The study explores how the group of school librarians from international schools in Hong Kong uses the Yahoo! Groups platform for their professional networking. In this case study quantitative and qualitative data were gathered and analyzed. Quantitative data about the groups’ use of Yahoo! Groups were extracted from the platform archive pages. An online questionnaire was sent to all group members to collect quantitative and qualitative data about their experience with social software and their views on Yahoo! Groups suitability for professional networking. The study findings show that the group members regularly use Messages, a web-based mailing list and occasionally use Files and Polls. While nearly half of the group members take part in discussions via Yahoo! Groups, only a small number posted most of the messages. Most popular discussion topics are reading, group’s administrative issues, professional development, and school library collection development. Group members mostly agree that Yahoo! Groups features which they use are user-friendly and that the platform is a convenient tool for the group. Although group members widely use various social software for leisure and for work purposes, most of them do not consider replacing Yahoo! Groups with another social networking tool.
AgarwalNKumarSGaoH, et al. (2012) Analyzing behavior of the influentials across social media. In: CaoLYuPS (eds) Behavior Computing: Modeling, Analysis, Mining, and Decision. London: Springer Verlag, pp. 3–19.
2.
AharonyN (2012) Facebook use in libraries: An exploratory analysis. Aslib Proceedings64(4): 358–372.
3.
ArdichviliAPageVWentlingT (2003) Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management7(1): 64–77.
BackstromLKumarRMarlowC, et al. (2008) Preferential behavior in online groups. In: Proceedings of the international conference on web search and data mining, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 11–12 February 2008, pp. 117–128. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press.
7.
BennettJOwersMPittM, et al. (2010) Workplace impact of social networking. Property Management28(3): 138–148.
8.
BodellSHookA (2014) Developing online professional networks for undergraduate occupational therapy students: An evaluation of an extracurricular facilitated blended learning package. British Journal of Occupational Therapy77(6): 320–323.
9.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
10.
BrounsFBerlangaAJFetterS, et al. (2011) A survey on social network sites to determine requirements for learning networks for professional development of university staff. International Journal of Web Based Communities7(3): 298–311.
11.
ButlerBS (2001) Membership size, communication activity and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Information Systems Research2(4): 346–362.
12.
ChanC (2012) Marketing the academic library with online social network advertising. Library Management33(8/9): 479–489.
13.
ChenDYTChuSKWXuSQ (2012) How do libraries use social networking sites to interact with users. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology49(1): 1–10.
14.
ChuSKWDuHS (2012) Social networking tools for academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science45(1): 64–75.
15.
CollinsGQuan-HaaseA (2012) Social media and academic libraries: Current trends and future challenges. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology49(1): 1–4.
16.
DaltonM (2013) ‘What would I tweet?’: Exploring new professionals’ attitudes towards Twitter as a tool for professional development. Journal of Library Innovation4(2): 101–110.
17.
Del BosqueD (2013) Will you be my friend? Social networking in the workplace. New Library World114(9/10): 428–442.
18.
DicksonAHolleyRP (2010) Social networking in academic libraries: The possibilities and the concerns. New Library World111(11/12): 468–479.
19.
Duncan-HowellJ (2010) Teachers making connections: Online communities as a source of professional learning. British Journal of Educational Technology41(2): 324–340.
20.
EysenbachGPowellJEnglesakisM, et al. (2004) Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: Systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. British Medical Journal328: 1166.
21.
Fernández-PérezVAlonso-GaliciaPERodríquez-ArizaL, et al. (2015) Professional and personal social networks: A bridge to entrepreneurship for academics?European Management Journal33(1): 37–47.
22.
FioreALee-TeirnanSSmithM (2002) Observed behavior and perceived value of authors in Usenet Newsgroups: Bridging the gap. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 20–25 April 2002, pp. 323–330. New York: ACM.
23.
GeigerBF (2003) Use of Yahoo!™ Groups for health education. American Journal of Health Education34(1): 54–55.
24.
GliwaBZygmuntA (2015) Finding influential bloggers. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing5(2): 127–131.
25.
GrabherGIbertO (2014) Distance as asset? Knowledge collaboration in hybrid virtual communities. Journal of Economic Geography14(1): 97–123.
26.
Grote-GarciaSVasindaS (2014) Pinning and practice: Using Pinterest as a tool for developing pedagogical content knowledge. Texas Journal of Literacy Education2(1): 36–45.
27.
HamadeSN (2012) Student perceptions of learning management systems in a University environment: Yahoo Groups vs. Blackboard. In: Information technology: New generations (ITNG), 2012 ninth international conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 16–18 April 2012, pp. 594–599. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
28.
HimelboimI (2008) Reply distribution in online discussions: A comparative network analysis of political and health newsgroups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication14(1):156–177.
29.
KellerEBarryJ (2003) The Influentials: One American in Ten Tells the Other Nine How to Vote, Where to Eat and What to Buy. New York: The Free Press.
30.
KhodeS (2012) Use of various mailing lists by library professionals in India: A study. International Journal of Information Research2(2): 189–206.
31.
