The original concept of information literacy (IL) identifies it as an enabler for lifelong learning and learning-to-learn, adaptable and transferable in any learning environment and context. However, practices of IL in electronic information and learning environments (e-environments) tend to question the origins, and workability, of IL on the grounds that the generic models of IL are inadequate for the complex and evolving context of e-environments. Conducting an analytical review of the literature on the approaches taken to adapt IL in e-environments, we discuss how a failure in understanding the dynamic context and components of e-environments and IL have resulted in the emergence of a marginalised way of viewing and practicing IL in these environments. Drawing on Nazari’s (2011) contextual study of IL in an online distance learning programme, we propose a holistic way of viewing and practicing IL in EL environments which is aligned with IL origins; it enables the e-learner to conceptualise IL and customise it to their actual learning style and needs. This study can be of value to IL scholars and practitioners who are interested in the concept and practice of IL in e-environments.
AndrettaS (2005) From prescribed reading to the excitement or the burden of choice: information literacy: Foundation of e-learning. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives57(2): 181–190.
3.
ArmstrongAGeorgasH (2006) Using interactive technology to teach information literacy concepts to undergraduate students. Reference Services Review34(4): 491–497.
4.
AshmoreBGroggJE (2004) Library virtual tours: A case study. Research Strategies 20(1–2): 77–88.
5.
Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) (2000) Information literacy competency standards for higher education: Introduction. Available at: http://archive.ala.org/acrl/il/toolkit/intro.html#highered (accessed December 2009).
6.
BawdenD (2001) Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts. Journal of Documentation57(2): 218–259.
7.
BeddieF (2004) Learning communities: A catalyst for collective responsibility. In: Lifelong learning: Whose responsibility and what is your contribution?Proceedings of the 3rd international lifelong learning conference (eds DanaherPAMacphersonCNouwensF.), Yeppoon, Australia, 13–16 June 2004, pp. 1–7. Rockhampton, Australia: Central Queensland University Press.
8.
BeethamHMcGillLLittlejohnA (2009) Thriving in the 21st Century: Learning Literacies for the Digital Age (LLiDA project). Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University. Available at: http://www.caledonianacademy.net/spaces/LLiDA/ (accessed July 2010).
9.
BehrensS (1994) A conceptual analysis and historical overview of information literacy. College & Research Libraries55(4): 309–322.
10.
BridglandAWhiteheadM (2004) Information literacy in the ‘E’ environment: An approach for sustainability. Journal of Academic Librarianship31(1): 54–59.
11.
BruceC (1997) Seven Faces of Information Literacy. Adelaide, Australia: Auslib Press.
12.
BundyA (2004) Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework: Principles, Standards and Practice. Adelaide, Australia: Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy (ANZIIL).
13.
CandyPC (2000) Learning and earning: Graduate skills for an uncertain future. In: Selected papers from the inaugural international lifelong learning conference (eds AppletonKMacphersonCOrrD), Yeppoon, Australia, 17–19 July 2000, pp. 7–19. Rockhampton, Australia: Central Queensland University Press.
CandyPCCrebertGO’LearyJ (1994) Developing Lifelong Learners through Undergraduate Education. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.
CoomeyMStephensonJ (2001) Online learning: It is all about dialogue, involvement, support and control – according to research. In: StephensonJ (ed.) Teaching and Learning Online: Pedagogies for New Technologies. London: Kogan Page, 37–51.
18.
DayJWaltonaGBentaM. (1996) Higher education, teaching, learning and the electronic library: A review of the literature for the IMPEL2 project: Monitoring organisational and cultural change. New Review of Academic Librarianship2(1): 131–204.
19.
Department for Education and Skills (DFES) (2003) Towards a unified e-learning strategy consultation document. Available at: http://www.alt.ac.uk/docs/e-Learning_Strategy.pdf (accessed December 2009).
20.
DohertyJJHansenMAKayaKK (1999) Teaching information skills in the information age: The need for critical thinking. Library Philosophy and Practice1(2): 1–12.
21.
DupuisEA (2001) Automating instruction. Library Journal: Net ConnectSpring(supplement): 21–22.
22.
EskolaE-L (1998) University students’ information seeking behaviour in a changing learning environment-how are students’ information needs, seeking and use affected by new teaching methods?Information Research4(2). Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/4-2/isic/eeskola.html (accessed December 2009).
23.
FaheyN (2003) The importance of addressing accepted training needs when designing electronic information literacy training. Informing Science6: 173–185. Available at: http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol6/v6p173-185.pdf (accessed 25 January 2012).
24.
FarmerL (2001) Information literacy: A whole school reform approach. In: The 67th IFLA council and general conference, Boston, USA, 16–25August2001. Available at: http://archive.ifla.org/IV/ifla67/papers/019-106e.pdf (accessed 25 January 2012).
25.
ForsythR (2003) Supporting e-learning: An overview of the needs of users. New Review of Academic Librarianship9(1): 131–140.
26.
GettyNKBurdBBurns-FeylS. (2000) Using courseware to deliver library instruction via the web: Four examples. Reference Services Review28(4): 349–359.
27.
