Although the perceptions of library user education of academic libraries has been studied in a general context, specific studies on perspective of library and information science students are relatively few, especially in the context of Asia. Filling this research gap is particularly important because it affects the experiential learning of these pre-professionals, and shapes future library user education directions. As such, this study aims at understanding and comparing the views and perceptions of library user education programs in Greater China from the perspective of library and information science students. A total number 305 questionnaire survey responses were collected from three different universities in Greater China, namely: The University of Hong Kong (HKU), National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU), and Peking University (PKU). Results from this survey study reveal high evaluations of library user education programs and library user education librarians as a whole, as well as possible ways for librarians to better promote such programs. Such ratings are attributed to findings from previous studies on why students choose librarianship as a career, as well as the importance of experiential learning embedded in the Library and Information Science programs at each university. Findings of this study also suggest that as pre-professionals (soon-to-be professional librarians), these student respondents recognize the values behind library user education as an important part of their overall learning practices. Results from this study will be useful in identifying how future library professionals in Greater China perceive library user education programs, and librarians – therefore potentially helping librarians improve the delivery of these services.
AndrewsCWrightSERaskinH (2015) Library learning spaces: Investigating libraries and investing in student feedback. Journal of Library Administration56(6): 647–672.
3.
Association of College, Research Libraries and American Library Association (ACRL) (2000) Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Chicago, IL: ACRL.
Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) (2016) Documented Library Contributions to Student Learning and Success: Building Evidence with Team-Based Assessment in Action Campus Projects. Prepared by Karen Brown with contributions by Kara J. Malenfant. Chicago, IL: ACRL. Available at: www.acrl.ala.org/value (accessed 21 May 2018).
6.
BallMA (2008) Practicums and service learning in LIS education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science49(1): 70–82.
7.
BruceCEdwardsSLuptonM (2006) Six frames for information literacy education: A conceptual framework for interpreting the relationships between theory and practice. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences5(1): 1–18.
8.
ChenKNLinPC (2011) Information literacy in university library user education. Aslib Proceedings63(4): 399–418.
9.
ChenLH (2011) Enhancement of student learning performance using personalized diagnosis and remedial learning system. Computers and Education56(1): 289–299.
10.
ClarkJCJohnstoneJ (2018) Exploring the research mindset and information-seeking behaviors of undergraduate music students. College & Research Libraries79(4): 499–516.
11.
CunninghamHVTaburS (2012) Learning space attributes: Reflections on academic library design and its use. Journal of Learning Spaces1(2). Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1152699.pdf
12.
DukicZ (2017) Choice of career in library and information science and past work experience. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science51(3): 654–669.
13.
FeliciaP (ed.) (2011) Handbook of Research on Improving Learning and Motivation through Educational Games: Multidisciplinary Approaches: Multidisciplinary Approaches. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
14.
GlazerSDanielSCShortKM (2004) A study of the relationship between organizational commitment and human values in four countries. Human Relations57(3): 323–345.
HoKKWLoPChiuDKW, et al. (2016) Intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivations of Master of Library and Information Science students: A cross-cultural comparative study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science50(2): 141–156.
17.
JohnstonBWebberS (2004) The role of LIS faculty in the information literate university: Taking over the academy?New Library World105 (1/2): 12–20.
KimJA (2017) User perception and use of the academic library: A correlation analysis. Journal of Academic Librarianship43(3): 209–215.
20.
KimSUShumakerD (2015) Student, librarian, and instructor perceptions of information literacy instruction and skills in a first year experience program: A case study. Journal of Academic Librarianship41(4): 449–456.
21.
KoEChiuDLoP, et al. (2015) Comparative study on m-learning usage among LIS students from Hong Kong, Japan and Taiwan. Journal of Academic Librarianship41(5): 567–577.
LiuQLoPItsumuraH (2016) Measuring the importance of library user education: A comparative study between Fudan University and the National Taiwan Normal University. Journal of Academic Librarianship42(6): 644–654.
24.
LoPDukicZChiuDKW, et al. (2015) Why librarianship? A comparative study between University of Tsukuba, University of Hong Kong, University of British Columbia and Shanghai University. Australian Academic and Research Libraries46(3): 194–215.
25.
LoPChiuDKWDukicZ, et al. (2017). Motivations for choosing librarianship as a second career among students at the University of British Columbia and the University of Hong Kong. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science49(4): 424–437.
26.
McCarthyPRMcCarthyHM (2006) When case studies are not enough: Integrating experiential learning into business curricula. Journal of Education for Business81(4): 201–204.
27.
McInnis-BowersCChewBFordCE, et al. (2009) Interdisciplinary synergy: A partnership between Business and Library Faculty and its effects on students’ information literacy. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship14(2): 110–127.
28.
MatthewsKEAndrewsVAdamsP (2011) Social learning spaces and student engagement. Higher Education Research and Development30(2): 105–120.
29.
O’FarrellMBatesJ (2009) Student information behaviours during group projects: A study of LIS students in University College Dublin, Ireland. Aslib Proceedings61(3): 302–315.
30.
Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) (2006) College Students’ Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources: A Report to the OCLC Membership. Dublin, OH: OCLC.
31.
O’TooleEBarhamRMonahanJ (2016) The impact of physically embedded librarianship on academic departments. Libraries and the Academy16(3): 529–556.
32.
RockmanIF (2004) The importance of information literacy. In: RockmanIF (ed.) Integrating Information Literacy into the Higher Education Curriculum: Practical Models for Transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 1–28.
33.
SaundersLKurbanogluSBoustanyJ, et al. (2015) Information behaviours and information literacy skills of LIS students: An international perspective. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science56(1): 80–99.
34.
SoderdahlPA (2011) Library classroom renovated as an active learning classroom. Library Hi Tech29(1): 83–90.
35.
SullivanRM (2010) Common knowledge: Learning spaces in academic libraries. College and Undergraduate Libraries17(2/3): 130–148.
36.
TracyDGSearingSE (2014) LIS graduate students as library users: A survey study. Journal of Academic Librarianship40(3/4): 367–378.
37.
TurnerAWelchBReynoldsS (2013) Learning spaces in academic libraries: A review of the evolving trends. Australian Academic and Research Libraries44(4):226–234.
38.
University of California Television (2015) Back to the future with the brave new library featuring Sarah Thomas VP for the Harvard Library. [Video File] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=at3PSQqd94k (accessed 3 September 2019).
39.
VirkusSMetsarS (2004) General introduction to the role of the library for university education. Liber Quarterly14(3/4): 290–305.
