This study examined online communications within library and information science (LIS)-related subreddits through the perspectives of social identity theory and social media engagement. A total of 17,049 Reddit posts from three major LIS-related subreddits were harvested through Pushshift by Python. Manual and computational coding methods were used to identify linguistic characteristics of the posts as well as the topicality of the content. Multiple logistic regressions were used to analyze the relationship between psychological and emotional characteristics of the posts and user engagement. Results showed that the majority of posts did not mention a specific type of LIS organization; of the subset that did, public libraries and academic libraries were most frequently referenced. “Library services and usage” was the topic most mentioned within LIS-related subreddits, followed by “librarians and jobs.” Various psychological features of posts including emotional tone score, authentic score, clout score, analytic score, and usage of words related to affective processes, anxiety, social processes, causation, and time were significantly related to user engagement. This study contributes to further understanding of social identity theory and social media engagement within the online communication context of LIS community. Key topics and issues in the LIS field and practical suggestions for strategies to improve social media engagement across LIS community were discussed.
AharonyN (2012) Facebook use in libraries: An exploratory analysis. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives64(4): 358–372.
2.
AlajmiBMAlbudaiwiD (2020) Response to COVID-19 pandemic: Where do public libraries stand?Public Library Quarterly. Epub ahead of print 19 October 2020. DOI: 10.1080/01616846.2020.1827618
BeasleyAMasonW (2015) Emotional states vs. emotional words in social media. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM web science conference, Oxford, 28 June–1 July 2015. New York, NY: ACM.
5.
BennettWLWellsCFreelonD (2011) Communicating civic engagement: Contrasting models of citizenship in the youth web sphere. Journal of Communication61(5): 835–856.
6.
BuntainCGolbeckJ (2014) Identifying social roles in reddit using network structure. In: WWW 2014 companion – Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World Wide Web, Seoul, Korea, April 7–11, 2014. New York, NY: ACM.
7.
BurclaffNJohnsonC (2014) Developing a social media strategy: Tweets, pins, and posts with a purpose. College and Research Libraries News75(7): 366–369.
8.
CalderBJMalthouseECSchaedelU (2009) An experimental study of the relationship between online engagement and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Interactive Marketing23(4): 321–331.
9.
CampbellCPittLFParentM, et al. (2011) Understanding consumer conversations around ads in a web 2.0 world. Journal of Advertising40(1): 87–102.
10.
CarmanMKoerberMLiJ, et al. (2018) Manipulating visibility of political and apolitical threads on Reddit via score boosting. In: Proceedings – 17th IEEE international conference on trust, security and privacy in computing and communications and 12th IEEE international conference on big data science and engineering, Trustcom/BigDataSE 2018, New York, NY, 1–3 August 2018. New York, NY: IEEE.
11.
CarmeliABrammerSGomesE, et al. (2017) An organizational ethic of care and employee involvement in sustainability-related behaviors: A social identity perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior38(9): 1380–1395.
12.
ChanTTWLamAHCChiuDKW (2020) From Facebook to Instagram: Exploring user engagement in an academic library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship46(6): 102229. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102229
13.
ChoudhuryMDDeS (2014) Mental health discourse on reddit: Self-disclosure, social support, and anonymity. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on weblogs and social media, ICWSM 2014, Ann Arbor, MI, 1-4 June, 2014. Palo Alto (California): AAAI Press.
14.
CohenJ (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement20(1): 37–46.
15.
ConroyMFeezellJTGuerreroM (2012) Facebook and political engagement: A study of online political group membership and offline political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior28(5): 1535–1546.
16.
FondrenEMenard McCuneM (2018) Archiving and preserving social media at the Library of Congress: Institutional and cultural challenges to build a Twitter archive. Preservation Digital Technology & Culture47(2): 33–44.
17.
GazitTAharonyN (2018) Factors explaining participation in WhatsApp groups: An exploratory study. Aslib Journal of Information Management70(4): 390–413.
18.
GilbertE (2013) Widespread underprovision on reddit. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW, Antonio, TX, 23–27 February 2013. New York, NY: ACM.
19.
GmiterekG (2021) Polish university libraries social networking services during the COVID-19 pandemic spring term lockdown. The Journal of Academic Librarianship47(3): 102331. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102331
20.
HargittaiEHsiehYLP (2010) Predictors and consequences of differentiated practices on social network sites. Information Communication & Society13(4): 515–536.
21.
HolmbergKHuvilaIKronqvist-BergM, et al. (2009) What is library 2.0?Journal of Documentation65(4): 668–681.
22.
HoltzmanNSTackmanAMCareyAL, et al. (2019) Linguistic markers of grandiose narcissism: A LIWC analysis of 15 samples. Journal of Language and Social Psychology38(5–6): 773–786.