KimAJ (2000) Community Building on the Web: Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities. San Francisco, CA: Peachpit Press.
32.
LampeCObarJOzkayaE, et al. (2012) Classroom Wikipedia participation effects on future intentions to contribute. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work, Seattle, Washington, USA, 11–15 February 2012, pp. 403–406. New York: ACM.
33.
LampeCWashRVelasquezA, et al. (2010) Motivations to participate in online communities. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Atlanta, GA, USA, 10–15 April 2010, pp. 1927–1936. New York: ACM.
MaiaMAlmeidaJAlmeidaV (2008) Identifying user behavior in online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st workshop on social network systems, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 1–4 April 2008, pp. 1–6. New York: ACM.
MathioudakisMKoudasN (2009) Efficient identification of starters and followers in social media. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on extending database technology: Advances in database technology (EDBT’09), Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, 23–26 March 2009, pp. 708–719. New York: ACM.
38.
MoreillonJ (2015) #schoollibrarians tweet for professional development: A netnographic case study of #txlchat. School Libraries Worldwide21(2): 127–137.
NonneckeBAndrewsDPreeceJ (2006) Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior. Electronic Commerce Research6(1): 7–20.
41.
NonneckeBPreeceJ (2000) Lurker demographics: Counting the silent. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI 2000), The Hague, Netherlands, 1–6 April 2000, pp. 73–80. New York: ACM.
42.
PalmerS (2014) Characterizing university library use of social media: A case study of Twitter and Facebook from Australia. Journal of Academic Librarianship40(6): 611–619.
43.
PauliniMMaherMLMurtyP (2014) Motivating participation in online innovation communities. International Journal of Web-Based Communities10(1): 94–114.
44.
PerezL (2012) Innovative professional development. Knowledge Quest40(3): 20–22.
45.
PhillipsNK (2011) Academic library use of Facebook: Building relationships with students. Journal of Academic Librarianship37(6): 512–522.
46.
PreeceJMaloney-KrichmarD (2003) Online communities: Focusing on sociability and usability. In: JackoAJSearsA (eds) The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook. Mahwah, NJ: L Erlbaum Associates, pp. 596–620.
47.
SchochNAShooshanSE (1997) Communication on a listserv for health information professionals: Uses and users of MEDLIB-L. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association85(1): 23–32.
48.
SeckerJ (2008a) Social software and libraries: A literature review from the LASSIE project. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems42(3): 215–231.
49.
SeckerJ (2008b) Case Study 5: Libraries and Facebook, LASSIE: Libraries and Social Software in Education. Centre for Distance Education, University of London. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download? (accessed 15 June 2016).
50.
SiddiqueNMahmoodK (2009) The role of mailing groups in the development of the library profession in Pakistan: The case of Plagpk. Information Development25(3): 218–223.
51.
SkeelsMMGrudinJ (2009) When social networks cross boundaries: A case study of workplace use of Facebook and Linkedin. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on supporting group work, Sanibel Island, FL, USA, 10–13 May 2009, pp. 95–104. New York: ACM.
52.
SmithKPChristakisNA (2008) Social networks and health. Annual Review of Sociology34(1): 405–429.
53.
StevensonCNBauerJC (2014) Building Online Communities in Higher Education Institutions: Creating Collaborative Experience. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
54.
TontaYKarabulutD (2010) The anatomy of an electronic discussion list for librarians, KUTUP-L: Bibliometric and content analyses of postings. In: 14th International conference on electronic publishing, Helsinki, Finland, 16–18 June 2010, pp. 234–244. Helsinki: Hanken School of Economics.
55.
TsaoRPreeceJLazarJ (1999) One foot in cyberspace and the other on the ground: A case study of analysis and design issues in a hybrid virtual and physical community. WebNet Journal: Internet Technologies, Applications & Issues1(3): 49–57.
56.
Van de BeltTHEngelenLJBerbenSA, et al. (2013) Internet and social media for health-related information and communication in health care: Preferences of the Dutch general population. Journal of Medical Internet Research15(10): e220.
57.
Van MierloT (2014) The 1% rule in four digital health social networks: An observational study. Journal of Medical Internet Research16(2): e33
58.
Van ZylAS (2009) The impact of Social Networking 2.0 on organisations. The Electronic Library27(6): 906–918.
59.
VassilakakiEGaroufallouE (2014) The impact of Facebook on libraries and librarians: A review of the literature. Program48(3): 226–245.
60.
VentolaCL (2014) Social media and health care professionals: Benefits, risks, and best practices. Pharmacy and Therapeutics39(7): 491–520.
61.
VyasRZachariahASwamidasanI, et al. (2012) A networking approach to reduce academic and social isolation for junior doctors working in rural hospitals in India. Education for Health25(1): 70.
62.
WangQWooHLQuekCL, et al. (2012) Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology43(3): 428–438.
63.
XuJKangQSongZ, et al. (2015) Applications of mobile social media: WeChat among academic libraries in China. Journal of Academic Librarianship41(1): 21–30.
64.
YoungSWHRossmannD (2015) Building library community through social media. Information Technology and Libraries34(1): 19–37.
