Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Chrysin (CHR) is a food-based bioactive ingredient whereas, sodium arsenite (SA) is one of the major contaminant in drinking water. When ingested, SA contributes to tissue damage due to bioactivation by S-adenosyl methionine (SAM)-dependent methyltransferase. Hence, the needs to nullify this effect by investigating the potentials of CHR on SA-induced genotoxicity in rats. The experiment was divided into two successive stages (ameliorative and preventive, curative studies) for 1 week. Rats were divided into four groups: distilled water, 10mg/kg SA, 10mg/kg CHR and co-administration. In stage 2, the experimental groups were given either CHR or SA for 1 week, and treated in reversed order for additional week. Lipid peroxidation, protein carbonyl and DNA fragmentation in liver, blood brain and bone marrow cells micronucleus were assayed for using standard protocols. Molecular docking of SAM-dependent methyltransferase in the presence of CHR was conducted. CHR significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the level of lipid peroxidation, protein carbonyls and DNA fragmentation in blood, liver and brain tissues as against group treated with SA. It also significantly (p<0.05) reduced the level of micronuclei generated in bone marrow cells. The effects of CHR were shown to be ameliorative, preventive and curative in nature. Furthermore, CHR was able to dock (with binding energy of −24.81 kcal/mol and predicted inhibition kinetic constant (Ki) of 0.959 µM) into the active site of SAM-dependent methyltransferase with strong hydrogen bond and hydrophobic interactions. The study might have unravelled the potentials of CHR against SA-induced chromosomal and DNA damage, which might be due to inhibition of SAM-dependent methyltransferase.

Keywords

Sodium arsenite chrysin DNA damage modelling

Introduction

Arsenic is a major environmental toxicant as well as a human carcinogen which is present in large amounts in the environment.^1,2 Arsenicals are found in the environment via industrial, agricultural processes as well as some medical applications,³ and their consumption through contaminated water is prevalent in many areas of the world.^3,4 They are spontaneously absorbed through gastrointestinal tract after ingestion and distributed in the blood to the liver, kidney, spleen, lung and many other delicate organs.⁵ Arsenic metabolism in the liver generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) which include dimethyl arsenic peroxyl ([(CH₃)₂AsOO]) and dimethyl arsenic radical [(CH₃)₂As].^6

–9 These reactions are catalysed by a cytosolic enzyme, methyltransferase, which uses S-adenosyl methionine (SAM, also known as S-adenosyl-L-methionine) as a methyl group donor.¹⁰ The methylated arsenic intermediates can be more toxic than inorganic arsenate (As^V) or arsenite (As^III), which means under certain circumstances methylation activity can exacerbate arsenic toxicity.^11
–13 Therefore, arsenic methylation serves as one of decisive factors to determine the overall arsenic-induced toxicities¹⁴; as a result, the modulation of this pathway could be a viable strategy in combating arsenic-induced oxidative damage.

In recent years, there is a tremendous interest in the possible role of nutrition in prevention of oxidative stress-related diseases.¹² Chrysin (CHR) is a natural flavonoid,¹⁵ biologically active compound extracted from many plants, honey^11,16 and propolis which were used as traditional medicine.^17
–19 CHR and its derivatives, in particular, have been reported to possess a broad range of biological activities, including anti-oxidation, anti-viral, anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties.^18,20,21 Previous work from our laboratory on acacia honey and propolis revealed a promising antioxidant property in sodium arsenite (SA)-induced oxidative damage. However, the work done was only on crude acacia honey, which necessitates the emergence of this idea to investigate the role of one of its bioactive component (CHR) and the possible mechanism of action in vivo. The findings from this work may provide an insight into the possible role of CHR in DNA repair or rather in genome protection.

Materials and methods

Chemicals/reagents

CHR (molecular weight, 254.24g/mol; melting point, 284–286°C; purity, 97%) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich St. Louis, Missouri, USA. SA (BDH Chemicals Ltd., Poole, England), thiobarbituric acid (Sigma Aldrich St. Louis, Missouri, USA), Giemsa (Sigma Aldrich St. Louis, Missouri, USA), phosphate buffer saline (PBS) (Sigma Aldrich St. Louis, Missouri, USA), 2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (KEM light laboratories, Mumbai, India) were also purchased. All other chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade.

