Insights into multitasking information behavior of library and information science professionals: The influence of polychronicity and task coordination
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2026
Insights into multitasking information behavior of library and information science professionals: The influence of polychronicity and task coordination
The study explores the multitasking information behavior of information professionals and its relationship with individual factors such as polychronicity and task coordination. This quantitative study utilized a questionnaire survey targeting Library and Information Science (LIS) professionals working in Higher Education Commission (HEC) recognized universities in Punjab and Islamabad, Pakistan. A total of 346 responses were collected from 502 LIS professionals, resulting in a response rate of 68.9%. Regression analyses were applied using SPSS to examine individual factors. The findings revealed that polychronicity significantly influenced multitasking behavior, with individuals exhibiting a polychronic nature more likely to engage in multitasking while handling information queries. Additionally, individuals’ ability to rationally integrate multiple tasks significantly contributed to multitasking information behavior among LIS professionals. The study will add new knowledge to MIB literature, and the findings will contribute to optimizing multitasking practices. This will improve productivity, decision-making, and well-being in libraries and information centers. Developers can create interfaces that align with users’ cognitive styles and preferences, leading to more user-friendly and efficient technologies.
BainbridgeL (1999) Verbal reports as evidence of the process operator’s knowledge. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies51(2): 213–238.
2.
BluedornAC (2002) The Human Organization of Time: Temporal Realities and Experience. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
3.
BluedornACJaussiKS (2007) Organizationally relevant dimensions of time across levels of analysis. In: YammarinoFDansereauF (eds) Multi-Level Issues in Organizations and Time, vol. 6. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.187–223.
4.
BluedornACKalliathTJStrubeMJ, et al. (1999) Polychronicity and the inventory of polychronic values (IPV) the development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology14(3/4): 205–231.
5.
BreedingM (2015) The future of library resource discovery. Information Standards Quarterly27(1): 24–30.
6.
BroekerLLiepeltRPoljacE, et al. (2018) Multitasking as a choice: A perspective. Psychological Research82(1): 12–23.
7.
BurgessPW (2000) Strategy application disorder: The role of the frontal lobes in human multitasking. Psychological Research63(3): 279–288.
8.
ButtNWarraichNF (2023) Examining the predictors of multitasking information behavior among library and information science professionals in Pakistan. Information Discovery and Delivery51(3): 283–292.
9.
ByströmKJärvelinK (1995) Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management31(2): 191–213.
10.
CarlsonRASohnMY (2000) Cognitive control of multistep routines: Information processing and conscious intentions. In: MonsellSDriverJ (eds) Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp.443–464.
11.
CaseDOGivenLM (2016) Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. Bingley: Emerald Group publishing limited.
12.
ConteJMJacobsRR (2003) Validity evidence linking polychronicity and big five personality dimensions to absence, lateness, and supervisory performance ratings. Human Performance16(2): 107–129.
13.
CrewsDERussMJ (2020) The impact of individual differences on multitasking ability. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management69(6): 1301–1319.
14.
De BruinR (2018) Social Judgments of Electronic Multitasking in the Workplace: The Role of Contextual and Individual Difference Factors. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.
15.
DelbridgeKA (2000) Individual Differences in Multi-Tasking Ability: Exploring a Nomological Network. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
16.
DewanP (2014) Can I have your attention? Implications of the research on distractions and multitasking for reference librarians. Reference Librarian55(2): 95–117.
17.
DuJTSpinkA (2011) Toward a web search model: Integrating multitasking, cognitive coordination, and cognitive shifts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology62(8): 1446–1472.
18.
EllisJKvavilashviliL (2000) Prospective memory in 2000: Past, present, and future directions. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition14(7): S1–S9.
19.
Frankfort-NachmiasCNachmiasD (2008) Research Methods in the Social Sciences, 7th edn.New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
20.
GonzálezVMMarkG (2004) “Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness:” Managing multiple working spheres. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Vienna, Austria, 24–29 April, pp.113–120. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
21.
GrawitchMJBarberLK (2013) In search of the relationship between polychronicity and multitasking performance. Journal of Individual Differences34(4): 222–229.
22.
HallET (1959) The Silent Language. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, p.240.
23.
HechtTDAllenNJ (2005) Exploring links between polychronicity and well-being from the perspective of person–job fit: Does it matter if you prefer to do only one thing at a time?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes98(2): 155–178.
24.
HimiSAVolbergGBühnerM, et al. (2023) Individual differences in everyday multitasking behavior and its relation to cognition and personality. Psychological Research87(3): 655–685.
25.
HwangYKimHJeongSH (2014) Why do media users multitask?: Motives for general, medium-specific, and content-specific types of multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior36: 542–548.
26.
IshizakaKMarshallSPConteJM (2001) Individual differences in attentional strategies in multitasking situations. Human Performance14(4): 339–358.
27.
KaliebeKShahK (2024) Digital Distractions and Misinformation. Pediatric Clinics72(2): 235–248.
28.
KaufmanCFLanePMLindquistJD (1991) Exploring more than 24 hours a day: A preliminary investigation of polychronic time use. Journal of Consumer Research18(3): 392–401.
29.
KimK-S (2001) Information-seeking on the Web: Effects of user and task variables. Library & Information Science Research23(3): 233–255.
30.
