Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Despite the extensive use of nanoparticles (NPs) in various fields, adequate knowledge of human health risk and potential toxicity is still lacking. The human lymphocytes play a major role in the immune system, and it can alter the antioxidant level when exposed to NPs. Identification of the hazardous NPs was done using in vitro toxicity tests and this study mainly focuses on the comparative in vitro cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of four different NPs including cobalt (II, III) oxide (Co₃O₄), iron (III) oxide (Fe₂O₃), silicon dioxide (SiO₂), and aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃) on human lymphocytes. The Co₃O₄ NPs showed decrease in cellular viability and increase in cell membrane damage followed by Fe₂O₃, SiO₂, and Al₂O₃ NPs in a dose-dependent manner after 24 h of exposure to human lymphocytes. The oxidative stress was evidenced in human lymphocytes by the induction of reactive oxygen species, lipid peroxidation, and depletion of catalase, reduced glutathione, and superoxide dismutase. The Al₂O₃ NPs showed the least DNA damage when compared with all the other NPs. Chromosomal aberration was observed at 100 µg/ml when exposed to Co₃O₄ NPs and Fe₂O₃ NPs. The alteration in the level of antioxidant caused DNA damage and chromosomal aberration in human lymphocytes.

Keywords

Nanoparticles cytotoxicity genotoxicity lymphocytes DNA damage

Introduction

Metal-oxide nanoparticles (NPs) have been commercially used in biosensors, water purification devices, diagnostics, cosmetics, and therapeutic agents. The NP toxicity study was one of the fastest growing areas of research due to its applications in a wide variety of fields.¹ Cobalt (II, III) oxide (Co₃O₄), iron (III) oxide (Fe₂O₃), silicon dioxide (SiO₂), and aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃) are commonly used NPs with a variety of applications and even toxic to human in a dose-dependent manner.^2,3

Co₃O₄ NPs are currently attracting enormous interest owing to their unique size and due to their various applications like pigments, sensors, electrochemistry, magnetism, energy storage, and medicine.^4,5 Fe₂O₃ NPs due to their magnetic properties have applications in magnetic drug, gene delivery, tissue repair, cell separation, magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic fluid hyperthermia. The antibody-targeted Fe₂O₃ NPs are used for diagnosis and targeted treatment of cancer.⁶ SiO₂ NPs are used in the biomedical field such as DNA delivery, additives to drugs, cancer therapy, enzyme immobilization, and biosensors.^7,8 Al₂O₃ NPs have a broad range of applications in aircrafts, ceramic industry, catalysis, biomaterials, and drugs.^9,10

The Co₃O₄ NPs can easily penetrate and cause damage to the skin than the bulk material. The NPs can pass through cuts and abrasions, causing toxicity in human epidermis.¹¹ It was reported that hard metal industry workers who are frequently exposed to NPs have increased the risk of lung cancer.¹² The Fe₂O₃ NPs after given orally for 28 days to female albino rats showed toxic signs and symptoms, but no mortality was observed. The Fe₂O₃ NPs caused a decrease in the level of brain acetylcholinesterase, indicating that the NPs can affect the synaptic transmission and nerve conduction.¹³ The release of Fe₂O₃ NPs into the environment causes ecological effects on aquatic organisms. It affects the early life stages of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) during embryonic development causing hatching delay, mortality, and malformation.¹⁴ Silica is the common name for materials, which is composed of SiO₂. It occurs in crystalline and amorphous forms. The 50, 100, and 200 nm sized SiO₂ NPs affect the liver causing inflammation in BALB/c mice by intravenous injection. The NPs remained in spleen and liver even after 4 weeks of NPs exposure.¹⁵ The SiO₂ NPs were also found to be toxic to two human cell lines from the proximal tubule (Caki-1 and Hek293). The Caki-1 cells exhibited more toxicity than Hek293 cells. SiO₂ NPs in the size range of 25 nm exhibited more cytotoxic and genotoxic effect than NPs at 100 nm for both kidney cell lines.¹⁶ The Al₂O₃ NPs have been toxic to algae, bacteria, fungi, fish, plants, and mammalian cells. The NPs not only affect the human body but also cause toxic effects in aquatic system and soil microbial communities. The NPs increased the chromosomal aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in plant cells.^17,18

Human lymphocytes are one of the major components of the immune cells, and they play a significant role in the prooxidant and antioxidant balance of immune cell activity.¹⁹ The studies done regarding NPs toxicity have mainly concentrated on the evaluation of individual NPs toxicity. Only limited works have been done regarding the comparison of different NPs for estimating their possible hazard. This study primarily focuses on the comparative toxicity of the four different NPs, namely, Co₃O₄, Fe₂O₃, SiO₂, and Al₂O₃ in human lymphocytes.

Materials and methods

Chemicals

The four different NPs (Co₃O₄, Fe₂O₃, SiO₂, and Al₂O₃ NPs) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, Missouri, USA). The product specification of the suppliers for Co₃O₄ (CAS number: 1308-06-1), Fe₂O₃ (CAS number: 1309-37-1), and Al₂O₃ NPs (CAS number: 1344-28-1) areas follows ≤50 nm and SiO₂ NPs (CAS number: 7631-86-9) in the size of 10–20 nm. All the chemicals used in this study were of analytical grade.

NPs characterization

The hydrodynamic size of the NPs in Milli-Q water was measured using dynamic light scattering (DLS; 90Plus particle size analyzer, Brookhaven Instruments Corporation, Holtsville, New York, USA). Particle size of the NPs was measured using a transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEOL-JEM-2100F TEM operating at 200 kV, Japan). The hydrodynamic size of the NPs after 0th and 24th h exposure to human lymphocyte culturing medium containing Rosewell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI-1640) medium supplemented with 1% penicillin,1% streptomycin, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), and 2% phytohemagglutinin (PHA) was measured using the DLS.

