Current scholarly debate around digital participatory youth projects and approaches to their evaluation are examined in this article. The analysis of the literature presented here reveals (1) an over-reliance on traditional evaluation techniques for such initiatives, and (2) a scarcity of models for the assessment of the social impact of digital participatory youth projects. It is concluded that the challenges and limitations of social impact evaluation practice in digital participatory youth projects should be addressed through the adoption of alternative, participant-centred approaches. These issues are discussed in reference to a current ongoing study that seeks to identify solutions for enhancing social impact evaluations of participatory digital initiatives by young people.
AikenM (2017) The Cyber Effect: A Pioneering Cyberpsychologist Explains How Human Behavior Changes Online. New York: Spiegel & Grau.
4.
AkpofureEAOjileM (2003) Social impact assessment: An interactive and participatory approach. In: UNEP EIA Training Resource Manual. Case Studies from Developing Countries. Geneva: UNEP, pp. 211–222.
BeckerDRHarrisCCMcLaughlinWJ, et al. (2003) A participatory approach to social impact assessment: The interactive community forum. Environmental Impact Assessment Review23(3): 367–382.
7.
BelfioreEBennettO (2007) Rethinking the social impacts of the arts. International Journal of Cultural Policy13(2): 135–151.
8.
BennettARobardsB (2014) Introduction: Youth, cultural practice and media technologies. In: BennettARobardsB (eds) Mediated Youth Cultures. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–7.
9.
BentleyHO’HaganORaffA, et al. (2016) How Safe are our Children. The Most Comprehensive Overview of Child Protection in the UK. London: NSPCC.
10.
BlackJCastroJLinC (2015) Youth Practices in Digital Arts and New Media: Learning in Formal and Informal Settings. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
BoydD (2014) It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
BuccieriKMollesonG (2015) Empowering homeless youth: Building capacity through the development of mobile technology. Journal of Community Practice23(2): 238–254.
13.
BuckinghamD (ed.) (2008) Youth, Identity, and Digital Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
BurdgeRVanclayF (1996) Social impact assessment: A contribution to the state of the art series. Impact Assessment14(1): 59–86.
15.
BurdgeRJ (2003) The practice of social impact assessment background. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal21(2): 84–88.
16.
ChambersR (1994) The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development22(7): 953–969.
17.
CheckowayBNGutierrezLM (2006) Youth participation and community change: An introduction. Journal of Community Practice14(1/2): 1–9.
18.
CheckowayBRichards-SchusterK (2003) Youth participation in community evaluation research. American Journal of Evaluation24(1): 21–33.
19.
CheckowayBRichards-SchusterK (2005) Facilitator’s Guide for Participatory Evaluation with Young People. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Program for Youth and Community, School of Social Work.
DellNKumarN (2016) The ins and outs of HCI for development. In: CHI’16: 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, USA, 7–12 May 2016, pp. 2220–2232. New York: ACM. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2858036 (accessed 22 April 2018).
25.
DouthwaiteBAlvarezSCookS, et al. (2007) Participatory impact pathways analysis: A practical application of program theory in research-for-development. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation22(2): 127–159.
26.
DufourB (2015) State of the art in social impact measurement: Methods for work integration social enterprises measuring their impact in a public context. In: 5th EMES international research conference on social enterprise: Building a scientific field to foster the social enterprise eco-system, Helsinki, Finland, 30 June–3 July 2015. Available at: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01458730/document (accessed 22 April 2018).
27.
DukeAMSollieDLSilvaK (2016) Using youth participatory evaluation to improve a bullying prevention program. Journal of Extension54(4): article 4.
28.
EgboR (2012) Technologies of governance: An examination of youth participation in development discourses. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement33(1): 77–89.
29.
ErstadO (2012) The learning lives of digital youth: Beyond the formal and informal. Oxford Review of Education38(1): 25–43.
30.
EstevesAMFranksDVanclayF (2012) Social impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal30(1): 34–42.
31.
FeinsteinCGiertsenAO’KaneC (2009) Children’s participation in armed conflict and postconflict peacebuilding. In: Percy-SmithBThomasN (eds) A Handbook of Children and Young People’s Participation: Perspectives from Theory and Practice. London: Routledge, pp. 53–62.
32.
FettermanDWandersmanA (2007) Empowerment evaluation: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. American Journal of Evaluation28(2): 179–198.
33.
FittonDBellBTLittleL, et al. (2016) Working with teenagers in HCI research: A reflection on techniques used in the Taking on the Teenagers project. In: LittleL, et al. (eds) Perspectives on HCI Research with Teenagers. Cham: Springer International, pp. 237–267.
34.
FloresKS (2007) Youth Participatory Evaluation: Strategies for Engaging Young People. Vol. 14. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
35.
FloresKS (2008) Youth Participatory Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
36.
GawlerM (2005) Useful Tools for Engaging Young People in Participatory Evaluation. Geneva: UNICEF CEE/CIS Regional Office
37.
