Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a serious clinical condition characterized by damage to the immune system as a result of an uncontrolled response to infection. Septic patients show complications such as fever, cardiovascular shock, and/or systemic organ failure. Acute organ failure formed in sepsis mostly affects the respiratory and cardiovascular systems. In sepsis, responses including pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory processes in addition to the Toll-Like Receptor 4 (TLR4) signals leading to the release of inflammatory mediators have been suggested to be fundamental pathways in the pathophysiology of sepsis. Purpose: In this context, unregulated levels of sepsis-associated inflammatory mediators may increase the risk of mortality. In sepsis, infection-induced pathogens lead to a systemic inflammatory response. These systemic responses may contribute to septic shock and organ dysfunction. In the unfavorable clinical course of sepsis, an uncontrolled inflammatory response is observed. Accordingly, the mechanism of inflammatory mediators such as cytokines and chemokines in sepsis might increase. Neurotransmitters and gene regulators affect inflammatory mediators and control the inflammatory response. In this review, we aimed to show the new therapeutic targets in sepsis treatment with current studies. New clinical implications targeting inflammatory mediators in high mortality affected by the uncontrolled inflammatory response in sepsis can contribute to the understanding of the symptoms.

Keywords

Sepsis cytokines chemokines inflammatory response

Introduction

Sepsis is an immunological response leading to multi-organ failure.¹ Pro- and anti-inflammatory responses result in a dysregulated reaction in sepsis. This reaction belongs to the host against the developing infection.² In the pathology of sepsis, the intracellular signaling process leads to expressional changes of genes contributing to adaptive immunity and inflammation. In the early stage of sepsis, the irregular inflammatory response may cause a low level of peripheral vasodilation associated with abnormal platelet stimulation.^3,4 In the current literature, there are no specific FDA-approved therapeutic agents for the treatment of sepsis. Accordingly, the complications that develop in sepsis could be attenuated by therapeutic approaches that regulate immune responses, such as reducing the levels of pro-inflammatory mediators.⁵

Sepsis initiates a complex immune response that changes over time through pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. As a result, septic patients quickly show signs of immunosuppression.⁶ Immune suppression due to sepsis can lead to an uncontrolled inflammatory response.⁷ The pathology of sepsis consists of an initial hyperinflammatory phase followed by a longer-lasting immunosuppressive phase.⁸ Sepsis-induced immunosuppression may occur through mechanisms such as destruction of immune cells by apoptosis and increased expression of regulatory T (Treg) cells.⁹ In this context, the stimulation of the complement system, coagulation system, vascular endothelium, neutrophils, and platelets may also play a role in the pro-inflammatory responses that occur in sepsis.¹⁰

A disruption of the inflammatory balance is seen as the most critical characteristic in the pathogenesis of sepsis. A disruption of this order can be caused by pathogens such as bacteria, fungi, parasites, and viruses.¹¹ The first acute host response to these pathogens is reported as the engulfment of the pathogens by macrophages and production of a variety of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Cytokine storms can be triggered by the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, or the innate immune system can be stimulated.^12,13 Additionally, the constant stimulation of neutrophils and macrophages/monocytes can also lead to the acceleration of the septic response. Accordingly, the delayed apoptosis of neutrophils, upregulation of lymphocyte-associated costimulatory molecules, and increased necrosis of tissues seem to be associated with factors leading to the pathogenesis of sepsis.¹⁴

In sepsis, the innate immune response that enables the invasion of pathogens is attributed to the development of the pathology.¹⁵ Triggering the cellular pathway of the immune system causes an excessive release of cytokines, chemokines, and other inflammatory mediators such as prostaglandins. Cytokines can regulate inflammatory responses by transporting immune cells to the site of infection. Inflammatory response prevents infection by controlling the localized regions. Additionally, irregular cytokine release may lead to endothelial dysfunction associated with vasodilation and increased capillary permeability (Figure 1). Accordingly, the release of inflammatory mediators in the environment is related to hypotension, hemoconcentration, macromolecular extravasation, and edema in sepsis.^16,17 In this review, we discuss inflammation mediators in sepsis with the current literature (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Role of inflammatory mediators in the pathology of sepsis. (a) Immunologic changes in the body due to the inflammatory response in sepsis. Stimulation of TFs associated with an uncontrolled inflammatory response in sepsis may induce IL-6 expression. Cytokine production occurs in the region where the infection is localized. Diapedesis of monocytes is observed with stimulation of IL-6 expression. Additionally, ROS may cause changes in the microcirculation in sepsis through oxidative stress as a result of the inflammatory response. (b) The role of NK cells in regulating inflammatory mediator release in sepsis. During sepsis, NK cells can induce changes in IFN-γ and TNF-α, leading to cytokine release and microbial death. Here, the function of IL-2, IL-12, and IL-18 cytokines can be reduced by macrophages. Decreased immune function may affect complications associated with sepsis, resulting in long-term mortality (IL-2, Interleukin 2; IL-12, Interleukin 12; IL-18, Interleukin 18; IL-6, Interleukin 6; NK, Natural killer cells; TF, Tissue factor; ROS, Reactive oxygen species; IFN-γ, Interferon gamma; TNF-α, Tumor necrosis factor alpha).

Figure 2.