Toxicity studies

Culturing of human peripheral lymphocytes

Blood samples were drawn from the healthy volunteers aged 21–25 for cytotoxicity and genotoxicity studies (n = 3) according to VIT University, Institutional Ethics Committee for human studies (IECH). All donors participated in the study signed the written informed consent according to the approved procedure by VIT University, IECH (IEC/IRB no: IECH/2013/Dec 18-005). The human lymphocytes were isolated from peripheral blood using the lymphocyte separation media (HiSepTM, Hi Media, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India) and 1 × 10⁶ cells were cultured using RPMI-1640 supplemented with 1% penicillin, 1% streptomycin, and 10% FBS. The 2% PHA was added to stimulate the cells and incubated for 24 h in 5% carbon dioxide (CO₂) at 37°C. The cells were counted by tryphan blue exclusion method and the cell viability was measured using a hemocytometer.²⁰

Cytotoxicity by MTT assay

After 24 h of incubation, the human lymphocytes were counted and 1 × 10⁴ cells seeded into the 96-well culture plates with different concentration of Co₃O₄, Fe₂O₃, SiO₂, and Al₂O₃ NPs (10, 25, 50, 75, and 100 µg/ml) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. After incubation, cells were treated with 5 mg/ml solution of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) at 37°C for 4 h in 5% CO₂ incubator. Then 50 μl of dimethyl sulfoxide was added to solubilize the formed formazan. The number of viable cells was read by a Microplate Absorbance Reader (BioTek, Winooski, Vermont, USA) at 532 nm. The human lymphocytes not treated with NPs were taken as a control.²¹

Lactate dehydrogenase leakage assay

The lactate dehydrogenase leakage (LDH) activity was an alternative assay to determine the cytotoxicity of NPs. The membrane integrity damage of cells was estimated using LDH by measuring the amount of enzyme released by the human lymphocytes. About 0.1 ml of Co₃O₄, Fe₂O₃, SiO₂, and Al₂O₃ NPs (50, 75, and 100 µg/ml) were added with 0.2 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris)–hydrochloric acid, 30 mM sodium pyruvate, and 6.6 mM nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide. The absorbance was measured at 340 nm, and the LDH release expressed in terms of percentage.²²

Oxidative stress in human lymphocytes

Oxidative stress in human lymphocytes was estimated by the reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. In 96-well culture plates, 1 × 10⁶ cells/ml were seeded and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. After 24 h, different concentration of NPs (50, 75, and 100 µg/ml) was added and incubated for 24 h. Then the cells were incubated at 37°C for 30 min with dichlorodihydrofluorescein-diacetate (10 mM). The intensities of fluorescence were detected with wavelength excitation at 485 nm and wavelength emission at 528 nm using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (SL174, ELICO, India).²³

LPO and antioxidant enzymes level

The lipid peroxidation (LPO) was estimated by the malondialdehyde (MDA) formation, and 0.1 ml of cell suspension was incubated at 37°C with 0.1 M of sodium phosphate buffer for 1 h. The cells were precipitated with 5% trichloroacetic acid and centrifuged at 2300g for 15 min at room temperature. Then 1% thiobarbituric acid was added and placed in boiling water for 15 min. After cooling at room temperature, the optical density was read at 532 nm using an ultraviolet–visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometer (2201, Systronics, India) and represented as nanomoles of MDA per milligram of protein.²⁴

The catalase activity in human lymphocytes was estimated by adding 0.1 ml of lymphocytes with 1 ml of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂; 30 mM in phosphate buffer, pH 7.0) and 2 ml of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The absorbance was measured at 240 nm using an UV–Vis spectrophotometer (2201, Systronics).²⁵ Glutathione (GSH) level was estimated using Ellman’s reagent. The assay mixture contained 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid), phosphate buffer, and human lymphocyte extract. The absorbance was measured at 412 nm for the estimation of GSH.²⁶ The superoxide dismutase (SOD) assay was done using the kit obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The absorbance was read at 440 nm by the decrease in color development.

Single-cell gel electrophoresis assay (comet assay)

The comet assay was performed with slight alterations according to the method described by Singh et al.²⁷ A total of 25 µl of cell suspension was mixed with 75 µl of 0.5% low-melting temperature agarose (LMPA), and it was pre-coated with 1% normal melting temperature agarose. The slides were covered with a microscope coverslip and refrigerated for 5 min. The coverslip was removed, and a layer of 1% LMPA was added on to the slides. This was followed by immersion in ice-cold alkaline lysis solution (2.5 M sodium chloride, 10 mM Tris, 100 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 10% dimethylsulfoxide, and 1% Triton X-100, pH 10.0) for at least 2 h. The slides were then incubated in ice-cold electrophoresis solution (0.3 M sodium chloride and 1 mM EDTA, pH 13.0) for 20 min, followed by electrophoresis at 15 V for 25 min. After electrophoresis, the slides were neutralized and stained by spreading ethidium bromide (20 µg/ml). Analysis of comets was carried out using a fluorescence microscope (Leica DM-2500, Germany), and the percentage tail DNA was calculated based on the equation, % tail DNA = 100 − % head DNA, for the quantification of DNA damage.

Chromosomal aberrations

Chromosome aberrations were obtained from PHA-stimulated peripheral human lymphocytes.²⁸ Under aseptic conditions, 0.5 ml of venous blood was added and incubated at 37°C with 5 ml of RPMI-1640 medium, 1.2 ml of FBS, and 0 3 ml of PHA. At the end of 71st h of incubation, the human lymphocytes were treated with 100 µg/ml of NPs for 1 h and centrifuged at 1000 r/min for 5 min. The cells were arrested by adding 0.01% of colchicine solution and then incubated for 5 min using 6 ml of the hypotonic solution, and 6 ml of Carnoy’s fixative was added prior to slide preparations. The slides were prepared by gently placing cell suspension on a glass slide and dried on a hot plate. The chromosomes were treated with 0.25% trypsin that alters the structure of proteins followed by staining with Giemsa solution, and the slides were observed under the microscope.

