The application of stricter copyright laws in academic libraries leaves users of reprographic materials at the mercy of rightsholders thereby inhibiting knowledge acquisition and dissemination. This study interrogated the copyright challenges faced by academic library users in Ghana using data from 530 postgraduate students in two private and two public universities. Among the major challenges faced by students were: (i) Digital technology has made it easier to access, reuse and share content (ii) Unintentionally exposing the institution or library to the risk of copyright infringement (iii) Piracy (iv) Undue concerns of authorities about copyright infringement, (v) Publishers and other intermediaries put impediments in the provision of learning resources, (vi) Difficulties in locating the rightsholder to seek permission for the use of material, (vii) Difficulties in supervising content use, (viii) Content is available from many different sources, including the open web, and (ix) Rights licensing are not always straightforward, easy or efficient. The support by some students (i.e., those at the Writing of findings/results or Discussion stage of their thesis writeup as well as fourth-year PhD students) of the commercial interests of publishers may be a positive contribution in promoting copyright compliance in academic libraries.
AdeyinkaTOyeyemiFO (2017) Undergraduate students’ knowledge of copyright infringement. Brazilian Journal of Information Studies: Research Trends11: 38–53.
2.
AdlerPButlerBAufderheideP, et al. (2010) Fair use challenges in academic and research libraries. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries. Available at: http://www.arl.org/bm∼doc/arl_csm_fairusereport.pdf (accessed December 5, 2017).
3.
AduTLvan der WaltTB (2021a) The level of awareness and understanding of copyright laws and policies among academic librarians in Ghana. The Journal of Academic Librarianship47: 102317.
4.
AduTLvan der WaltTB (2021b) Copyright administration in academic libraries in Ghana. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science: 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211024716.
5.
AduTLvan der WaltTB (2021c) Effects of awareness of user rights on compliance with copyright laws and policies in academic libraries in Ghana. The Journal of Academic Librarianship47(4): 102359.
6.
AduTLvan der WaltTB (2021d) The legal and institutional framework for, and challenges to the payment of reprographic fees in higher education institutions in Ghana. Library Management42(8/9): 550–560.
7.
AduTLvan der WaltTB (2024) Information type and format, and copyright infringement in academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006241246792.
8.
AlbitzRS (2013) Copyright information management and the university library: Staffing, organizational placement and authority. Journal of Academic Librarianship39(5): 429–235.
9.
AlzapiediK (2012) Copyright Challenges and Solutions. PIPELINE, Issue 38.
10.
BeijenMF, 2021. Effects of time constraints and search results presentation on web search. MSc. Thesis, Delft University of Technology
ChapdelaineP (2018) Copyright user rights and remedies: An access to justice perspective. Laws7: 24.
13.
CharbonneauDHPriehsM (2014) Copyright awareness, partnerships, and training issues in academic libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship40: 228–233.
CrewsK (2017) Study on copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries and archives: Updated and revised. In: Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights Thirty-fifth Session, Geneva, 13–17 November 2017, pp.1–479: WIPO. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_35/sccr_35_6.pdf (accessed August 8, 2018).
18.
DarkeyEMAkussahH (2008) Academic libraries and copyright issues in Ghana: The university of Ghana in focus. International Journal of Legal Information36: 432–446.
19.
DempseyMNannA (2020) Librarian advocacy for open educational resource adoptions and programs. International Journal of Open Educational Resources3(1): 119–131.
FerulloDL (2004) Major copyright issues in academic libraries. Journal of Library Administration40(1–2): 23–40.
22.
FinckMMosconV (2019) Copyright law on blockchains: Between new forms of rights administration and digital rights management 2.0. IIC50: 77–108.
23.
GervaisDJ (2008) Making copyright whole: A principled approach to copyright exceptions and limitations. University of Ottawa Law & Technology Journal5(1–2): 1–41.
Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. (2021) 593 U. S. Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc.
26.
HendersonSMcGrealRVladimirschiV (2018) Access copyright and fair dealing guidelines in higher educational institutions in Canada: A survey. The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research13: 2.
27.
HoravaT (2010) Copyright communication in Canadian academic libraries: A national survey / les modes de communication concernant les droits d’auteur dans les bibliothèques universitaires canadiennes: Une enquête nationale. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science34(1): 1–38.
28.
IFRRO and WIPO (2005) Collective management in reprography. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/copyright/924/wipo_pub_924.pdf (accessed February 13, 2019).
IzuagbeR (2017) Pricing implication of publishers’ licensing models on sustainable e-resources integration in academic libraries: A review. International Journal of Information Science and Management15(2): 79–88.
31.
Kantar Media (2013) OCI Tracker Benchmark Study "Deep Dive" Analysis Report.
32.
KumekporTKB (1999) Research Methods and Techniques of Social Research, 1st ed.Accra: Sonlife Press.
33.
LiuJMitsuiMBelkinNJ, et al. (2019) Task, information seeking in tentions, and user behavior: Toward a multi-level understanding of web search. Section 5: Information interests & needs. In: ZopardiLAHalveyMRuthvenIJohoHMurdockVQvarfordtP (eds) Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, CHIIR 2019. Glasgow, Scotland, UK: ACM, 123–132.
34.
MungaiMWDorvloSSNuwagiryaA, et al. (2020) Influence of copyright exceptions and limitations on access to information in Kenya, Ghana and Uganda libraries. Library Management41(6/7): 565–577.
OkedijiRL (2006) The international copyright system: Limitations, exceptions and public interest considerations for developing countries. In: UNCTAD – ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development (Issue Paper No. 15). 1–52. Geneva, Switzerland: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD). Available at: https://unctad.org/en/docs/iteipc200610_en.pdf (accessed March 3, 2017).
RawlinsonDRLuptonRA (2007) Cross-National attitudes and perceptions concerning software piracy: A comparative study of students from the United States and China. Journal of Education for Business83(2): 87–93.
42.
RikowskiR (2003) Rethinking the “Balance in Copyright”: 3 Parts to the Balance, Not Just One! Available at: www.libr.org/isc/articles/21/8.pdf (accessed August 8, 2016).
43.
RonkainenIAGuerrero-CusumanoJ-L (2001) Correlates of intellectual property violation. Multinational Business Review9(1): 59–65.
44.
SeckerJMorrisonCNilssonI (2019) Copyright literacy and the role of librarians as educators and advocates: An international symposium. Journal of Copyright in Education and Librarianship3(2): 1–19.
45.
ShraybergYLVolkovaKY (2021) Features of copyright transformation in the information environment in the age of digitalization. Scientific and Technical Information Processing48(1): 30–37.
46.
StokkmoO (2019) The Role of Collective Licensing. Geneva, Switzerland: International Publishers Association.
47.
TehWLAbdinEAsharaniP (2023) Measuring social desirability bias in a multi-ethnic cohort sample: its relationship with self-reported physical activity, dietary habits, and factor structure. Measuring social desirability bias in a multi- ethnic cohort sample: its relationship. BMC Public Health23: 415.
TodorovaTYKurbanogluSBoustanyJ, et al. (2017) Information professionals and copyright literacy: A multi-national study. Library Management38(6–7): 323–344.