The role of cytokines in sepsis pathology

In the mechanism of sepsis, the pro-inflammatory response has a balance with certain anti-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 10 (IL-10), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), and interleukin 4 (IL-4), restoring the immunological balance.¹⁸ Sepsis leads to a rapid increase in pathogen recognition receptors and stimulation of signal transduction cascades.¹⁹ Additionally, the response of the host to sepsis has no simple pattern followed by an initial pro-inflammatory phase and anti-inflammatory response. Accordingly, sepsis is proposed to be a dynamic process that may reflect heterogeneous genome-specific pathways.²⁰ Evaluating these processes that create and regulate pro- and anti-inflammatory responses in sepsis may contribute to cytokine-based treatment approaches. In septic shock, the depletion of Treg leads to a loss of function, while reduced cytokine release has also been reported.²¹ The characterization of cells producing IL-10 in septic shock patients showed that IL–10 production may increase, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) expression may decrease. An increase in circulating IL-10 production may be considered a trigger for CD4 + Treg lymphocyte cells, which are the main source of IL–10 secretion.²² A study in 22 septic patients reported that the synthesis of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and TNF-α by CD8 + T and CD4 + T cells may decrease. The negative correlation between the quantities of CD4 + T cells and IL-10 expression in the same cells may be due to the susceptibility of helper T cells 1 (Th1 T) to apoptosis.²³ Accordingly, the effects of mediators such as IL-10 and IL-2 on Th1 T cells in sepsis can be evaluated by analyzing the immune profile. Treg cells, together with inflammatory mediators in cytokine loss, are known as regulators in the mechanism of sepsis. In sepsis, different T cell types may affect the immune heterogeneity of patients by controlling cytokine release. In the clinic, cardiac dysfunction is one of the diagnostic criteria in severe sepsis.²⁴ Inflammation triggers heart damage and may lead to sepsis. Accordingly, interleukin-5 (IL-5) gene deletion showed that cardiac dysfunction may cause sepsis. An increased expression of markers of cardiac injury in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced sepsis has been reported in IL-5-deficient (IL-5/-) C57BL/6J mice. Moreover, cardiac dysfunction occurs through M1 macrophages in sepsis. In the case of IL-5−/−, M1 macrophage differentiation in LPS-stimulated mice can be modulated via the p65 pathway. In this context, IL-5 may be a potential target for the clinical prevention of cardiac injury associated with the pathology of sepsis pathology.²⁵ The effect of IL-6 deficiency on myocardial signal transduction pathways in LPS-induced sepsis in young and old mice indicated that a high LPS dose was observed to increase the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) phosphorylation.²⁶ High doses of LPS cause the development of septic shock, while low doses of LPS show a preconditioning effect before myocardial ischemia/reperfusion.^27,28 Accordingly, LPS dosing through pre-administration could affect septic shock. STAT3 phosphorylation and M1 macrophages may be involved in myocardial damage due to sepsis. To counteract the inflammatory response, macrophages could undergo apoptosis.²⁹ The macrophage polarization process, which is observed in response to a signal from the environment, can regulate sepsis by affecting cytokines.

Data reported in animal studies have indicated that various processes such as inflammation, oxidative stress, and autophagy are involved in the mechanisms causing cardiac damage and dysfunction in sepsis.^30–32 IL-16 expression from cardiac tissue and serum was observed to result in an increase in LPS-induced sepsis, while the increase in IL-16 expression was reduced by superoxide dismutase (SOD). IL-16 expression can be regulated by oxidative stress parameters in sepsis cases. Additionally, the nuclear factor erythroid 2 (Nrf2) pathways may be protectively mediated against sepsis-induced cardiac injury in anti-IL-16 therapy.³³ In a clinical study conducted with 32 sepsis patients, there was no significant difference in the expressions of antioxidant glutathione (GSH) and malondialdehyde (MDA) in peripheral blood. The absence of significant data about the relationships between oxidative stress markers, GSH, and MDA indicates the necessity of new studies on the effectiveness of oxidative stress in sepsis. Furthermore, sepsis-associated encephalopathy was alleviated by an anti-oxidant, ginsenoside, by suppressing oxidative stress.³⁴ Accordingly, oxidative stress may affect cardiac sepsis complications through inflammatory cytokines. Additionally, the Nrf2 pathway may be involved in the oxidative stress-related mechanism in cardiac damage in sepsis.

Studies show that inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10, IL-6, and TNF-α may be associated with the pathology of sepsis. The p65 pathway in the setting of sepsis with cardiac damage modulates M1 macrophage differentiation.²⁵ Another study showed that the pretreatment of IL-6 deficiency with a low dose of LPS in young mice reduced the protein kinase B (AKT)-related cell-protective effect.²⁶ These findings indicate the role of the AKT signaling pathway in cardiac dysfunction of cytokines such as IL-5 and IL-6 in sepsis. However, the role of M1 and M2 macrophage cells that regulate cytokine expression in inflammatory differentiation needs additional evidence to be reached with further studies. The potential correlation of oxidative stress and apoptosis molecules with inflammatory cytokines could be determined in cardiac damage. Hence, determining the complex factors regulating cytokines in sepsis may contribute to the improvement of the prognosis.

The role of chemokines in the pathology of sepsis

Peptide chemokines have a high concentration in circulation, and they suppress local inflammation by desensitization.³⁵ These peptides are secreted by tissue cells, leukocytes, and triggered epithelial cells.³⁶ Chemokines are defined in four distinct subfamilies such as CC chemokines, CXC chemokines, CX3C chemokines, and C chemokines due to the highly conserved presence of the first two cysteine residues.³⁷ Therefore, the chemokine family is critical in the pathology of sepsis.