Statistical analysis

The analysis of the data obtained was done using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) by Bonferroni posttest for cytotoxicity and oxidative stress and one-way ANOVA by Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests for DNA damage and chromosomal aberrations. All data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 5 and found to be statistically significant at p < 0.05.

Results

NPs characterization

The NPs were characterized by measuring the hydrodynamic size using DLS, but the shape and particle size of the NPs were studied using TEM.²⁹ The hydrodynamic size of the Co₃O₄, Fe₂O₃, SiO₂, and Al₂O₃ NPs in Milli-Q water was found to be 96.4 ± 0.57, 74.6 ± 0.6, 41.7 ± 2.6, and 90.2 ± 2.4 nm, respectively (Figure 1). TEM analysis confirmed that NPs are almost spherical in shape with a particle size of 35.8 ± 0.8, 43.7 ± 4.7, 17.1 ± 2.1, and 39.4 ± 3.9 nm for Co₃O₄, Fe₂O₃, SiO₂, and Al₂O₃ NPs, respectively (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

NPs characterization by DLS. (a) Co₃O₄ NPs; (b) Fe₂O₃ NPs; (c) SiO₂ NPs; and (d) Al₂O₃ NPs. DLS: dynamic light scattering; NP: nanoparticle; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide; Co₃O₄: cobalt (II, III) oxide; Fe₂O₃: iron (III) oxide; SiO₂: silicon dioxide.

Figure 2.

NPs characterization by TEM. (a) Co₃O₄ NPs; (b) Fe₂O₃ NPs; (c) SiO₂ NPs; and (d) Al₂O₃ NPs. TEM: transmission electron microscope; NP: nanoparticle; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide; Co₃O₄: cobalt (II, III) oxide; Fe₂O₃: iron (III) oxide; SiO₂: silicon dioxide.

Hydrodynamic size of NPs in the lymphocyte culture medium

The stability of the NPs in lymphocyte culture medium was considered to be an important aspect of the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity assessment. The hydrodynamic size was used to monitor the kinetic changes in order to study the stability of the NPs in the culture medium.²² The hydrodynamic size of Co₃O₄ NPs after initial exposure to the lymphocyte culture medium was found to be 206.9 ± 14.4 nm (Figure 3(a)), and an increase in the size to 675.7 ± 41.8 nm was observed after 24 h of exposure to the culture medium (Figure 4(a)). In case of Fe₂O₃ NPs, at 0th h the hydrodynamic size was found to be 380.6 ± 20 nm (Figure 3(b)), whereas at 24 h a drastic increase in the size to 909.07 ± 45.3 nm was observed when compared with the other metal-oxide NPs (Figure 4(b)). The size of the SiO₂ NPs after 0th h of exposure was found to be 192.6 ± 6.9 nm (Figure 3(c)), and an increase in the size to 435.6 ± 29.9 nm due to agglomeration was observed after 24 h of exposure to lymphocyte cure medium (Figure 4(c)). Interestingly, the Al₂O₃ NPs after initial exposure to the lymphocyte culture medium had a size of 234.02 ± 11.03 nm (Figure 3(d)) when compared with the size of 560.3 ± 20.2 nm after 24 h exposure to the lymphocyte culture medium (Figure 4(d)).

Figure 3.

Hydrodynamic size of the metal-oxide NPs after 0th h exposure to the lymphocyte culture medium. (a) Co₃O₄ NPs; (b) Fe₂O₃ NPs; (c) SiO₂ NPs; and (d) Al₂O₃ NPs. NP: nanoparticle; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide; Co₃O₄: cobalt (II, III) oxide; Fe₂O₃: iron (III) oxide; SiO₂: silicon dioxide.

Figure 4.

Hydrodynamic size of the metal-oxide NPs after 24 h of exposure to the lymphocyte culture medium. (a) Co₃O₄ NPs; (b) Fe₂O₃ NPs; (c) SiO₂ NPs; and (d) Al₂O₃ NPs. NP: nanoparticle; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide; Co₃O₄: cobalt (II, III) oxide; Fe₂O₃: iron (III) oxide; SiO₂: silicon dioxide.

Cytotoxicity of the NPs in human lymphocytes

The cytotoxicity was observed in human lymphocytes after 24 h of interaction of NPs by MTT and LDH assays. Both MTT and LDH assays have been frequently used for determining the in vitro cytotoxicity of NPs in cell culture experiments.³⁰ Results of MTT assay showed a significant reduction in cell viability compared with control in a dose-dependent manner. At 50, 75, and 100 µg/ml, the Co₃O₄ NPs showed a significant reduction in percentage cell viability (p < 0.001). Interestingly, the Fe₂O₃ and SiO₂ NPs have a similar significant decrease in cell viability and the lowest reduction in cellular viability was observed with Al₂O₃ NPs. The Co₃O₄ NPs were found to be more toxic to human lymphocytes followed by Fe₂O₃, SiO₂, and Al₂O₃ NPs in a descending order (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Cellular viability in human lymphocytes by MTT assay when treated with Co₃O₄, Fe₂O₃, SiO₂ NPs, and Al₂O₃ NPs. The data obtained are expressed in terms of mean ± SD (n = 3). *p < 0.05: the significance versus control; **p < 0.01: the significance versus control; ***p < 0.001: the significance versus control. NP: nanoparticle; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide; Co₃O₄: cobalt (II, III) oxide; Fe₂O₃: iron (III) oxide; SiO₂: silicon dioxide; MTT: 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide.