Experimental animals and design

Thirty-five male Wistar albino rats (110–190 g) were used in the present study. They were allowed to adapt for 1 week under standard laboratory conditions of 12 h light–dark cycle before commencement of all experiments that lasted for 2 weeks. The rats were maintained in the animal house of Biochemistry Department, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, with protocol for the study approved by Ahmadu Bello University Animal Right Review Committee. They were randomly grouped into seven groups of five rats each. All the treatments were orally administered since arsenicals in the environment are majorly ingested through drinking water, and duration of exposure was selected based on our previous works.^3,8,22 However, it is paramount to note that the experiment was carried out in two stages using oral administrations for 2 weeks, the ameliorative stage (stage 1, first week) and the preventive and curative stage (stage 2, extended to second week) as shown in the experimental design below.

Stage 1 (Ameliorative Study) – sacrificed after first week

Group 1a: Distilled water

Group 2: 10 mg/kg body weight (bw) SA as reported,^2,23
–25

Group 3: 10 mg/kg bw CHR as reported,^20,26
–28

Group 4: 10 mg/kg bw CHR + 10 mg/kg bw SA

Stage 2 (Preventive and Curative Studies) – extended to second week

Group 1b: Distilled water

Group 5: 10mg/kg bw CHR for one week followed by 10mg/kg bw SA for another week

Group 6: 10mg/kg bw SA for one week followed by 10mg/kg bw CHR for another week

Collection of samples

After 24 h of last administration, the rats were kept without food overnight and sacrificed by decapitation following mild chloroform anaesthesia based on American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals, 2013 Edition, which reported that, any effect as a result of chloroform will be neutral since all the animals were subjected under same treatment.²⁹ About 2 to 3 mls of blood was collected by cardiac puncture. Equally, brain, liver and femurs were also collected. The tissues were homogenized in 1:10 of 0.1 M phosphate buffer. The supernatant (brain and liver) was collected after centrifugation at 3500×g at 4°C for 10 min, and 1:1 blood dilution was also prepared and kept for further analysis. Each time the samples were outside the freezer, they were kept in ice bags. Femurs were immediately used for micronucleus assay.

Determination of lipid peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation was determined using thiobarbituric acid according to Ohkawa³⁰ with slight modification. Exactly 2 ml of 15% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) was added into a test tube, then 2 ml of thiobarbituric acid followed by 100 µl of the tissue homogenate. The mixture was incubated at 80oC in water bath for 30 minutes and allowed to cool for some time. This was followed by centrifugation at 1500 ×g for 10 minutes. Absorbance at 535 nm was taken using spectrophotometer and the amount of malondialdehyde (MDA) was calculated using a molar extinction coefficient of 1.56x10⁵/M/cm. The results were presented in nmol/L.

Determination of protein carbonyl

Carbonyl content was determined by a simplified alkaline method based on the reaction of protein carbonyls with dinitrophenylhydrazine forming dinitrophenylhydrazone, a yellow compound by Dixon.³¹ A 400 µL portion of 2, 4 dinitrophenylhydrazine (10 mM in 2.5 M HCl) was added to 400 µL of sample and incubated in dark at room temperature for 10 min; 200 µL of NaOH (6 M) was then added and shaken mildly. Absorbance was read at 450 nm using microplate reader and molar absorption coefficient of 22,000 M^-1 cm^-1 was used to quantify the concentration of protein carbonyls. The results were presented in nmol/mg of protein.

DNA fragmentation assay

Quantitative DNA fragmentation assay was carried out according to the method of Sellins.³² The tissue was broken using homogenizer in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The homogenate was centrifuged at several steps (200×g to obtain the supernatant (S), and at 20,000×g after treating the pellet with Tris-tritonX100-Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution to obtain supernatant (T) for 10 min each) and the supernatant was precipitated. 12.5% TCA at 4°C was added to the pellet (B) and thereafter quantified using a diphenylamine reagent after hydrolysis in 5% TCA at 90°C in water bath for 20 min. Absorbance was read at 600 nm using microplate reader and the percentage of fragmented DNA was calculated using the formula:

% f r a g m e n t e d D N A = \frac{(S + T)}{S + T + B} \times 100

where S, T and B were the absorbance at 600 nm of fragmented DNA. Percentage of DNA fragmentation refers to the ratio of DNA in the supernatant (fragmented) to the total DNA recovered in both supernatant and pellet (fragmented plus intact DNA).

