This paper discusses the present state of the art and forthcoming directions of digital library adoption (DLA) research over the past 30 years. By means of scientometric analysis, we synthesize 216 articles and conference papers published between 1992 and 2022 using visualization maps of prolific contributions, co-citation, co-occurrence, and thematic networks. The analysis reveals important findings concerning research evolution, models and theories, intellectual foundations, emerging streams, frontiers, and hotspots that inform DLA decisions. Moreover, the paper highlights future DLA research opportunities through addressing scarcely observed areas in the field. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt that comprehensively oversees the breadth and depth of the DLA research over a long-time span.
AboelmagedMMouakketS (2020). Influencing models and determinants in big data analytics research: A bibliometric analysis. Information Processing & Management, 57(4): 102234.
2.
AgarwalRSambamurthyVStairR M (2000) The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy—An empirical assessment. Information Systems Research11(4): 418–430.
3.
Abdul RahmanARMohezarSHabidinNF, et al (2020) Critical success factors of the continued usage of digital library successful implementation in military-context: An organisational support perspective. Digital Library Perspectives36(1): 38–54.
4.
AhmadKJian MingZRafiM (2018) Assessing the digital library research output: bibliometric analysis from 2002 to 2016. The Electronic Library36(4): 696–704.
5.
AjzenI (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2): 179–211.
6.
AliNShoaibMSyedK (2021a) Steady ship: Digital, online, and e-libraries (1971–2020). Journal of Information Science. Epub ahead of print 9 November 2021. DOI: 10.1177/01655515211040678
7.
AliSHabesMYoussefE, et al (2021b) A cross-sectional analysis of digital library acceptance, and dependency during covid-19. International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems10(1): 1415–1425.
8.
AlzahraniAIMahmudIRamayahT, et al (2019) Modelling digital library success using the DeLone and McLean information system success model. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science51(2): 291–306.
9.
AnserMKTabashMINassaniAA, et al (2021) Toward the e-loyalty of digital library users: Investigating the role of e-service quality and e-trust in digital economy. Library Hi Tech. Epub ahead of print 15 June 2021. DOI: 10.1108/LHT-07-2020-0165
10.
AwwadMSAl-MajaliSM (2015) Electronic library services acceptance and use an empirical validation of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. The Electronic Library33(6): 1100–1120.
11.
BagozziRPBaumgartnerJYiY (1989) An investigation into the role of intentions as mediators of the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Economic Psychology10(1): 35–62.
12.
BanduraA (1986) Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 23–28.
13.
BegumDElahiMH (2022) Digital library services to support online learning amid COVID-19: a study of a private university library in Bangladesh. Digital Library Perspectives38(3): 332–345.
14.
BornmannLHaunschildRHugSE (2018) Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: A new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis. Scientometrics114: 427–437.
15.
ChangCLinCChenY, et al (2009) Predicting information-seeking intention in academic digital libraries. The Electronic Library27(3): 448–460.
16.
CoviLM (1999) Material mastery: Situating digital library use in university research practices. Information Processing & Management35(3): 293–316.
17.
D’AlessandroDMD’AlessandroMPGalvinJR, et al (1998) Barriers to rural physician use of a digital health sciences library. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association86(4): 583–593.
18.
DavisFD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly13: 319–340.
19.
DavisFDBagozziRPWarshawPR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science35(8): 982–1003.
20.
DeLoneWMcLeanE (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems19(4): 9–30.
21.
DeLoneWHMcLeanER (1992) Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research3(1): 60–95.
22.
DibieOMaullKESumnerT (eds) (2012) Teacher sociality and information diffusion in educational digital libraries. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, ACM Digital Libraries, June 10–14, 2012, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 27–30.
23.
EaglyAHChaikenS (1993) The Psychology of Attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
24.
EiteneyerNBendigDBrettelM (2019) Social capital and the digital crowd: Involving backers to promote new product innovativeness. Research Policy48(8): 103744.
25.
FishbeinMAjzenI (1980) Predicting and understanding consumer behavior: Attitude-behavior correspondence. In AjzenI.FishbeinM. (eds.). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (pp. 148–172). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
27.
