This review article synthesizes current research findings to propose effective strategies for measuring and enhancing user engagement in digital curation. This review article synthesizes current research findings to propose effective strategies for measuring and enhancing user engagement in digital curation. By establishing comprehensive frameworks and methodologies, researchers and practitioners can gain deeper insights into user behaviors, preferences, and interactions with curated content. This understanding will improve digital curation practices, ensuring curated resources meet user expectations and needs. The review identifies best practices, offers actionable recommendations, and highlights the critical need for robust user engagement strategies. Through systematic analysis of existing literature, it empowers the digital curation community to develop more effective strategies for managing and curating digital resources, ultimately enhancing user experience and engagement across diverse digital platforms.
AlbertsonDJohnstonMP (2021) Modelling users’ perceptions of video information seeking, learning through added value and use of curated digital collections. Journal of Information Science47(5): 575–589.
2.
BabinJHullandJ (2019) Exploring online consumer curation as user-generated content: A framework and agenda for future research, with implications for brand management. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC23(3): 325–338.
3.
BeagrieN (2008) Digital curation for science, digital libraries, and individuals. International Journal of Digital Curation1(1): 3–16.
4.
CadavidJAP (2017) Evolution of legal deposit in New Zealand: From print to digital heritage. IFLA Journal43(4): 379–390.
5.
Carballo-GarciaABoté-VericadJJ (2022) Fair data: History and present context. Central European Journal of Educational Research4(2). University of Debrecen Publishing: 45–53.
6.
ChawingaWZinnS (2020) Research data management at a public university in Malawi: the role of “three hands”. Library Management41(6/7): 467–485.
7.
ChenCMChenYTHongCM, et al. (2012) Developing a Taiwan library history digital library with reader knowledge archiving and sharing mechanisms based on the DSpace platform. In: The Electronic Library, vol. 30. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 426–442.
8.
ChenCMTsayMY (2017) Applications of collaborative annotation system in digital curation, crowdsourcing, and digital humanities. The Electronic Library35(6): 1122–1140.
9.
ColeKZhouAJonesT, et al. (2022) How to Harness the Power of Social Media for Quality Drug Information in Infectious Diseases: Perspectives on Behalf of the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Clinical Infectious Diseases74(Supplement_3). Oxford New York: University Press US, pp. e23–e33.
10.
ConstantinidisD (2016) Crowdsourcing Culture: Challenges to Change. Cultural Heritage in a Changing World. Cham:Springer International Publishing, pp. 215–234.
11.
CotterKNHarroucheMRodriguez-BoerwinkleRM, et al. (2023) Virtual art visits: Examining the effects of slow looking on well-being in an online environment. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.
12.
CushingAL (2009) Understanding interest to inform recruitment: What characteristics of digital curation interest computer science and computer engineering students?Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology46(1): 1–4.
13.
DagaEAsprinoLDamianoR, et al. (2022) Integrating Citizen Experiences in Cultural heritage Archives: Requirements, state of the art, and challenges. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage15(1): 1–35.
14.
DallasC (2015) Curating Archaeological Knowledge in the digital continuum: From practice to infrastructure. Open Archaeology1(1): 176–207.
15.
DallasC (2016) Digital curation beyond the “wild frontier”: A pragmatic approach. Archival Science16(4). Springer: 421–457.
16.
DownsRRChenRS (2010) Designing submission and workflow services for preserving interdisciplinary scientific data. Earth Science Informatics3(1-2): 101–110.
GreenHECourtneyA (2015) Beyond the scanned image: A needs assessment of scholarly users of digital collections. College & Research Libraries76(5): 690–707.
19.
GulottaROdomWFasteH, et al. (2014) Legacy in the age of the internet: reflections on how interactive systems shape how we are remembered. In: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems, Vancouver BC Canada, 21 June 2014, pp. 975–984. ACM. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2598510.2598579 (accessed 21 May 2024).
20.
HarrisI (2022) Collaborative playlist-making: Musical interaction via digitally mediated co-curation. Music and Science5: 205920432210769.
21.
HellmerEN.d (2023) It is a matter of perspectives: A literature review of users and use in an archival context. Nordic Journal of Library and Information Studies4(2): 19–34.
22.
HenchozNCrankA (2018) Digital heritage: Bringing new life to the montreux jazz festival’s audio-visual archives with immersive installations. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2018 Art Gallery, Vancouver British Columbia Canada, 12 August 2018, pp. 375–380. ACM. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3202918.3203089 (accessed 21 July 2024).
23.
HuvilaI (2008) Participatory archive: towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualisation of records management. Archival Science8. Springer: 15–36.
24.
JansenBJungSSalminenJ, et al. (2021) Strengths and weaknesses of persona creation methods: Guidelines and opportunities for digital innovations. Epub ahead of print 2021.
25.
JorenteMBatistaL (2022) Social Curation: Collective Participation in the Curation of Digital-Virtual Museum Environments. Encontros Bibli: Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência Da Informação 27. Santa Catarina: Universidade Federal de, pp. 1–23.
26.