Bone marrow cells micronucleus assay

Presence of micronuclei was determined as described by Gonza.³³ Bone marrow cells were aspirated from femur and the smears was prepared on slides, fixed in methanol and stained with 5% Giemsa stain solution. The smear was analysed under oil immersion using light microscope (100 M). The slides were scored for the presence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (mPCEs) by examining a total of 2000 erythrocytes per animal; that is, 500 erythrocytes were examined per field in accordance with Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) procedure 2014.

Molecular modelling of SAM-dependent methyltransferase

The structure of CHR (Figure 1) was sketched using ChemBioDraw program, imported into Discovery Studio 2.5v (Accelrys Inc., San Diego, California, USA) and optimized with a Chemistry at Harvard Macromolecular Mechanics (CHARMm) force field, while their partial charges were calculated via the Momany–Rone option^34,35 using smart minimizer algorithm. The X-ray diffraction crystal structure of human SAM-dependent methyltransferase (NSUN5) protein at resolution 1.65 Å (PDB ID: 2B9E) was retrieved from Protein Data Bank. All protein preparation and minimization were done using Discovery Studio 2.5v. A sphere binding site with 9Å radius was defined around the bonded ligand to identify the binding site of the protein structure. The CHARMm-based DOCKER program was used as the scoring function to CHR into crystal structure of the receptor (2B9E) binding pocket.³⁶ The PDB files of the docked position were generated for best pose of compound using Accelrys discovery studio and was imported into chimera to view the hydrophobic structure of the interaction. Furthermore, the two-dimensional view of the hydrogen bond and hydrophobic interactions of 2B9E-CHR complex were drawn using a Ligplot + v 1.4.5 program.

Figure 1.

Structure of CHR. CHR: chrysin.

Statistical analysis

The experiment was carried-out in triplicate (independently) and the results were presented as mean ± SD. The data were analysed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the aid of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software, SPSS Inc., Chicago, Standard Version 20.0. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for differences in mean using the least of significance difference (LSD).

Results

Effect of CHR on SA-induced lipid peroxidation

As shown in Tables 1 and 2, a significant (p < 0.05) increase in the level of MDA in the liver, blood and brain of SA treated group when both compared with the control groups (1a and 1b) was observed. This difference was observed to be less in co-administered group and groups 5 and 6 which received both SA and CHR in different denominations. Although when the level of this decrease in MDA was considered across various organs, it was highest in brain followed by liver and blood.

Table 1.

Antioxidant and DNA protective effects of CHR against SA-induced damage to the liver, blood and brain of male Wister albino rats for 1-week treatment.

	Treatment	MDA (nmol/L)	PC (nmol/mg of protein)	% DNA fragmentation
Liver	Normal control	274.20 ± 4.07^b	2.88 ± 0.70^b	26.50 ± 3.15^b
	10mg/kg b.w NaAsO₃	358.50 ± 0.90^a	4.74 ± 0.56^a	86.30 ± 1.49^a
	10mg/kg b.w CHR	156.90 ± 1.60^{a, b}	1.43 ± 0.62^{a, b}	22.10 ± 4.80^b
	10mg/kg b.w NaAsO₃ + 10mg/kg b.w CHR	221.30 ± 2.30^{a, b}	2.53 ± 0.65^b	64.40 ± 1.40^a
Blood	Normal control	94.42 ± 2.99^b	9.43 ± 4.43^b	14.00 ± 0.38^b
	10mg/kg b.w NaAsO₃	192.70 ± 1.20^a	24.40 ± 1.40^a	42.20 ± 9.20^a
	10mg/kg b.w CHR	116.50 ± 2.70^{a, b}	11.40 ± 0.52^b	16.70 ± 1.00^b
	10mg/kg b.w NaAsO₃ + 10mg/kg b.w CHR	105.50 ± 3.80^{a, b}	10.00 ± 4.80^b	29.00 ± 0.90^a
Brain	Normal control	867.17 ± 2.25^b	7.52 ± 2.66^b	20.10 ± 2.83^b
	10mg/kg b.w NaAsO₃	1320.90 ± 3.80^a	19.25 ± 0.75^a	40.90 ± 0.93^a
	10mg/kg b.w CHR	499.80 ± 14.50^{a, b}	4.78 ± 1.09^b	19.10 ± 2.70^b
	10mg/kg b.w NaAsO₃ + 10mg/kg b.w CHR	804.80 ± 0.49^{a, b}	7.52 ± 1.36^b	30.10 ± 0.20^{a, b}

CHR: chrysin; SA: sodium arsenite; MDA: malondialdehyde; PC: protein carbonyl.

