1 Hanekamp JC Verstegen SW Vera-Navas G . The historical roots of precautionary thinking: the cultural ecological critique and ‘The Limits to Growth’. J Risk Res2005; 8: 295–310.
2.
2 Breyer S . Breaking the vicious circle: toward effective risk regulation.Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1993.
3.
3 Sunstein CR . Laws of fear: beyond the precautionary principle.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
4.
4 Pieterman R . Culture in the risk society. An essay on the rise of a precautionary culture. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie2001; 22: S145–S168.
5.
5 Pieterman R . Weg met het voorzorgbeginsel? Een rechtssociologische cultuurkritiek. Nederlands Juristenblad2001; 76: 1023–1029 [Away with the precautionary principle? A sociological critique.].
6.
6 Furedi F . Culture of fear: risk-taking and the morality of low expectations.Continuum, UK; 1997.
7.
7 Bourke J . Fear. A cultural history.UK: Virago Press; 2005.
8.
8 Garland D . The culture of control: crime and social order in contemporary society.Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2002.
9.
9 Erickson RV . Crime in an insecure world.Cambridge: Polity Press; 2007.
10.
10 Carson R . Silent spring.Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1962.
11.
11 Ward B Jackson L Dubos R Strong MF . Only one earth: the care and maintenance of a small planet. An Unofficial Report Commissioned by the Secretary-General of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. New York, London: W.W. Norton & Company; 1972.
12.
12 Meadows, DH, Meadows, DL, Jorgen Randers, J, Behrens III, WW. The limits to growth; A report for the club of rome’s project on the predicament of mankind.New York: Potomac Associates; 1972.
13.
13 Margolis H . Dealing with risk. Why the public and the experts disagree on environmental issues.Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1996.
14.
14 Sunstein CR . Risk and reason. Safety, law, and the environment.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
15.
15 Herring H . From energy dreams to nuclear nightmares: lessons from the Anti-nuclear Power Movement in the 1970s.Oxon: John Carpenter Publishing; 2005.
16.
16 Williams TI . A history of technology.Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1978.
17.
17 Pacey A . The maze of ingenuity. Ideas and idealism in the development of technology.Holmes & Meier Publishers Inc; 1975.
18.
18 Beck U . Risk society: towards a new modernity.London: SAGE Publications; 1992.
19.
19 Goklany IM . Clearing the air: the real story of the war on air pollution.Washington DC: Cato Institute; 1999.
20.
20 Hanekamp JC . Precaution and cholera: A response to tickner and gouveia-vigeant. Risk Anal2006; 26: 1013–1019.
21.
21 Mol APJ Spaargaren G . Environment, modernity, and the risk–society: the Apocalyptic Horizon of environmental Reform. Int Sociol1993; 8: 431–459.
22.
22 Cohen MJ . Risk society and ecological modernisation. Alternative visions for post–industrial Nations. Futures1997; 29: 105–119.
23.
23 Grübler A . Technology and global change.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
24.
24 Bramwell A . Ecology in the 20th century. A history.New Haven, London: Yale University Press; 1989.
25.
25 Trouwborst A . Evolution and status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law.The Hague: Kluwer Law International; 2002.
26.
27.
27 Siegrist M Cvetkovich G . Better negative than positive? Evidence of a bias for negative information about possible health dangers. Risk Anal2001; 21: 199–206.
28.
28 Hanekamp JC Verstegen SW . The problem of the precautionary principle: the paternalism of the precautionary coalition. In: J Panton OM Hartwich , (eds), Science vs Superstition. The case for a new scientific enlightenment.Policy Exchange and University of Buckingham Press; 2006.
29.
29 Harremoës P; Gee D; MacGarvin M; Stirling A; Keys J; Wynne B; . Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896–2000. European Environment Agency, Environmental issue report No 22, 2001; 70.
30.
30 Jones WE . Explaining our own beliefs: Non-Epistemic believing and doxastic instability. Philos Stud2002; 111: 217–249.
31.
31 Jones WE . Is scientific theory-commitment doxastic or practical. Synthese2003; 137: 325–344.
32.
32 Williams B . Problems of the self.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1973.
33.
33 Last accessed on the 9th of July, 2008.
34.
34 Burgess A . Flattering Consumption. Creating a Europe of the Consumer. J Consumer Culture2001; 1: 93–117.
35.
35 Forbes I . Making a crisis out of a drama: The political analysis of BSE policy-making in the UK. Political Studies2004; 52: 342–357.
36.
37.
37 Burgess A . Cellular phones, public fears, and a culture of precaution.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
38.
38 Hanekamp JC . Precaution and cholera: A response to tickner and gouveia-vigeant. Risk Anal2006; 26: 1013–1019.
39.
39 Thomas WJ Thomas DS . The child in America: behaviour problems and programs.New York: Knopf; 1928.
40.
40 Durodié B . Limitations of public dialogue in science and the rise of new ‘experts’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy2003; 6: 82–92.
41.
42.
42 Hottois G . A philosophical and critical analysis of the European Convention of Bioethics. J Med Philos2000; 25: 133–146.