It is evident from previous research that user satisfaction is a multidimensional, subjective variable which can be affected by many factors other than performance of the system or searcher. This article draws on information retrieval and information systems literature in an attempt to understand what user satisfaction is, how it is measured, what factors affect it, and why findings on user satisfaction have been so varied and contradictory. It concludes with recommendations for future investigation of the use of user satisfaction as a measure of system performance.
Adams, D. , Nelson, R. and Todd, P. (1992) ` Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication ', MIS Quarterly: 227—47 .
2.
Ankeny, M.L. (1991) ` Evaluating End-user Services: Success or Satisfaction? ', Journal of Academic Librarianship16 (6): 352—6 .
3.
Applegate, R. (1993) ` Models of User Satisfaction: Understanding False Positives' , RQ32 (4): 525—39 .
4.
Bailey, J.E. and Pearson, S.W. (1983) ` Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction ', Management Science29 (5): 530—45 .
5.
Barki, H. and Hartwick, J. (1994) ` Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude ', MIS Quarterly: 59—82 .
6.
Barrett, A. (2005) ` The Information-Seeking Habits of Graduate Student Researchers in the Humanities ', Journal of Academic Librarianship31 (4): 324—31 .
7.
Beaulieu, M. (2000) ` Interaction in Information Searching and Retrieval' , Journal of Documentation56 (4): 431—9 .
8.
Berryman, J. (2006) ` What Defines “Enough” Information? How Policy Workers Make Judgements and Decisions during Information Seeking: Preliminary Results from an Exploratory Study' , Information Research11 (4), URL (consulted May 2007): http://information.net/ir/11-4/paper266.html
9.
Bruce, H. (1998) ` User Satisfaction with Information Seeking on the Internet' , Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology49 (6): 541—56 .
10.
Buczynski, J.A. (2005) ` Satisficing Digital Library Users ', Internet Reference Services Quarterly10 (1): 99—102 .
11.
Byron, M. (2004) Satisficing and Maximising: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
12.
Cooper, W.S. (1973) ` On Selecting a Measure of Retrieval Effectiveness, Part 1: The “Subjective” Philosophy of Evaluation ', Journal of the American Society for Information Science24: 87—100 .
13.
Craven, J. and Griffiths, J.R. (2002) ` 30,000 Different Users, 30,000 Different Needs? Design and Delivery of Distributed Resources to the User Community ', in P. Brophy, S. Fisher and Z. Clarke (eds) Libraries without Walls 4: the Delivery of Library Services to Distant Users: Proceedings of the Libraries Without Walls conference, 14-18 September 2001. London: Facet Publishing.
14.
Davis, F. (1989) ` Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology ', MIS Quarterly: 319—40 .
15.
Davis, F. , Bogozzi, R. and Warshaw, P. (1989) ` User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models' , Management Science35 (8): 982—1003 .
16.
Doll, W.J. and Torkzadeh, G. (1988) ` The Measurement of End-user Computing Satisfaction' , MIS Quarterly12 (2): 259—74 .
17.
Dunlop, M.D. (2000) ` Reflections onMira : Interactive Evaluation in Information Retrieval', Journal of American Society for Information Science51 (14): 1269—74 .
18.
Dunlop, M.D. , Johnson, C.W. and Reid, J. (1998) ` Exploring the Layers of Information Retrieval Evaluation ', editorial for second special edition of Interacting with Computers on HCI and IR10 (3): 225—36 .
19.
Ein-Dor, P. and Segev, E. (1978) ` Organisational Context and the Success of Management Information Systems' , Management Science24 (10): 1064—77 .
20.
Gatian, A.W. (1994) ` Is User Satisfaction a Valid Measure of System Effectiveness? ', Information and Management26: 119—31 .
21.
Gluck, M. (1996) ` Exploring the Relationship between User Satisfaction and Relevance in Information Systems' , Information Processing and Management32 (1): 89—104 .
22.
Griffiths, J.R. and Brophy, P. (2005) ` Student Searching Behaviour and the Web: Use of Academic Resources and Google' , Library Trends Spring: 539—54 .
23.
Harter, S.P. and Hert, C.A. (1997) `Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems: Approaches, Issues, and Methods', in Martha E. Williams , (ed.) Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) 32. Medford, NJ: Information Today , pp. 3—94.
24.
Herring, S.D. (2001) ` Using the World Wide Web for Research: Are Faculty Satisfied? ', Journal of Academic Librarianship27 (3): 213—19 .
25.
Hildreth, C.R. (2001) `Accounting for Users' Inflated Assessments of On-line Catalogue Search Performance and Usefulness: An Experimental Study' , Information Research6 (2), URL (consulted September 2008): http://informationr.net/ir/6-2/paper101.html
26.
Hiltz, S.R. and Johnson, K. (1990) ` User Satisfaction with Computer-mediated Communication Systems' , Management Science36 (6): 739—64 .
27.
Igbaria, M. , Zinatelli, N. , Cragg, P. and Cavage, A.L.M. (1997) ` Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model ', MIS Quarterly21 (3): 279—306 .
28.