The effectiveness of CC and CXC chemokine levels on disease severity was investigated in 58 children with meningococcal sepsis. Nine sepsis patients who died were reported to have significantly higher serum levels of CCL1, CCL2, CCL8, CCL20, and chemokines including CXCL8, CXCL10, and CXCL12 in comparison to surviving sepsis patients. Based on these results, chemokine levels in sepsis may be key candidates for prognostic practice based on laboratory parameters.³⁸ CXCR2 receptors are associated with the regulation of neutrophil uptake.³⁹ The efficacy of CXCR2 was investigated for differentiating sepsis from infection via neutrophil dysfunction. At disease onset, the CXCR2 level decreases with a dose–response relationship depending on the clinical course. Among the neutrophil functions examined in this study, there was a decrease in the CXCR2 surface level associated with sepsis. Accordingly, the decrease in the CXCR2 surface level is also associated with sepsis in the presence of infection.⁴⁰ On the other hand, some studies on changes in the surface levels of the CD64 and CCR2 chemokine families state that these changes are not associated with sepsis. In this context, the increase in CCR2 surface levels may be related to infection rather than sepsis, while the in CD64 surface levels may not. This conclusion is a dose–response relationship due to infection.^40–42

Gain-of-function in CCR2 helps in the definition of the binding of polymorph nuclear leukocytes (PMNs). Blood PMNs and endothelial cells can put tissues at risk of injury due to an intense inflammatory response during sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP).⁴³ Based on these data, varying chemokine levels are stated to have a prognostic value in septic patients. The relationship of CCR2 in sepsis with PMN at varying surface levels needs to be evaluated in detail with future studies.

The effect of sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) on hippocampal neurogenesis in the case of CXCR5 knockdown was investigated, and it was shown that reduced memory capacity and learning deficits are associated with CLP-induced sepsis.³² CXCR5 may function in reducing the maintenance of immature neural cell populations, as well as increasing the proliferation of subgranular cells in the hippocampal dentate gyrus.⁴⁴ The removal of CXCR5 was reported to alleviate sepsis-induced deficits in hippocampal neurogenesis and increase cognitive function in mice in a SAE model. In this context, CXCR5 may act through inflammatory signaling to explain hippocampal neural stem cell proliferation and differentiation, reducing the protection of mature neurons.³² Sepsis was also reported to deplete the radial pool of glia, like stem cells in the hippocampus.⁴⁵ Sepsis may lead to the depletion of the neural stem cell pool and increased gliogenesis in the dentate gyrus. Accordingly, chemokines such as CXCR5 can modulate neurogenesis in hippocampal stem cells in the pathology of sepsis.

A murine model of LPS-induced neuroinflammation showed that the CXCR2 antagonist reduced the transfer rates of neutrophils to the brain. The results suggested that there may be potential chemokines to compensate for chemotaxis for neutrophils to pass through the endothelial barrier associated with reduced neutrophil infiltration.⁴⁶ Additionally, IL-8 can cause cytoskeletal reorganization between adjacent endothelial cells by the CXCR2-dependent stimulation of Rac signaling.⁴⁷ So, CXCR2 was proposed as a potential pharmacological target for blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity concerning neuroinflammation in sepsis.⁴⁶ A negative correlation was determined between CXCR2 and protein phosphatase 2C delta (Wip1) during sepsis in human neutrophils under in vitro conditions. The pharmacological suppression of Wip1 by the related antagonist can prevent the uptake of CXCR2 in an LPS model of human neutrophils. Accordingly, Wip1 can negatively regulate neutrophil migration and anti-microbial immunity during sepsis.⁴⁸ Further investigation of the suppression of Wip1 and chemokine subfamilies such as CXCR2 may be a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of sepsis. Besides, the efficacy of chemokines and cytokines CXCR2 to BBB in sepsis with modulators such as the Rac signaling pathway should be determined in detail with new studies.

CXCR2 expression decreased in CLP-induced sepsis in C57BL/6 mice, and the protection of neutrophil CXCR2 was reduced by the suppression of inducible nitric oxide (iNOS). The downregulation of CXCR2 may also mediate the downregulation of the nitric oxide (NO) receptor associated with the disruption of neutrophil migration observed in severe sepsis.⁴⁹ Therefore, the ability of NO to react with superoxide-forming peroxynitrite is important in understanding sepsis.

The peroxynitrite scavenger is involved in the prevention of vascular dysfunction in sepsis.⁵⁰ Thus, the efficacy of peroxynitrite in the CXCR2 chemokine-mediated NO signaling pathway may affect vascular function in sepsis. Angiotensin-(1–7) treatment was demonstrated to inhibit LPS-induced organ damage, IL-6 and NO production in rats. Additionally, angiotensin-(1–7) was reported to reduce elevated tissue levels of CXCL1 in endotoxemic rats. The nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) signaling pathway appears to mediate the protective effects of Ang-(1–7) in this model.⁵¹ In this sense, NO may lead to vascularization in sepsis by modulating different chemokine families such as CXCR2 and CXCL1. Molecules such as Ang-(1–7) that inhibit NO production are considered a target as a potential therapeutic agent in the treatment of sepsis.

The platelet factor 4 (PF4), a megakaryocyte-derived chemokine involved in innate immunity, may stimulate macrophages. A study in 45 sepsis patients also evaluated the immune response mediated by PF4. The number of platelet-derived microparticles (PMP) carrying PF4 was reported to increase in septic patients. Likewise, increased anti-PF4/heparin antibodies were found in bacterial sepsis patients.⁵² The level of circulating PMPs can be increased in various pathological conditions associated with inflammation and sepsis.^53,54 In the presence of bacterial infections, PF4 was observed to bind to polyanionic sequences on the surface of aerobic bacteria to form an antigenic complex that induces early antibody formation.⁵⁵ In relation to this, a high PF4 + PMP count in sepsis patients may be associated with secondary platelet stimulation due to bacterial infection.⁵⁶ The PF4 chemokine in sepsis as a mediator of an innate immune response may be involved in a signaling mechanism mediated by immunoglobulins.