GoodhueDL (1998) Development and measurement validity of a task-technology fit instrument for user evaluations of information system. Decision Sciences29(1): 105–138.
28.
GoodhueDLThompsonRL (1995) Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly19(2): 213–236.
29.
HaqMSSamaniMHariyatiN (2022) Android-based digital library application development. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies16(11): 224–237.
30.
HongWThongJYLWongWM, et al (2002) Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems18(3): 97–124.
31.
IkenweIJUdemOK (2023) Beyond library beginnings: Understanding digital libraries. In: HollandB (ed.) Handbook of Research on Technological Advances of Library and Information Science in Industry 5.0. Hershey: IGI Global, pp.160–177.
32.
InnocentiPKonstantelosLRossS, et al (eds) (2010) Assessing digital preservation infrastructures: Implementing a framework for library, engineering and eScience organisations. In: IS&T Archiving Conference 2010 – (ARCHIVING 2010), Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 1-4 June 2010, Den Haag, Netherlands, pp.18–23.
33.
IsraniAEllisonNBDillahuntTR (2021) ‘A library of people”: Online resource-seeking in low-income communities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1): 152.
34.
JeongH (2011) An investigation of user perceptions and behavioral intentions towards the e-library. Library Collections Acquisitions and Technical Services35(2–3): 45–60.
35.
KhanSAShahzadK (2022) Key features of digital library management system (DLMS) for developing digital libraries: An investigation from LIS practitioners in Pakistan. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. Epub ahead of print 28 October 2022. DOI: 10.1177/09610006221127033.
36.
KilkerJGayG (1998) The social construction of a digital library: A case study examining implications for evaluation. Information Technology and Libraries17(2): 60–70.
37.
LittlesKJ (2021) Voices of the Incarcerated: Speaking from the Cellblock about Their Perspective on Dropping Out of School, Doctoral dissertation, Southeastern Louisiana University.
38.
LiuLSuXAkramU, et al (2020) The user acceptance behavior to mobile digital libraries. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems16(2): 38–53.
39.
LymanP (ed.) (2000) What is a digital library? The social impact of information artifacts. In: Proceedings - 2000 Kyoto International Conference on Digital Libraries: Research and Practice, KyotoDL 2000, Kyoto, Japan, 13–16 November 2000, pp.57–61. New York, NY: IEEE.
40.
MoorthyKChun T’ingLMingKS, et al (2019) Behavioral intention to adopt digital library by the undergraduates. The International Information & Library Review51(2): 128–144.
41.
Mudogo MutulaS (2012) Library automation in Sub Saharan Africa: Case study of the university of Botswana. Program46(3): 292–307.
42.
NaveedMAAnwarMA (2022) Mapping the literature on anxiety associated with information related tasks: A scientometric analysis. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science54: 791–802.
43.
NovOYeC (2008) Users’ personality and perceived ease of use of digital libraries: The case for resistance to change. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology59(5): 845–851.
44.
OguzF (2016) Organizational influences in technology adoption decisions: A case study of digital libraries. College & Research Libraries77(3): 314–334.
45.
Olmeda-GómezC.de Moya-AnegónF. (2016). Publishing trends in library and information sciences across European countries and institutions. The Journal of Academic Librarianship42(1): 27–37.
46.
OmotayoFOHaliruA (2020) Perception of task-technology fit of digital library among undergraduates in selected universities in Nigeria. The Journal of Academic Librarianship46(1): 46.
47.
ParkNRomanRLeeS, et al (2009) User acceptance of a digital library system in developing countries: An application of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Information Management29(3): 196–209.
48.
QiSHuaFXuS, et al (2021) Trends of global health literacy research (1995-2020): Analysis of mapping knowledge domains based on citation data mining. PLoS One16(8): e0254988.
49.
RafiqueHAlmagrabiAOShamimA, et al (2020) Investigating the acceptance of mobile library applications with an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Computers & Education145: 103732.
50.
RafiqueHAlroobaeaRMunawarBA, et al (2021) Do digital students show an inclination toward continuous use of academic library applications? A case study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship47(2): 102298.