GraceAP (2006) Reflecting critically on lifelong learning in an era of neoliberal paragmatism: Instrumental, social, and cultural perspectives. In: Lifelong learning: Partners, pathways, and pedagogies: keynote and refereed papers from the 4th international lifelong learning conference (eds OrrDNouwensFMacphersonCR.), Yeppoon, Australia, 13–16 June 2006, pp. 1–16. Rockhampton, Australia: Central Queensland University Press.
28.
HadengueV (2005) E-learning for information literacy. Library Review54(1): 36–46.
29.
Haygarth JacksonA (1989) Training and Education for Online. London: Taylor Graham.
30.
HerronPJGrinerLG (2000) Research strategies and information sources in Latin American studies: A one-credit, web-based course. Research Strategies17(1): 11–21.
31.
Information Literacy (IL) Meeting of Experts (2003) The Prague Declaration: Towards an Information Literate Society. Washington, DC: National Commission on Library and Information Science, National Forum on Information Literacy & UNESCO.
32.
JohnstonBWebberS (1999) Information literacy as an academic discipline: An action research approach to developing a credit-bearing class for business undergraduates. In: KlassonMLoughridgeBLööfS (eds) New Fields for Research in the 21st Century. Boras: University College of Boras, 183–197.
33.
JohnstonBWebberS (2005) As wemaythink: Information literacy as a discipline for the information age. Research Strategies20(3): 108–121.
34.
JointN (2003) Information literacy evaluation: Moving towards virtual learning environments. Electronic Library21(4): 322–334.
KennyM (2004) Lifelong learning: Sailing to Atlantis? In: Lifelong learning: Whose responsibility and what is your contribution?Proceedings of the 3rd international lifelong learning conference (eds DanaherPAMacphersonCNouwensF.), Yeppoon, Australia, 13–16 June, 2004, pp. 20–25. Rockhampton, Australia: Central Queensland University Press.
37.
KubiakC (2002) Lessons from U120 MOSAIC: Making sense of information in the connected age: drawn from an interview with Jo Parker. The Open University. Available at: http://kn.open.ac.uk/public/getfile.cfm?documentfileid=2353 (accessed 25 January 2012).
38.
LangfordL (1998) Information literacy? seeking clarification. School Libraries Worldwide4(1): 59–72.
39.
LloydA (2005) Information literacy: Different contexts, different concepts, different truths?Journal of Librarianship and Information Science37(2): 82–88.
40.
McClureCR (1994) Network literacy: A role for libraries. Information Technology and Libraries13(2): 115–125.
41.
MarklessS (2009) A new conception of information literacy for the digital learning environment in higher education. Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education1(1): 25–40.
42.
MartinA (2003) Essential e-literacy. Connected9: 22–24.
NazariM (2010) Design and process of a contextual study of information literacy. Library and Information Science Research32(3): 179–191.
46.
NazariM. (2011) A contextual model of information literacy. Journal of Information Science37(4): 345–359.
47.
NazariMWebberS (2008) Model of geo/spatial information literacy. In: EUGISES2008: Sixth European GIS education seminar, Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester, UK, 11–14September. Available at: http://www.eugises.eu/proceedings2008/nazari.pdf (accessed 25 January 2012).
48.
NazariMWebberS (2010) What do the conceptions of geo/spatial information tell us about information literacy?Journal of Documentation67(2): 334–354.
49.
ParkerJ (2008) Going beyond Google at the Open University. In: GoodwinPParkerJ (eds) Information Literacy, Meets Library 2.0. London: Facet, 133–138.
50.
PatalongS (2003) Using the virtual learning environment WebCT to enhance information skills teaching at Coventry University. Library Review52(3): 103–110.
51.
RayKDayJ (1998) Student attitudes towards electronic information resources. Information Research4(2). Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/4-2/paper54.html (accessed December 2009).
52.
SavolainenR (2002) Network competence and information seeking on the Internet: From definitions towards a social cognitive model. Journal of Documentation58(2): 211–226.
SimsR (2000) An interactive conundrum: Constructs of interactivity and learning theory. Australian Journal of Educational Technology16(1): 45–57.
55.
SpitzerKLEisenbergMBLoweCA (1998) Information Literacy: Essential Skills for the Information Age. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
56.
StansfieldMHMcLellanEConnollyT (2004) Enhancing student performance in online learning and traditional face-to-face class delivery. Journal of Information Technology Education3: 173–188.
57.
SundinO (2008) Negotiations on information-seeking expertise: A study of web-based tutorials for information literacy. Journal of Documentation64(1): 24–44.
58.
TiefelV (1995) Library user education: Examining its past, projecting its future. Library Trends44(2): 318–338.
UnruhB (1978) User education: The channel for communication. In: The 2nd international online information meeting, London, UK, 5–7 December 1978, pp. 65–74. Oxford: Learned Information.
61.
WallaceRM (2003) Online learning in higher education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication & Information3(2): 241–280.
62.
WaltonGBarkerJHepworthM. (2007) Using online collaborative learning to enhance information literacy delivery in a Level 1 module: An evaluation. Journal of Information Literacy1(1): 13–30.
63.
WebberSJohnstonB (2000) Conceptions of information literacy: New perspectives and implications. Journal of Information Science26(6): 381–397.
ZurkowskiP (1974) The Information Services Environment: Relationships and Priorities. Washington, DC: National Commission on Libraries and Information Science.