LaganSD’MelloRVaidyamA, et al. (2021) Assessing mental health apps marketplaces with objective metrics from 29,190 data points from 278 apps. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica144(2): 201–210.
27.
LapworthEChungSK (2021) The archives at the tip of their fingers: Exploring user reactions to large-scale digitization. Journal of Archival Organization18(1-2): 1–36.
28.
LawrenceG (2019) Building capacity for 21st century digital ELT practices. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada36(3): 132–172.
29.
LingoEL (2023) Digital curation and creative brokering: Managing information overload in open organizing. Organization Studies44(1): 105–133.
30.
LucaENarayanB (2016) Redesigning the open-access institutional repository: A user experience approach. In: MorishimaARauberALiewC (eds) Digital Libraries: Knowledge, Information, and Data in an Open Access Society. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 275–281.
31.
LutherWBaloianNBiellaD, et al. (2023) Digital twins and enabling technologies in museums and cultural heritage: An overview. Sensors23(3): 1583.
32.
MaharsoRD (2021) Audio Content Curation in Digital Music Streaming Applications. In: Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities Universitas Indonesia Conference (APRISH 2019). Atlantis Press, pp. 201–207. Available at: https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/aprish-19/125957131 (accessed 21 May 2024).
33.
MihailidisP (2015) Digital curation and digital literacy: Evaluating the role of curation in developing critical literacies for participation in digital culture. E-Learning and Digital Media12(5-6): 443–458.
34.
MolesN (2014) DigCurV curriculum framework: applications in the development of digital curation vocational training programmes. iConference 2014 Proceedings. iSchools. Epub ahead of print 2014.
35.
MutibwaDHHessAJacksonT (2020) Strokes of serendipity: Community co-curation and engagement with digital heritage. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies26(1): 157–177.
36.
NdhlovuP (2018) The state of preparedness for digital curation and preservation: A case study of a developing country academic library. IASSIST Quarterly/International Association for Social Science Information Service and Technology42(3): 1–22.
37.
O’BrienHLTomsEG (2010) The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology61(1): 50–69.
38.
PooleA (2016) The conceptual landscape of digital curation. Journal of Documentation72(5): 961–986.
39.
PotterJGilje (2015) Curation as a new literacy practice. E-Learning and Digital Media12(2): 123–127.
40.
PuntEAfroozAPettitC (2020) Precinct Scale Living Laboratories: Case Study of Randwick Living Lab. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 6. Göttingen: Copernicus GmbH, pp. 127–134.
41.
RayJ (2017) Digital curation in museums. Library Hi Tech35(1): 32–39.
42.
RheeHL (2024) A new lifecycle model enabling optimal digital curation. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science56(1): 241–266.
43.
Rivers CofieldSChildsSTMajewskiT (2024) A survey of how archaeological repositories are managing digital associated records and data: A byte of the reality sandwich. Advances in Archaeological Practice12(1): 20–33.
44.
RobinsonTM (2020) Community college students’ perspectives on the use of gamification in online learning (Doctoral dissertation). Walden University.
45.
RotmanDProcitaKHansenD, et al. (2012) Supporting content curation communities: The case of the Encyclopedia of life. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology63(6): 1092–1107.
46.
SakasDPReklitisDP (2021) The impact of organic traffic of crowdsourcing platforms on airlines’ website traffic and user engagement. Sustainability13(16): 8850.
47.
SesartićAFischlinATöweM (2016) Towards narrowing the curation gap—Theoretical considerations and lessons learned from decades of practice. ISPRSInternationalJournal of Geo-Information5(6): 91.
48.
StviliaBHinnantCCWuS, et al. (2015) Research project tasks, data, and perceptions of data quality in a condensed matter physics community. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology66(2): 246–263.
49.
ThomerAKWeberNMTwidaleMB (2018) Supporting the long-term curation and migration of natural history museum collections databases. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology55(1): 504–513.
50.
UngererLM (2016) Digital curation as a core competency in current learning and literacy: A higher education perspective. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning17(5): 1–27.
51.
WagnerTLFenlonKSorensenA (2023) “Garbage bags full of files”: Exploring sociotechnical perceptions of formats within the recovery and reuse of scientific data. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology60(1): 396–407.
52.
WrightHRichardsJD (2018) Reflections on collaborative archaeology and large-scale online research infrastructures. Journal of Field Archaeology43(sup1): S60–S67.
53.
YakelE (2007) Digital curation. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives23(4): 335–340.
54.
YoonASchultzT (2017) Research data management services in academic libraries in the US: A content analysis of libraries’ websites. Epub ahead of print 2017.
55.
ZhaoF (2023) A systematic review of Wikidata in Digital Humanities projects. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities38(2): 852–874.
56.
ZhaoXShu’ningLYa’nanX, et al. (2020) Digital humanities scholarly commons at Beijing normal university library. Library Trends69(1): 250–268.
57.
ZhaoYCLianJZhangY, et al. (2024) Value co-creation in cultural heritage information practices: Literature review and future agenda: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology75(3): 298–323.