Hence, chemokines, one of the inflammatory mediators, appear to be related to clinical and experimental sepsis pathology via signaling pathways and molecules. Increased chemokine levels in sepsis patients may be potential candidates for diagnostic evaluation. Moreover, the potential of this change observed in patients to affect BBB and hippocampal neural stem cell neurogenesis may be involved in the mechanism of multi-organ damage caused by sepsis. Molecules such as Ang-(1–7) and Wip1 may provide an important therapeutic approach for patients in the treatment of sepsis by modulating the structures affected by chemokines.

Discussion

In this review, we show the clinical implications of inflammatory mediators in sepsis through current studies. We discuss the role of inflammatory mediators in the pathology and treatment of serious complications such as organ failure in sepsis, using recent studies. Table 1 summarizes recent studies addressing inflammatory mediators in sepsis. In this respect, it is important to determine in detail the inflammatory mediators, molecules and signal pathways regulating the mediators in response to sepsis.

Table 1.

Summaries of findings reporting the role of inflammatory mediators in sepsis.

Study number	Study type	Model	Agent of model	Parameters in the study	Results	Reference
1	Clinical study	12 adult septic shock patients, 9 healthy volunteers	—	TNF-α, IL-10	TNF-α decrease, IL-10 increase in septic shock patients	²²
2	In vivo	1–3 days old C57BL/6J mice	A single dose of LPS i.p. 0.5 mg/kg body weight (locomotion analysis), 1 mg/kg (LTP experiments)	Microglial TNF IL-10	LPS-associated mice harboring IL-10 receptor-deficient microglia exhibit neuronal impairment	⁵⁸
3	In vivo	IL-5 knockout (IL-5^−/−) C57BL/6J mice	10 mg/kg LPS and CLP	IL-5, M1 macrophage	IL-5 expression decreased in LPS and CLPIL-5 deficiency inducing M1 macrophage differentiation in LPS-induced septic mice	²⁵
4	In vivo	10-week-old WT mice weighing 25–27 g	10 mg/kg LPS and CLP	IL-16	Increased cardiac and serum IL-16 expression in LPS-induced septic mice	³³
5	Clinical study	58 children with meningococcal sepsis or septic shock	—	CCL2, CCL1, CCL8, CCL20, CXCL8, CXCL10, CXCL12	Increased serum levels of CCL1, CCL2, CCL8, CCL20 and CXCL8, CXCL10, CXCL12 in 9 deceased sepsis patients compared to surviving sepsis patients	³⁸
6	In vivo	3–24 months old male IL-6 gene knockout (IL-6KO) and WT mice	I.P. LPS for 24 h in a single low (0.1 mg/kg) or high (10 mg/kg) dose or in two doses (0.1 + 10 mg kg)	STAT3, ERK1/2, Akt1/2/3 Expression and phosphorylation of proteins	Increased STAT3 phosphorylation in all groups due to high LPS doseDecreased expression of ERK1/2 in young WT miceIncreased Akt1/2/3 expression and phosphorylation in young IL-6 KO mice	²⁶
7	Clinical study	19 septic shock patients and 11 infected patients	—	CXCR2 surface level	Decreased CXCR2 surface level in septic shock patients	⁴⁰
8	Clinical study	45 sepsis patients	—	PF4	Significant increase in F4-bearing PMP levels in septic patients	⁵⁶
9	In vivo	36 adult male Wistar rats	LPS 10 mg, intravenous	IL-6NO	Decreased platelet aggregation associated with LPSPositive effect of Ang-(1–7) on platelet aggregation in sepsis model rats	⁵¹
10	In vivo	8–10 weeks old, 20–25 g, male C57BL/6J mice	LPS	TNF-αIL-1β L-6, Macrophage inflammatory protein-2	LPS-associated neutrophil infiltration, increased mRNA expression of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and macrophage inflammatory protein-2	⁶⁹
11	Clinical study	Sepsis patients with acute liver injury	CLP	IL-27IL-6, TNF-α	Increase in IL-27, serum and liver TNF-α, IL-6 levels in CLP-WT patient group	⁷⁰
12	Clinical study	22 septic shock patient and 8 controls	—	IL-2, TNF-α, IFN-γ	Decreased IL-2 and TNF-α production, no significant change in IFN-γ production in septic patients	⁷¹
13	Clinical study	32 sepsis patients and 12 control	—	Thioredoxin-1GSH, MDA IL-6, TNF-α	Increased expression of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β in plasma of sepsis patients and no correlation with Trx-1	⁷²
14	Clinical study	103 sepsis and 365 non-sepsis patients	—	neutrophil CD64	High nCD64 expression in septic patients compared to non-septic patients	⁴²
15	In vivo	6–10 week, 20–25 g C57BL/6J mice	10 mg/kg, i.p. LPS	CXCR2 neutrophil migration	Decreased neutrophil infiltration in the brain due to the CXCR2 antagonist SB225002	⁴⁶
16	In vivo	Adult male C57BL/6J mice	CLP	CXCR5	Reduction of CLP-induced learning deficits in case of CXCR5 knockdown	⁴⁴
17	In vivo	8–12-week-old male C57BL/6 mice	CLP	CXCR2	CXCR2 expression decreased in S-CLP miceNeutrophil CXCR2 reduction due to iNOS blockade	⁴⁹
18	In vivo	Prenatal C57BL/6J and CCR2^−/− mice	LPS	TNF-αIL-17	Repetitive LPS exposure with TLR4 signaling in immature mice increases lung inflammation	⁷³
				IL-17
				IL-6
				IL-1β
				CCL2 CCL7 CXCL1 CXCL2
19	In vitro	HK-2 cell lines	LPS	CXCL12CXCR4 miR-20a	Negative regulation of CXCL12 expression by miR-20aCXCR4 downregulates the suppression of miR-20a on inflammation and apoptosis	⁶¹

TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; IL-10, interleukin 10; i.p, intraperitoneal; IL-5, interleukin 5; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; CLP, cecal ligation, and puncture; LTP, Long-term potentiation; WT, Wild type; IL-16, interleukin 16; Ang-(1–7), Angiotensin (1–7); NO, nitric oxide; IFN-γ, interferon-gamma; GSH, Glutathione; MDA, Malondialdehyde; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide; TLR4, toll-like receptor 4; HK-2, proximal tubular epithelial; mir-20a, micro-RNA 20a; PF4, Platelet factor 4; IL-1β, interleukin 1 beta; IL-2, interleukin 2; STAT3, Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; ERK1/2, Extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2; Akt1/2/3, serine/threonine-protein kinase; PMP, PF4-bearing platelet microparticles; CCL2, C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 2; CCL1, C-C motif chemokine ligand 1; CCL8, C-C motif chemokine ligand 8; CCL20, C-C motif chemokine ligand 20; Trx-1, Thioredoxin-1.

In the acute phase of sepsis, microglia cells can be stimulated by inflammatory mediators and neurotransmitters, causing neuronal dysfunction in the brain.⁵⁷ In the pathology of sepsis, cytokines such as IL–10 can affect microglia support cells in the brain. IL-10 prevents the overstimulation of pathological microglia by peripheral endotoxin. In a study of LPS-induced endotoxin in C57BL/6J mice, IL-10 receptor-deficient mice were seen to exhibit neuronal impairment. On the other hand, the addition of microglial TNF-α deficiency improved neuronal disorders. Similarly, IL-10 detection is critical in the prevention of microglia overstimulation during septic shock or bacteremia. Additionally, investigating the gene-level factors that suppress microglial IL-10 production in cases of sepsis or bacteremia may contribute to the understanding of the mechanism.⁵⁸

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) acting on the gene level have a diagnostic potential in the pathology of sepsis.⁵⁹ The downregulation of microRNA 1184 (miR-1184) could regulate the LPS-induced inflammatory response by suppressing IL-16 in monocytes in a neonatal sepsis model. In 72 cases with neonatal sepsis, IL-16 was shown to be the target of miR-1184, and a negative correlation was found between these parameters. Hence, reduced serum miR-1184 levels may be a potential diagnostic biomarker in neonatal sepsis cases.⁶⁰ In another study, miR-150 was defined as a plasma prognostic marker in sepsis patients. Again, in the same study, the plasma levels of TNF-α, IL-10, and IL-18 with sequence complementarity to miR-150 were negatively correlated with the plasma levels of miRNA. miRNA-20a was reported to target CXCL12 and reduce LPS-induced proximal tubular epithelial (HK-2) cell damage via NF-κB and ERK1/2 signaling. In a study that utilized an in vitro model of acute kidney injury with LPS in HK-2 cells, CXCL12 was identified as a direct target of miR-20a by luciferase reporter gene analysis 61. In this respect, the modulation of inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α, IL-10, and IL-18 of the miRNA family, also known as gene-level regulators, may be an important regulatory stage in sepsis. The potential regulatory effect of miRNAs associated with inflammatory mediators might help in reducing the clinical course of sepsis.

Cytokine expressions were evaluated in the epithelium in response to endotoxin-induced systemic inflammation in mice. The transcript levels of IL-10, CCL2, CXCL1, CXCL2, and IL-6 in the isolated choroid plexus 4 h after LPS injection were increased in response to systemic inflammation.⁶² So, the choroid plexus may form a link between blood-borne pro-inflammatory mediators and the brain during peripheral inflammation.⁶³ Thus, unlike the brain parenchyma, structures such as the choroid plexus have been proposed to be the main sites of macrophages that first respond to endotoxin-induced systemic inflammation.⁶² In sepsis, the production of substances such as CSF affect the inflammatory response occurring in the choroid plexus. The efficacy of CSF production during the development of sepsis in the choroid plexus was investigated.

The increase in CSF permeability in the choroid plexus in a polymicrobial sepsis model rats with CLP was determined to be associated with oxidative damage and reduced stimulation of the antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase. In the end, oxidative stress may be an important regulatory mechanism in CSF dysfunction in experimental sepsis.⁶⁴ Additionally, the effect of changing cytokine and chemokine levels due to inflammation in the choroid plexus on the CSF structure in sepsis may be worth considering.

