The testing strategy for chemical substances is discussed with regard to obtaining improved quality of data for health assessment while respecting the ethical responsibility for consideration of the welfare of the animals involved. Ensuring animal welfare without indulging too much in anthropomorphism leads to better research/testing, Current trends in toxicity testing will result in tests involving more sophisticated techniques, better quality of laboratory animals, and eventually the use of fewer animals,
Brown NA & Fabro S.The value of animal teratogenicity testing for predicting human risk. Clinical Obstetrics andGynecology1983; 26: 467-77.
3.
Lijinsky W.Importance of animal experiments in carcinogenesis research. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis1988; 11: 307-14.
4.
Schardein JL , Schwetz BA & Kenel MFSpecies sensitivities and prediction of teratogenic potential. Environmental Health Perspectives1985; 61: 55-67.
5.
Calabrese EJAnimal extrapolation: a summary. In: Principles of Animal Extrapolation . New York: John Wiley, 1983, pp 575-591.
6.
Visek WJ, Cinton SK, Imrey PB et al. Dietary protein and chronic toxicity of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine fed to mice. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health1991; 32: 383-413.
7.
Thorup I., Meyer O. & Kristiansen E.Effect of a dietary (Beet Fiber) on dimethylhydrazine-induced colon cancer in Wistar rats. Nutrition and Cancer1992; 17: 251-61.
8.
Goldsworthy TL & Pitot HCAn approach to the development of a short-term whole-animal bioassay to distinguish initiating agents (incomplete carcinogens), promoting agents, complete carcinogens, and noncarcinogens in rat liver. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health1985; 16: 389-402.
9.
Kristiansen E., Clemmensen S. & Meyer O.Chronic ethanol intake and reduction of lung tumours from urethane in strain A mice. Food and Chemical Toxicology1990; 28: 35-8.
10.
Atkinson JB , Hoover RL, Berry KK & Swift LLCholesterol-fed heterozygous Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits: a new model for atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis1989; 78: 123-36.
11.
Russel Wms & Burch RLThe Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. London : Methuen, 1959.
12.
Cec.Council Directive 86/609/EEC of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European Communities1986; 29: (L358): 1-29.
13.
Orlans FBClassification system for degree of animal harm. Scandinavian Journal ofLaboratory Animal Science1986; 13: 93-7.
14.
Hau J.Trends in laboratory animal science and welfare. Scandinavian Journal of LaboratoryScience1991; 18: 41-59.
15.
Haseman JK, Huff JE, Rao GN & Eustis SLSources of variability in rodent carcinogenicity studies. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology1989; 12: 793-804.
16.
Rowan ANRefinement of animal research technique and validity of research data. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology1990; 15: 25-32.
17.
Anon.Acute oral toxicity. OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. Paris: OECD, 1987.
18.
British Toxicology Society.Special report: A new approach to the classification of substances and preparations on the basis of their acute toxicity. Human Toxicology1984; 3: 85-92.
19.
Heuvel MJ van den, Clark DG, Fielder RJ, Koundakjan PP, Oliver Gja, Pelling D., Tomlinson NJ & Walker APThe international validation of Fixed-Dose Procedure as an alternative to the classical LD50 test. Food and Chemical Toxicology1990; 28: 469-82.
20.
Anon.Acute eye irritation/corrosion. OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. Paris: OECD, 1987.
21.
Hampson JE & Silcock SRAnimal protection and toxicity testing regulations. Food and Chemical Toxicology1985; 23: 183-6.
22.
Zbinden GAA look behind drug regulatory guidelines. In: National and International Drug Safety Guidelines, Adler S & Zbinden G (eds). Zollikon: M.T.C. Verlag, 1988, pp7-13.
23.
Travis CC & Belfant H.Promotion as a factor in carcinogenesis. Toxicology Letters1992; 60: 1-9.
24.
Zbinden G.Predictive value of animal studies in toxicology. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology1991; 14: 167-77.
25.
Anon.Report of Scientific Committee for Food on Guidelines for the Safety Assessment of Food Additives (Tenth series). Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities : 1980.
