Uncovering information literacy’s disciplinary differences through students’ attitudes: An empirical study

Abstract

This paper uses a self-assessment questionnaire (IL-HUMASS) with a wide sample of university students. The questionnaire puts forward a scale of attitudes that aim to measure ‘belief in importance’ and ‘skills self-assessment’ regarding diverse information competences. We use a group of 26 information sub-competences gathered in four categories (searching, evaluation, processing and communication-dissemination). The results show some considerable differences in these categories when statistically comparing 17 university degrees related to five branches of knowledge. It is proved that attitudes appreciably vary between branches, in reverse relation to the interdisciplinary differences we have found. An improvement regarding students’ informational attitudes will help reduce the interdisciplinary differences. The results of this study suggest the feasibility of shared training actions for some information competences in the branches of Sciences, Engineering & Architecture, and Health Sciences. The branches of Arts & Humanities and Social & Legal Sciences show considerable widespread attitudinal differences that advise against that shared training.

Keywords

Case study empirical study information literacy interdisciplinarity self-assessment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ALA/ACRL (2000) Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Available at: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency (accessed 14 April 2013).

Anderson

May

(2010) Does the method of instruction matter ? An experimental examination of information literacy instruction in the online, blended, and face-to-face classrooms. Journal of Academic Librarianship 36(6): 495–500.

Andretta

(2007) Phenomenography: A conceptual framework for information literacy education. Aslib Proceedings 59(2): 152–168. DOI:10.1108/00012530710736663.

Arum

Roksa

Cho

(2012) Improving Undergraduate Learning: Findings and Policy Recommendations from the SSRC-CLA Longitudinal Project. New York: Social Science Research Council.

Bandura

(1986) Social Foundation of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bandyopadhyay

(2012) Measuring the disparities between Biology undergraduates’ perceptions and their actual knowledge of scientific literature with clickers. Journal of Academic Librarianship 39(2): 194–201.

Bloom

Engelhart

Furst

. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.

Boon

Johnston

Webber

(2007) A phenomenographic study of English faculty’s conceptions of information literacy. Journal of Documentation 63(2): 204–228. DOI:10.1108/00220410710737187.

Brown

Kingsley-Wilson

(2010) Assessing organically: Turning an assignment into an assessment. Reference Services Review 38(4): 536–556. DOI:10.1108/00907321011090719.

10.

Bruce

(1997) The Seven Faces of Information Literacy. Adealide: Auslib Press.

11.

Clark

Catts

(2007) Information skills survey: Its application to a medical course. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 2(3): 3–26.

12.

Colthart

Bagnall

Evans

. (2008) The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide No. 10. Medical Teacher 30(2): 124–45. DOI:10.1080/01421590701881699.

13.

Comas

Sureda

Pastor

. (2011) La busqueda de informacion con fines academicos entre el alumnado universitario. Revista Española de Documentacion Cientifica 34(1): 44–64.

14.

Corrall

(2007) Benchmarking Strategic Engagement with Information Literacy in Higher Education: Towards a Working Model. Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/12–4/paper328.html (accessed 14 April 2013).

15.

Cronbach

(1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16: 297–334.

16.

Diller

Phelps

(2008) Learning outcomes, portfolios, and rubrics, oh my! Authentic assessment of an information literacy program. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 8(1): 75–89. DOI:10.1353/pla.2008.0000.

17.

Elder

Barber

Staples

. (2012) Assessing health literacy: A new domain for collaboration between language testers and health professionals.” Language Assessment Quarterly 9(3): 205–224. DOI:10.1080/15434303.2011.627751.

18.

Fetter

(2009) Graduating nurses’ self-evaluation of information technology competencies. Journal of Nursing Education 48(2): 86–90.

19.

Fourie

van Niekerk

(2001) Follow-up on the Use of portfolio assessment for a module in research information skills: An analysis of its value. Education for Information 19(2): 107–126.

20.

Freeman

Lynd-Balta

(2010) Developing information literacy skills early in an undergraduate curriculum. College Teaching 58(3): 109–115. DOI:10.1080/87567550903521272.

21.

Garde

Harrison

Hovenga

(2005) Australian Skill Needs Analysis of Health Informatics Professionals Volume 1 : Rationale & Methods, Key Findings & Conclusions” 1 (June): 1–34.

22.

Grafstein

(2002) A discipline-based approach to information literacy. Journal of Academic Librarianship 28(4): 197–204.

23.

Green

Macauley

(2007) Doctoral students’ engagement with information: An American-Australian perspective. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 7(3): 317–332. DOI:10.1353/pla.2007.0031.

24.

Gross

Latham

(2007) Attaining information literacy: An investigation of the relationship between skill level, self-estimates of skill, and library anxiety. Library & Information Science Research 29(3): 332–353.

25.

Gross

Latham

(2012) What’s skill got to do with It ? Information literacy skills and self-views of ability among first-year college students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63(3): 574–583. DOI:10.1002/asi.

26.

Head

(2008) Information literacy from the trenches: How do Humanities and Social Science majors conduct academic research? College & Research Libraries 69(5): 427–446.

27.

Head

Eisenberg

(2010) Truth Be Told: How College Students Evaluate and Use Information in the Digital Age. Project Information Literacy Progress Report. Washington, DC: University of Washington Information School.

28.

Hjørland

(2002) Domain analysis in information science: Eleven approaches - traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation 58(4): 422–462.

29.

Ivanitskaya

O’Boyle

Casey

. (2006) Health information literacy and competencies of information age students: Results from the Interactive Online Research Readiness Self-Assessment (RRSA). Journal of Medical Internet Research 8 (2): e6. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e6.

30.

