Inquiry project-based learning is a contemporary focus area in curriculum development around the world. This new learning approach requires students to locate appropriate information from various sources in order to satisfy their information needs under strict anti-plagiarism requirements. However, technological advancement inadvertently allows convenient plagiarism opportunities. Students must learn how to enhance their academic integrity and not to copy information directly from readily available sources like the Internet. This study investigated junior secondary students’ standard of academic integrity. Data was collected through information literacy tests, plagiarism checks on student group projects and structured interviews. Poor information literacy and language abilities were found to be potential factors behind poor academic practice, and academic integrity teaching proved to be largely effective. Therefore, related teaching should be further included in the school curriculum starting at the junior secondary level. Including a statement of academic honesty as part of school policy could also heighten students’ awareness of academic integrity and bring about plagiarism-free learning to actualize genuine education.
AjzenI (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2): 179–211.
2.
American Psychological Association (2002) Plagiarism or Memory Glitch? Inadvertent Plagiarism Complicates Efforts to End Cheating. Available at: http://www.apa.org/monitor/feb02/glitch.aspx (accessed 16 May 2014).
3.
American Psychological Association (2010) Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. 6th edn.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
BombaroC (2007) Using audience response technology to teach academic integrity: The seven deadly sins of plagiarism at Dickinson College. Reference Services Review35(2): 296–309.
6.
BoonSJohnstonBWebberS (2007) A phenomenographic study of English faculty’s conceptions of information literacy. Journal of Documentation63(2): 204–228.
7.
BowlerL (2010) A taxonomy of adolescent metacognitive knowledge during the information search process. Library and Information Science Research32(1): 27–42.
8.
CardNA (2012) Applied Meta-analysis for Social Science Research. New York: Guilford Press.
9.
CaseDO (2006) Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. 2nd edn.Bingley: Emerald.
10.
ChaoC-AWilhelmWJNeureutherBD (2009) A study of electronic detection and pedagogical approaches for reducing plagiarism. Delta Pi Epsolpn Journal51(1): 31–42.
11.
ChoYBrownC (2013) Project-based learning in education: Integrating business needs and student learning. European Journal of Training and Development37(8): 744–766.
12.
ChuSKWChanCKKTiwariAFY (2012) Using blogs to support learning during internship. Computers and Education58(3): 989–1000.
13.
ChuSKWTseSKChowK (2011a) Using collaborative teaching and inquiry project-based learning to help primary school students develop information literacy and information skills. Library and Information Science Research33(2): 132–143.
14.
ChuSKWTseSKLohEKY. (2011b) Collaborative inquiry project-based learning: Effects on reading ability and interests. Library and Information Science Research33(3): 236–243.
15.
CourtneySACanigliaJSinghR (2014) Investigating the impact of field trips on teachers’ mathematical problem posing. Journal of Experiential Education37(2): 144–159.
16.
ElanderJPittamGLusherJ. (2010) Evaluation of an intervention to help students avoid unintentional plagiarism by improving their authorial identity. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education35(2): 157–171.
17.
EllahiAMushtaqRKhanMB (2013) Multi campus investigation of academic dishonesty in higher education of Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Management27(6): 647–666.
18.
EretEGokmenogluT (2010) Plagiarism in higher education: A case study with prospective academicians. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences2(2): 3303–3307.
GibsonNSChester-FangmanC (2010) The librarian’s role in combating plagiarism. Reference Services Review39(1): 132–150.
21.
GuoX (2011) Understanding student plagiarism: An empirical study in accounting education. Accounting Education: an International Journal20(1): 17–37.
22.
GulliferJTysonGA (2010) Exploring university students’ perceptions of plagiarism: A focus group study. Studies in Higher Education35(4): 463–481.
23.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBJ. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th edn.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
HaradaVYoshinaJ (2004) Moving from rote to inquiry: Creating leaning that counts. Library Media Connection23(2): 22–25.
25.
HarrisonTMPardoTGil-GarciaR. (2007) Geographic information technologies, structuration theory, and the World Trade Centre crisis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology58(14): 2240–2254.
26.
HegartyNCarberyAHurleyT (2009) Learning by doing: Re-designing the first year information literacy programme at Waterford Institute of Technology (WIT) libraries. Journal of Information Literacy3(2): 73–87.