Values are expressed as means ± SD; the treatments were carried-out for 1 week.

^aMean difference is significant (p < 0.05) when compared with normal control group in each organ, respectively.

^bMean difference is significant (p < 0.05) when compared with SA treated group in each organ, respectively.

Table 2.

Antioxidant and DNA protective effects of CHR against SA-induced damage to the liver, blood and brain of male Wister albino rats for 2-week treatment.

	Treatment	MDA (nmol/L)	PC (nmol/mg of protein)	% DNA fragmentation
Liver	Normal control	135.18 ± 3.82^b	2.67 ± 0.82^b	26.60 ± 0.54^b
	10mg/kg b.w CHR (first week) followed by 10mg/kg b.w SA (second week)	183.80 ± 3.90^{a, b}	3.93 ± 0.50	29.20 ± 1.13^b
	10mg/kg b.w SA (first week) followed by 10 mg b.w CHR (second week)	248.30 ± 3.00^{a, b}	3.00 ± 0.18^b	10.40 ± 0.07^{a, b}
Blood	Normal control	95.28 ± 2.09^b	10.88 ± 0.52^b	11.60 ± 0.92^b
	10mg/kg b.w Chrysin (first week) followed by 10mg/kg b.w SA (second week)	132.70 ± 1.90^{a, b}	14.70 ± 3.60^ab	13.30 ± 4.70^b
	10mg/kg b.w SA (first week) followed by 10mg/kg b.w CHR (second week)	103.30 ± 0.40^{a, b}	12.70 ± 2.40^b	26.60 ± 2.13
Brain	Normal control	754.76 ± 1.07^b	6.51 ± 0.15^b	20.80 ± 0.94^b
	10mg/kg b.w CHR (first week) followed by 10mg/kg b.w SA (second week)	813.40 ± 3.90^{a, b}	10.52 ± 1.96^{a, b}	21.20 ± 1.40^b
	10mg/kg b.w SA (first week) followed by 10mg/kg b.w CHR (second week)	804.40 ± 5.40^{a, b}	7.08 ± 1.55^b	10.60 ± 0.08^b

CHR: chrysin; SA: sodium arsenite; MDA: malondialdehyde; PC: protein carbonyl.

Values are expressed as means ± SD, CHR (first week) followed by SA (second week) and vice-versa to access the preventive and curative effect of CHR against arsenite-induced toxicity.

^aMean difference is significant (p < 0.05) when compared with normal control group in each organ, respectively.

^bMean difference is significant (p < 0.05) when compared with SA treated group in each organ, respectively.

Effect of CHR on SA-induced protein damage

Tables 1 and 2 show a significant (p < 0.05) increase in the level of protein carbonyl in the liver, blood and brain of SA-treated group when compared with the control groups (1a and 1b). This difference was observed to be significantly (p < 0.05) lowered in co-administered group and groups 5 and 6 which received both SA and CHR in different denominations. Although the level of this decrease in protein carbonyl was considered across various organs, it is higher in brain followed by blood and liver, respectively.

Effect of CHR on SA-induced DNA fragmentation

A significant (p < 0.05) increase in the level of DNA fragmentation in the liver, blood and brain of SA-treated group when compared with the control groups (1a and 1b) was observed (Tables 1 and 2). The difference was observed to be less in co-administered group and groups 5 and 6 which received both SA and CHR in different denominations. Although when the level of this decrease in DNA fragmentation was considered across various organs, it is observed to be highest in the liver followed by brain and blood, respectively.

Effect of CHR on SA-induced chromosomal damage

The clastogenic effect of SA was observed to be significantly (p < 0.05) higher in SA-treated groups (Figures 2 and 3), whereas significant decrease in the level of micronuclei as in co-administered group (Figures 2 and 3) and groups 5 and 6 (Figures 2 and 4) was observed with higher reduction in groups 6, 5 and 4, respectively.

Figure 2.

Effect of CHR against SA-induced chromosomal damage in bone marrow cells of male Wistar albino rats. Values are expressed as Means ± SD; a Mean difference is significant (p < 0.05) when compared with normal control group (1a), b Mean difference is significant (p < 0.05) when compared with SA group, c Mean difference is significant (p< 0.05) when compared with normal control group (1b). CHR: chrysin; SA: sodium arsenite; mPCEs: micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes; b.w: body weight.

Figure 3.

