This study used coauthorship analysis to investigate trends in researcher–practitioner collaborations by examining articles published between 2005 and 2014 in the disciplines of library and information science, education, and sociology. The results revealed that articles coauthored by researchers were the main type of research collaboration in these three disciplines. Articles coauthored by researchers and practitioners were the third largest type of research collaboration in all three disciplines; the percentage of such articles in library and information science (14.2%) was considerably higher than that in education (6.1%) and sociology (2.7%). A slightly decreasing trend was observed in these articles in library and information science, but a slightly increasing trend was identified in education and sociology. Regarding authorship, library and information science practitioners were more active than were education and sociology practitioners. Librarians, governmental staff, and administrators were the dominant practitioner authors of this type of article in library and information science, sociology, and education, respectively.
AmabileTMPattersonCMuellerJet al. (2001) Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration. Academy of Management Journal44(2): 418–431.
2.
AndersonNHerriotPHodgkinsonGP (2001) The practitioner-researcher divide in industrial, work and organizational (IWO) psychology: Where are we now, and where do we go from here?Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology74: 391–411.
3.
BelliG (2010) Bridging the researcher-practitioner gap: Views from different fields. In: Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence-based society. Proceedings of the Eighth international conference on teaching statistics (ed. C Reading), ICOTS8, July 2010. Available at: iase-web.org/documents/papers/icots8/ICOTS8_1D3_BELLI.pdf (accessed 20 May 2015)
4.
ButtlarL (1999) Information sources in library and information science doctoral research. Library & Information Science Research21(2): 227–245.
5.
CascioWF (2008) To prosper, organizational psychology should … bridge application and scholarship. Journal of Organizational Behavior29(4): 455–468.
6.
ChangYW (2015) Librarians’ contribution to open access journal publishing in library and information science from the perspective of authorship. Journal of the Academic Librarianship41(5): 660–668.
7.
ChangYWHuangMH (2012) A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science: Using three bibliometric methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology63(1): 22–33.
8.
ChenCYWuYCJWuWH (2013) A sustainable collaborative research dialogue between practitioners and academics. Management Decision51(3): 566–593.
9.
DonovanAJTompkinsRK (2010) Surgical research publication in a selection of research and surgical speciality journals. Surgery147(1): 5–12.
GalbraithQSmartESmithSDet al. (2014) Who publishes in top-tier library science journals? An analysis by faculty status and tenure. College & Research Libraries75(5): 724–735.
12.
GinsburgMBGorostiagaJM (2001) Relationships between theorists/researchers and policy makers/practitioners: Rethinking the two-cultures thesis and the possibility of dialogue. Comparative Education Review45(2): 173–196.
13.
GlenSSmithK (1999). Towards new models of teaching and researching nursing: The research practitioner. Nurse Education Today19: 628–632.
14.
GopinathCHoffmanRC (1995) The relevance of strategy research: Practitioner and academic viewpoint. Journal of Management Studies32(5): 575–594.
15.
GuptaA (2014) Authorship, research assistants and the ethnographic field. Ethnography15(3): 394–400.
16.
HaddowGKlobasJE (2004) Communication of research to practice in library and information science: Closing the gap. Library and Information Science Research26: 29–43.
17.
HanHStenhouseN (2015) Bridging the research–practice gap in climate communication: Lessons from one academic-practitioner collaboration. Science Communication37(3): 396–404.
18.
HenardDHMcFadyenMA (2005) The complementary roles of applied and basic research: A knowledge-based perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management22(6): 503–514.
KamlerB (2008) Rethinking doctoral publication practices: Writing from and beyond the thesis. Studies in Higher Education33(3): 283–294.
21.
KatzJSMartinBR (1997) What is research collaboration?Research Policy26(1): 1–18.
22.
KernaghanK (2009) Speaking truth to academics: The wisdom of the practitioners. Canadian Public Administration52(4): 503–523.
23.
KielhofnerG (2005) Scholarship and practice: Bridging the divide. American Journal of Occupational Therapy59(2): 231–239.
24.
KohlDFDavisCH (1985) Rating of journals by ARL library directors and deans of library and information science schools. College & Research Libraries46(1): 40–47.
25.
LaudelG (2002) What do we measure by co-authorships?Research Evaluation11(1): 3–15.
26.
LeiJHuG (2015) Apprenticeship in scholarly publishing: A student perspective on doctoral supervisors’ roles. Publications3(1): 27–42.
27.
LewisJMRossSHoldenT (2012) The how and why of academic collaboration: Disciplinary differences and policy implications. Higher Education64(5): 693–708.
28.
LimKJYoonDYYunEJet al. (2012) Characteristics and trends of radiology research: A survey of original articles published in AJR and Radiology between 2001 and 2010. Radiology264(3): 796–802.