The cytotoxicity was further investigated by estimating the percentage of LDH released after incubation with NPs. The Al₂O₃ NPs showed a significant increase in LDH level (p < 0.01) when exposed to 100 µg/ml, whereas an insignificant increase in LDH level (p > 0.05) was observed when treated at 50 and 75 µg/ml in human lymphocytes. The Co₃O₄ NPs showed a significant increase (p < 0.001) in LDH level when compared with Fe₂O₃ NPs and SiO₂ NPs after 24 h of exposure to the human lymphocytes at 50, 75, and 100 µg/ml (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

LDH leakage in human lymphocytes when treated with Co₃O₄, Fe₂O₃, SiO₂, and Al₂O₃ NPs. The data obtained are expressed in terms of mean ± SD (n = 3). The LDH release for the untreated control cells is 0%. *p < 0.05: the significance versus control; **p < 0.01: the significance versus control; ***p < 0.001: the significance versus control. NP: nanoparticle; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide; Co₃O₄: cobalt (II, III) oxide; Fe₂O₃: iron (III) oxide; SiO₂: silicon dioxide; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase leakage.

Oxidative stress in human lymphocytes

The Co₃O₄ NPs were found to significantly increase (p < 0.001) ROS level in the human lymphocytes at 50, 75, and 100 µg/ml. The Al₂O₃ NPs showed a significant increase in ROS level at 100 µg/ml (p < 0.01). The Fe₂O₃ NPs and SiO₂ NPs showed a significant increase in ROS level at 75 and 100 µg/ml (p < 0.001), but insignificant increase in ROS level was observed at 50 µg/ml (p > 0.05) (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Oxidative stress estimated in human lymphocytes by measuring the ROS level. The percentage of ROS release for untreated control cells is 0%. The data obtained are expressed in terms of mean ± SD. *p < 0.05: the significance versus control; **p < 0.01: the significance versus control; ***p < 0.001: the significance versus control. ROS: reactive oxygen species.

Alteration in the level of LPO and antioxidant enzymes

The oxidative stress was evaluated in human lymphocytes by measuring the level of LPO and antioxidant enzymes like catalase, GSH, and SOD (Table 1). The higher production of intercellular ROS and reduced antioxidant level is the primary reason for toxicity due to metal-oxide NPs.³¹ The Co₃O₄ NPs when treated with human lymphocytes showed a significant increase in LPO level and reduction in catalase and SOD level at 50, 75, and 100 µg/ml. An insignificant reduction in GSH level (p > 0.05) was observed at 50 µg/ml while a significant reduction was observed in GSH level at 75 and 100 µg/ml (p < 0.001), indicating that the oxidative stress created by Co₃O₄ NPs was higher when compared with all the three NPs used for this study.

Table 1.

Alterations in the level of LPO and antioxidant enzymes in human lymphocytes.^a

	LPO (nmol MDA/mg protein)	Catalase (H₂O₂ decomposition/min/mg protein)	GSH (nmol GSH/mg protein)	SOD (U/mg protein)
Control	1.9 ± 0.15	47.7 ± 0.8	32.25 ± 1.7	6.18 ± 0.4
Co₃O₄ NPs
50 (µg/ml)	3.3 ± 0.16^b	39.3 ± 1.2^c	30 ± 1.6	4.9 ± 0.6^b
75 (µg/ml)	5.2 ± 0.7^c	35 ± 2.3^c	27 ± 0.6^c	2.89 ± 0.3^c
100 (µg/ml)	6 ± 0.4^c	27.3 ± 3.8^c	21.3 ± 0.5^c	2.53 ± 0.4^c
Fe₂O₃ NPs
50 (µg/ml)	3 ± 0.6^d	44 ± 1.3	30.5 ± 1.07	5.1 ± 0.5^d
75 (µg/ml)	4.3 ± 0.4^c	38 ± 2.6^c	26.2 ± 1.1^c	3.86 ± 0.7^c
100 (µg/ml)	4.5 ± 1.2^c	25.6 ± 3.4^c	24.6 ± 0.7^c	3.58 ± 0.49^c
SiO₂ NPs
50 (µg/ml)	2.8 ± 0.18	44.3 ± 2.5	31 ± 1.6	5.3 ± 0.39
75 (µg/ml)	3.8 ± 0.4^c	41.5 ± 1.7^b	27.4 ± 1.5^c	4.01 ± 0.6^c
100 (µg/ml)	4.7 ± 0.4^c	24.3 ± 2.6^c	25.7 ± 1.3^c	3.3 ± 0.6^c
Al₂O₃ NPs
50 (µg/ml)	2.2 ± 0.08	47.2 ± 1	31.5 ± 1.04	6.1 ± 0.1
75 (µg/ml)	2.4 ± 0.13	42.5 ± 0.9^d	30.8 ± 1.4	5.9 ± 0.16
100 (µg/ml)	2.9 ± 0.08	39.5 ± 1.3^c	29.5 ± 0.6^d	5.5 ± 0.32

LPO: lipid peroxidation; H₂O₂: hydrogen peroxide; MDA: malondialdehyde; GSH: reduced glutathione; SOD: superoxide dismutase; NP: nanoparticle; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide; Co₃O₄: cobalt (II, III) oxide; Fe₂O₃: iron (III) oxide; SiO₂: silicon dioxide.

^aThe data obtained are expressed in terms of mean ± SD.

^b p < 0.01: the significance versus control.

^c p < 0.001: the significance versus control.

^d p < 0.05: the significance versus control.