Photomicrograph showing the presence of mPCEs in bone marrow cells of male Wistar albino rats. Magnification ×630; 5% Giemsa stain, arrow pointing mPCEs and ABCD indicating normal control,10mg/kg b.w SA, 10mg/kg b.w chrysin, 10mg/kg b.w chrysin + 10mg/kg b.w SA, respectively. The treatment was carried out for 1 week. mPCEs: micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes; SA: sodium arsenite; b.w: body weight.

Figure 4.

Photomicrograph showing the presence of mPCEs in bone marrow cells of male Wistar albino rats. Magnification ×630; 5% Giemsa stain, arrow pointing mPCEs and ABC indicating normal control, 10mg/kg b.w chrysin (first week) followed by 10mg/kg b.w SA (second week), 10mg/kg b.w SA (first week) followed with 10mg/kg b.w chrysin (second week) to access the preventive and curative effect of chrysin against arsenite-induced toxicity. mPCEs: micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes; SA: sodium arsenite; b.w: body weight.

In silico inhibitory potentials of CHR on SAM-dependent methyltransferase

To validate the preceding observed effects of CHR from in vivo findings, we employed the use of molecular modelling strategies. To this end, CHR structure was docked into the binding site of 2B9E SAM-dependent methyltransferase and the optimal conformation was identified (Figure 5) via molecular modelling. The amino acids interacting with the ligand vis-à-vis the hydrophobicity were also determined (Figures 6(a) and 7(a)). Similarly, the two-dimensional view of the hydrogen bond and hydrophobic interactions of 2B9E-CHR complex were shown in Figures 6(b) and 7(b), respectively. It was revealed that the binding pocket of 2B9E-CHR complex was made of Lys240, Ser215, Asp212, Gln211, Leu210, Cys369, Asn239 of SAM-dependent methyltransferases. The binding energy of CHR was found to have a high binding affinity for the receptor 2B9E, which was given as −24.81 kcal/mol and predicted inhibition kinetic constant (Ki) of 0.959 µM.

Figure 5.

Predicted structure of the best docking pose conformation of CHR on 2B9E protein. CHR: chrysin.

Figure 6.

Illustration of the interacting amino acids within the active site of SAM-dependent methyltransferase 2B9. (a) Chrysin with surrounding amino acids of 2B9E. (b) Hydrogen bond interaction between chrysin and amino acid within 2B9E active site. SAM: S-adenosyl methionine.

Figure 7.

Illustration of hydrophobic interaction between CHR and 2B9E active site. (a) Chrysin with 4NEV (hydrophobicity surface) at the active binding site, in which the brown and blue regions represent oxygen and nitrogen atoms, respectively, whereas white regions indicate carbon or hydrogen atoms. (b) Two-dimensional illustration of the hydrophobic interaction between the binding modes of 2B9E-chrysin. CHR: chrysin; SAM: S-adenosyl methionine.

Discussion

SA when ingested is bio-transformed to mono and dimethyl arsenic by SAM-dependent methyltransferase, which are more polar and easily excreted.^37
–39 However, when the level of dimethyl arsenic becomes high, it spontaneously reacts with superoxide radical to generate dimethyl arsenic peroxyl radical that can negatively affect the antioxidant system via a covalent binding to thiol group in proteins. This leads to generation of ROS that can directly affect protein and DNA or indirectly via lipid peroxidation, peptide crosslinking initiating chromosomal and DNA damage with fatal metabolic consequences.⁸

SA was found to significantly (p < 0.05) increase the level of thiobarbituric acids reacting substance in liver, blood and brain tissue. Co-administration of SA and CHR was observed to ameliorate this damage when compared with control group. The concentration of MDA has shown to be higher in brain, liver and blood respectively, this is in agreement with Atawodi et al.,⁴⁰ and Adegunlola et al.⁴¹ Preventive and curative roles of CHR against oxidative lipid damage in this study was observed to be significant (p<0.05) in group five and six when compared to control group. Curative role of CHR observed in group six could be due to antioxidant ability of CHR as a result of hydroxyl group at positions 5 and 7 of the flavan ring that can donate proton thereby quenching the chain of lipid oxidation induced by SA.^15,42,43 The protective role of CHR on SA-induced generation of thiobarbituric acid reacting substances might be due to the ability of CHR to increase the level of catalase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione and glutathione peroxidase²⁶ and inhibit the expression of some prooxidant enzymes such as matrix metalloproteinase^44,42 and even SAM-dependent methyltransferase in the case of arsenic toxicity.¹³

Data from our study show a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the level of protein carbonyl in liver, blood and brain tissue of SA-induced oxidative damage in experimental rats. Co-administration of SA and CHR shows a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in the level of protein carbonyl relative to SA treated group. Likewise, significant (p < 0.05) decrease in protein carbonyl was observed in group six and five when compared to SA group. Protective and ameliorative effect of CHR on protein carbonyl induced by SA has been attributed to the ability of CHR to appease the level of reactive species induced arsenite metabolism through radical scavenging and increase in the expression level of antioxidant enzymes.^44,17 This might as well be linked to inhibition of SAM-dependent methyltransferase being the major enzymes involved in arsenic metabolism and generation of reactive oxygen species.