Hofmeister-TóthÁNagyP (2011) The content analysis of advergames in Hungary. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal14(3): 289–303.
29.
HoldfordD (2008) Content analysis methods for conducting research in social and administrative pharmacy. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy4(2): 173–181.
LearyMR (2012) Introduction to Behavioral Research Methods. 5th edn.London: Pearson.
37.
McGregorJHWilliamsonK (2005) Appropriate use of information at the secondary school level: Understanding and avoiding plagiarism. Library and Information Science Research27(4): 496–512.
38.
MagesWKGarsonDS (2010) Get the cite right: Design and evaluation of a high-quality online citation tutorial. Library and Information Science Research32(2): 138–146.
39.
MartinJAReaumeKMReevesEM. (2012) Relationship building with students and instructors of ESL. Reference Services Review40(3): 352–367.
40.
MokhtarIAMajidSFooS (2008) Information literacy education: Applications of mediated learning and multiple intelligences. Library and Information Science Research30(3): 195–206.
41.
NewlonGJ (2009) Plagiarism in high schools: A case study of how teachers address a perpetual dilemma. EdD Dissertation, West Virginia University, USA.
42.
Owusu-AnsahEK (2004) Information literacy and higher education: Placing the academic library in the center of a comprehensive solution. Journal of Academic Librarianship30(1): 3–16.
43.
PatelABakhtiyariKTaghaviM (2011) Evaluation of cheating detection methods in academic writings. Library Hi Tech29(4): 623–640.
44.
PecorariD (2003) Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing12(4): 317–345.
45.
PecorariD (2013) Teaching to Avoid Plagiarism: How to Promote Good Source Use. Berkshire: Open University Press.
46.
RiasatiMJRahimiF (2013) Why do Iranian postgraduate students plagiarize? A qualitative investigation. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research14(3): 309–317.
47.
RiedlerMEryamanMY (2010) Transformative library pedagogy and community-based libraries: a Freirean perspective. In LeckieGJGivenLMBuschmanJ (eds) Critical Theory for Library and Information Science: Exploring the Social from Across the Disciplines. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited, pp. 89–99.
48.
RisquezAO’DwyerMLedwithA (2011) Technology enhanced learning and plagiarism in entrepreneurship education. Education and Training53(8/9): 750–761.
SistiDA (2007) How do high school students justify internet plagiarism?Ethics and Behavior17(3): 215–231.
52.
SmithMGhazaliNMinhadSFN (2007) Attitudes towards plagiarism among undergraduate accounting students: Malaysian evidence. Asian Review of Accounting15(2): 122–146.
53.
StoneTHJawaharIMKisamoreJL (2009) Using the theory of planned behaviour and cheating justifications to predict academic misconduct. Career Development International14(3): 221–241.
54.
TarrantMDodgsonJELawBV (2008) A curricular approach to improve the information literacy and academic writing skills of part-time post-registration nursing students in Hong Kong. Nurse Education Today28(4): 458–468.
TillemaHHKesselsJWMMeijersF (2000) Competencies as building blocks for integrating assessment with instruction in vocation: A case from the Netherlands. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education25(3): 253–263.
WestwoodP (2004) Learning and Learning Difficulties: A Handbook for Teachers. London: David Fulton.
59.
WheelerG (2009) Plagiarism in the Japanese universities: Truly a cultural matter?Journal of Second Language Writing18(1): 17–29.
60.
WongGKW (2010) Facilitating students’ intellectual growth in information literacy teaching. Reference and User Services Quarterly50(2): 114–118.
61.
YeoSChienR (2007) Evaluation of a process and proforma for making consistent decisions about the seriousness of plagiarism incidents. Quality in Higher Education13(2): 187–204.
62.
YorkeJLawsonKMcMahonG (2009) Can we reliably determine intent in cases of plagiarism?International Journal for Education Integrity5(2): 39–46.
63.
ZimermanM (2012) Plagiarism and international students in academic libraries. New Library World113(5): 6–6.
64.
ZwaagstraMCCliftonRALongJC (2010) What’s Wrong with Our Schools and How We Can Fix Them. Plymouth: Rowman and Littlefield Education.
