The adverse outcomes of copyright violations to most businesses and Higher Education Institutions which depend on copyright in their operations have led these businesses and institutions to put in place stiffer measures with the view to avoiding lawsuits. Data collected from 38 library staff and head librarians from two public and two private universities using questionnaires and one-on-one interviews were used in a sequential mixed methods approach to investigate the mechanisms for copyright administration that ensure a balance of stakeholder rights in academic libraries in Ghana. Although participants had knowledge of the permitted use clauses in the copyright laws of Ghana they did not know of their right, and the right of library users to permitted use for: “Private copying,” “Illustrations for instructions,” and “For the benefit of libraries and archives.” Copyright was thus being administered to the disadvantage of library users. Library staff also lacked confidence, and rather shifted responsibility to other departments in the interpretation of the copyright laws. Thus, awareness of the law per se is only one part of the equation, the other part being its proper interpretation and administration.
AdlerPButlerBAufderheideP, et al. (2010) Fair Use Challenges in Academic and Research Libraries. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries. Available at: http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/arl_csm_fairusereport.pdf (accessed 5 December 2017).
2.
AduTLvan der WaltTB (2021) The level of awareness and understanding of copyright laws and policies among academic librarians in Ghana. The Journal of Academic Librarianship47: 102317.
3.
American University Library (2010) What Faculty Need to Know About Copyright for Teaching. Washington, DC: American University Library.
BandJGerafiJ (2013) The Fair Use/Fair Dealing Handbook. Available at: infojustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/band-and-gerafi-2013.pdf (accessed 3 July 2017).
6.
BensonSR (2018) Increasing librarian confidence and comprehension in a fair use training session. Library and the Academy18(4): 781–804.
7.
Berkman Center for Internet and Society and EIFL (2013) Copyright for Librarians: The Essential Handbook. EIFL and Berkman Center for Internet and Society. Utrecht: Berkman Center for Internet and Society and EIFL.
8.
BerlinckRGS (2011) The academic plagiarism and its punishments—A review. Brazilian Journal of Pharmacognosy21(3): 365–372.
9.
CharbonneauDHPriehsM (2014) Copyright awareness, partnerships, and training issues in academic libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship40(3–4): 228–233.
Copyright Clearance Center and Outsell (2019) 2019 Information Seeking, Consumption and Use Survey. Danvers, MA: Clearance Center and Outsell.
15.
CreswellJW (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th edn.London: SAGE.
16.
CrewsK (2008) Study on copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries and archives. Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights Seventeenth Session, Geneva, 3–7November, pp. 1–434. WIPO. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_17/sccr_17_2.pdf (accessed 2 June 2016).
17.
CrewsK (2017) Study on copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries and archives: Updated and revised. In: Standing committee on copyright and related rights thirty-fifth session, Geneva, 13–17November, pp. 1–479. WIPO. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_35/sccr_ 35_6.pdf (accessed 8 August 2018).
EyeJ (2013) Knowledge level of library deans and directors in copyright law. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication2(1): eP1103.
20.
FerulloDL (2004) Major copyright issues in academic libraries. Journal of Library Administration40(1–2): 23–40.
21.
FinckMMosconV (2019) Copyright law on blockchains: Between new forms of rights administration and digital rights management 2.0. IIC50: 77–108.
22.
Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc., 2021. 593 U. S. Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc.
23.
HartDLSlaterRD (2019) Think your company is in compliance with the Copyright Act: Listen carefully. The Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance30: 169–174.
24.
HoravaT (2010) Copyright communication in Canadian academic libraries: A national survey [Les modes de communication concernant les droits d’auteur dans les bibliothèques universitaires canadiennes: Une enquête nationale]. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science34(1): 1–38.
25.
Intellectual Property Office (2014) Exceptions to Copyright: Education and Teaching. London: Crown Copying.
Molina-AzorinJFFettersMD (2019) Building a better world through mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research13(3): 275–281.
32.
MorrisonCSeckerJ (2015) Copyright literacy in the UK: A survey of librarians and other cultural heritage sector professionals. Library and Information Research39(121): 75–97.
33.
MungaiMWDorvloSSNuwagiryaA, et al. (2020) Influence of copyright exceptions and limitations on access to information in Kenya, Ghana and Uganda libraries. Library Management41(67): 565–577.
NilssonI (2016) Developing new copyright services in academic libraries. Insights29(1): 78–83.
36.
NorrisSATierneyBGDubachL (2019) Why every librarian should know about copyright: Creating copyright training opportunities for librarians at your institution. Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works 866. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/ucfscholar/866
OnwuegbuzieAJLeechNCollinsK (2012) Qualitative analysis techniques for the review of the literature. Qualitative Report17(28): 1–28.
39.
PuckettJ (2010) Digital rights management as information access barrier. Progressive Librarian34(35): 11–24.
40.
SeckerJMorrisonCNilssonI (2019) Copyright literacy and the role of librarians as educators and advocates: An international symposium. Journal of Copyright in Education and Librarianship3(2): 1–19.
41.
SheatK (2004) Libraries, copyright and the global digital environment. The Electronic Library22(6): 487–491.
42.
SnowN (2020) Fair use in Sayre V. Moore: A reply to Oracle. University of Illinois Law Review Online2020: 284–292.
43.
StokkmoO (2019) The Role of Collective Licensing. Geneva: International Publishers Association.
44.
TodorovaTYKurbanogluSBoustanyJ, et al. (2017) Information professionals and copyright literacy: A multinational study. Library Management38(6–7): 323–344.
UrsSR (2004) Copyright, academic research and libraries: Balancing the rights of stakeholders in the digital age. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems38(3): 201–207.
47.
VoglRLeeFRussellMG, et al. (2012) SIPX: Addressing the Copyright Law Barrier in Higher Education—Access-to-Clean-Content Technology in the 21st Century. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law School.