In this communication, SA led to significant (p < 0.05) increase in the level of DNA damage in the liver, blood and brain tissue when compare with the control group. Co-administration of SA successfully reduced the level of DNA damage. Preventive and curative role of CHR on SA-induced chromosomal and DNA damage was observed in group five and six respectively. This is in agreement with a work reported by Manzolli,²⁶ who reported on effect of CHR against methyl mercury-induced genotoxicity.

Oxidative products of lipid peroxidation such as MDA, acrolein can initiate the formation of DNA adducts thereby exacerbating chromosomal breakage and micronuclei formation. Level of chromosomal damage has been reported in this study based on the frequency of micronuclei in PCEs. We have clearly demonstrated that SA treatment significantly (p < 0.05) induced the formation of mPCEs of the rat bone marrow cells. These observation is consistent with earlier observation on clastogenic potential of SA in bone marrow.⁴⁵ CHR was also seen to significantly (p < 0.05) reduce the clastogenic effect earlier induced by SA. This improvement may be due to ability of CHR to donate a proton thereby quenching the sequential oxidation reactions of macromolecules as well as inhibition of methylation process of sodium arsenite leading to the formation of unstable dimethylarsinic peroxyl radicals.

Bearing in mind the metabolic role of SAM-dependent methyltransferase in facilitating the systemic toxicities associated with arsenicals, it can thus be hypothetically deduced that modulation of this enzyme could serve a viable strategy in combating arsenicals-induced toxicities.^37
–39 Based on the validation studies using in silico approach, CHR was able to comfortably dock into the active site of SAM-dependent methyltransferase via strong hydrogen bond and hydrophobic interactions. This of course agrees with the observations of Ramesh,⁴⁶ where strong hydrogen bonds were formed between the hydroxyl groups on CHR with polar amino acid residues in the binding pocket of some proteins in addition to the strong hydrophobic interactions observed. Inhibition of this enzyme by some bioactive food component such as CHR could be reasonable, thus decrease in generation of reactive methylated arsenic species responsible in arsenic-induced oxidative damage observed in this study. Although, in vivo inhibition analysis of CHR on this enzyme need to be confirmed. Overall, the in silico findings might further explain the observed ameliorative, preventive and curative roles of CHR against SA-induced chromosomal and DNA damage in the present study.

Conclusion

Findings from this study revealed that CHR possibly confers both ameliorative, preventive and curative role on SA-induced chromosomal and DNA damage in male Wistar albino rats, which might be due to inhibition of SAM-dependent methyltransferase. We, therefore, recommend further work to ascertain the effects of CHR on SAM-dependent methyltransferase in vivo.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the advice and assistance of Dr M Bisallah, Dr YY Pala from the Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology and Mal Yau Dary from the Department of Pharmacology, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, towards the successful completion of this work.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

A Muhammad

References

Martinez

Vucic

Adonis

. Arsenic biotransformation as a cancer promoting factor by inducing DNA damage and disruption of repair mechanisms. Mol Biol Int 2011; 2011: 718974. DOI: 10.4061/2011/718974.

Sadia

Nazmul

Masashi

. Protective effects of Phyllanthus imblica leaf extract on sodium arsenite-mediated adverse effects in mice. Nagoya J Med Sci 2015; 77: 145–53.

Aliyu

Ibrahim

Inuwa

. Ameliorative effects of acacia honey against sodium arsenite-induced oxidative stress in some viscera of male Wistar albino rats. Biochemistry Res Int 2013; 2013: 1–5.

Cheng

Chuu

Chang

. Atherosclerosis induced by arsenic in drinking water in rats through altering lipid metabolism. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2011; 256(2): 146–153.

Moktar

Fatma

MER

. Ameliorating effect of curcumin on sodium arsenite-induced oxidative damage and lipid peroxidation in different rat organs. Food Chem Toxicol 2008; 46(2008): 3506–3511.

