The purpose of this study was to determine if secondary students overestimate their information literacy (IL) abilities and if differences exist between their information literacy self-efficacy and performance levels. A sample of 397 secondary students completed the Information Literacy Self-efficacy Scale (ILSES) and the Tool for Real-time Assessment of Information Literacy Skills (TRAILS) to measure their information literacy self-efficacy and performance. Descriptive means were calculated, compared using a t-test, and reported for student information literacy self-efficacy levels according to the ILSES and student information literacy performance levels according to the TRAILS measure. Quantitative analyses showed that all groups overestimated their information literacy abilities. Additional findings were that as self-efficacy increased, so too did performance. However, the discrepancy between self-efficacy and performance increased as self-efficacy increased as well.
AesaertKVoogtJKuiperE, et al. (2017) Accuracy and bias of ICT self-efficacy: An empirical study into students’ over- and underestimation of their ICT competences. Computers in Human Behavior75: 92–102.
2.
AharonyNGazitT (2019) Factors affecting students’ information literacy self-efficacy. Library Hi Tech37(2): 183–196.
BanduraA (1997) Self-efficacy. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
8.
BarthelMMitchellAHolcombJ (2016) Many Americans believe fake news is sowing confusion. Report, Pew Research Center, Washington, DC, December.
9.
BondTGFoxCM (2007) Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
ClarkM (2017) Imposed-inquiry information-seeking self-efficacy and performance of college students: A review of the literature. The Journal of Academic Librarianship43(5): 417–422.
11.
ClearyTJ (2009) Monitoring trends and accuracy of self-efficacy beliefs during interventions: Advantages and potential applications to school-based settings. Psychology in the Schools46(2): 154–171.
12.
Delli CarpiniMXKeeterS (1996) What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
DolencKŠorgoA (2020) Information literacy capabilities of lower secondary school students in Slovenia. The Journal of Educational Research113(5): 335–342.
14.
DunningD (2011) The Dunning-Kruger effect: On being ignorant of one’s own ignorance. In: OlsonJZannaMP (eds) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 44. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, pp.247–296.
15.
EisenbergMB (2008) Information literacy: Essential skills for the information age. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology28(2): 39–47.
16.
European Commission (2013) Survey of Schools: ICT in Education. Benchmarking Access, Use and Attitudes to Technology in Europe’s Schools. Brussels: European Commission.
17.
GriffithsJRBrophyP (2005) Student searching behavior and the web: Use of academic resources and Google. Library Trends53(4): 539.
18.
GrossM (2005) The impact of low-level skills on information-seeking behavior: Implications of competency theory for research and practice. Reference & User Services Quarterly45(2): 155–162.
19.
GrossMLathamD (2007) Attaining information literacy: An investigation of the relationship between skill level, self-estimates of skill, and library anxiety. Library & Information Science Research29(3): 332–353.
20.
GrossMLathamD (2009) Undergraduate perceptions of information literacy: Defining, attaining, and self-assessing skills. College & Research Libraries70(4): 336–350.
21.
GrossMLathamD (2011) Experiences with and perceptions of information: A phenomenographic study of first-year college students. The Library Quarterly81(2): 161–186.
22.
GrossMLathamD (2012) What’s skill got to do with it? Information literacy skills and self-views of ability among first-year college students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology63(3): 574–583.
23.
GustavsonANallHC (2011) Freshman overconfidence and library research skills: A troubling relationship?College & Undergraduate Libraries18(4): 291–306.
24.
HinchliffeLJRandACollierJ (2018) Predictable information literacy misconceptions of first-year college students. Communications in Information Literacy12(1): 4–18.
25.
HochschildJEinsteinKL (2015) Do Facts Matter: Information and Misinformation in American Politics. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
26.
JulienHBarkerS (2009) How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development. Library & Information Science Research31(1): 12–17.
27.
KaraarslanGSungurS (2011) Elementary students’ self -efficacy beliefs in science: Role of grade level, gender, and socio-economic status. Science Education International22(1): 72–79.
28.
Kent State University Libraries (2004) TRAILS: Tool for real-time assessment of information literacy skills. Available at: http://www.trails-archive.org/
KrugerJDunningD (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology77(6): 1121–1134.
31.
KuhlthauCC (2004) Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services, 2nd ed.Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
32.
KurbanogluSSAkkoyunluBUmayA (2006) Developing the information literacy self-efficacy scale. Journal of Documentation62(6): 730–743.
33.
LathamDGrossM (2008) Broken links: Undergraduates look back on their experiences with information literacy in K-12 education. School Library Media Research11. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ823031 (accessed 8 March 2018).
34.
MacklinAS (2001) Integrating information literacy using problem-based learning. Reference Services Review29(4): 306–314.
35.
MahmoodK (2017) Reliability and validity of self-efficacy scales assessing students’ information literacy skills: A systematic review. The Electronic Library35(5): 1035–1051.
36.
MetzgerMJFlanaginAJMarkovA, et al. (2015) Believing the unbelievable: Understanding young people’s information literacy beliefs and practices in the United States. Journal of Children and Media9(3): 325–348.
37.
MolteniVEChanEK (2015) Student confidence/overconfidence in the research process. The Journal of Academic Librarianship41(1): 2–8.
38.
MooreDAHealyPJ (2008) The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review115(2): 502–517.
39.
PrenskyM (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon9(5): 1–6.
40.
SalemJAJr (2014) The development and validation of all four TRAILS (Tool for Real-time Assessment of Information Literacy Skills) tests for k-12 students. PhD Dissertation, Kent State University, Kent, OH. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text. Available at: https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_olink/r/1501/10?clear=10&p10_accession_num=kent1415382839 (accessed 4 May 2018).
41.
SirinSR (2005) Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research75(3): 417–453.
Yevelson-ShorsherABronsteinJ (2018) Three perspectives on information literacy in Academia: Talking to librarians, faculty, and students. College & Research Libraries79(4): 535–553.