23.
HornseyMJ (2008) Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass2(1): 204–222.
24.
HumphreysS (2019) Tweeting into the void?: Creating a UK library Twitter list and analyzing best practice – Successes and myths. Insights the UKSG Journal32(1): 20. DOI: 10.1629/uksg.471
25.
JonesMJHarveyM (2019) Library 2.0: The effectiveness of social media as a marketing tool for libraries in educational institutions. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science51(1): 3–19.
26.
KirpalS (2004) Researching work identities in a European context. Career Development International9(3): 199–221.
27.
LamETHAuCHChiuDKW (2019) Analyzing the use of Facebook among university libraries in Hong Kong. The Journal of Academic Librarianship45(3): 175–183.
28.
LiAJiaoDZhuT (2018) Detecting depression stigma on social media: A linguistic analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders232: 358–362.
29.
ManessJM (2006) Library 2.0 theory: Web 2.0 and its implications for libraries. Webology3(2).
30.
MerleMReeseGDrewsS (2019) #Globalcitizen: An explorative Twitter analysis of global identity and sustainability communication. Sustainability11(12): 3472.
31.
PanZLuYWangB, et al. (2017) Who do you think you are? Common and differential effects of social self-identity on social media usage. Journal of Management Information Systems34(1): 71–101.
32.
ParabhoiLMeherPKSahuRR (2017) Use of social networking sites Facebook, Google Plus, Linked in, and Twitter among user of state library, Odisha: An exploratory study. Indian Journal of Library and Information Science11(2): 185–190.
33.
PennebakerJWBoydRLJordanK, et al. (2015) The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.
34.
PhillipsAL (2015) Facebooking it: Promoting library services to young adults through social media. Public Library Quarterly34(2): 178–197.
RafiqMBatoolSHAliAF, et al. (2021) University libraries response to COVID-19 pandemic: A developing country perspective. The Journal of Academic Librarianship47(1): 102280. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102280
37.
ReicherSDHaslamSASpearsR, et al. (2012) A social mind: The context of John Turner’s work and its influence. European Review of Social Psychology23(1): 344–385.
38.
SewellRR (2013) Who is following us? Data mining a library’s Twitter followers. Library Hi Tech31(1): 160–170.
39.
ShulmanJYepJToméD (2015) Leveraging the power of a Twitter network for library promotion. The Journal of Academic Librarianship41(2): 178–185.
40.
SinghKPSingh GillM (2013) Web 2.0 technologies in libraries: A survey of periodical literature published by Emerald. Library Review62: 177–198.
41.
SmithBGGallicanoTD (2015) Terms of engagement: Analyzing public engagement with organizations through social media. Computers in Human Behavior53: 82–90.
42.
SmithD (2021) Crowdsourcing COVID-19: A brief analysis of librarian posts on Reddit. In: BakerDEllisL (eds) Libraries, Digital Information, and COVID. Oxford: Chandos Publishing, pp.227–238.
43.
SowlesSJMcLearyMOpticanA, et al. (2018) A content analysis of an online pro-eating disorder community on reddit. Body Image24: 137–144.
44.
StewartBWalkerJ (2018) Build it and they will come? Patron engagement via Twitter at historically black college and university libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship44(1): 118–124.
45.
StovoldEM (2017) Twitter users with access to academic library services request health sciences literature through social media. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice12: 162.
46.
TajfelHTurnerJ (1979) An Integrated theory of Intergroup Conflict. In: HoggMAAbramsD (eds) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Hove: Psychology Press, pp.94–109.
47.
TurnerJHoggMOakesP, et al. (1987) Rediscovering the Social Groups: A Self-Categorization Perspective. Basil Blackwell.
48.
Ulfsdotter ErikssonYLindeM (2014) “Being” or “doing” a profession: Work as a matter of social identity. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Cultural Studies8(1): 33–43.
49.
VassilakakiEGaroufallouE (2014) The impact of Facebook on libraries and librarians: A review of the literature. Program48(3): 226–245.
50.
VassilakakiEGaroufallouE (2015) The impact of Twitter on libraries: A critical review of the literature. The Electronic Library33(4): 795–809.
51.
WalshKGordonJR (2008) Creating an individual work identity. Human Resource Management Review18(1): 46–61.
52.
ZhangMSheuFRZhangY (2018) Understanding twitter use by major LIS professional organisations in the United States. Journal of Information Science44(2): 165–183.
53.
ZimmerM (2015) The twitter archive at the Library of Congress: Challenges for information practice and information policy. First Monday20(7): DOI: 10.5210/fm.v20i7.5619