Mónica

Rita

Helena

. Impairment of mice spermatogenesis by sodium arsenite. Human Exp Toxicol 2011; 0(0): 1–13.

Klibet

Boumendjel

Khiari

. Oxidative stress-related liver dysfunction by sodium arsenite: Alleviation by Pistacia lentiscus oil. Pharmacol Biol 2016; 54: 345–363.

Odunola

Muhammad

Farooq

. Comparative assessment of redox-sensitive biomarkers due to acacia honey and sodium arsenite administration in vivo. Med J Nutr Metab 2013; 6(2): 119–26.

Amal

AAE

Hanan

MFA

Rasha

. The effective strategy of curcumin and/or morin as compared to N-acetylcysteine to combat the hepatotoxicity of sodium arsenite in rats. African J Bio Sci 2012; 8(1): 1–22.

10.

Mohamad

Masafumi

Charles

. Identification of a S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) dependent arsenic methyltransferase in Danio rerio . Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2013; 262(2): 185–193.

11.

Muhammad

Odunola

Gbadegesin

. Inhibitory effects of sodium arsenite and acacia honey on acetylcholinesterase in rats. Int J Alzhe Dis 2015; 2015: 7.

12.

Kumar

. Emblica officinalis protects against sodium arsenite induced hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity in rats. Int J Sci 2015; 4(3): 47–55.

13.

Alexandre

Maria

. Possible key intermediates in arsenic biochemistry: synthesis and identification by liquid chromatography, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and high resolution mass spectro. Manuscript 2016; 2015(9): 1–67.

14.

Zuzana

Hua

Kevin

. Disruption of the arsenic (+3 oxidation state) methyltransferase gene in the mouse alters the phenotype for methylation of arsenic and affects distribution and retention of orally. Chem Res Toxicol 2016; 22(10): 1713–1720.

15.

Janeiro

Corduneanu

Maria

. Chrysin and (Æ)-taxifolin electrochemical oxidation mechanisms. Electroanalysis 2005; 17(12): 1059–1064.

16.

Muhammad

Ibrahim

. Potential biological activity of acacia honey. Front Biosci Elite 2015; 8(6): 351–357.

17.

Patel

. Emerging adjuvant therapy for cancer: propolis and its constituents. J Diet Suppl 2015; 13(3): 245–268.

18.

Woo

Jeong

Park

. Chrysin-induced apoptosis is mediated through caspase activation and Akt inactivation in U937 leukemia cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004; 325(2004): 1215–1222.

19.

Sun

Hwang

. Dichloromethane extracts of propolis protect cell from oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced oxidative stress via reducing apoptosis. Food Nutr Res 2016; 1: 1–10.

20.

Khan

Qamar

. Chrysin protects against cisplatin-induced colon toxicity via amelioration of oxidative stress and apoptosis: probable role of p38MAPK and p53. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2010; 258(3): 315–329.

21.

Tmt

. Potential protective effect of costus speciosus or its nanoparticles on streptozotocin-induced genotoxicity and histopathological alterations in rats. J Nutr Food Sci 2015; s2: 002. DOI: 10.4172/2155-9600.1000S3002 Page.

22.

Aliyu

Oyeronke

Michael

. Modulatory role of acacia honey from north-west Nigeria on sodium arsenite-induced clastogenicity and oxidative stress in male Wistar rats. Natural Prod Res 2014; 29: 321–326.

23.

Usoh

Akpan

Etim

. Antioxidant actions of dried flower extracts of Hibiscus sabdariffa l on sodium arsenite-induced oxidative stress in rats. Pakistan J Nutr 2005; 4(3): 135–141.

24.

Xiu-juan

Cheng-shuai

Fang-bai

. The oxidative transformation of sodium arsenite at the interface of α-MnO2 and water. J Hazard Mater 2010; 173: 675–681.

25.

Ricardo

F'elix

M'arcia

. Protective activity of hesperidin and lipoic acid against sodium arsenite acute in mice. Toxicol Patholol 2004; 32: 527–535.

26.

Manzolli

Serpeloni

Grotto

. Protective effects of the flavonoid chrysin against methylmercury-induced genotoxicity and alterations of antioxidant status, in vivo. Oxidat Med Cell Long 2015; 2015: 1–7.

27.

Ali

Adham

. Ameliorative effect of chrysin on adenine-induced chronic kidney disease in rats. PLoS One 2015; 10: 1–14.

