The current study seeks to describe and analyze journal research publications in the top 10 Library and Information Science journals from 2007–8. The paper presents a statistical descriptive analysis of authorship patterns (geographical distribution and affiliation) and keywords. Furthermore, it displays a thorough content analysis of keywords and abstracts extracted from 10 leading Information Science journals in 2007–8, using Zins’ (2007) classification scheme of Information Science. The main results suggest the tendency of authors towards collaboration in authorship. North American and European authors – from the core discipline of Librarianship and Information Science – can be considered as leaders in the top 10 LIS journals. Furthermore, there are three major cores of research in these journals: information technology, methodology and social information science. It is important that LIS researchers, professionals, teachers and students be keenly aware of the updated main spheres of research in top leading LIS journals.
AstromF (2007) Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990–2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology58(7): 947–957.
2.
AtkinsSE (1988) Subject trends in Library and Information Science research, 1975–1984. Library Trends36(Spring): 633–658.
3.
Bar-IlanJ (2000) The Web as an information source on informetrics? A content analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science51(6): 432–443.
4.
BlessingerKFrasierM (2007) Analysis of a decade in library literature: 1994–2004. College & Research Libraries68(2): 155–170.
5.
ButtlarL (1991) Analyzing the library periodical literature: Content and authorship. College & Research Libraries52(1): 39–53.
6.
ChuaAYKYangCC (2008) The shift towards multi-disciplinarily in Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology59(13): 2156–2170.
7.
DavarpanahMRAslekiaS (2008) A scientometric analysis of international LIS journals: Productivity and characteristics. Scientometrics77(1): 21–39.
8.
GinnLK (2003) Citation analysis of authored articles in Library and Information Science research, 2001–2002. MississippiLibraries67(Winter): 106–109.
9.
González-AlcaideGCastelló-CogollosLNavarro-MolinaCAleixandre-BenaventRValderrama-ZuriánC (2008) Library and Information Science research areas: Analysis of journal articles in LISA. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology59(1): 150–154.
10.
GossettJLByrneS (2002) ‘Click here’: A content analysis of Internet rape sites. Gender & Society16(5): 689–709.
11.
HiderPPymmB (2008) Empirical research methods reported in high-profile LIS journal literature. Library & Information Science Research30(2): 108–114.
12.
JärvelinKVakkariP (1990) Content of research articles in Library and Information Science. Library & Information Science Research12(4): 395–421.
13.
JärvelinKVakkariP (1993) The evolution of Library and Information Science 1965–1985: A content analysis of journal articles. Information Processing and Management29(1): 129–144.
14.
JulienHMcKechnieLEFHartS (2005) Affective issues in Library and Information Science systems work: A content analysis. Library & Information Science Research27(4): 453–466.
15.
KoufogiannakisDSlaterLCrumleyE (2004) A content analysis of librarianship research. Journal of Information Science30(3): 227–239.
16.
KrippendorffK (1980) Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
KumpulainenS (1999) Library and Information Science research 1975: Content analysis of journal articles. Libri41(l): 59–76.
18.
LipetzB (1999) Aspects of JASIS authorship through five decades. Journal of the American Society for Information Science50(11): 994–1003.
19.
McMillanS (2000) The microscope and the moving target: The challenge of applying content analysis to the World Wide Web., Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly77(1): 80–98.
20.
NourMM (1985) A quantitative analysis of the research articles published in core library journals of 1980. Library & Information Science Research7(3): 261–273.
21.
OdellJGabbardR (2008) The interdisciplinary influence of Library and Information Science 1996–2004: A journal-to-journal citation analysis. College & Research Libraries69 (6): 546–564.
22.
PaulMJ (2001) Interactive disaster communication on the Internet: A content analysis of sixty-four disaster relief home pages. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly78(4): 739–753.
23.
PreborG (2007) Information Science – facing social and ethical challenges: Analysis of Masters theses and Doctoral dissertations over the past five years (2002–2006) in Information Science Departments worldwide. Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society5(2–3): 253–269.
24.
RochesterMKVakkariP (2003) International Library and Information Science research: A comparison of national trends. In: IFLA Professional Reports, No. 82, 1–40.
25.
StillJ (2001) A content analysis of university library websites in English speaking countries. Online Information Review25(3): 160–164.
26.
TangR (2004) Evolution of the interdisciplinary characteristics of Information and Library Science. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology41(1): 54–63.