IMLS (2006) Sense-making the Information Confluence: The Whys and Hows of College and University User Satisficing of Information Needs. Funded by the Institute of Museum and Library Services, The Ohio State University, and OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. URL (consulted May 2007): http://imlsosuoclcproject.jcomm.ohio-state.edu/
29.
Ives, B. , Olson, M. and Baroudi, S. (1983) ` The Measurement of User Information Satisfaction' , Communications of the ACM26 (10): 785—93 .
30.
Johnson, F.C. , Griffiths, J.R. and Hartley, R.J. (2003) ` Task Dimensions of User Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems' , Information Research8 (4), URL (consulted May 2007): http://informationr.net/ir/8-4/paper157.html
31.
Lawrence, M. and Low, G. (1993) ` Exploring Individual User Satisfaction within User-led Development' , MIS Quarterly17 (2): 195—208 .
32.
Lindgaard, G. and Dudek, C. (2003) ` What is this Evasive Beast we call User Satisfaction?', Interacting WithComputers15 (3): 429—52 .
33.
McKeen, J.D. , Guimaraes, T. and Wetherbe, J.C. (1994) `The Relationship between User Participation and User Satisfaction: An Investigation of Four Contingency Factors' , MIS Quarterly: 427—51 .
34.
Meho, L.I. and Tibbo, H.R. (2003) ` Modeling the Information-seeking Behavior of Social Scientists: Ellis's Study Revisited ', Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology54 (6): 570—87 .
35.
Melone, N.P. (1990) ` A Theoretical Assessment of the User-satisfaction Construction in Information Systems Research' , Management Science36 (1): 7—91 .
36.
Montazemi, A.R. (1988) ` Factors Affecting Information Satisfaction in the Context of the Small Business Environment' , MIS Quarterly : 239—56 .
37.
Nath, R. (1989) ` Are Frequent Computer Users More Satisfied ?', Information Processing and Management25 (5): 557—62 .
38.
Petrelli, P. , Beaulieu, M. , Sanderson, M. , Demetriou, G. , Herring, P. and Hansen, P. (2004) ` Observing Users, Designing Clarity: A Case Study on the User-centered Design of a Cross-language Information Retrieval System ', Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology: 923—34 .
39.
Prabha, C. , Connaway, L.S. , Olszewski, L. and Jenkins, L.R. (2007) ` What is Enough? Satisficing Information Needs ', Journal of Documentation63 (1): 74—89 .
40.
Reid, J. (1999) ` A New, Task-oriented Paradigm for Information Retrieval: Implications for Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems ', in T. Aparac, T. Saracevic, P. Ingwersen and P. Vakkari (Eds) Proceedings from the Third International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science, CoLIS 3. Digital Libraries: Interdisciplinary Concepts, Challenges and Opportunities, University of Zagreb: Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 97—108.
41.
Reid, J. (2000) ` A Task-oriented Non-interactive Evaluation Methodology for Information Retrieval Systems' , Information Retrieval2: 115—29 .
42.
Robey, D. (1979) ` User Attitudes and Management Information System Use' , Academy of Management Journal22 (3): 527—38 .
43.
Sandore, B. (1990) ` Online Searching: What Measure Satisfaction ?', Library and Information Science Review12: 33—54 .
44.
Simon, H.A. (1957) Models of Man — Social and Rational. New York: John Wiley and Sons .
45.
Su, L. (1992) ` Evaluation Measures for Interactive Information Retrieval' , Information Processing and Management28 (4): 503—16 .
46.
Su, L. (1998) ` Value of Search Results as a Whole as the Best Single Measure of Information Retrieval Performance' , Information Processing and Management34 (5): 577—9 .
47.
Su, L.T. (2003) ` A Comprehensive and Systematic Model of User Evaluation of Web Search Engines: I. Theory and Background, and: II. An Evaluation by Undergraduates ', Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology54 (14): 1175—223 .
48.
Sullivan, D. (2002) `Search Engine Placement Tips', Search Engine Watch, URL (consulted May 2007): http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=2168021
49.
Szajna, B. and Scamell, R.W. (2001) ` The Effects of Information System User Expectations on their Performance and Perceptions ', MIS Quarterly: 493—516 .
50.
Tessier, J.A. , Crouch, W.W. and Atherton, P. (1977) ` New Measures of User Satisfaction with Computer-based Literature Searches' , Special Libraries68: 383—9 .
51.
Wood, F. , Ford, N. , Miller, D. , Sobczyk, G. and Duffin, R. (1996) ` Information Skills, Searching Behaviour and Cognitive Styles for Student-centred Learning: A Computer-assisted Learning Approach' , Journal of Information Science22 (2): 79—92 .
52.
Woodroof, J. and Burg, W. (2003) `Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction: Are Users Predisposed? ', Information and Management40 (4): 317—24 .
53.
Zach, L. (2005) ` When is “enough” enough? Modelling the Information-seeking and Stopping Behaviour of Senior Arts Administrators' , Journal of the American Society for Information Science56 (1): 23—35 .
54.
Zmud, R.W. and Boynton, A.C. (1991) `Survey Measures and Instruments in MIS: Inventory and Appraisal', in K. Kraemer (ed.) The Information Systems Research Challenge: Survey Research Methods, pp. 149—80. Boston: Harvard Business School .