Increased IL-16 expression in the cardiomyocytes of rats reported to be modeled for sepsis with LPS or CLP could be reduced by SOD. IL-16 expression may be regulated by oxidative stress levels during sepsis. However, in a mouse model of LPS-induced sepsis, the neutralization of IL-16 was reported to improve cardiac function by reducing the expression of markers of heart damage 33. In a mouse model of sepsis, it was found that increased oxidative stress may be accompanied by increased cardiomyocyte apoptosis.⁶⁵ These data have suggested that oxidative stress may be an important cause of cardiomyocyte apoptosis in sepsis. Additionally, the expression of inflammatory and lipid mediators such as IL-16 may modulate sepsis-induced cardiac injury. Maresin 1, which is a pro-solvent lipid mediator, was reported to have potent regulatory effects on oxidative stress and inflammation in a study about heart damage induced by sepsis in an LPS-induced sepsis model. Maresin 1 improved cardiac function and increased serum SOD, GSH, and Nrf-2 levels in mice in an LPS-induced sepsis model.⁶⁶ Regulatory lipid molecules in inflammatory response may also affect heart damage in sepsis through the oxidative stress mechanism.

Differential responses to immune-stimulant drugs were investigated by immunophenotyping peripheral blood mononuclear cells in septic shock patients. An increased expression of leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) in hyper-response immunity was observed under in vitro conditions in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in septic shock patients. Additionally, IL-17a production by CD8 + T cells was seen to result in an increase in the hyper subgroup. Immunostimulatory therapy could be ineffective or potentially harmful in the hyper-immune response group. Ex vivo stimulations in monitoring responses to immunomodulatory therapies such as interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), immune checkpoint inhibitors, tocilizumab, and steroids may allow the clinician to tailor treatments for sepsis.⁶⁷ These stimulations may have a potential in the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis based on the use of cytokines, chemokines and growth factors. A study in 80 sepsis patients also reported significant increases in IL-6, IL-8, IL-15, and CCL11 levels. Besides, IL-1α and IL-4 levels were low in the cluster 2 patient group associated with unfavorable prognosis or immune dysregulation.⁶⁸ In this context, lower IL-4 levels in sepsis may cause a higher likelihood of mortality. Sepsis-related cytokines such as IL-17 may affect the patient’s response to immune therapy at different rates via CD cells. In addition, the effectiveness of factors affecting treatment sensitivity such as age, sex and growth factors in the use of inflammatory mediators on the prognosis of sepsis should be determined in detail.

In summary, it may be possible to modulate cytokine and chemokine inflammatory mediators through various signal pathways and stimuli such as NF-κB and ERK1/2. Different degrees of immune responses observed in sepsis patients may be related to these mediators. Moreover, inflammatory mediators regulate resistance to anti-inflammatory drugs administered to reduce sepsis-related complications. Detailed studies are needed to use interleukins and chemokines in prognostic clinical applications in sepsis.

Conclusion

Instead of the devastating clinical picture in sepsis, inflammatory mediators can regulate the inflammatory response. Inflammatory mediators may be regulated by complex signaling networks in the pathogenesis of sepsis. Additionally, secreted by various cells such as neutrophils, inflammatory mediators increase inflammation in target organs. In this respect, pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators in sepsis are also associated with various lethal conditions such as multi-organ failure, vessel damage and pathologies in the brain. New therapeutic approaches to these mediators may help reduce the high mortality rate of sepsis.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Figures were prepared by biorender application

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Zuleyha Doganyigit

References

Gyawali

Ramakrishna

Dhamoon

. Sepsis: The evolution in definition, pathophysiology, and management, 7. Washington DC: SAGE Open Med, 2019, p. 2050312119835043.

Rello

Valenzuela-Sánchez

Ruiz-Rodriguez

, et al. Sepsis: a review of advances in management. Adv Ther 2017;34:2393–2411.

Wang

Ouyang

Liu

, et al. Platelet activation and antiplatelet therapy in sepsis: a narrative review. Thromb Research 2018;166:28–36.

Dhooria

Sehgal

Agarwal

. The quest for the optimal blood pressure in septic shock. J Thoracic Disease 2016;8:E1019–E1022.

Bosmann

Ward

. The inflammatory response in sepsis. Trends Immunology 2013;34:129–136.

Venet

Monneret

. Advances in the understanding and treatment of sepsis-induced immunosuppression. Nat Rev Nephrol 2018;14:121–137.

Cao

Chai

. Pathological alteration and therapeutic implications of sepsis-induced immune cell apoptosis. Cel Death Disease 2019; 10: 1–14.

Hotchkiss

Monneret

Payen

. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: from cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol 2013;13:862–874.

Boomer

Chang

, et al. Immunosuppression in patients who die of sepsis and multiple organ failure. JAMA 2011;306:2594–2605.

10.

van der Poll

van de Veerdonk

Scicluna

, et al. The immunopathology of sepsis and potential therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Immunol 2017;17:407–420.

11.

Huang

Cai

. The pathogenesis of sepsis and potential therapeutic targets. Int J Molec Sci 2019;20.

12.

Takeuchi

Akira

. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell 2010;140:805–820.

13.

D'Elia

Harrison

Oyston

, et al. Targeting the “cytokine storm” for therapeutic benefit. Clin Vaccin Immunol 2013;20:319–327.

14.

Stearns-Kurosawa

Osuchowski

Valentine

, et al. The pathogenesis of sepsis. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis 2011;6:19–48.

15.

Chun

Syndergaard

Damas

, et al. Sepsis pathogen identification. J Lab Automa 2015;20:539–561.

16.

Rivers

Nguyen

Havstad

, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. New Engl J Med 2001;345:1368–1377.

17.

Capuron

Miller

. Immune system to brain signaling: neuropsychopharmacological implications. Pharmacol Ther 2011;130:226–238.

18.

Cohen

. The immunopathogenesis of sepsis. Nature 2002;420:885–891.

19.