Interestingly, both Fe₂O₃ and SiO₂ NPs at 75 and 100 µg/ml showed a significant reduction in catalase and GSH level after 24 h of exposure to the human lymphocytes in a dose-dependent manner. The Fe₂O₃ NPs at 75 and 100 µg/ml showed a significant increase in LPO level and a significant reduction in SOD level (p < 0.001). The SiO₂ NPs showed an insignificant increase in LPO and a decline in SOD level at 50 µg/ml (p > 0.05). The least alteration in the level of antioxidant enzymes was observed with Al₂O₃ NPs. The Al₂O₃ NPs showed an insignificant reduction in GSH and SOD level at 50 and 75 µg/ml (p > 0.05) but at 100 µg/ml the GSH level was found to be significant (p < 0.05). The Al₂O₃ NPs had an insignificant increase in LPO level at 75 and 100 µg/ml (p > 0.05). The oxidative stress was evidenced by the induction of ROS, LPO, and depletion of catalase, GSH, and SOD in human lymphocytes in time and dose-dependent manner.

Tail DNA migration

Single-cell gel electrophoresis or comet assay was a reliable assay to measure the genotoxicity of any compound. The comet assay was a simple, most reliable, and inexpensive method to detect DNA damage in individual cells when treated with various chemicals, radiation, and drugs. This technique requires only few cells for obtaining the results within few hours.³² The obtained results from the comet assay indicated that Co₃O₄ NPs and Fe₂O₃ NPs were able to cause significant and dose-dependent increase in percentage (%) tail DNA damage compared with control (p < 0.001). Tail DNA damage of 10.1% and 9.3% was observed when exposed for 24 h to Co₃O₄ NPs and Fe₂O₃ NPs at 100 µg/ml, respectively (Table 2). The SiO₂ NPs showed an insignificant increase of 3.4% tail DNA at 100 µg/ml (p > 0.05). The highest % tail DNA was observed in Co₃O₄ NPs and the least % tail DNA was observed in Al₂O₃ NPs (Figure 8). The Al₂O₃ NPs showed an insignificant increase of 2.8% tail DNA at 100 µg/ml (p > 0.05).

Table 2.

Tail DNA migration in human lymphocytes treated with Co₃O₄, Fe₂O₃, SiO₂ ^c, and Al₂O₃ ^d NPs.^a

Control	Co₃O₄ NPs (100 (µg/ml)	Fe₂O₃ NPs (100 (µg/ml)	SiO₂ NPs (100 (µg/ml)	Al₂O₃ NPs (100 (µg/ml)
2.2 ± 0.23	10.1 ± 1.2^b	9.3 ± 0.6^b	3.4 ± 0.9	2.8 ± 0.7

NP: nanoparticle; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide; Co₃O₄: cobalt (II, III) oxide; Fe₂O₃: iron (III) oxide; SiO₂: silicon dioxide; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase leakage.

^aThe % tail DNA data obtained are expressed in terms of mean ± SD.

^b p < 0.001: the significance versus control.

^c p < 0.05: the significance versus control.

^d p < 0.01: the significance versus control.

Figure 8.

DNA damage (% tail DNA migration) in human lymphocytes. (a) Control; (b) Co₃O₄ NPs; (c) Fe₂O₃ NPs; (d) SiO₂ NPs; (e) Al₂O₃ NPs; and (f) percentage tail DNA. The data obtained are expressed in terms of mean ± SD. *p < 0.05: the significance versus control; **p < 0.01: the significance versus control; ***p < 0.00: the significance versus control. NP: nanoparticle; Al₂O₃: aluminum oxide; Co₃O₄: cobalt (II, III) oxide; Fe₂O₃: iron (III) oxide; SiO₂: silicon dioxide; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase leakage.

Chromosomal aberrations

A minimum of 50 metaphases per sample were scored for the chromosome aberration assay. When compared with control, an insignificant increase (p > 0.05) in chromosomal aberrations was observed when exposed to SiO₂ and Al₂O₃ NPs (p > 0.05). The Co₃O₄ NPs (p < 0.001) and Fe₂O₃ NPs (p < 0.05) showed a significant increase in chromosomal aberration when compared with control at 100 µg/ml (Figure 9).

Figure 9.

Chromosomal aberration in metaphase chromosomes of human lymphocytes: (a) control; (b) chromosome break; and (c) chromosome deletion. (d) The graphs show that data obtained are represented in terms of mean ± SD. Chromosomal aberrations, *p < 0.05: the significance versus control; **p < 0.01: the significance versus control; ***p < 0.001: the significance versus control.

Discussion

The use of NPs has been increased in various fields, and it was very important to investigate the toxic effects of the NPs in human health. The toxicity of NPs was mainly due to the structure, solubility, shape, and surface/mass ratio.³³ The hydrodynamic size of the NPs was found to be larger due to the agglomeration of the NPs in the prepared culture medium, and the agglomerates formed are greater when compared with the primary particle size.³⁴ The release of Co²⁺ ions was the main reason for the aggregation and toxicity of the Co₃O₄ NPs. The Co₃O₄ NPs form agglomerates of different size due to its magnetic properties in the cell culture medium.³¹ The amine-modified Fe₂O₃ NPs were able to agglomerate in the cell culture medium but failed to induce cytotoxicity, whereas the carboxylated Fe₂O₃ NPs induce greater cytotoxicity and redox-related gene expression in the human lymphocyte cells.³⁵ The surface charge and ionic strength are the main reasons for agglomeration of the SiO₂ NPs in the lymphocyte culture medium.³⁶ The addition of FBS has effects on the stability of Al₂O₃ NPs.³⁷ The lymphocyte culture medium contains amino acids, vitamins, and salts that cause decrease in electrostatic repulsive forces and increase in ionic strength forming NPs aggregation. The serum contains proteins that prevent the aggregation of the NPs by creating a protein corona. The agglomeration of NPs was lower at 10% FBS than the serum-free media.³⁸ The agglomeration of NPs was less in 10% FBS than the serum-free media.³¹