GuhaMLDruinAFailsJA (2010) Investigating the impact of design processes on children. In: IDC ʼ10: 9th International conference on interaction design and children, Barcelona, Spain, 9–11 June 2010, pp. 198–201. New York: ACM. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1810570 (accessed 22 April 2018).
38.
HartR (1992) Innocenti Essays no. 4: Children’s Participation. From Tokenism to Citizenship. Available at: www.unicef-irc.org/publications/100 (accessed 2 September 2017).
HeadBW (2011) Why not ask them? Mapping and promoting youth participation. Children and Youth Services Review33(4): 541–547.
41.
HerringSC (2008) Questioning the generational divide: Technological exoticism and adult constructions of online youth identity. In: BuckinghamD (ed.) Youth, Identity, and Digital Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.71–94.
42.
HoEClarkeADoughertyI (2015) Youth-led social change: Topics, engagement types, organizational types, strategies, and impacts. Futures67: 52–62.
43.
HoldenDJMesseriPEvansWD, et al. (2004) Conceptualizing youth empowerment within tobacco control. Health Education & Behavior31(5): 548–563.
ItoMHorstHABittantiM, et al. (2009) Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
ItoMLivingstoneGutiérrez K, et al. (2013) Connected Learning: An Agenda for Research and Design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
48.
JenningsLBParra-MedinaDMHilfinger-MessiasDK, et al. (2006) Toward a critical social theory of youth empowerment. Journal of Community Practice14(1/2): 31–55.
KohK (2013) Adolescents’ information-creating behavior embedded in digital media practice using scratch. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology64(9): 1826–1841.
LemkeJLecusayRColeM, et al. (2015) Documenting and Assessing Learning in Informal and Media-Rich Environments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53.
LivingstoneS (2010) Digital learning and participation among youth: Critical reflections on future research priorities. International Journal of Learning and Media2(2/3): 1–13.
54.
LivingstoneS (2012) Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education38(1): 9–24.
55.
LivingstoneSSefton-GreenJ (2016) The Class: Living and Learning in the Digital Age. New York: New York University Press.
LockieS (2001) SIA in review: Setting the agenda for impact assessment in the 21st century. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal19(4): 277–287.
58.
LonclePJacksonGMunigliaV (2012) Youth participation in Europe: Beyond discourses, practices and realities. Policy Press Scholarship Online Youth15(1): 205–214.
59.
McCabeAHorsleyK (2008) The Evaluator’s Cookbook: Exercises for Participatory Evaluation with Children and Young People. London: Routledge.
60.
MackrillTEbsenF (2017) Key misconceptions when assessing digital technology for municipal youth social work. European Journal of Social Work. DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2017.1326878.
61.
McMillanASSimkissD (2009) The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and HIV/AIDS. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MihailidisP (2015) Digital curation and digital literacy: Evaluating the role of curation in developing critical literacies for participation in digital culture. E-Learning and Digital Media12(5/6): 443–458.
64.
MorrisJTassoneVde GrootR, et al. (2011) A framework for participatory impact assessment: Involving stakeholders in European policy making, a case study of land use change in Malta. Ecology and Society16(1): article 12.
Percy-SmithBThomasN (eds) (2009) A Handbook of Children and Young People’s Participation: Perspectives from Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
68.
PrenskyM (2009) Homo sapiens digital: From digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom. Innovate: Journal of Online Education5(3): 1.
69.
PrintM (2007) Citizenship education and youth participation in democracy. British Journal of Educational Studies55(3): 325–345.
70.
QuinlanO (2015) Young Digital Makers. London: Nesta.
71.
Richards-SchusterKPritzkerS (2015) Strengthening youth participation in civic engagement: Applying the Convention on the Rights of the Child to social work practice. Children and Youth Services Review57: 90–97.
72.
Rietbergen-McCrackenJNarayan-ParkerD (1998) Participation and Social Assessment: Tools and Techniques. Washington, DC: World Bank.
73.
SaboK (2003) A Vygotskian perspective on youth participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation2003(98): 13–24.
74.
SamuelsonBLSmithRTStevensonE, et al. (2013) A case study of youth participatory evaluation in co-curricular service learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning13(3): 63–81.
75.
STEP (2016) Scottish Traveller Education Programme. Available at: www.step.education.ed.ac.uk (accessed 20 August 2017).
76.
StevensRGilliard-MatthewsSDunaevJ, et al. (2016) The digital hood: Social media use among youth in disadvantaged neighborhoods. New Media & Society19(6): 1–18.
77.
StornaiuoloAThomasEE (2017) Disrupting educational inequalities through youth digital activism. Review of Research in Education41(1): 337–357.
78.
SubrahmanyamKŠmahelD (2011) Constructing identity online: Identity exploration and self-presentation. In: SubrahmanyamKŠmahelDDigital Youth. New York: Springer, pp. 59–80.
Youth Link Scotland (2017) YouthLink Scotland: The national agency for youth work. Available at: https://www.youthlinkscotland.org/ (accessed 30 August 2017).