Tang

Huang

McLean

. Genome-wide transcription profiling of human sepsis: a systematic review. Crit Care (London, England) 2010; 14: 1–14.

20.

Schulte

Bernhagen

Bucala

. Cytokines in sepsis: potent immunoregulators and potential therapeutic targets‐an updated view. Mediators Inflamm 2013;2013:165974.

21.

Monneret

Debard

Venet

, et al. Marked elevation of human circulating CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in sepsis-induced immunoparalysis. Crit Care Medicine 2003;31:2068–2071.

22.

Fabri

Kandara

Coudereau

, et al. Characterization of circulating IL-10-Producing cells in septic shock patients: a proof of concept study. Front Immunol 2021;11:615009.

23.

Roth

Moser

Krenn

, et al. Susceptibility to programmed cell death in T-lymphocytes from septic patients: a mechanism for lymphopenia and Th2 predominance. Biochem Biophysical Research Communications 2003;308:840–846.

24.

Annane

Bellissant

Cavaillon

J-M

. Septic shock.Lancet 2005;365:63–78.

25.

Liang

Bai

, et al. Interleukin 5 deletion promotes sepsis induced M1 macrophage differentiation, deteriorates cardiac dysfunction, and exacerbates cardiac injury via the NF κB p65 pathway in mice. BioFactors 2020;46:1006–1017.

26.

Tarasiuk

Bonda

Dziemidowicz

, et al. The effect of interleukin 6 deficiency on myocardial signal transduction pathways activation induced by bacterial lipopolysaccharide in young and old mice. Adv Medical Sciences 2020;65:386–393.

27.

Pipicz

Kocsis

Sarvary-Arantes

, et al. Low-dose endotoxin induces late preconditioning, increases peroxynitrite formation, and activates STAT3 in the rat heart. Molecules 2017;22:433.

28.

Wang

Sato

Mizoguchi

, et al. Lipopolysaccharide triggers late preconditioning against myocardial infarction via inducible nitric oxide synthase. Cardiovasc Res 2002;56:33–42.

29.

Liu

Y.-C.

Zou

X.-B.

Chai

Y.-F.

, et al. Macrophage polarization in inflammatory diseases. Int J Biol Sci 2014;10:520–529.

30.

Zhang

Feng

Liao

H-H

, et al. Myricetin attenuated LPS induced cardiac injuring vivoandin vitro. Phytotherapy Res 2018;32:459–470.

31.

Yuan

Perry

Huang

, et al. LPS-induced autophagy is mediated by oxidative signaling in cardiomyocytes and is associated with cytoprotection. Am J Physiology-Heart Circulatory Physiol 2009;296:H470–H479.

32.

Shen

Jing

Zhang

, et al. CXCR5 knockdown attenuates hippocampal neurogenesis deficits and cognitive impairment in a mouse model of sepsis-associated encephalopathy. Neuroscience 2020;433:212–220.

33.

Zhang

Yang

Liang

, et al. Anti-interleukin-16 neutralizing antibody treatment alleviates sepsis-induced cardiac injury and dysfunction via the nuclear factor erythroid-2 related factor 2 pathway in mice. Oxidative Medicine Cellular Longevity 2021;2021:6616422.

34.

Mei

Feng

Shao

. Alleviation of sepsis-associated encephalopathy by ginsenoside via inhibition of oxidative stress and cell apoptosis: an experimental study. Pak J Pharm Sci 2020;33:2567–2577.

35.

Krakauer

Vilcek

JJFi

. Proinflammatory cytokines: TNF and IL-1 families, chemokines. TGFβ and others, 1999, pp. 775–811.

36.

Luster

. Chemokines - chemotactic cytokines that mediate inflammation. New Engl J Med 1998;338:436–445.

37.

Rollins

. Chemokines. Blood 1997;90:909–928.

38.

Vermont

Hazelzet

de Kleijn

, et al. CC and CXC chemokine levels in children with meningococcal sepsis accurately predict mortality and disease severity. Crit Care (London, England) 2006;10:R33–R38.

39.

Stadtmann

Zarbock

. CXCR2: from bench to bedside. Front Immunol 2012;3:263.

40.

Seree-Aphinan

Vichitkunakorn

Navakanitworakul

, et al. Distinguishing Sepsis From Infection by Neutrophil Dysfunction: A Promising Role of CXCR2 Surface Level. Front Immunology 2020;11:608696.

41.

Wang

Z-Y

Zeng

, et al. Neutrophil CD64 expression as a diagnostic marker for sepsis in adult patients: a meta-analysis. Crit Care 2015;19:245.

42.

Dimoula

Pradier

Kassengera

, et al. Serial determinations of neutrophil CD64 expression for the diagnosis and monitoring of sepsis in critically Ill patients. Clin Infect Dis 2014;58:820–829.

43.

Ward

Gao

. Sepsis, complement and the dysregulated inflammatory response. J Cell Mol Med 2009;13:4154–4160.

44.

Stuart

Corrigan

Baune

. Knockout of CXCR5 increases the population of immature neural cells and decreases proliferation in the hippocampal dentate gyrus. J Neuro Inflammation 2014;11:31.

45.

Bluemel

Wickel

Grünewald

, et al. Sepsis promotes gliogenesis and depletes the pool of radial glia like stem cells in the hippocampus. Exp Neurology 2021;338:113591.

46.

Chen

Zhai

, et al. CXCR2 antagonist attenuates neutrophil transmigration into brain in a murine model of LPS induced neuroinflammation. Biochem Biophysical Research Communications 2020;529:839–845.