The in vitro toxicity testing is an alternative testing method instead of animal experiments to study the nanotoxicity of the NPs.³⁰ Direct contact of the NPs to the human lymphocytes has been implicated to produce damage to mitochondria by influencing the electron flow and altering the mitochondrial functionality. The NPs damage the cells, and stimulate the release of cytoplasmic LDH, which further catalyzes the conversion of the tetrazolium salt to formazan.³⁹ The internalization and easy penetration of NPs into the cells were found to be the main reasons regarding the size-dependent toxic effects of NPs.⁴⁰ The toxicity in human lymphocytes was mainly due to the pathway that involves the endocytosis of NPs agglomerate.^41,42

The previous toxicity studies done have reported that cytotoxic effects and alteration in the level of oxidative stress biomarkers were observed after 24 h of exposure to the NPs. Similar results were obtained in this study in a time and dose-dependent manner. The human lymphocytes showed alteration in the level of oxidative stress biomarkers and antioxidant level after 24 h of exposure to the metal-oxide NPs.⁴³ Oxidative stress occurs when ROS disturbs the balance between oxidative and antioxidant defense levels. The ROS was due to the superoxide radical, H₂O₂, and the hydroxyl radical, which causes DNA damage and apoptotic cell death. The cytotoxicity observed with NPs might be due to the pro-inflammatory effects through ROS-mediated mechanism.^44,45 The Co₃O₄ NPs enter the cell, and they remain in the cytoplasm causing the induction of ROS.⁴⁶ The LPO was due to the oxidative degradation of polyunsaturated fatty acids, and it causes membrane damage and structural integrity to the human lymphocytes. The LPO was assessed by measuring the level of MDA, the final product of lipid breakdown.⁴⁷ The antioxidants like catalase, GSH, and SOD protect the human lymphocytes from oxidative damage because of their ability to scavenge ROS such as superoxide anion and hydroxyl radical. The free radicals are controlled by the antioxidant enzymes by maintaining a balance between the prooxidant and antioxidant process.¹⁹ The Fe₂O₃ NPs generate redox cycling resulting in intracellular iron overload, and large surface area of the NPs promotes the generation of ROS. The Fe₂O₃ NPs showed an enhanced MDA level and reduced GSH level in rats similar when exposed to human lymphocytes.⁴⁸ When exposed to SiO₂ NPs, the excessive ROS can cause injuries and impair the function of lymphocytes by aggravating the effect of LPO and damaging the intracellular components of a cell completely including its proteins, lipids, and DNA.⁴⁹ Oxidative stress and alteration in the level of antioxidant enzymes observed with alumina NPs are mainly due to the pro-inflammatory effects through ROS-mediated mechanism.⁵⁰

The oxidative stress disturbs the cellular macromolecules such as lipids, proteins, and DNA when exposed to NPs. The DNA damage occurs mainly due to mutations, deletions, cross-linking, and formation of adducts leading to apoptosis.^51,52 The caspases play a significant role in the initiation and execution of apoptosis causing cellular DNA damage by Co₃O₄ NPs in human lymphocytes.³¹ The Fe₂O₃ NPs cause chromosomal DNA fragmentation and nuclear condensation in human lymphocytes. The Fe₂O₃ NPs arrest the G0/G1 phase in a dose-dependent manner.⁵³ The genotoxicity of SiO₂ NPs was due to chromatin modification, ROS induction, and DNase liberation from the lysozyme. The cellular production of ROS can cause damage to cellular macromolecules such as DNA.⁵⁴ Studies done in female rats with Al₂O₃ NPs −30 nm, and 40 nm did not increase the % tail DNA in rat peripheral human lymphocytes after oral exposure.⁵⁵ The Al₂O₃ NPs do not cause DNA damage in human peripheral lymphocytes when compared with the other three NPs.

The chromosomal aberration is a genetic marker to study the genotoxicity risk of human leukocytes. Alteration in the chromosome could be any changes in either the number of chromosomes or the structure of chromosome. The chromosomal aberrations like break and deletion were observed after exposed to different NPs. Chromosomal aberrations were believed to be an important aspect resulting in cell cycle arrest, and it was an important marker for cancer risk.⁵⁶ The Co₃O₄ and Fe₂O₃ NPs were able to cause chromosome break and deletion leading to deleterious effect on humans. The penetration of metal ions into the cell causes cross-link in the DNA, sister chromatid exchange, and mutations leading to cancer risk when exposed to metal-oxide NPs.^57,58

The possible mechanism that induces cytotoxicity and genotoxicity when exposed to the metal-oxide NPs is shown in Figure 10. The metal-oxide NPs were able to generate ROS and oxidative stress by the mitochondrial dysfunction in human lymphocytes. The ROS generation, a by-product of oxidative phosphorylation, causes damage in mitochondrial macromolecules including the mitochondrial DNA leading to mutation and cancer in humans. The NPs cause chromosomal aberrations and DNA damage, causing cell cycle arrest and finally to cell death.⁵⁹ The imbalance in the ROS production when exposed to the metal-oxide NPs caused DNA damage by the oxidation of purine molecules. The metal-oxide NP-treated cells showed mitotic arrest, chromosomes break, and deletion in human lymphocytes.^57,60 The results have proven that the metal-oxide NPs were able to cause DNA damage and chromosomal aberration due to the generation of ROS, which leads to cell death in human lymphocytes.

Figure 10.

Possible mechanism of metal-oxide NPs when exposed to human lymphocytes. NP: nanoparticle.

Conclusion

The cytotoxicity and genotoxicity studies revealed that the Co₃O₄ NPs were found to be more toxic to human lymphocytes when compared with other metal-oxide NPs. The least toxicity was observed in the case of Al₂O₃ NPs. When exposed to Co₃O₄ NPs and Fe₂O₃ NPs, the human lymphocytes exhibited increase in genotoxicity when compared with SiO₂ and Al₂O₃ NPs. The cytotoxicity and oxidative stress lead to DNA damage and chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes. The results highlight the toxicity associated with the exposure of the NPs and suggest that proper attention needs to be paid regarding the use of the NPs since it can cause harmful effects to humans.

