The current study aims to examine doctoral research works produced by Pakistani universities in the field of library and information science (LIS). The study provides an understanding of the perspective of PhD level research in Pakistan and aims to determine developmental patterns, popular focused areas, current trends, and the most productive universities. The content analysis method was used to conduct this study. A self-structured questionnaire was used for the collection of data. A total of five universities were selected for the collection of softcopies of theses for this study. The information was gathered from department heads at five LIS schools in Pakistan. MS-Excel was used to analyze and present the data in the form of tables and charts to achieve the study’s objectives. The findings show that Pakistani LIS schools have produced a total of 62 PhD theses from 1981 to 2021. Steady development has been observed until 2010. However, the growth of LIS research has increased significantly during the last decade. The study has explored LIS research trends at the doctoral level and presents an agenda for future research to inspire potential LIS scholars. The findings are useful to improve research quality at the doctoral level for LIS scholars and faculty members of LIS schools in Pakistan and other developing countries.
AmeenKWarraichNF (2014) Trends in LIS education and research in Pakistan. In: DuJT (ed.) Library and Information Science Research in Asia-Oceania: Theory and Practice. Hershey: IGI Global, pp.187–199.
3.
ArifMNunesJMBKanwalS (2018) Looking back, moving forward: An assessment of LIS Internship Programme in developing country’s perspective. The Journal of Academic Librarianship44(5): 595–602.
4.
BansalGCTikkuUK (1988) Library science education in Punjab. International Library Review20(3): 395–403.
5.
ChakrabartiKMondalDMaityA (2020) A trend analysis of the doctoral dissertations in LIS research in West Bengal, India during 1979-2018. Library Philosophy & Practice (e-journal)4149. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4149/.
6.
ChuH (2015) Research methods in library and information science: A content analysis. Library & Information Science Research37: 36–41.
cIRcle (n.d) University of British Columbia’s Information Repository. Available at: https://circle.ubc.ca/ (accessed 26 November 2021).
9.
DavarpanahMRAslekiaS (2008) A scientometric analysis of international LIS journals: Productivity and characteristics. Scientometrics77(1): 21–39.
10.
DehghaniMWrightSDenisonT (2022) Library, information science, and archives doctoral research trends in Australia. In: International Conference on Information, pp.53–60. Cham: Springer.
GholampourBGholampourSNoruziA (2022) Research Trend analysis of information science in France based on total, cited and uncited publications: A scientometric and altmetric analysis. Informology1(1): 7–26.
14.
HaiderSMahmoodK (2007) MPhil and PhD library and information science research in Pakistan: An evaluation. Library Review56(5): 407–417.
15.
HussainAJanSUIbrahimM, et al. (2019) Library and information science research productivity at Sarhad University of Science & Information Technology Peshawar. Pakistan Library & Information Science Journal50(3): 37–44.
16.
JabeenMYunLRafiqM, et al. (2015a) Research productivity of library scholars: Bibliometric analysis of growth and trends of LIS publications. New Library World116(7/8): 433–454.
17.
JabeenMYunLRafiqM, et al. (2015b) Scientometric analysis of library and information science journals 2003–2012 using web of science. The International Information & Library Review47(3–4): 71–82.
18.
JabeenM (2019) Mining citation patterns of LIS scholars: An analysis with Asian perspective. In: 2019 5th International conference on information management (ICIM),Cambridge, UK, 24–27 March 2019, ;pp.211–214. NewYork NY: IEEE.
19.
JabeenMImranMBadarK, et al. (2017) Scientific collaboration of Library & Information Science research in China (2012-2013). Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science22(2): 67–83.
20.
JabeenMYunLWangX, et al. (2016) A study to analyze collaboration patterns for Asian library and information science (LIS) scholars on author, institutional and country levels. Serials Review42(1): 18–30.
21.
JadabADasRK (2017) Doctoral research in library and information science in Bangladesh: An analysis on trends and development. International Journal of Information Studies and Libraries2(1): 25–32.
22.
JärvelinKVakkariP (2022) LIS research across 50 years: Content analysis of journal articles. Journal of Documentation78(7): 65–88.
23.
KeshavarzHShekariMR (2020) Factors affecting topic selection for theses and dissertations in library and information science: A national scale study. Library & Information Science Research42(4): 101052.
24.
KhurshidZ (2013) Contributions of Pakistani authors to foreign library and information science journals: An evaluative study. Aslib Proceedings65(3):441–460.
MahmoodKShafiqueF (2010) Changing research scenario in Pakistan and demand for research qualified LIS professionals. Library Review59(4): 291–303.
27.
NARCIS (n.d) National Academic Research and Collaborations Information System. Available at: https://www.narcis.nl/ (accessed 26 November 2021).
28.
NaseerMM (2011) Library and information science research in Pakistan: Bibliographic control, bibliometric analysis and issues. PhD Thesis, University of the Punjab, Pakistan.
29.
NaseerMMMahmoodK (2009) LIS research in Pakistan: An analysis of Pakistan Library and Information Science Journal 1998-2007. Library Philosophy & Practice (e-journal) 275. http://eprints.rclis.org/13803/.
30.
NgulubePUkwomaSC (2019) Cartographies of research designs in library information science research in Nigeria and South Africa, 2009–2015. Library & Information Science Research41(3): 100966.
31.
SamdaniRABhattiR (2011) Doctoral research in library and information science by Pakistani professionals: An analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice649: 160–175.
32.
SheikhAJanSU (2017) Research productivity of LIS schools in Pakistan: A study of MPhil and Ph.D. theses to 2015. Portal17(3): 451–470.
ShuFLarivièreVMongeonP, et al. (2016) On the evolution of library and information science doctoral dissertation topics in North America (1960–2013). Journal of Education for Library and Information Science57(2): 131–142.
35.
SiddiqueNRehmanSUAhmadS, et al. (2021a) Library and information science research in the Arab World: A bibliometric analysis 1951–2021. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication72(1/2): 138–159.
36.
SiddiqueNRehmanSUKhanMA, et al. (2021b) Library and information science research in Pakistan: A bibliometric analysis, 1957–2018. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science53(1): 89–102.
37.
SongYZhuLShuF (2021) On the evolution of library and information science doctoral dissertation topics in China. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science53(2): 298–306.
38.
SpinkASinghD (Eds) (2012) Library and Information Science Trends and Research: Asia-Oceania. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
39.
S-Space (n.d) SNU open repository and archive. Available at: http://s-space.snu.ac.kr/ (accessed 26 November 2021).
40.
Theses (n.d) France. Available at: http://theses.fr (accessed 24 November 2021).
41.
Theses and Dissertations Database (n.d) China Doctoral/Master Dissertation Database (CNKI). Available at: https://oversea.cnki.net/kns?dbcode=CDFD (accessed 26 November 2021).
42.
The University of Auckland (n.d) Libraries and learning services. Available at: http://auckland.ac.nz (accessed 26 November 2021).
Universdiad (n.d) Complutense de Madrid. Available at: https://www.ucm.es/ (accessed 26 November 2021).
45.
USpace (n.d) University of Utah Institutional Repository. Available at: http://uspace.utah.edu/ (accessed 26 November 2021).
46.
WangTLundBDowM (2022) A bibliometrics study of library and information science doctoral dissertations in China from 2011 to 2020. Education for Information38: 1–15.