47.

Schraufstatter

Chung

Burger

. IL-8 activates endothelial cell CXCR1 and CXCR2 through Rho and Rac signaling pathways. Am J Physiology-Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2001;280:L1094–L1103.

48.

Shen

X-F

Zhao

Cao

, et al. Wip1 deficiency promotes neutrophil recruitment to the infection site and improves sepsis outcome. Front Immunol 2017;8:1023.

49.

Rios-Santos

Alves-Filho

Souto

, et al. Down-regulation of CXCR2 on neutrophils in severe sepsis is mediated by inducible nitric oxide synthase-derived nitric oxide. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;175:490–497.

50.

Nin

El-Assar

Sánchez

, et al. Vascular dysfunction in sepsis. Shock 2011;36:156–161.

51.

Tsai

H-J

Shih

C-C

Chang

K-Y

, et al. Angiotensin-(1-7) treatment blocks lipopolysaccharide-induced organ damage, platelet dysfunction, and IL-6 and nitric oxide production in rats. Scientific Rep 2021;11:610.

52.

Maharaj

Chang

. Anti-PF4/heparin antibodies are increased in hospitalized patients with bacterial sepsis. Thromb Research 2018;171:111–113.

53.

Nieuwland

Berckmans

McGregor

, et al. Cellular origin and procoagulant properties of microparticles in meningococcal sepsis. Blood 2000;95:930–935.

54.

Joop

Berckmans

Nieuwland

, et al. Microparticles from patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and sepsis support coagulation through multiple mechanisms. Thromb Haemostasis 2001;85:810–820.

55.

Greinacher

Holtfreter

Krauel

, et al. Association of natural anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies with periodontal disease. Blood 2011;118:1395–1401.

56.

Sartori

Zurlo

Bon

, et al. Platelet-derived microparticles bearing PF4 and anti-GAGS immunoglobulins in patients with sepsis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) 2020;10.

57.

Yin

Fan

, et al. Microglia: a potential therapeutic target for sepsis-associated encephalopathy and sepsis-associated chronic pain. Front Pharmacol 2020;11.

58.

Shemer

Scheyltjens

Frumer

, et al. Interleukin-10 prevents pathological microglia hyperactivation following peripheral endotoxin challenge. Immunity 2020;53:1033–1049, e7.

59.

Szilágyi

Fejes

Pócsi

, et al. Role of sepsis modulated circulating microRNAs. EJIFCC 2019;30:128–145.

60.

Wang

Han

. Downregulation of miR-1184 serves as a diagnostic biomarker in neonatal sepsis and regulates LPS-induced inflammatory response by inhibiting IL-16 in monocytes. Exp Ther Med 2021;21:350.

61.

Zhang

Wang

, et al. miRNA-20a suppressed lipopolysaccharide-induced HK-2 cells injury via NFκB and ERK1/2 signaling by targeting CXCL12. Mol Immunology 2020;118:117–123.

62.

Shimada

Hasegawa-Ishii

. Increased cytokine expression in the choroid plexus stroma and epithelium in response to endotoxin-induced systemic inflammation in mice. Toxicol Rep 2021;8:520–528.

63.

Mitchell

Yang

H-YT

Berk

, et al. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in the choroid plexus: a potential link between vascular pro-inflammatory mediators and the CNS during peripheral tissue inflammation. Neuroscience 2009;158:885–895.

64.

Goldim

Danielski

Rodrigues

, et al. Oxidative stress in the choroid plexus contributes to blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier disruption during sepsis development. Microvasc Research 2019;123:19–24.

65.

Dong

Hua

, et al. Chronic akt activation attenuated lipopolysaccharide-induced cardiac dysfunction via Akt/GSK3β-dependent inhibition of apoptosis and ER stress. Biochim Biophys Acta (Bba) - Mol Basis Dis 2013;1832:848–863.

66.

Wang

, et al. Maresin 1 alleviates the inflammatory response, reduces oxidative stress and protects against cardiac injury in LPS-induced mice. Life Sciences 2021;277:119467.

67.

Wang

Gloss

Tang

, et al. Immunophenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in septic shock patients with high-dimensional flow cytometry analysis reveals two subgroups with differential responses to immunostimulant drugs. Front Immunol 2021;12:634127.

68.

Jekarl

Kim

, et al.

Diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis based on use of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors

Disease Markers 2019;2019.

69.

Maehara

Higashitarumi

Kondo

, et al. Prostaglandin F 2α receptor antagonist attenuates LPS‐induced systemic inflammatory response in mice. FASEB J 2020;34:15197–15207.

70.

Fan

Zhang

Y-C

Zheng

D-F

, et al. IL-27 is elevated in sepsis with acute hepatic injury and promotes hepatic damage and inflammation in the CLP model. Cytokine 2020;127:154936.

71.

Letessier

Demaret

Gossez

, et al. Decreased intra-lymphocyte cytokines measurement in septic shock patients: a proof of concept study in whole blood. Cytokine 2018;104:78–84.

72.

Shao

Yang

Zhang

, et al. The expression of thioredoxin-1 and inflammatory cytokines in patients with sepsis. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 2020;42:280–285.

73.

Cui

Brady

Fulton

, et al. CCR2 Mediates chronic LPS-induced pulmonary inflammation and hypoalveolarization in a murine model of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Front Immunology 2020;11:579628.

Inflammatory mediators of cytokines and chemokines in sepsis: From bench to bedside

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

The role of cytokines in sepsis pathology

The role of chemokines in the pathology of sepsis

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References