Julien

Barker

(2009) How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development. Library & Information Science Research 31 (1): 12–17. DOI:10.1016/j.lisr.2008.10.008.

31.

Korobili

Malliari

Christodoulou

(2009) Assessing Information literacy skills in the Technological Education Institute of Thessaloniki, Greece. Reference Services Review 37(3): 340–354. DOI:10.1108/00907320910982820.

32.

Limberg

(2005) Informing information literacy education through empirical research. In: Henri

Asselin

(eds) The Information Literate School Community: Issues of Leadership. Wagga Wagga, Australia: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University, pp. 39–50.

33.

Lund

(2013) Kruskal-Wallis H Test Using SPSS. Laerd Statistics. Available at: https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-tutorials/kruskal-wallis-h-test-using-spss-statistics.php (accessed 20 April 2013).

34.

McKinney

Jones

Turkington

(2011) Information literacy through inquiry: A Level One Psychology module at the University of Sheffield. Aslib Proceedings 63(2/3): 221–240. DOI:10.1108/00012531111135673.

35.

Maybee

(2006) Undergraduate perceptions of information use: The basis for creating user-centered student information literacy instruction. Journal of Academic Librarianship 32(1): 79–85. DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2005.10.010.

36.

Nicholas

Rowlands

Jubb

. (2010) The impact of the economic downturn on libraries: with special reference to university libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship 36(5): 376–382.

37.

Oakleaf

(2008) Dangers and opportunities: A conceptual map of information literacy assessment approaches. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 8(3): 233–253. DOI:10.1353/pla.0.0011.

38.

Oakleaf

Kaske

(2009) Guiding questions for assessing information literacy in higher education. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 9(2): 273–286. DOI:10.1353/pla.0.0046.

39.

Patterson

(20090 A needs analysis for information literacy provision for research: A case study in University College Dublin. Journal of Information Literacy 3(1): 5–18.

40.

Pinto

(2010) Design of the IL-HUMASS Survey on Information Literacy in Higher Education: A self-assessment approach. Journal of Information Science 36(1): 86–103.

41.

Pinto

(2011) An approach to the internal facet of information literacy using the IL-HUMASS Survey. Journal of Academic Librarianship 37(2): 145–154. DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2011.02.006.

42.

Pinto

(2012) Information literacy perceptions and behaviour among History students. Aslib Proceedings 64(3): 304–327. DOI:10.1108/00012531211244644.

43.

Pinto

Fernández-Ramos

Sánchez

. (2012) Information competence of doctoral students in Information Science in Spain and Latin America: A self-assessment. Journal of Academic Librarianship 39(2): 144–154. DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2012.08.006.

44.

Rader

(2002) Information literacy 1973–2002: A selected literature review.” Library Trends 51(2): 242–259.

45.

Resnis

Gibson

Hartsell-Gundy

. (2010) Information literacy assessment: A case study at Miami University. New Library World 111(7/8): 287–301.

46.

Scales

Blakesley

(2005) Qualitative assessment of student attitudes toward information literacy. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 5(4): 513–526. DOI:10.1353/pla.2005.0059.

47.

SCONUL (1999) Information Skills in Higher Education: A SCONUL Position Paper. Available at: http://www.sconul.ac.uk/groups/information_literacy/papers/Seven_pillars.html (accessed 22 May 2013).

48.

Seamans

(2002) Student perceptions of information literacy: Insights for librarians. Reference Services Review 30(2): 112–123. DOI:10.1108/00907320210428679.

49.

Shenton

Hay-Gibson

(2011) Information behaviour and information literacy: The ultimate in transdisciplinary phenomena? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 43(3): 166–175. DOI:10.1177/0961000611410767.

50.

Singh

(2005) A report on faculty perceptions of students’ information literacy competencies in Journalism and Mass Communication programs : The ACEJMC survey. College & Research Libraries 66(4): 294–311.

51.

Talja

Maula

(2003) Reasons for the use and non use of electronic journals and databases: A Domain analytical study in four scholarly disciplines. Journal of Documentation 59(6): 673–691.

52.

Thaxton

(2002) Information dissemination and library instruction in Psychology revisited. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian 21(1): 1–14. DOI:10.1300/J103v21n01_01.

53.

Tuominen

Savolainen

Talja

(2005) Information literacy as s sociotechnical practice. Library Quarterly 75(3): 329–345.

54.

Usluel

(2007) Can ICT usage make a difference on student teachers’ information literacy self-efficacy. Library & Information Science Research 29(1): 92–102. DOI:10.1016/j.lisr.2007.01.003.

55.

Vickery

Cooper

(2002) Confidence or competence ? Auditing information literacy skills of Biology undergraduate students. Part One: Part Two. In: Celebrating Teaching at Macquarie. Sydney: Macquarie University Research Online, pp. 1–7.

56.

Walsh

(2009) Information literacy assessment where do we start? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 41(1): 19–28. DOI:10.1177/0961000608099896.

57.

Ward

(2006) Revisioning information literacy for lifelong meaning. Journal of Academic Librarianship 32(4): 396–402. DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2006.03.006.

58.

Webber

Johnson

(2006) Working towards the information literate university. In: Walton

Pope

(eds) Information Literacy: Recognising the Need. Oxford: Chandos, pp. 47–58.

59.

Weiler

(2004) Information-seeking behavior in generation Y students : Motivation, critical thinking, and learning theory. Journal of Academic Librarianship 31(1): 46–53.

60.

Wilkinson

While

Roberts

(2009) Measurement of information and communication technology experience and attitudes to e-learning of students in the healthcare professions: Integrative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 65(4): 755–72. DOI:10.1111/j.1365–2648.2008.04924.x.