‘More Product,Less Process’ (MPLP): An early printed book project

Abstract

This article addresses the challenge to make printed hidden collections known quickly without sacrificing ultimate quality. It takes as its starting point the archival mantra ‘More product, less process’ and explores its application to printed books, mindful of projects in the United States to catalogue 19th- and 20th-century printed books quickly and cheaply with the help of OCLC. A problem is lack of time or managerial inclination ever to return to ‘quick and dirty’ imports. This article is a case study concerning a collection of 18th-century English imprints, the Graveley Parish Library, at Senate House Library, University of London. Faced with the need to provide metadata as quickly as possible for digitisation purposes, Senate House Library decided, in contrast to its normal treatment of early printed books, to download records from the English Short Title Catalogue and amend them only very minimally before releasing them for public view, and to do this work from catalogue cards rather than the books themselves. The article describes the Graveley Parish collection, the project method’s rationale, and the advantages and disadvantages of sourcing the English Short Title Catalogue for metadata. It discusses the drawbacks of retrospective conversion (cataloguing from cards, not books): insufficient detail in some cases to identify the relevant book, and ignorance of the copy-specific elements of books which can constitute the main research interest. The method is compared against cataloguing similar books from photocopies of title pages, and retrospective conversion using English Short Title Catalogue is compared against retrospective conversion of early printed Continental books from cards using Library Hub Discover or OCLC. The control groups show our method’s effectiveness. The project succeeded by producing records fast that fulfilled their immediate purpose and simultaneously would obviously require revisiting. The uniform nature of the collection enabled the saving of time through global changes.

Keywords

Cataloguing More Product Less Process (MPLP)retrospective conversion Senate House Library University of London ESTC case studies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Association of College and Research Libraries, Rare Books and Manuscripts Section, Bibliographic Standards Committee (2007) Descriptive Cataloging of Rare Materials (Books). Washington, DC: Library of Congress.

Attar

(ed.) (2016) Directory of Rare Book and Special Collections in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. London: Facet Publishing.

Blayney

(2000) Correspondence. The Library 1: 72–74.

British Library (n.d.) English Short Title Catalogue (ESTC). Available at: http://estc.bl.uk

Crowe

Spilman

(2010) MPLP@5: More access, less backlog? Journal of Archival Organization 8: 110–133.

Duhaime

(2019) Copyright and the early English book market: An algorithmic study. PhD Thesis, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.

Greene

Meissner

(2005) More product, less process: Revamping traditional archival processing. American Archivist 68: 208–263.

Historic Libraries Forum (2020-2021) Historic Libraries Forum statement on proposed redundancies at the National Trust, 17 Aug.2020; Historic Libraries Forum letter to the Royal College of Physicians regarding the proposed sale of books from the Dorchester Collection, 23 Oct. 2020; Historic Libraries Forum statement on cuts to staff and services in libraries with Unique and Distinctive Collections (UDC), 16 Mar. 2021. Available at: https://historiclibrariesforum.com/blog/ (accessed 26 May 2021).

Hubbard

Myers

AKD

(2010) Bringing rare books to light: The state of the profession. RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts and Cultural Heritage 11(2): 134151.

10.

Jacob

(2006) Libraries for the parish: Individual donors and charitable societies. In. Mandelbrote

Manley

(eds) The Cambridge History of Libraries in Britain and Ireland (Vol. 2, 1640-1850). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–82.

11.

Jones

(2004) Hidden collections, scholarly barriers: Creating access to unprocessed special collections in America’s research libraries. RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts and Cultural Heritage 5(2): 88–105).

12.

Jones

Panitch

(2004) Exposing hidden collections: Introduction. RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts and Cultural Heritage 5(2): 84–87).

13.

Lentz

(1992) Editing recon records. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 14: 129–144.

14.

Lundy

(2007) Providing access to uncataloged special collections in-process records. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 45: 39–58.

15.

McKitterick

(2005) ‘Not in STC’: Opportunities and challenges in the ESTC. The Library 6: 178–194.

16.

Meissner

Greene

(2010) More application while less appreciation: The adopters and antagonists of MPLP. Journal of Archival Organization 8: 174–226.

17.

Nicholson

(2012) Cataloguing. In. Bowman

(ed.) British Librarianship and Information Work 2006-2010. London: JH Bowman via lulu, pp. 388–397.

18.

Patty

(2008) Metadata, technology and processing a backlog in a university special collections [sic]. Journal of Archival Organization 6(1-2): 102–120.

19.

Pearson

(2019) Provenance Research in Book History: A Handbook. 2nd edn. Oxford: Bodleian Library.

20.

Perkin

(2004) A Directory of the Parochial Libraries of the Church of England and the Church in Wales. 2nd edn. London: Bibliographical Society.

21.

Research Libraries UK (RLUK) in association with the London Library (2012) Hidden collections. Available at: https://www.rluk.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/RLUK-Hidden-Collections.pdf

22.

Richnell

(1959) The library of Bishop Beilby Porteus. Library Association Record 61: 156–158.

23.

Royal College of Physicians (2020) 9 Oct.2020, RCP considers sale of non-medical assets from its collections. Available at: https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/news/rcp-considers-sale-non-medical-assets-its-collections (accessed 26 May 2021).

24.

Russell

(2004) Special collections cataloguing at a crossroads: A survey of ARL libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship 30(4): 294–303.

25.

Schmitz

(2002) Revealing hidden collections. Technical Services Quarterly 19: 47–60.

26.

Snyder

(2003) The future of the ESTC: A vision. In. Snyder

Smith

(eds) The English Short Title Catalogue: Past, Present, Future. New York: AMS Press, pp. 21–30.

27.

Süle

(1990) Bibliographic standards for retrospective conversion. IFLA Journal 16(1): 5863.

28.

Tabb

(2004) ‘Wherefore are these things hid?’ A report of a survey undertaken by the ARL Special Collections Taskforce. RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts and Cultural Heritage 5(2): 123–126.

29.

Tabor

(2007) ESTC and the bibliographical community. The Library 8: 367–386.

30.

Zeeman

(rev) (1986) The Eighteenth Century Short Title Catalogue: The Cataloguing Rules, 1986 Edition. London: British Library.