29.
LuoL (2011) Fusing research into practice: The role of research methods education. Library & Information Science Research33(3): 191–201.
30.
McGinnMKNiemczykEKSaudelliMG (2013) Fulfilling an ethical obligation: An educative research assistantship. Alberta Journal of Educational Research59(1): 72–91.
31.
MaherM ATimmermanBCFeldonDFet al. (2013) Factors affecting the occurrence of faculty-doctoral student coauthorship. Journal of Higher Education84(1): 121–143.
32.
MajdzadehRNedjatSGholamiJet al. (2009) Research collaboration in Tehran University of Medical Sciences: Two decades after integration. Health Research Policy and Systems7(8). Available at: health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1478–4505–7–8 (accessed 1 September 2016).
33.
MikailYÖzogluEADönmezA (2016) Metaphoric perceptions of academic staff about the concept of research assistant. Education and Science41(185): 19–32.
34.
MorganSDLightner-LawsC (2013) An examination of academic-practitioner co-authorship trends in supply chain management journals. International Journal of Supply Chain Management2(1): 2051–3771. Available at: ojs.excelingtech.co.uk/index.php/IJSCM/article/view/706/386 (accessed 1 May 2016).
35.
NorelliBHarperTL (2013) Collaborative scholarship in academic library literature: Who, what, and when. College & Undergraduate Libraries20(2): 173–196.
36.
OpokuD (2013) Academic status and research publication: The dilemma of librarians at the University of Ghana. Information Development29(3): 233–240.
37.
OrrKBennettM (2012) Public administration scholarship and the politics of coproducing academic-practitioner research. Public Administration Review72(4): 487–496.
38.
PandaaAGuptaRK (2014) Making academic research more relevant: A few suggestions. IIMB Management Review26(3): 156–169.
39.
PhamHTTannerK (2015) Collaboration between academics and library staff: A structurationist perspective. Australian Academic & Research Libraries46(1): 2–18.
40.
PilerotO (2014) Connections between research and practice in the information literacy narrative: A mapping of the literature and some propositions. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science48(4): 313–321.
41.
PontiM (2008) A LIS collaborator to bridge the research-practice gap. Library Management29(4/5): 265–277.
42.
PontiM (2013) Peer production for collaboration between academics and practitioners. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science45(1): 23–37.
43.
PosnerPL (2009) The pracademic: An agenda for re-engaging practitioners and academics. Public Budgeting & Finance29(1): 12–26.
44.
PowellRRBakerLMMikaJJ (2002) Library and information science practitioners and research. Library & Information Science Research24(1): 49–72.
45.
PuskarKRHardinSB (1988) Research assistants in nursing: Roles and issues. Nurse Educator13(5): 34–36.
46.
RaadscheldersJCN (2008) Understanding government: Four intellectual traditions in the study of public administration. Public Administration86(4): 925–949.
47.
RostanMCeravoloFA (2015) The internationalisation of the academy: Convergence and divergence across disciplines. European Review23(S1): S38–S54.
48.
RynesSLBartunekJMDaftRL (2001) Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal44(2): 340–355.
49.
ShortDCShindellTJ (2009) Defining HRD scholar-practitioners. Advances in Developing Human Resources11(4): 472–485.
50.
ShortDCKeeferJStoneSJ (2009) The link between research and practice: Experiences of HRD and other professions. Advances in Developing Human Resources11(4): 420–437.
51.
Savoie-ZajcLDescamps-BednarzN (2007) Action research and collaborative research: Their specific contributions to professional development. Educational Action Research15(4): 577–596.
52.
SugimotoCRTsouANaslundSet al. (2014) Beyond gatekeepers of knowledge: Scholarly communication practices of academic librarians and archivists at ARL institutions. College & Research Libraries75(2): 145–161.
53.
SulloE (2014). Academic library administrators perceive value in their librarians’ research. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice9(3): 89–91.
54.
VogelR (2010) Parallel, transfer or collaboration strategy of relating theory to practice? A case study of public management debate in Germany. Public Administration88(3): 680–705.
55.
WarbyDGreeneMHigginsKet al. (1999). Suggestions for translating research into classroom practices. Intervention in School and Clinic34(4): 205–212.
56.
WatsonPD (1985) Production of scholarly articles by academic librarians and library school faculty. College & Research Libraries46(4): 334–342.
57.
WoffordLTroiloM (2013) The academic-professional divide: Generating useful research and moving it to practice. Journal of Property Investment & Finance31(1): 41–52.
58.
ZinnerDECampbellEG (2009) Life-science research within US academic medical centers. Journal of the American Medical Association302(9): 969–976.