KirchbergDMRoeRAVan EerdeW (2015) Polychronicity and multitasking: A diary study at work. Human Performance28(2): 112–136.
31.
KonigCJBuhnerMMurlingG (2005) Working memory, fluid intelligence, and attention are predictors of multitasking performance, but polychronicity and extraversion are not. Human Performance18(3): 243–266.
32.
KönigCJOberacherLKleinmannM (2010) Personal and situational determinants of multitasking at work. Journal of Personnel Psychology9(2): 99–103.
33.
KönigCJWallerMJ (2010) Time for reflection: A critical examination of polychronicity. Human Performance23(2): 173–190.
34.
LascauLGouldSJCoxAL, et al. (2019). Monotasking or multitasking: Designing for crowdworkers’ preferences. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Glasgow, 4–9 May, pp.1–14. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
35.
LeeFJTaatgenNA (2002) Multi-tasking as Skill Acquisition. In: Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual conference of the cognitive science society, pp.572–577. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36.
LeeFJTaatgenNA (2019) Multitasking as skill acquisition. In: Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual conference of the cognitive science society, April, pp.572–577. England: Routledge.
37.
LuiKFWongAC-N (2012) Does media multitasking always hurt? A positive correlation between multitasking and multisensory integration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review19(4): 647–653.
38.
MeyerP (2023) The Google effect, multitasking, and lost linearity: What we should do. Ohio Northern University Law Review42(3): 3.
39.
MonsellS (2003) Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences7(3): 134–140.
40.
OlechnickiKZałeckiP (2000) Słownik socjologiczny [Dictionary of sociology]. Toruń: Graffiti BC.
41.
OzmutluSOzmutluHCSpinkA (2003) Multitasking Web searching and implications for design. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology40(1): 416–421.
42.
ParkM (2015) Human multiple information task behavior on the web. Aslib Journal of Information Management67(2): 118–135.
43.
ParryDAle RouxDBBantjesJR (2020) Testing the feasibility of a media multitasking self-regulation intervention for students: Behaviour change, attention, and self-perception. Computers in Human Behavior104: 106182.
44.
PoposkiEMOswaldFL (2010) The multitasking preference inventory: Toward an improved measure of individual differences in polychronicity. Human Performance23(3): 247–264.
45.
PuranikHKoopmanJVoughHC (2020) Pardon the interruption: An integrative review and future research agenda for research on work interruptions. Journal of Management46(6): 806–842.
46.
RubinsteinJSMeyerDEEvansJE (2001) Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance27(4): 763.
47.
RussMJCrewsD (2012). The impact of multitasking in organizations. Academy of Management Proceedings2012(1): 17171.
48.
SanbonmatsuDMStrayerDLMedeiros-WardN, et al. (2013) Who multi-tasks and why? Multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking. Plos One8(1): e54402.
49.
SandersonKRBruk-LeeVViswesvaranC, et al. (2013) Multitasking: Do preference and ability interact to predict performance at work?Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology86(4): 556–563.
50.
SheerVCRiceRE (2017) Mobile instant messaging use and social capital: Direct and indirect associations with employee outcomes. Information & Management54(1): 90–102.
51.
SlocombeTEBluedornAC (1999) Organizational behavior implications of the congruence between preferred polychronicity and experienced work-unit polychronicity. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior20(1): 75–99.
52.
SpinkA (2004) Multitasking information behavior and information task switching: An exploratory study. Journal of Documentation60(4): 336–351.
53.
SpinkAAlvarado-AlbertorioFNarayanB, et al. (2007) Multitasking information behaviour in public libraries. A survey study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science39(3): 177–186.
54.
SpinkAColeC (2005) A multitasking framework for cognitive information retrieval. In: SpinkAColeC (eds) New Directions in Cognitive Information Retrieval. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Netherlands, pp.99–112.
55.
SpinkAColeC (2006) Integrations and further research. In: SpinkAColeC (eds) New Directions in Human Information Behavior. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, pp.231–237.
56.
SpinkAColeCWallerM (2008) Multitasking behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology42(1): 93–118.
57.
SpinkACurrierJ (2006) Towards an evolutionary perspective for human information behavior: An exploratory study. Journal of Documentation62(2): 171–193.
58.
SpinkAOzmutluHCOzmutluS (2002) Multitasking information seeking and searching processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology53(8): 639–652.
59.
SpinkAParkM (2005) Information and non-information multitasking interplay. Journal of Documentation61(4): 548–554.
60.
SpinkAParkMKoshmanS (2006) Factors affecting assigned information problem ordering during Web search: An exploratory study. Information Processing & Management42(5): 1366–1378.
61.
SrivastavaJNakazawaMChenYW (2016) Online, mixed, and offline media multitasking: Role of cultural, socio-demographic, and media factors. Computers in Human Behavior62: 720–729.
62.
StrohmeierS (2020) Digital human resource management: A conceptual clarification. Journal of Human Resource Management34(3): 345–365.
63.
TwymanNWProudfootJGCameronAF, et al. (2020) Too busy to be manipulated: How multitasking with technology improves deception detection in collaborative teamwork. Journal of Management Information Systems37(2): 377–395.
64.
WeaverSMArringtonCM (2015) Tracking the multitasking mind. Zeitschrift für Psychologie221(1): 51–60.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