Footnotes

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to the VIT University management for funding the work.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

Roco

. Nanotechnology: convergence with modern biology and medicine. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2003; 3: 337–346.

Huang

C-H

Aronstam

. Toxicity of transition metal oxide nanoparticles: recent insights from in vitro studies. Materials 2010; 10: 4842–4859.

Zhang

Yin

Tang

. ZnO, TiO(2), SiO(2), and Al(2)O(3) nanoparticles-induced toxic effects on human fetal lung fibroblasts. Biomed Environ Sci 2011; 6: 661–669.

Liu

Qiu

. Shape-controlled synthesis and properties of uniform spinel cobalt oxide nanocubes. Nanotechnology 2005; 12: 3035.

Salimi

Hallaj

Mamkhezri

. Electrochemical properties and electrocatalytic activity of FAD immobilized onto cobalt oxide nanoparticles: application to nitrite detection. J Electroanal Chem 2008: 31–38.

Laurent

Forge

Port

. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. Chem Rev 2008; 6: 2064–2110.

Kang

Sun

. Microchip-based immunoassays with application of silicon dioxide nanoparticle film. Anal Bioanal Chem 2012; 8: 2449–2457.

Yang

Liu

. SiO₂ nanoparticles induce cytotoxicity and protein expression alteration in HaCaT cells. Part Fibre Toxicol 2010; 7: 1.

Ribes

Colomina

Vicens

. Effects of oral aluminum exposure on behavior and neurogenesis in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Neurol 2008; 2: 293–300.

10.

Molloy

Standish

Nieboer

. Effects of acute exposure to aluminum on cognition in humans. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2007; 23: 2011–2019.

11.

Larese

Crosera

Timeus

. Human skin penetration of cobalt nanoparticles through intact and damaged skin. Toxicol In Vitro 2013; 1: 121–127.

12.

Murray

Kisin

Inman

. Oxidative stress and dermal toxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles in vitro. Cell Biochem Biophys 2013; 2: 461–476.

13.

Kumari

Rajak

Singh

. Repeated oral dose toxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles: biochemical and histopathological alterations in different tissues of rats. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2012; 3: 2149–2159.

14.

Zhu

Tian

Cai

. Toxicity assessment of iron oxide nanoparticles in zebrafish (Danio rerio) early life stages. PLoS One 2012; 9: e46286.

15.

Cho

Choi

. The impact of size on tissue distribution and elimination by single intravenous injection of silica nanoparticles. Toxicol Lett 2009; 3: 177–183.

16.

Paget

Sergent

Chevillard

. Nano-silicon dioxide toxicological characterization on two human kidney cell lines. J Phys: Conf Ser 2011; 304: 012080.

17.

Pakrashi

Dalai

Humayun

. Ceriodaphnia dubia as a potential bio-indicator for assessing acute aluminum oxide nanoparticle toxicity in fresh water environment. PLoS One 2013; 9: e74003.

18.

Burklew

Ashlock

Winfrey

. Effects of aluminum oxide nanoparticles on the growth, development, and microRNA expression of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). PLoS One 2012; 5: e34783.

19.

Gautam

Das

Mahapatra

. Age associated oxidative damage in lymphocytes. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2010; 4: 275–282.

20.

Ghosh

Bandyopadhyay

Mukherjee

. Genotoxicity of titanium dioxide (TiO₂) nanoparticles at two trophic levels: plant and human lymphocytes. Chemosphere 2010; 81: 1253–1262.

21.

Jerobin

Sureshkumar

Anjali

. Biodegradable polymer based encapsulation of neem oil nanoemulsion for controlled release of Aza-A. Carbohydr Polym 2012; 4: 1750–1756.

22.

Pakrashi

Dalai

Prathna

. Cytotoxicity of aluminium oxide nanoparticles towards fresh water algal isolate at low exposure concentrations. Aquat Toxicol 2013; 132–133: 34–45.

23.

Wang

Joseph

. Quantifying cellular oxidative stress by dichlorofluorescein assay using microplate reader. Free Radic Biol Med 1999; 5: 612–616.

24.

Ohkawa

Ohishi

Yagi

. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem 1979; 2: 351–358.

25.

Sinha

. Colorimetric assay of catalase. Anal Biochem 1972; 2: 389–394.

26.

Ellman

. Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch Biochem Biophys 1959; 1: 70–77.

27.

Singh

McCoy

Tice

. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 1988; 1: 184–191.

28.

Hungerford

. Leukocytes cultured from small inocula of whole blood and the preparation of metaphase chromosomes by treatment with hypotonic KCl. Biotech Histochem 1965; 6: 333–338.

29.

Lim

Yeap

Che

. Characterization of magnetic nanoparticle by dynamic light scattering. Nanoscale Res Lett 2013; 1: 1–14.

30.

Holder

Goth-Goldstein

Lucas

. Particle-induced artifacts in the MTT and LDH viability assays. Chem Res Toxicol 2012; 9: 1885–1892.

31.

Alarifi

Ali

Al Omar Suliman

. Oxidative stress contributes to cobalt oxide nanoparticles-induced cytotoxicity and DNA damage in human hepatocarcinoma cells. Int J Nanomed 2013; 8: 189–199.

32.

McKenna

Doherty

Downes

. Use of the comet-FISH assay to compare DNA damage and repair in p53 and hTERT genes following ionizing radiation. PLoS One 2012; 11: e49364.

33.

Greish

Thiagarajan

Herd

. Size and surface charge significantly influence the toxicity of silica and dendritic nanoparticles. Nanotoxicology 2012; 7: 713–723.

34.

Vujacic

Vodnik

Joksic

. Particle size and concentration dependent cytotoxicity of citrate capped gold nanoparticles. Digest J Nanomater Biostruct 2011; 6: 1367–1376.

