This article presents a reading of the user interface in one public library system. Its aim is to find out the frames and competences required and used in the communication between the computer and the patron. The authors see the computer as a text that is to be read by the user who wants to search for information from the library. The transition from the traditional library to the digital library has meant that the communication process has changed radically. It seems that library systems are planned mainly for the advanced user, i.e. for librarians or individuals with a librarian’s skills. Some suggestions on how to improve this situation are given.
Akeroyd, J. ( 2000) The management of change in electronic libraries. Paper presented at the 66th IFLA Council and General Conference, Jerusalem, Israel, 13-18 August 2000 . Available at: http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla66/papers/037-110e.htm
2.
Barton, D. ( 1994) Literacy: An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language . Oxford: Blackwell.
3.
Bawden, D. ( 2001) Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts . Journal of Documentation57(2):218-252.
4.
Baynham, M. ( 1995) Literacy Practices: Investigating Literacy in Social Contexts . London: Longman.
5.
Cooren, F. ( 2000) The Organizing Property of Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6.
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. ( 1983) Anti-Oedipus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Athlone Press.
7.
Derrida, J. ( 1988) Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
8.
Dervin, B. and Nilan, M. ( 1986) Information needs and uses. In: Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST)21, 3-33. White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry.
9.
Goffman, E. ( 1959) ThePresentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday & Anchor Books.
10.
Greimas, AJ ( 1988) Maupassant. The Semiotics of Texts: Practical Exercises . Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
11.
Griffiths, JR, Hartley, RJ and Willson, JP ( 2002) An improved method of studying user-system interaction by combining transaction log analysis and protocol analysis. Information Research7(4). http://informationr.net/ir/7-4/paper139.html (accessed 8 August 2007).
12.
Harter, SP and Hert, CA ( 1997) Evaluation of information retrieval systems: Approaches, issues, and methods. In: Williams, ME (ed.) Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) 32, 3-94.
13.
Heath, SB ( 1983) Ways with words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Heikkinen, V., Hiidenmaa, P. and Tiililä, U. ( 2000) TekstiTyönä, VirkaKielenä. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
15.
Heritage, J. ( 1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge : Polity Press.
16.
Karlsson, F. ( 1994) YleinenKielitiede. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
17.
Latour, B. ( 1988) Mixing humans and non-humans together: The sociology of the door-closer.Social Problems35(3): 298-310.
18.
Latour, B. ( 1996) On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity3(4): 228-245.
19.
Latour, B. ( 1993) On Technical Mediation. The Messenger Lectures on the Evolution of Civilization. Lund: Institute of Economic Research Working Paper Series.
20.
Louet, J. ( 2004) Tietysti jonkinlainen ohjeistus olisi kiva: Tutkimus Jyväskylän kaupunginkirjaston asiakkaiden kirjastoterminologian tuntemuksesta. Proseminaariesitelmä . Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän kesäyliopisto. Available at: http://www.jyvaskyla.fi/kirjasto/julkaisut/prosem_louet.pdf
21.
Pitkänen-Huhta, A. ( 1999) Vieraalla kielellä lukemisen tutkimus. In: Sajavaara, K, Piirainen-Marsh, A (eds) Kielenoppimisen kysymyksiä. Jyväskylä: Soveltavan kielentutkimuksen keskus, Jyväskylän Yliopisto.
22.
Savolainen, R. ( 1993) The sense-making theory: Reviewing the interests of a user-centered approach to information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management29(1):13-28.
23.
Street, BV ( 1995) Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy in Development, Ethnography and Education. London: Longman.
24.
Strum, S. and Latour, B. ( 1987) The meanings of the social: From baboons to humans. Information sur les Sciences Sociales/ Social Science Information26(4): 783-802.
25.
Tainio, L (ed.) (1997) Keskustelunanalyysin Perusteet. Tampere: Vastapaino.
26.
Talja, S., Heinisuo R., Pispa K., Luukkainen, S. and Järvelin, K. ( 1997) Discourse analysis in the development of a regional information service. In: Beaulieu, M, Davenport, E, Pors, NO (eds) LIS Research and Professional Practice. Proceedings of the 2nd British-Nordic Conference on Library and Information Studies, Edinburgh, 24-26 March. London: Taylor Graham,109-128.
27.
Talja, S., Heinisuo, R., Kasesniemi, E-L., Kemppainen, H., Luukkainen, S., Pispa, K. and Järvelin, K. ( 1998) Discourse analysis of user requests.Communications of the ACM41(4): 93-94.
28.
Tuominen, K. ( 2000) Monologue or dialogue in the web environment? The role of networked library and information services in the future. Paper presented at the 66th IFLA Council and General Conference , Jerusalem, Israel, 13-18 August. Available at: http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla66/papers/004-131e.htm
29.
Tuominen, K. and Savolainen, R. ( 1997) Social constructionist approach to the study of information use as discursive action. In: Vakkari, P, Savolainen, R, Dervin, B (eds)Information Seeking in Context. Proceedings of an International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 14-16 August, 1996, Tampere, Finland. London: Taylor Graham, 81-96.
30.
Tuominen, K., Savolainen, R. and Talja, S. ( 2005) Information literacy as a socio-technical practice. Library Quarterly75(3): 329-345.
31.
Uotinen, J. ( 2003a) Involvement in (Information) Society: The Joensuu Community Resource Centre Netcafé. New Media & Society5(3):335-356.
32.
Uotinen, J. ( 2003b) Where have all the boys come from? Gender in the ‘Computer Biographies’ of Finnish IT students. In: Mörtberg, C, Lundgren, A (eds) How Do we Make a Difference? Information Technology, Transnational Democracy and Gender. Division Gender and Technology. Luleå : Luleå University of Technology, 267-275.
33.
Woolgar, S. ( 1991) Configuring the user: The case of usability trials.In: Law, J (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. Sociological Review Monograph38. London: Routledge, 59-89.
