The fixed-dose procedure and the acute-toxic-class method: a mathematical comparison

Abstract

The fixed-dose procedure (FDP), proposed by the British Toxicology Society, and the acute-toxic-class (ATC) method, proposed by the German Federal Health Authority, provide alternatives to the LD₅₀ test for classify ing substances by their acute oral toxicity. This paper pre sents a mathematical model that is used to compare the two procedures in terms of their classification properties and the required numbers of animals.

It is found that the classification properties of the proce dures depend on the dose levels used, the number of ani mals tested per dose and the criteria that are used to decide whether testing should continue at a higher or lower dose. For substances with steep dose-response curves, the most likely classification is determined chiefly by the choice of the dose levels whilst the number of ani mals and continuation criteria used are increasingly important for substances with dose-response curves with a smaller slope.

The use of toxicity as a possible endpoint as in the FDP and the use of a two-stage testing procedure at each dose as in the ATC method are both found to reduce the expect ed numbers of animals required with little effect on the classification properties. On the strength of these findings it is indicated that a new procedure combining the dose levels and testing approach of the ATC method with the inclusion of toxicity as an endpoint as in the FDP would be more efficient than either the FDP or the ATC method.

Keywords

fixed-dose procedure acute-toxic-class method classification probabilities acute toxicity animal welfare

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Oecd. Guideline for Testing of Chemical Substances - No. 401. Acute Oral Toxicity. OECD, Paris, 1987.

Zbinden G. , Flury-Roversi M. Significance of the LD50 test for the toxicological evaluation of chemical substances. Arch Toxicol 1981; 47: 79-99.

British Toxicology Society. Special report: a new approach to the classification of substances and preparations on the basis of their acute toxicity. Hum Toxicol 1984; 3: 85-92.

Oecd. Guideline for Testing of Chemicals - No. 420 Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Procedure. OECD , Paris, 1992.

Schlede E. et al. A national validation study of the acute-toxic-class method — an alternative to the LD50 test. Arch Toxicol 1992; 66: 455-470.

Ad hoc expert meeting on acute toxicity. Chairman's report, Berlin, 1994.

Commission of the European Communities Council Directive 83/467/EEC amending for the fifth time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances: Annex III. Off J Europ Comm No. L257, 13-33, 1983.

Whitehead A. , Curnow RN Statistical evaluation of the fixed-dose procedure . Food Chem Toxicol 1992; 30: 313-324.

Stallard N. , Whitehead A. Reducing animal numbers in the fixed-dose procedure. Hum Exp Toxicol 1995; 14: 315-323.

10.

van den Heuvel MJ et al. The international validation of a fixed-dose procedure as an alternative to the classical LD50 test. Food Chem Toxicol 1990; 28: 469-482.

11.

Diener W. et al. The biometric evaluation of the acute-toxic-class method (oral) . Arch Toxicol 1994; 68: 599-610.