RahmatTRazaSZahidH, et al (2022) Nexus between integrating technology readiness 2.0 index and students’ e-library services adoption amid the COVID-19 challenges: Implications based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Education and Health Promotion11(1). Doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_508_21
53.
RamayahTAafaqiB (2004) Role of self-efficacy in e-library usage among students of a public university in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science9(1): 39–57.
54.
Ramírez-CorreaPRondán-CataluñaFJArenas-GaitánJ, et al (2019) Analysing the acceptation of online games in mobile devices: An application of UTAUT2. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 85–93.
55.
Rey-MorenoMMedina-MolinaC (2016) Social capital in e-services adoption. Psychology & Marketing33(12): 1151–1158.
56.
RogersEM (2010) Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster.
57.
SamarasekaraCKOttCRobinsA (2023) Future scenarios for high school digital technology in New Zealand. In: Proceedings of the 25th Australasian computing education conference, ACE ’23, January 30-February 3, 2023, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, pp.21–30.
58.
SingehFWAbrizahAKiranK (2020) Bringing the digital library success factors into the realm of the technology-organization-environment framework. The Electronic Library38(3): 659–675.
59.
SinghGMittalRAhmadM (2007) A bibliometric study of literature on digital libraries. The Electronic Library25(3): 342–348.
60.
SinghTSharmaASinghCB (2016) Social construction of technology: A flexible strategy for DL success. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management17(3): 265–273.
61.
SmithCSmithJBShawE (2017) Embracing digital networks: Entrepreneurs’ social capital online. Journal of Business Venturing32(1): 18–34.
62.
SuXLiXKangY (2019) A bibliometric analysis of research on intangible cultural heritage using CiteSpace. Sage Open9(2): 2158244019840119.
63.
TsaiC H (2014) Integrating social capital theory, social cognitive theory, and the technology acceptance model to explore a behavioral model of telehealth systems. International Journal of Environmental Research And Public Health11(5): 4905–4925.
64.
ThengYTanKLimE, et al. (eds) (2007) Mobile G-portal supporting collaborative sharing and learning in geography fieldwork: An empirical study. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries, ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL2007, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, United States. Research Collection School Of Information Systems, pp.462–471. Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/1270
65.
ThongJYLHongWTamKY (2004) What leads to user acceptance of digital libraries?Communications of the ACM47(11): 78–83.
66.
ThongJYLHongWTamKY (2002) Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences?International Journal of Human-Computer Studies57(3): 215–242.
67.
TornatzkyLGFleischerM (1990) The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
68.
TsakonasGPapatheodorouC (2008) Exploring usefulness and usability in the evaluation of open access digital libraries. Information Processing & Management44(3): 1234–1250.
69.
VanwynsbergheHBoudryEVanderlindeR, et al (2014) Experts as facilitators for the implementation of social media in the library? A social network approach. Library Hi Tech32(3): 529–545.
70.
VenkateshVMorrisMGDavisGB, et al (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly27: 425–478.
71.
VenkateshV.ThongJ. Y.XuX. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly36: 157–178.
72.
WhiteMD (2001) Diffusion of an innovation: Digital reference service in Carnegie foundation master’s (comprehensive) academic institution libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship27(3): 173–187.
73.
WixomBHToddPA (2005) A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research16(1): 85–102.
74.
XuFDuJT (2018) Factors influencing users’ satisfaction and loyalty to digital libraries in Chinese universities. Computers in Human Behavior83: 64–72.
75.
XuFDuJT (2022) Research on the drivers of undergraduates’ intention to use university digital libraries: Affinity theory as an additional construct of information system success model. Library Hi Tech40: 1627–1641.
76.
YuSMuY (2022) Sustainable Agricultural Development Assessment: A Comprehensive Review and Bibliometric analysis. Sustainability14(19): 11824.
77.
ZhaXLiuKYanY, et al (2019) Comparing digital libraries with social media from the dual route perspective. Online Information Review43(4): 617–634.
78.
ZhouJ (2022) The role of libraries in distance learning during COVID-19. Information Development38(2): 227–238.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
