC Public Health19(1): 860.
28.
KlineP (1994) An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. London: Routledge.
29.
LeiHXiongYChiuMM, et al. (2021) The relationship between ICT literacy and academic achievement among students: A meta-analysis. Children and Youth Services Review127: 106123.
30.
LyngsULukoffKSlovakP, et al. (2019) Self-control in cyberspace: Applying dual systems theory to a review of digital self-control tools. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp.1–18.
31.
MartzoukouK (2020) Academic libraries in COVID-19: A renewed mission for digital literacy. Library Management42(4/5): 266–276.
32.
MartzoukouKKostagiolasPLavranosC, et al. (2021) ‘A study of university law students’ self-perceived digital competences. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science54: 751–769.
33.
MartzoukouKLudersESMairJ, et al. (2023) A cross-sectional study of discipline-based self-perceived digital literacy competencies of nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing79(9): 1–17.
34.
McGivernP (2023) Commentary on promoting the mental health and wellbeing benefits of using student response systems (SRS) in higher education: More than just a learning device. Mental Health and Social Inclusion28(4): 283–288.
35.
MelwaniMTayLYLimCP (2018) Digital storytelling as a pedagogy to develop literacy and twenty-first century competencies in a Singapore primary school: Teachers as designers. In: OakleyG (ed.) Mobile Technologies in Children’s Language and Literacy. Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp.67–81.
MundfromDJShawDGKeTL (2005) Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing5(2): 159–168.
38.
NiemiHMultisiltaJ (2016) Digital storytelling promoting twenty-first century skills and student engagement. Technology Pedagogy and Education25(4): 451–468.
39.
ÖncülG (2020) Defining the need: Digital literacy skills for first-year university students. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education13(4): 925–943.
40.
ParryDAle RouxDBMortonJ, et al. (2023) Digital wellbeing applications: Adoption, use and perceived effects. Computers in Human Behavior139: 107542.
41.
PrabowoTTSitthiworachartJLoCK (2024) Demographic analysis of information literacy self-efficacy among library and information science students in Indonesia. Library & Information Science Research46(1): 101281.
42.
PrabowoTTSitthiworachartJSriwisathiyakunK (2025) Fostering student digital wellbeing through digital storytelling integrated with peer assessment. Education and Information Technologies30: 3411–3442.
43.
ReddyPChaudharyKSharmaB, et al. (2021) Contextualized game-based intervention for digital literacy for the Pacific Islands. Education and Information Technologies26(5): 5535–5562.
44.
SaastamoinenUEronenLJuvonenA, et al. (2022) Wellbeing at the 21st century innovative learning environment called learning ground. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning16(2): 239–252.
45.
SaleemQUAAmeenK (2021) The role of human environment in making a workplace congenial: A case of university libraries. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication70(8/9): 714–730.
46.
SchmittJBBreuerJWulfT (2021) From cognitive overload to digital detox: Psychological implications of telework during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior124: 106899.
47.
SibiyaPTNgulubeP (2023) Perceptions of employers in South Africa on library and information science graduates’ skills, knowledge and competencies on digital scholarship. Heliyon9(2): e13531.
48.
Tachie-DonkorGEzemaIJ (2023) Effect of information literacy skills on university students’ information seeking behaviour and lifelong learning. Heliyon9(8): e18427.
49.
TennantRHillerLFishwickR, et al. (2007) The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes5(1): 63.
50.
ThomasNMChoudhariSGGaidhaneAM, et al. (2022) ‘Digital Wellbeing’: The need of the hour in today’s digitalized and technology driven world!Cureus14(8): e27743.
51.
ThorpeHBriceJO’LearyG, et al. (2023) Affective geographies in pandemic times: An intersectional analysis of women’s wellbeing in Aotearoa New Zealand. Emotion Space and Society48: 100964.
52.
TwengeJM (2019) More Time on technology, less happiness? Associations between digital-media use and psychological well-being. Current Directions in Psychological Science28(4): 372–379.
53.
Vanden AbeeleMMP (2021) Digital wellbeing as a dynamic construct. Communication Theory31(4): 932–955.
54.
YaacoubEAlouiniM-S (2020) A key 6G challenge and opportunity—connecting the base of the Pyramid: a survey on rural connectivity. Proceedings of the IEEE108(4): 533–582. Proceedings of the IEEE.
55.
ZakyYAM (2023) Chatbot positive design to facilitate referencing skills and improve digital well-being. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM)17(09): 106–126.
56.
ZemonMBahrAH (2005) Career and/or children: Do female academic librarians pay a price for motherhood?College & Research Libraries66(5): 394–406.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