28.

Zarzecki

Araujo

Bortolotto

. Hypolipidemic action of chrysin on Triton WR-1339-induced hyperlipidemia in female C57BL / 6 mice. Toxicol Rep 2014; 1: 200–208.

29.

American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2013 Edition. Version 2013.0.1. American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA), 2013. ISBN: 978-1-882691-21-0.

30.

Ohkawa

Ohishi

Yagi

. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem 1979; 95: 351–358.

31.

Mesquita

Oliveira

Bento

. Simplified 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine spectrophotometric assay for quantification of carbonyls in oxidized proteins. Anal Biochem 2014; 458: 69–71.

32.

Sellins

Cohen

. Gene induction by gamma-irradiation leads to DNA fragmentation in lymphocytes. Journal of Immunology 1987; 139: 3199–3206.

33.

Gonza

Creus

Marcos

. The mutagenic potential of the furylethylene derivative 2-furyl-1-nitroethene in the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test. Toxicol Sci 2003; 362: 359–362.

34.

Ankit

3D-QSAR (CoMFA, CoMFA-RG, CoMSIA) and molecular docking study of thienopyrimidine and thienopyridine derivatives to explore structural requirements for aurora-B kinase inhibition. Eur J Pharm Sci 2015; 79: 1–12.

35.

Chen

. Results of molecular docking as descriptors to predict human serum albumin binding affinity. J Mol Graph Model 2015; 33: 35–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2011.11.003.

36.

Yang

. Empirical correction to density functional theory for van der Waals interactions. J Chem Phys 2002; 116(2): 515–524.

37.

Hui

Mahendra

Adel

. Identification of small molecule inhibitors of human as(III) s adenosylmethionine methyltransferase (AS3MT). Chem Res Toxicol 2015: 28: 2419−2425. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00432.

38.

Mohamad

Masafumi

Charles

. Identification of a S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) dependent arsenic methyltransferase in Danio rerio . Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2012; 262(2): 185–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2012.04.035.

39.

Asma

Syed

. Binding free energy based analysis of arsenic (+3 oxidation state) methyltransferase with S-adenosylmethionine. J Mol Liquid 2016; 220: 375–382.

40.

Atawodi

Liman

Onyike

. Antioxidant effects of Tamarindus indica following acute and chronic carbon tetrachloride induced liver injury. Int J Agricul Biol 2011; 15: 410–418.

41.

Adegunlola

Afolabi

Akhigbe

. Lipid peroxidation in brain tissue following administration of low and high doses of arsenite and l-ascorbate in Wistar strain rats. Toxicol Int 2012; 19(1): 47–50.

42.

Łukaszewicz-hussain

. Activities of brain antioxidant enzymes, lipid and protein peroxidation. Central Eur J Med 2011; 6(5): 588–594.

43.

Bilto

Suboh

Aburjai

. Structure-activity relationships regarding the antioxidant effects of the flavonoids on human erythrocytes. Natural Sci 2012; 4(9): 740–747.

44.

Jung

. Emerging utilization of chrysin using nanoscale modification. Hindawi Pub J Nano 2016: 1–7.

45.

Solomon

Odunola

. Co-administration of sodium arsenite and ethanol: protection by aqueous extract of Aframomum longiscapum seeds. Pharm Res 2012; 4(3): 154–160.

46.

Ramesh

Reddy

Babu

. Synthesis, characterization and molecular docking studies of novel 2-amino 3-cyano pyrano [2, 3 H] chrysin derivatives as potential antimicrobial agents. Med Chem Res 2015; 24(10): 3696–3709.

The role of molecular modelling strategies in validating the effects of chrysin on sodium arsenite-induced chromosomal and DNA damage

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and methods

Chemicals/reagents

Experimental animals and design

Stage 1 (Ameliorative Study) – sacrificed after first week

Stage 2 (Preventive and Curative Studies) – extended to second week

Collection of samples

Determination of lipid peroxidation

Determination of protein carbonyl

DNA fragmentation assay

Bone marrow cells micronucleus assay

Molecular modelling of SAM-dependent methyltransferase

Statistical analysis

Results

Effect of CHR on SA-induced lipid peroxidation

Effect of CHR on SA-induced protein damage

Effect of CHR on SA-induced DNA fragmentation

Effect of CHR on SA-induced chromosomal damage

In silico inhibitory potentials of CHR on SAM-dependent methyltransferase

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References