35.

Sharma

Kodali

Gaffrey

. Iron oxide nanoparticle agglomeration influences dose rates and modulates oxidative stress-mediated dose-response profiles in vitro. Nanotoxicology 2014; 6: 663–675.

36.

Izak-Nau

Voetz

Eiden

. Altered characteristics of silica nanoparticles in bovine and human serum: the importance of nanomaterial characterization prior to its toxicological evaluation. Part Fibre Toxicol 2013; 1: 56.

37.

Radziun

Dudkiewicz Wilczyńska

Książek

. Assessment of the cytotoxicity of aluminium oxide nanoparticles on selected mammalian cells. Toxicol In Vitro 2011; 8: 1694–1700.

38.

Maiorano

Sabella

Sorce

. Effects of cell culture media on the dynamic formation of protein-nanoparticle complexes and influence on the cellular response. ACS Nano 2010; 12: 7481–7491.

39.

Vijayakumar

Ganesan

. In vitro cytotoxicity assay on gold nanoparticles with different stabilizing agents. J Nanomater 2012; 2012: 14.

40.

Mahmoudi

Simchi

Imani

. An in vitro study of bare and poly(ethylene glycol)-co-fumarate-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: a new toxicity identification procedure. Nanotechnology 2009; 22: 225104.

41.

Peters

Unger

Gatti

. Metallic nanoparticles exhibit paradoxical effects on oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory response in endothelial cells in vitro. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2006; 4: 685–695.

42.

Ghodake

Seo

Lee

. Hazardous phytotoxic nature of cobalt and zinc oxide nanoparticles assessed using Allium cepa . J Hazard Mater 2011; 1: 952–955.

43.

Guan

Kang

. Cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, and genotoxicity in human hepatocyte and embryonic kidney cells exposed to ZnO nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012; 7: 602.

44.

Barillet

Jugan

Laye

. In vitro evaluation of SiC nanoparticles impact on A549 pulmonary cells: cyto-, genotoxicity and oxidative stress. Toxicol Lett 2010; 3: 324–330.

45.

AshaRani

Low Kah Mun

Hande

. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in human cells. ACS Nano 2008; 2: 279–290.

46.

Papis

Rossi

Raspanti

. Engineered cobalt oxide nanoparticles readily enter cells. Toxicol Lett 2009; 3: 253–259.

47.

Yetuk

Pandir

Bas

. Protective role of catechin and quercetin in sodium benzoate-induced lipid peroxidation and the antioxidant system in human erythrocytes in vitro. Sci World J 2014; 2014: 874824.

48.

Samal

Paulraj

. Modulatory role of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles on oxidative stress in rat. J Bionanosci 2010; 1(2): 22–28.

49.

Eom

Choi

. Oxidative stress of silica nanoparticles in human bronchial epithelial cell, Beas-2B. Toxicol In Vitro 2009; 7: 1326–1332.

50.

Oesterling

Chopra

Gavalas

. Alumina nanoparticles induce expression of endothelial cell adhesion molecules. Toxicol Lett 2008; 3: 160–166.

51.

Karlsson

Cronholm

Gustafsson

. Copper oxide nanoparticles are highly toxic: a comparison between metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes. Chem Res Toxicol 2008; 9: 1726–1732.

52.

Pakrashi

Jain

Dalai

. In vivo genotoxicity assessment of titanium dioxide nanoparticles by Allium cepa root tip assay at high exposure concentrations. PLoS One 2014; 2: e87789.

53.

Xin-li

Shu-hua

Zhang

. Dose-dependent cytotoxicity and oxidative stress induced by “Naked” Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles in human hepatocyte. Chem Res Chin Univ 2012; 28: 114–118.

54.

Choi

Kim

Song

. Genotoxicity of nano-silica in mammalian cell lines. Toxicol Environ Health Sci 2011; 1: 7–13.

55.

Balasubramanyam

Sailaja

Mahboob

. In vivo genotoxicity assessment of aluminium oxide nanomaterials in rat peripheral blood cells using the comet assay and micronucleus test. Mutagenesis 2009; 3: 245–251.

56.

Rossner

Boffetta

Ceppi

. Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes of healthy subjects and risk of cancer. Environ Health Perspect 2005; 113(5): 517–520.

57.

Magaye

Zhao

Bowman

. Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of cobalt-, nickel- and copper-based nanoparticles. Exp Ther Med 2012; 4: 551–561.

58.

Loeb

Wallace

Martin

. The mitochondrial theory of aging and its relationship to reactive oxygen species damage and somatic mtDNA mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 52: 18769–18770.

59.

Bhattacharya

Davoren

Boertz

. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce oxidative stress and DNA-adduct formation but not DNA-breakage in human lung cells. Part Fibre Toxicol 2009; 17: 13–24.

60.

Chao

Yang

. The effects of DNA damage induced by acetaldehyde. Huan Jing KeXue 2004; 3: 102–105.

Comparative cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of cobalt (II,III) oxide,iron (III) oxide,silicon dioxide,and aluminum oxide nanoparticles on human lymphocytes in vitro

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and methods

Chemicals

NPs characterization

Toxicity studies

Culturing of human peripheral lymphocytes

Cytotoxicity by MTT assay

Lactate dehydrogenase leakage assay

Oxidative stress in human lymphocytes

LPO and antioxidant enzymes level

Single-cell gel electrophoresis assay (comet assay)

Chromosomal aberrations

Statistical analysis

Results

NPs characterization

Hydrodynamic size of NPs in the lymphocyte culture medium

Cytotoxicity of the NPs in human lymphocytes

Oxidative stress in human lymphocytes

Alteration in the level of LPO and antioxidant enzymes

Tail DNA migration

Chromosomal aberrations

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgement

Funding

References